Skip to main content

Full text of "Mein Kampf"

See other formats



■ ^■■-i->- ■ 



Adolf Hitler, born April 20, 1889, in Braunau-on-the-Inn, Austria, 

refused to surrender 

and died on April 29, 1945 in Berlin, Germany. 

T 1 _ !•_ _^_ "1 _ Jl__J _ _ _ ~i _ A • •______"■____ M. il. . MI _ P i.l. _ A 1 _ _• 1_ J 

In standing guard against the Jew I am defending the handiwork of the Lord.' 


Publishers since 1812 

This translation of the unexpurgated edition of "Mein Kampf " 
was first published on March 21st, 1939 


file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampffirst.htm (1 of 5) [04/06/2000 16:01:11] 







file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf first.htm (2 of 5) [04/06/2000 1 6:01 :1 1 ] 





Foot Notes: 

1) In order to understand the reference here, and similar references in later portions of Mein Kampf, 
the following must be borne in mind: 

From 1792 to 1814 the French Revolutionary Armies overran Germany. In 1800 Bavaria shared in the 
Austrian defeat at Hohenlinden and the French occupied Munich. In 1805 the Bavarian Elector was 
made King of Bavaria by Napoleon and stipulated to back up Napoleon in all his wars with a force of 
30,000 men. Thus Bavaria became the absolute vassal of the French. This was The Time of Germany 
s Deepest Humiliation, Which is referred to again and again by Hitler. 

In 1806 a pamphlet entitled Germanys Deepest Humiliation was published in South Germany. 
Amnng those who helped to circulate the pamphlet was the Niirnberg bookseller, Johannes Philipp 
Palm. He was denounced to the French by a Bavarian police agent. At his trial he refused to disclose 
the name of the author. By Napoleons orders, he was shot at Braunau-on-the-Inn on August 26th, 
1806. A monument erected to him on the site of the execution was one of the first public objects that 
made an impression on Hitler as a little boy. 

Leo Schlageters case was in many respects parallel to that of Johannes Palm. Schlageter was a 
German theological student who volunteered for service in 1914. He became an artillery officer and 
won the Iron Cross of both classes. When the French occupied the Ruhr in 1923 Schlageter helped to 
organize the passive resistance on the German side. He and his companions blew up a railway bridge 
for the purpose of making the transport of coal to France more difficult. 

Those who took part in the affair were denounced to the French by a German informer. Schlageter 
took the whole responsibility on his own shoulders and was condemned to death, his companions 
being sentenced to various terms of imprisonment and penal servitude by the French Court. Schlageter 
refused to disclose the identity of those who issued the order to blow up the railway bridge and he 
would not plead for mercy before a French Court. He was shot by a French firing-squad on May 26th, 
1923. Severing was at that time German Minister of the Interior. It is said that representations were 
made, to him on Schlageters behalf and that he refused to interfere. 

Schlageter has become the chief martyr of the German resistance to the French occupation of the Ruhr 
and also one of the great heroes of the National Socialist Movement. He had joined the Movement at a 
very early stage, his card of membership bearing the number 61. 

2) Non-classical secondary school. The Lyceum and Gymnasium were classical or semiclassical 
secondary schools. 

3) See Translators Introduction. 

4) When Francis II had laid down his title as Emperor of the Holy Roman Empire of the German 
Nation, which he did at the command of Napoleon, the Crown and Mace, as the Imperial Insignia, 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf first.htm (3 of 5) [04/06/2000 1 6:01 :1 1 ] 


were kept in Vienna. After the German Empire was refounded, in 1871, under William I, there were 
many demands to have the Insignia transferred to Berlin. But these went unheeded. Hitler had them 
brought to Germany after the Austrian Anschluss and displayed at Nuremberg during the Party 
Congress in September 1938. 

5) The Phaecians were a legendary people, mentioned in Homers Odyssey. They were supposed to 
live on some unknown island in the Eastern Mediterranean, sometimes suggested to be Corcyra, the 
modern Corfu. They loved good living more than work, and so the name Phaecian has come to be a 
synonym for parasite. 

6) Spottgeburt von Dreck und Feuer. This is the epithet that Faust hurls at Mephistopheles as the latter 
intrudes on the conversation between Faust and Martha in the garden: Mephistopheles: Thou, full of 
sensual, super-sensual desire, A girl by the nose is leading thee. Faust: Abortion, thou of filth and fire. 

7) Herodotus (Book VII, 213218) tells the story of how a Greek traitor, Ephialtes, helped the Persian 
invaders at the Battle of Thermopylae (480 B.C.) When the Persian King, Xerxes, had begun to 
despair of being able to break through the Greek defence, Ephialtes came to him and, on being 
promised a definite payment, told the King of a pathway over the shoulder of the mountain to the 
Greek end of the Pass. The bargain being clinched, Ephialtes led a detachment of the Persian troops 
under General Hydarnes over the mountain pathway. Thus taken in the rear, the Greek defenders, 
under Leonidas, King of Sparta, had to fight in two opposite directions within the narrow pass. 
Terrible slaughter ensued and Leonidas fell in the thick of the fighting. 

The bravery of Leonidas and the treason of Ephialtes impressed Hitler, as it does almost every 
schoolboy. The incident is referred to again in Mein Kampf (Chap. VIII, Vol. I), where Hitler 
compares the German troops that fell in France and Flanders to the Greeks at Thermopylae, the 
treachery of Ephialtes being suggested as the prototype of the defeatist policy of the German 
politicians towards the end of the Great War. 

8) German Austria was the East Mark on the South and East Prussia was the East Mark on the North. 

9) Carry le explains the epithet thus: "First then, let no one from the title Gehoernte (Horned, 
Behorned), fancy that our brave Siegfried, who was the loveliest as well as the bravest of men, was 
actually cornuted, and had horns on his brow, though like Michael Angelos Moses; or even that his 
skin, to which the epithet Behorned refers, was hard like a crocodiles, and not softer than the softest 
shamey, for the truth is, his Hornedness means only an Invulnerability, like that of Achilles&" 

10) Lines quoted from the Song of the Curassiers in Schillers Wallenstein. 

11) The Second Infantry Bavarian Regiment, in which Hitler served as a volunteer. 

12) Schwabing is the artistic quarter in Munich where artists have their studios and litterateurs, 
especially of the Bohemian class, foregather. 

13) Here again we have the defenders of Thermopylae recalled as the prototype of German valour in 
the Great War. Hitlers quotation is a German variant of the couplet inscribed on the monument 
erected at Thermopylae to the memory of Leonidas and his Spartan soldiers who fell defending the 
Pass. As given by Herodotus, who claims that he saw the inscription himself, the original text may be 
literally translated thus: 

Go, tell the Spartans, thou who passeth by, 

That here, obedient to their laws, we lie. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf first.htm (4 of 5) [04/06/2000 1 6:01 :1 1 ] 


14)Swedish Chancellor who took over the reins of Government after the death of Gustavus Adolphus 

15) When Mephistopheles first appears to Faust, in the latters study, Faust inquires: "What is thy 
name?" To which Mephistopheles replies: "A part of the Power which always wills the Bad and 
always works the Good." And when Faust asks him what is meant by this riddle and why he should 
call himself a part, the gist of Mephistopheles reply is that he is the Spirit of Negation and exists 
through opposition to the positive Truth and Order and Beauty which proceed from the never-ending 
creative energy of the Deity. In the Prologue to Faust the Lord declares that mans active nature would 
grow sluggish in working the good and that therefore he has to be aroused by the Spirit of Opposition. 
This Spirit wills the Bad, but of itself it can do nothing positive, and by its opposition always works 
the opposite of what it wills. 

16) The last and most famous of the medieval alchemists. He was born at Basle about the year 1490 
and died at Salzburg in 1541. He taught that all metals could be transmuted through the action of one 
primary element common to them all. This element he called Alcahest. If it could be found it would 
prove to be at once the philosophers stone, the universal medicine and the irresistible solvent. There 
are many aspects of his teaching which are now looked upon as by no means so fantastic as they were 
considered in his own time. 

17) The Battle of Leipzig (1813), where the Germans inflicted an overwhelming defeat on Napoleon, 
was the decisive event which put an end to the French occupation of Germany. 

The occupation had lasted about twenty years. After the Great War, and the partial occupation of 
Germany once again by French forces, the Germans used to celebrate the anniversary of the Battle of 
Leipzig as a symbol of their yearning. 

18) The flag of the German Empire, founded in 1871, was Black- White-Red. This was discarded in 
1918 and Black-Red-Gold was chosen as the flag of the German Republic founded at Weimar in 
1919. The flag designed by Hitler red with a white disc in the centre, bearing the black swastika is 
now the national flag. 

19) After the debacle of 1918 several semi-military associations were formed by demobilized officers 
who had fought at the Front. These were semi-clandestine associations and were known as Freikorps 
(Volunteer corps). Their principal purpose was to act as rallying centres for the old nationalist 

20) Schiller, who wrote the famous drama of William Tell. 

21) The reference here is to those who gave information to the Allied Commissions about hidden 
stores of arms in Germany. 

22) Before 1918 Germany was a federal Empire, composed of twenty-five federal states. 

23) Probably the author has two separate incidents in mind. The first happened in 390 B.C., when, as 
the victorious Gauls descended on Rome, the Senators ordered their ivory chairs to be placed in the 
Forum before the Temples of the Gods. There, clad in their robes of state, they awaited the invader, 
hoping to save the city by sacrificing themselves. This noble gesture failed for the time being; but it 
had an inspiring influence on subsequent generations. The second incident, which has more historical 
authenticity, occurred after the Roman defeat at Cannae in 216 B.C. On that occasion Varro, the 
Roman commander, who, though in great part responsible for the disaster, made an effort to carry on 
the struggle, was, on his return to Rome, met by the citizens of all ranks and publicly thanked because 
he had not despaired of the Republic. The consequence was that the Republic refused to make peace 
with the victorious Carthagenians. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf first.htm (5 of 5) [04/06/2000 1 6:01 :1 1 ] 




On April 1st, 1924, 1 began to serve my sentence of detention in the Fortress of Landsberg am Lech, 
following the verdict of the Munich Peoples Court of that time. 

After years of uninterrupted labour it was now possible for the first time to begin a work which many 
had asked for and which I myself felt would be profitable for the Movement. So I decided to devote 
two volumes to a description not only of the aims of our Movement but also of its development. There 
is more to be learned from this than from any purely doctrinaire treatise. 

This has also given me the opportunity of describing my own development in so far as such a 
description is necessary to the understanding of the first as well as the second volume and to destroy 
the legendary fabrications which the Jewish Press have circulated about me. 

In this work I turn not to strangers but to those followers of the Movement whose hearts belong to it 
and who wish to study it more profoundly. I know that fewer people are won over by the written word 
than by the spoken word and that every great movement on this earth owes its growth to great 
speakers and not to great writers. 

Nevertheless, in order to produce more equality and uniformity in the defence of any doctrine, its 
fundamental principles must be committed to writing. May these two volumes therefore serve as the 
building stones which I contribute to the joint work. 

The Fortress, Landsberg am Lech. 

At half-past twelve in the afternoon of November 9th, 1923, those whose names are given below fell 
in front of the Feldherrnhalle and in the forecourt of the former War Ministry in Munich for their loyal 
faith in the resurrection of their people: 

Alfarth, Felix, Merchant, born July 5th, 1901 

Bauriedl, Andreas, Hatmaker, born May 4th, 1879 

Casella, Theodor, Bank Official, born August 8th, 1900 

Ehrlich, Wilhelm, Bank Official, born August 19th, 1894 

Faust, Martin, Bank Official, born January 27th, 1901 

Hechenberger, Anton, Locksmith, born September 28th, 1902 

Koerner, Oskar, Merchant, born January 4th, 1875 

Kuhn, Karl, Head Waiter, born July 25th, 1897 

Laforce, Karl, Student of Engineering, born October 28th, 1904 

Neubauer, Kurt, Waiter, born March 27th, 1899 

Pape, Claus von, Merchant, born August 16th, 1904 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfintro.htm (1 of 7) [04/06/2000 16:04:03] 


Pfordten, Theodor von der, Councillor to the Superior Provincial Court, born May 14th, 1873 

Rickmers, Johann, retired Cavalry Captain, born May 7th, 1881 

Scheubner-Richter, Max Erwin von, Dr. of Engineering, born January 9th, 1884 

Stransky, Lorenz Ritter von, Engineer, born March 14th, 1899 

Wolf, Wilhelm, Merchant, born October 19th, 1898 

So-called national officials refused to allow the dead heroes a common burial. So I dedicate the first 
volume of this work to them as a common memorial, that the memory of those martyrs may be a 
permanent source of light for the followers of our Movement. 

The Fortress, Landsberg a/L., 

October 16th, 1924 


In placing before the reader this unabridged translation of Adolf Hitlers book, Mein Kampf, I feel it 
my duty to call attention to certain historical facts which must be borne in mind if the reader would 
form a fair judgment of what is written in this extraordinary work. 

The first volume of Mein Kampf was written while the author was imprisoned in a Bavarian fortress. 
How did he get there and why? The answer to that question is important, because the book deals with 
the events which brought the author into this plight and because he wrote under the emotional stress 
caused by the historical happenings of the time. It was the hour of Germanys deepest humiliation, 
somewhat parallel to that of a little over a century before, when Napoleon had dismembered the old 
German Empire and French soldiers occupied almost the whole of Germany. 

In the beginning of 1923 the French invaded Germany, occupied the Ruhr district and seized several 
German towns in the Rhineland. This was a flagrant breach of international law and was protested 
against by every section of British political opinion at that time. The Germans could not effectively 
defend themselves, as they had been already disarmed under the provisions of the Versailles Treaty. 
To make the situation more fraught with disaster for Germany, and therefore more appalling in its 
prospect, the French carried on an intensive propaganda for the separation of the Rhineland from the 
German Republic and the establishment of an independent Rhenania. Money was poured out lavishly 
to bribe agitators to carry on this work, and some of the most insidious elements of the German 
population became active in the pay of the invader. At the same time a vigorous movement was being 
carried on in Bavaria for the secession of that country and the establishment of an independent 
Catholic monarchy there, under vassalage to France, as Napoleon had done when he made Maximilian 
the first King of Bavaria in 1805. 

The separatist movement in the Rhineland went so far that some leading German politicians came out 
in favour of it, suggesting that if the Rhineland were thus ceded it might be possible for the German 
Republic to strike a bargain with the French in regard to Reparations. But in Bavaria the movement 
went even farther. And it was more far-reaching in its implications; for, if an independent Catholic 
monarchy could be set up in Bavaria, the next move would have been a union with Catholic 
German- Austria, possibly under a Habsburg King. Thus a Catholic bloc would have been created 
which would extend from the Rhineland through Bavaria and Austria into the Danube Valley and 
would have been at least under the moral and military, if not the full political, hegemony of France. 
The dream seems fantastic now, but it was considered quite a practical thing in those fantastic times. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf intro.htm (2 of 7) [04/06/2000 16:04:03] 


The effect of putting such a plan into action would have meant the complete dismemberment of 
Germany; and that is what French diplomacy aimed at. Of course such an aim no longer exists. And I 
should not recall what must now seem old, unhappy, far-off things to the modern generation, were it 
not that they were very near and actual at the time Mein Kampf was written and were more unhappy 
then than we can even imagine now. 

By the autumn of 1923 the separatist movement in Bavaria was on the point of becoming an 
accomplished fact. General von Lossow, the Bavarian chief of the Reichswehr no longer took orders 
from Berlin. The flag of the German Republic was rarely to be seen, Finally, the Bavarian Prime 
Minister decided to proclaim an independent Bavaria and its secession from the German Republic. 
This was to have taken place on the eve of the Fifth Anniversary of the establishment of the German 
Republic (November 9th, 1918.) 

Hitler staged a counter-stroke. For several days he had been mobilizing his storm battalions in the 
neighbourhood of Munich, intending to make a national demonstration and hoping that the 
Reichswehr would stand by him to prevent secession. Ludendorff was with him. And he thought that 
the prestige of the great German Commander in the World War would be sufficient to win the 
allegiance of the professional army. 

A meeting had been announced to take place in the Burgerbrau Keller on the night of November 8th. 
The Bavarian patriotic societies were gathered there, and the Prime Minister, Dr. von Kahr, started to 
read his official pronunciamento, which practically amounted to a proclamation of Bavarian 
independence and secession from the Republic. While von Kahr was speaking Hitler entered the hall, 
followed by Ludendorff. And the meeting was broken up. 

Next day the Nazi battalions took the street for the purpose of making a mass demonstration in favour 
of national union. They marched in massed formation, led by Hitler and Ludendorff. As they reached 
one of the central squares of the city the army opened fire on them. Sixteen of the marchers were 
instantly killed, and two died of their wounds in the local barracks of the Reichswehr. Several others 
were wounded also. Hitler fell on the pavement and broke a collar-bone. Ludendorff marched straight 
up to the soldiers who were firing from the barricade, but not a man dared draw a trigger on his old 

Hitler was arrested with several of his comrades and imprisoned in the fortress of Landsberg on the 
River Lech. On February 26th, 1924, he was brought to trial before the Volksgericht, or Peoples 
Court in Munich. He was sentenced to detention in a fortress for five years. With several companions, 
who had been also sentenced to various periods of imprisonment, he returned to Landsberg am Lech 
and remained there until the 20th of the following December, when he was released. In all he spent 
about thirteen months in prison. It was during this period that he wrote the first volume of Mein 

If we bear all this in mind we can account for the emotional stress under which Mein Kampf was 
written. Hitler was naturally incensed against the Bavarian government authorities, against the 
footling patriotic societies who were pawns in the French game, though often unconsciously so, and 
of course against the French. That he should write harshly of the French was only natural in the 
circumstances. At that time there was no exaggeration whatsoever in calling France the implacable 
and mortal enemy of Germany. Such language was being used by even the pacifists themselves, not 
only in Germany but abroad. And even though the second volume of Mein Kampf was written after 
Hitlers release from prison and was published after the French had left the Ruhr, the tramp of the 
invading armies still echoed in German ears, and the terrible ravages that had been wrought in the 
industrial and financial life of Germany, as a consequence of the French invasion, had plunged the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf intro.htm (3 of 7) [04/06/2000 16:04:03] 


country into a state of social and economic chaos. In France itself the franc fell to fifty per cent of its 
previous value. Indeed, the whole of Europe had been brought to the brink of ruin, following the 
French invasion of the Ruhr and Rhineland. 

But, as those things belong to the limbo of a dead past that nobody wishes to have remembered now, 
it is often asked: Why doesnt Hitler revise Mein Kampf? The answer, as I think, which would 
immediately come into the mind of an impartial critic is that Mein Kampf is an historical document 
which bears the imprint of its own time. To revise it would involve taking it out of its historical 
context. Moreover Hitler has declared that his acts and public statements constitute a partial revision 
of his book and are to be taken as such. This refers especially to the statements in Mein Kampf 
regarding France and those German kinsfolk that have not yet been incorporated in the Reich. On 
behalf of Germany he has definitely acknowledged the German portion of South Tyrol as permanently 
belonging to Italy and, in regard to France, he has again and again declared that no grounds now exist 
for a conflict of political interests between Germany and France and that Germany has no territorial 
claims against France. Finally, I may note here that Hitler has also declared that, as he was only a 
political leader and not yet a statesman in a position of official responsibility, when he wrote this 
book, what he stated in Mein Kampf does not implicate him as Chancellor of the Reich. 

I now come to some references in the text which are frequently recurring and which may not always 
be clear to every reader. For instance, Hitler speaks indiscriminately of the German Reich. Sometimes 
he means to refer to the first Reich, or Empire, and sometimes to the German Empire as founded 
under William I in 1871. Incidentally the regime which he inaugurated in 1933 is generally known as 
the Third Reich, though this expression is not used in Mein Kampf. Hitler also speaks of the Austrian 
Reich and the East Mark, without always explicitly distinguishing between the Habsburg Empire and 
Austria proper. If the reader will bear the following historical outline in mind, he will understand the 
references as they occur. 

The word Reich, which is a German form of the Latin word Regnum, does not mean Kingdom or 
Empire or Republic. It is a sort of basic word that may apply to any form of Constitution. Perhaps our 
word, Realm, would be the best translation, though the word Empire can be used when the Reich was 
actually an Empire. The forerunner of the first German Empire was the Holy Roman Empire which 
Charlemagne founded in A.D. 800. Charlemagne was King of the Franks, a group of Germanic tribes 
that subsequently became Romanized. In the tenth century Charlemagnes Empire passed into German 
hands when Otto I (936973) became Emperor. As the Holy Roman Empire of the German Nation, its 
formal appellation, it continued to exist under German Emperors until Napoleon overran and 
dismembered Germany during the first decade of the last century. On August 6th, 1806, the last 
Emperor, Francis II, formally resigned the German crown. In the following October Napoleon entered 
Berlin in triumph, after the Battle of Jena. 

After the fall of Napoleon a movement set in for the reunion of the German states in one Empire. But 
the first decisive step towards that end was the foundation of the Second German Empire in 1871, 
after the Franco-Prussian War. This Empire, however, did not include the German lands which 
remained under the Habsburg Crown. These were known as German Austria. It was Bismarcks dream 
to unite German Austria with the German Empire; but it remained only a dream until Hitler turned it 
into a reality in 1938. It is well to bear that point in mind, because this dream of reuniting all the 
German states in one Reich has been a dominant feature of German patriotism and statesmanship for 
over a century and has been one of Hitlers ideals since his childhood. 

In Mein Kampf Hitler often speaks of the East Mark. This East Mark i.e. eastern frontier land was 
founded by Charlemagne as the eastern bulwark of the Empire. It was inhabited principally by 
Germano- Celtic tribes called Bajuvari and stood for centuries as the firm bulwark of Western 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf intro.htm (4 of 7) [04/06/2000 16:04:03] 


Christendom against invasion from the East, especially against the Turks. Geographically it was 
almost identical with German Austria. 

There are a few points more that I wish to mention in this introductory note. For instance, I have let 
the word Weltanschhauung stand in its original form very often. We have no one English word to 
convey the same meaning as the German word, and it would have burdened the text too much if I 
were to use a circumlocution each time the word occurs. Weltanschhauung literally means 
Outlook-on-the World. But as generally used in German this outlook on the world means a whole 
system of ideas associated together in an organic unity ideas of human life, human values, cultural 
and religious ideas, politics, economics, etc., in fact a totalitarian view of human existence. Thus 
Christianity could be called a Weltanschhauung, and Mohammedanism could be called a 
Weltanschhauung, and Socialism could be called a Weltanschhauung, especially as preached in 
Russia. National Socialism claims definitely to be a Weltanschhauung. 

Another word I have often left standing in the original is volkisch. The basic word here is Volk, which 
is sometimes translated as People; but the German word, Volk, means the whole body of the people 
without any distinction of class or caste. It is a primary word also that suggests what might be called 
the basic national stock. Now, after the defeat in 1918, the downfall of the Monarchy and the 
destruction of the aristocracy and the upper classes, the concept of Das Volk came into prominence as 
the unifying co-efficient which would embrace the whole German people. Hence the large number of 
volkisch societies that arose after the war and hence also the National Socialist concept of unification 
which is expressed by the word Volksgemeinschaft, or folk community. This is used in 
contradistinction to the Socialist concept of the nation as being divided into classes. Hitlers ideal is 
the Volkischer Staat, which I have translated as the Peoples State. 

Finally, I would point out that the term Social Democracy may be misleading in English, as it has not 
a democratic connotation in our sense. It was the name given to the Socialist Party in Germany. And 
that Party was purely Marxist; but it adopted the name Social Democrat in order to appeal to the 
democratic sections of the German people. 


Abbots Langley, February, 1939 


"What soon gave me cause for very serious consideration were the activities of the Jews in certain branches of life, into 
the mystery of which I penetrated little by little. Was there any shady undertaking, any form of foulness, especially in 
cultural life, in which at least one Jew did not participate? On putting the probing knife carefully to that kind of abscess 
one immediately discovered, like a maggot in a putrescent body, a little Jew who was often blinded by the sudden 
light." (p.42) 

"And so I believe to-day that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. In standing guard 
against the Jew I am defending the handiwork of the Lord." (p. 46) 

"The yoke of slavery is and always will remain the most unpleasant experience that mankind can endure. Do the 
Schwabing decadents look upon Germanys lot to-day as aesthetic? Of course, one doesnt discuss such a question 
with the Jews, because they are the modern inventors of this cultural perfume. Their very existence is an incarnate 
denial of the beauty of Gods image in His creation." (p. 107) 

"What we have to fight for is the necessary security for the existence and increase of our race and people, the 
subsistence of its children and the maintenance of our racial stock unmixed, the freedom and independence of the 
Fatherland; so that our people may be enabled to fulfil the mission assigned to it by the Creator." (p. 125) 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfintro.htm (5 of 7) [04/06/2000 16:04:03] 


"From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and calumny can be 
exploited. Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a religious community, whereas in 
reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the greatest thinkers that mankind has produced has branded the Jews 
for all time with a statement which is profoundly and exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew The Great Master 
of Lies. Those who do not realize the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a 
hand in helping Truth to prevail." (p. 134) 

"In short, the results of miscegenation are always the following: 

(a) The level of the superior race becomes lowered; 

(b) physical and mental degeneration sets in, thus leading slowly but steadily towards a progressive drying up of 
the vital sap. 

The act which brings about such a development is a sin against the will of the Eternal Creator. And as a sin this act will 
be avenged. Mans effort to build up something that contradicts the iron logic of Nature brings him into conflict with 
those principles to which he himself exclusively owes his own existence. By acting against the laws of Nature he 
prepares the way that leads to his ruin." (p. 162) 

"It is just at those junctures when the idealistic attitude threatens to disappear that we notice a weakening of this force 
which is a necessary constituent in the founding and maintenance of the community and is thereby a necessary 
condition of civilization. As soon as the spirit of egotism begins to prevail among a people then the bonds of the social 
order break and man, by seeking his own personal happiness, veritably tumbles out of heaven and falls into hell." 

"In times of distress a wave of public anger has usually arisen against the Jew; the masses have taken the law into their 
own hands; they have seized Jewish property and ruined the Jew in their urge to protect themselves against what they 
consider to be a scourge of God. Having come to know the Jew intimately through the course of centuries, in times of 
distress they looked upon his presence among them as a public danger comparable only to the plague." (p. 174) 

"He will stop at nothing. His utterly low-down conduct is so appalling that one really cannot be surprised if in the 
imagination of our people the Jew is pictured as the incarnation of Satan and the symbol of evil. The ignorance of the 
broad masses as regards the inner character of the Jew, and the lack of instinct and insight that our upper classes 
display, are some of the reasons which explain how it is that so many people fall an easy prey to the systematic 
campaign of falsehood which the Jew carries on. While the upper classes, with their innate cowardliness, turn away 
from anyone whom the Jew thus attacks with lies and calumny, the common people are credulous of everything, 
whether because of their ignorance or their simple-mindedness. Government authorities wrap themselves up in a robe 
of silence, but more frequently they persecute the victims of Jewish attacks in order to stop the campaign in the Jewish 
Press." (p. 184) 

"How devoid of ideals and how ignoble is the whole contemporary system! The fact that the churches join in 
committing this sin against the image of God, even though they continue to emphasize the dignity of that image, is 
quite in keeping with their present activities. They talk about the Spirit, but they allow man, as the embodiment of the 
Spirit, to degenerate to the proletarian level. Then they look on with amazement when they realize how small is the 
influence of the Christian Faith in their own country and how depraved and ungodly is this riff-raff which is physically 
degenerate and therefore morally degenerate also. To balance this state of affairs they try to convert the Hottentots and 
the Zulus and the Kaffirs and to bestow on them the blessings of the Church. While our European people, God be 
praised and thanked, are left to become the victims of moral depravity, the pious missionary goes out to Central Africa 
and establishes missionary stations for negroes. Finally, sound and healthy though primitive and backward people 
will be transformed, under the name of our higher civilization, into a motley of lazy and brutalized mongrels." (p. 226) 

"Look at the ravages from which our people are suffering daily as a result of being contaminated with Jewish blood. 
Bear in mind the fact that this poisonous contamination can be eliminated from the national body only after centuries, 
or perhaps never. Think further of how the process of racial decomposition is debasing and in some cases even 
destroying the fundamental Aryan qualities of our German people, so that our cultural creativeness as a nation is 
gradually becoming impotent and we are running the danger, at least in our great cities, of falling to the level where 
Southern Italy is to-day. This pestilential adulteration of the blood, of which hundreds of thousands of our people take 
no account, is being systematically practised by the Jew to-day. Systematically these negroid parasites in our national 
body corrupt our innocent fair-haired girls and thus destroy something which can no longer be replaced in this world. 

The two Christian denominations look on with indifference at the profanation and destruction of a noble and unique 
creature who was given to the world as a gift of Gods grace. For the future of the world, however, it does not matter 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf intro.htm (6 of 7) [04/06/2000 16:04:03] 


which of the two triumphs over the other, the Catholic or the Protestant. But it does matter whether Aryan humanity 
survives or perishes. And yet the two Christian denominations are not contending against the destroyer of Aryan 
humanity but are trying to destroy one another. Everybody who has the right kind of feeling for his country is solemnly 
bound, each within his own denomination, to see to it that he is not constantly talking about the Will of God merely 
from the lips but that in actual fact he fulfils the Will of God and does not allow Gods handiwork to be debased. For it 
was by the Will of God that men were made of a certain bodily shape, were given their natures and their faculties. 
Whoever destroys His work wages war against Gods Creation and Gods Will." (p. 3 10) 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf intro.htm (7 of 7) [04/06/2000 16:04:03] 





It has turned out fortunate for me to-day that destiny appointed Braunau-on-the-Inn to be my 
birthplace. For that little town is situated just on the frontier between those two States the reunion of 
which seems, at least to us of the younger generation, a task to which we should devote our lives and 
in the pursuit of which every possible means should be employed. 

German- Austria must be restored to the great German Motherland. And not indeed on any grounds of 
economic calculation whatsoever. No, no. Even if the union were a matter of economic indifference, 
and even if it were to be disadvantageous from the economic standpoint, still it ought to take place. 
People of the same blood should be in the same Reich. The German people will have no right to 
engage in a colonial policy until they shall have brought all their children together in the one State. 
When the territory of the Reich embraces all the Germans and finds itself unable to assure them a 
livelihood, only then can the moral right arise, from the need of the people to acquire foreign territory. 
The plough is then the sword; and the tears of war will produce the daily bread for the generations to 

And so this little frontier town appeared to me as the symbol of a great task. But in another regard also 
it points to a lesson that is applicable to our day. Over a hundred years ago this sequestered spot was 
the scene of a tragic calamity which affected the whole German nation and will be remembered for 
ever, at least in the annals of German history. At the time of our Fatherlands deepest humiliation a 
bookseller, Johannes Palm, uncompromising nationalist and enemy of the French, was put to death 
here because he had the misfortune to have loved Germany well. He obstinately refused to disclose 
the names of his associates, or rather the principals who were chiefly responsible for the affair. Just as 
it happened with Leo Schlageter. The former, like the latter, was denounced to the French by a 
Government agent. It was a director of police from Augsburg who won an ignoble renown on that 
occasion and set the example which was to be copied at a later date by the neo-German officials of the 
Reich under Herr Severings regime *). 

In this little town on the Inn, haloed by the memory of a German martyr, a town that was Bavarian by 
blood but under the rule of the Austrian State, my parents were domiciled towards the end of the last 
century. My father was a civil servant who fulfilled his duties very conscientiously. My mother 
looked after the household and lovingly devoted herself to the care of her children. From that period I 
have not retained very much in my memory; because after a few years my father had to leave that 
frontier town which I had come to love so much and take up a new post farther down the Inn valley, at 
Passau, therefore actually in Germany itself. 

In those days it was the usual lot of an Austrian civil servant to be transferred periodically from one 
post to another. Not long after coming to Passau my father was transferred to Linz, and while there he 
retired finally to live on his pension. But this did not mean that the old gentleman would now rest 
from his labours. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap1.htm (1 of 9) [04/06/2000 16:06:12] 


He was the son of a poor cottager, and while still a boy he grew restless and left home. When he was 
barely thirteen years old he buckled on his satchel and set forth from his native woodland parish. 
Despite the dissuasion of villagers who could speak from experience, he went to Vienna to learn a 
trade there. This was in the fiftieth year of the last century. It was a sore trial, that of deciding to leave 
home and face the unknown, with three gulden in his pocket. By when the boy of thirteen was a lad of 
seventeen and had passed his apprenticeship examination as a craftsman he was not content. Quite the 
contrary. The persistent economic depression of that period and the constant want and misery 
strengthened his resolution to give up working at a trade and strive for something higher. As a boy it 
had seemed to him that the position of the parish priest in his native village was the highest in the 
scale of human attainment; but now that the big city had enlarged his outlook the young man looked 
up to the dignity of a State official as the highest of all. With the tenacity of one whom misery and 
trouble had already made old when only half-way through his youth the young man of seventeen 
obstinately set out on his new project and stuck to it until he won through. He became a civil servant. 
He was about twenty-three years old, I think, when he succeeded in making himself what he had 
resolved to become. Thus he was able to fulfil the promise he had made as a poor boy not to return to 
his native village until he was somebody. 

He had gained his end. But in the village there was nobody who had remembered him as a little boy, 
and the village itself had become strange to him. 

Now at last, when he was fifty-six years old, he gave up his active career; but he could not bear to be 
idle for a single day. On the outskirts of the small market town of Lambach in Upper Austria he 
bought a farm and tilled it himself. Thus, at the end of a long and hard-working career, he came back 
to the life which his father had led. 

It was at this period that I first began to have ideals of my own. I spent a good deal of time 
scampering about in the open, on the long road from school, and mixing up with some of the roughest 
of the boys, which caused my mother many anxious moments. All this tended to make me something 
quite the reverse of a stay-at-home. I gave scarcely any serious thought to the question of choosing a 
vocation in life; but I was certainly quite out of sympathy with the kind of career which my father had 
followed. I think that an inborn talent for speaking now began to develop and take shape during the 
more or less strenuous arguments which I used to have with my comrades. I had become a juvenile 
ringleader who learned well and easily at school but was rather difficult to manage. In my freetime I 
practised singing in the choir of the monastery church at Lambach, and thus it happened that I was 
placed in a very favourable position to be emotionally impressed again and again by the magnificent 
splendour of ecclesiastical ceremonial. What could be more natural for me than to look upon the 
Abbot as representing the highest human ideal worth striving for, just as the position of the humble 
village priest had appeared to my father in his own boyhood days? At least, that was my idea for a 
while. But the juvenile disputes I had with my father did not lead him to appreciate his sons oratorical 
gifts in such a way as to see in them a favourable promise for such a career, and so he naturally could 
not understand the boyish ideas I had in my head at that time. This contradiction in my character made 
him feel somewhat anxious. 

As a matter of fact, that transitory yearning after such a vocation soon gave way to hopes that were 
better suited to my temperament. Browsing through my fathers books, I chanced to come across some 
publications that dealt with military subjects. One of these publications was a popular history of the 
Franco-German War of 187071. It consisted of two volumes of an illustrated periodical dating from 
those years. These became my favourite reading. In a little while that great and heroic conflict began 
to take first place in my mind. And from that time onwards I became more and more enthusiastic 
about everything that was in any way connected with war or military affairs. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap1.htm (2 of 9) [04/06/2000 16:06:12] 


But this story of the Franco-German War had a special significance for me on other grounds also. For 
the first time, and as yet only in quite a vague way, the question began to present itself: Is there a 
difference and if there be, what is it between the Germans who fought that war and the other 
Germans? Why did not Austria also take part in it? Why did not my father and all the others fight in 
that struggle? Are we not the same as the other Germans? Do we not all belong together? 

That was the first time that this problem began to agitate my small brain. And from the replies that 
were given to the questions which I asked very tentatively, I was forced to accept the fact, though with 
a secret envy, that not all Germans had the good luck to belong to Bismarcks Empire. This was 
something that I could not understand. 

It was decided that I should study. Considering my character as a whole, and especially my 
temperament, my father decided that the classical subjects studied at the Lyceum were not suited to 
my natural talents. He thought that the Realschule 2 ) would suit me better. My obvious talent for 
drawing confirmed him in that view; for in his opinion drawing was a subject too much neglected in 
the Austrian Gymnasium. Probably also the memory of the hard road which he himself had travelled 
contributed to make him look upon classical studies as unpractical and accordingly to set little value 
on them. At the back of his mind he had the idea that his son also should become an official of the 
Government. Indeed he had decided on that career for me. The difficulties through which he had to 
struggle in making his own career led him to overestimate what he had achieved, because this was 
exclusively the result of his own indefatigable industry and energy. The characteristic pride of the 
self-made man urged him towards the idea that his son should follow the same calling and if possible 
rise to a higher position in it. Moreover, this idea was strengthened by the consideration that the 
results of his own lifes industry had placed him in a position to facilitate his sons advancement in the 
same career. 

He was simply incapable of imagining that I might reject what had meant everything in life to him. 
My fathers decision was simple, definite, clear and, in his eyes, it was something to be taken for 
granted. A man of such a nature who had become an autocrat by reason of his own hard struggle for 
existence, could not think of allowing inexperienced and irresponsible young fellows to choose their 
own careers. To act in such a way, where the future of his own son was concerned, would have been a 
grave and reprehensible weakness in the exercise of parental authority and responsibility, something 
utterly incompatible with his characteristic sense of duty. 

And yet it had to be otherwise. 

For the first time in my life I was then eleven years old I felt myself forced into open opposition. 
No matter how hard and determined my father might be about putting his own plans and opinions into 
action, his son was no less obstinate in refusing to accept ideas on which he set little or no value. 

I would not become a civil servant. 

No amount of persuasion and no amount of grave warnings could break down that opposition. I 
would not become a State official, not on any account. All the attempts which my father made to 
arouse in me a love or liking for that profession, by picturing his own career for me, had only the 
opposite effect. It nauseated me to think that one day I might be fettered to an office stool, that I could 
not dispose of my own time but would be forced to spend the whole of my life filling out forms. 

One can imagine what kind of thoughts such a prospect awakened in the mind of a young fellow who 
was by no means what is called a good boy in the current sense of that term. The ridiculously easy 
school tasks which we were given made it possible for me to spend far more time in the open air than 
at home. To-day, when my political opponents pry into my life with diligent scrutiny, as far back as 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap1.htm (3 of 9) [04/06/2000 16:06:12] 


the days of my boyhood, so as finally to be able to prove what disreputable tricks this Hitler was 
accustomed to in his young days, I thank heaven that I can look back to those happy days and find the 
memory of them helpful. The fields and the woods were then the terrain on which all disputes were 
fought out. 

Even attendance at the Realschule could not alter my way of spending my time. But I had now 
another battle to fight. 

So long as the paternal plan to make a State functionary contradicted my own inclinations only in the 
abstract, the conflict was easy to bear. I could be discreet about expressing my personal views and 
thus avoid constantly recurrent disputes. My own resolution not to become a Government official was 
sufficient for the time being to put my mind completely at rest. I held on to that resolution inexorably. 
But the situation became more difficult once I had a positive plan of my own which I might present to 
my father as a counter-suggestion. This happened when I was twelve years old. How it came about I 
cannot exactly say now; but one day it became clear to me that I would be a painter I mean an artist. 
That I had an aptitude for drawing was an admitted fact. It was even one of the reasons why my father 
had sent me to the Realschule; but he had never thought of having that talent developed in such a way 
that I could take up painting as a professional career. Quite the contrary. When, as a result of my 
renewed refusal to adopt his favourite plan, my father asked me for the first time what I myself really 
wished to be, the resolution that I had already formed expressed itself almost automatically. For a 
while my father was speechless. "A painter? An artist-painter?" he exclaimed. 

He wondered whether I was in a sound state of mind. He thought that he might not have caught my 
words rightly, or that he had misunderstood what I meant. But when I had explained my ideas to him 
and he saw how seriously I took them, he opposed them with that full determination which was 
characteristic of him. His decision was exceedingly simple and could not be deflected from its course 
by any consideration of what my own natural qualifications really were. 

"Artist! Not as long as I live, never." As the son had inherited some of the fathers obstinacy, besides 
having other qualities of his own, my reply was equally energetic. But it stated something quite the 

At that our struggle became stalemate. The father would not abandon his Never, and I became all the 
more consolidated in my Nevertheless. 

Naturally the resulting situation was not pleasant. The old gentleman was bitterly annoyed; and indeed 
so was I, although I really loved him. My father forbade me to entertain any hopes of taking up the art 
of painting as a profession. I went a step further and declared that I would not study anything else. 
With such declarations the situation became still more strained, so that the old gentleman irrevocably 
decided to assert his parental authority at all costs. That led me to adopt an attitude of circumspect 
silence, but I put my threat into execution. I thought that, once it became clear to my father that I was 
making no progress at the Realschule, for weal or for woe, he would be forced to allow me to follow 
the happy career I had dreamed of. 

I do not know whether I calculated rightly or not. Certainly my failure to make progress became quite 
visible in the school. I studied just the subjects that appealed to me, especially those which I thought 
might be of advantage to me later on as a painter. What did not appear to have any importance from 
this point of view, or what did not otherwise appeal to me favourably, I completely sabotaged. My 
school reports of that time were always in the extremes of good or bad, according to the subject and 
the interest it had for me. In one column my qualification read very good or excellent. In another it 
read average or even below average. By far my best subjects were geography and, even more so, 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap1.htm (4 of 9) [04/06/2000 16:06:12] 


general history. These were my two favourite subjects, and I led the class in them. 

When I look back over so many years and try to judge the results of that experience I find two very 
significant facts standing out clearly before my mind. 

First, I became a nationalist. 

Second, I learned to understand and grasp the true meaning of history. 

The old Austria was a multi-national State. In those days at least the citizens of the German Empire, 
taken through and through, could not understand what that fact meant in the everyday life of the 
individuals within such a State. After the magnificent triumphant march of the victorious armies in the 
Franco-German War the Germans in the Reich became steadily more and more estranged from the 
Germans beyond their frontiers, partly because they did not deign to appreciate those other Germans 
at their true value or simply because they were incapable of doing so. 

The Germans of the Reich did not realize that if the Germans in Austria had not been of the best racial 
stock they could never have given the stamp of their own character to an Empire of 52 millions, so 
definitely that in Germany itself the idea arose though quite an erroneous one that Austria was a 
German State. That was an error which led to dire consequences; but all the same it was a magnificent 
testimony to the character of the ten million Germans in that East Mark. 3 ) Only very few of the 
Germans in the Reich itself had an idea of the bitter struggle which those Eastern Germans had to 
carry on daily for the preservation of their German language, their German schools and their German 
character. Only to-day, when a tragic fate has torn several millions of our kinsfolk away from the 
Reich and has forced them to live under the rule of the stranger, dreaming of that common fatherland 
towards which all their yearnings are directed and struggling to uphold at least the sacred right of 
using their mother tongue only now have the wider circles of the German population come to realize 
what it means to have to fight for the traditions of ones race. And so at last perhaps there are people 
here and there who can assess the greatness of that German spirit which animated the old East Mark 
and enabled those people, left entirely dependent on their own resources, to defend the Empire against 
the Orient for several centuries and subsequently to hold fast the frontiers of the German language 
through a guerilla warfare of attrition, at a time when the German Empire was sedulously cultivating 
an interest for colonies but not for its own flesh and blood before the threshold of its own door. 

What has happened always and everywhere, in every kind of struggle, happened also in the language 
fight which was carried on in the old Austria. There were three groups the fighters, the hedgers and 
the traitors. Even in the schools this sifting already began to take place. And it is worth noting that the 
struggle for the language was waged perhaps in its bitterest form around the school; because this was 
the nursery where the seeds had to be watered which were to spring up and form the future generation. 
The tactical objective of the fight was the winning over of the child, and it was to the child that the 
first rallying cry was addressed: 

"German youth, do not forget that you are a German," and "Remember, little girl, that one day you 
must be a German mother." 

Those who know something of the juvenile spirit can understand how youth will always lend a glad 
ear to such a rallying cry. Under many forms the young people led the struggle, fighting in their own 
way and with their own weapons. They refused to sing non-German songs. The greater the efforts 
made to win them away from their German allegiance, the more they exalted the glory of their 
German heroes. They stinted themselves in buying things to eat, so that they might spare their pennies 
to help the war chest of their elders. They were incredibly alert in the significance of what the 
non-German teachers said and they contradicted in unison. They wore the forbidden emblems of their 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap1.htm (5 of 9) [04/06/2000 16:06:12] 


own kinsfolk and were happy when penalised for doing so, or even physically punished. In miniature 
they were mirrors of loyalty from which the older people might learn a lesson. 

And thus it was that at a comparatively early age I took part in the struggle which the nationalities 
were waging against one another in the old Austria. When meetings were held for the South Mark 
German League and the School League we wore cornflowers and black-red-gold colours to express 
our loyalty. We greeted one another with Heil! and instead of the Austrian anthem we sang our own 
Deutschland iiber Alles, despite warnings and penalties. Thus the youth were educated politically at a 
time when the citizens of a so-called national State for the most part knew little of their own 
nationality except the language. Of course, I did not belong to the hedgers. Within a little while I had 
become an ardent German National, which has a different meaning from the party significance 
attached to that phrase to-day. 

I developed very rapidly in the nationalist direction, and by the time I was 15 years old I had come to 
understand the distinction between dynastic patriotism and nationalism based on the concept of folk, 
or people, my inclination being entirely in favour of the latter. 

Such a preference may not perhaps be clearly intelligible to those who have never taken the trouble to 
study the internal conditions that prevailed under the Habsburg Monarchy. 

Among historical studies universal history was the subject almost exclusively taught in the Austrian 
schools, for of specific Austrian history there was only very little. The fate of this State was closely 
bound up with the existence and development of Germany as a whole; so a division of history into 
German history and Austrian history would be practically inconceivable. And indeed it was only 
when the German people came to be divided between two States that this division of German history 
began to take place. 

The insignia 4 ) of a former imperial sovereignty which were still preserved in Vienna appeared to act 
as magical relics rather than as the visible guarantee of an everlasting bond of union. 

When the Habsburg State crumbled to pieces in 1918 the Austrian Germans instinctively raised an 
outcry for union with their German fatherland. That was the voice of a unanimous yearning in the 
hearts of the whole people for a return to the unforgotten home of their fathers. But such a general 
yearning could not be explained except by attributing the cause of it to the historical training through 
which the individual Austrian Germans had passed. Therein lay a spring that never dried up. 
Especially in times of distraction and forgetfulness its quiet voice was a reminder of the past, bidding 
the people to look out beyond the mere welfare of the moment to a new future. 

The teaching of universal history in what are called the middle schools is still very unsatisfactory. 
Few teachers realize that the purpose of teaching history is not the memorizing of some dates and 
facts, that the student is not interested in knowing the exact date of a battle or the birthday of some 
marshal or other, and not at all or at least only very insignificantly interested in knowing when the 
crown of his fathers was placed on the brow of some monarch. These are certainly not looked upon as 
important matters. 

To study history means to search for and discover the forces that are the causes of those results which 
appear before our eyes as historical events. The art of reading and studying consists in remembering 
the essentials and forgetting what is not essential. 

Probably my whole future life was determined by the fact that I had a professor of history who 
understood, as few others understand, how to make this viewpoint prevail in teaching and in 
examining. This teacher was Dr. Leopold Poetsch, of the Realschule at Linz. He was the ideal 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap1.htm (6 of 9) [04/06/2000 16:06:12] 


personification of the qualities necessary to a teacher of history in the sense I have mentioned above. 
An elderly gentleman with a decisive manner but a kindly heart, he was a very attractive speaker and 
was able to inspire us with his own enthusiasm. Even to-day I cannot recall without emotion that 
venerable personality whose enthusiastic exposition of history so often made us entirely forget the 
present and allow ourselves to be transported as if by magic into the past. He penetrated through the 
dim mist of thousands of years and transformed the historical memory of the dead past into a living 
reality. When we listened to him we became afire with enthusiasm and we were sometimes moved 
even to tears. 

It was still more fortunate that this professor was able not only to illustrate the past by examples from 
the present but from the past he was also able to draw a lesson for the present. He understood better 
than any other the everyday problems that were then agitating our minds. The national fervour which 
we felt in our own small way was utilized by him as an instrument of our education, inasmuch as he 
often appealed to our national sense of honour; for in that way he maintained order and held our 
attention much more easily than he could have done by any other means. It was because I had such a 
professor that history became my favourite subject. As a natural consequence, but without the 
conscious connivance of my professor, I then and there became a young rebel. But who could have 
studied German history under such a teacher and not become an enemy of that State whose rulers 
exercised such a disastrous influence on the destinies of the German nation? Finally, how could one 
remain the faithful subject of the House of Habsburg, whose past history and present conduct proved 
it to be ready ever and always to betray the interests of the German people for the sake of paltry 
personal interests? Did not we as youngsters fully realize that the House of Habsburg did not, and 
could not, have any love for us Germans? 

What history taught us about the policy followed by the House of Habsburg was corroborated by our 
own everyday experiences. In the north and in the south the poison of foreign races was eating into 
the body of our people, and even Vienna was steadily becoming more and more a non-German city. 
The Imperial House favoured the Czechs on every possible occasion. Indeed it was the hand of the 
goddess of eternal justice and inexorable retribution that caused the most deadly enemy of Germanism 
in Austria, the Archduke Franz Ferdinand, to fall by the very bullets which he himself had helped to 
cast. Working from above downwards, he was the chief patron of the movement to make Austria a 
Slav State. 

The burdens laid on the shoulders of the German people were enormous and the sacrifices of money 
and blood which they had to make were incredibly heavy. 

Yet anybody who was not quite blind must have seen that it was all in vain. What affected us most 
bitterly was the consciousness of the fact that this whole system was morally shielded by the alliance 
with Germany, whereby the slow extirpation of Germanism in the old Austrian Monarchy seemed in 
some way to be more or less sanctioned by Germany herself. Habsburg hypocrisy, which endeavoured 
outwardly to make the people believe that Austria still remained a German State, increased the feeling 
of hatred against the Imperial House and at the same time aroused a spirit of rebellion and contempt. 

But in the German Empire itself those who were then its rulers saw nothing of what all this meant. As 
if struck blind, they stood beside a corpse and in the very symptoms of decomposition they believed 
that they recognized the signs of a renewed vitality. In that unhappy alliance between the young 
German Empire and the illusory Austrian State lay the germ of the World War and also of the final 

In the subsequent pages of this book I shall go to the root of the problem. Suffice it to say here that in 
the very early years of my youth I came to certain conclusions which I have never abandoned. Indeed 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap1.htm (7 of 9) [04/06/2000 16:06:12] 


I became more profoundly convinced of them as the years passed. They were: That the dissolution of 
the Austrian Empire is a preliminary condition for the defence of Germany; further, that national 
feeling is by no means identical with dynastic patriotism; finally, and above all, that the House of 
Habsburg was destined to bring misfortune to the German nation. 

As a logical consequence of these convictions, there arose in me a feeling of intense love for my 
German- Austrian home and a profound hatred for the Austrian State. 

That kind of historical thinking which was developed in me through my study of history at school 
never left me afterwards. World history became more and more an inexhaustible source for the 
understanding of contemporary historical events, which means politics. Therefore I will not "learn" 
politics but let politics teach me. 

A precocious revolutionary in politics I was no less a precocious revolutionary in art. At that time the 
provincial capital of Upper Austria had a theatre which, relatively speaking, was not bad. Almost 
everything was played there. When I was twelve years old I saw William Tell performed. That was 
my first experience of the theatre. Some months later I attended a performance of Lohengrin, the first 
opera I had ever heard. I was fascinated at once. My youthful enthusiasm for the Bayreuth Master 
knew no limits. Again and again I was drawn to hear his operas; and to-day I consider it a great piece 
of luck that these modest productions in the little provincial city prepared the way and made it 
possible for me to appreciate the better productions later on. 

But all this helped to intensify my profound aversion for the career that my father had chosen for me; 
and this dislike became especially strong as the rough corners of youthful boorishness became worn 
off, a process which in my case caused a good deal of pain. I became more and more convinced that I 
should never be happy as a State official. And now that the Realschule had recognized and 
acknowledged my aptitude for drawing, my own resolution became all the stronger. Imprecations and 
threats had no longer any chance of changing it. I wanted to become a painter and no power in the 
world could force me to become a civil servant. The only peculiar feature of the situation now was 
that as I grew bigger I became more and more interested in architecture. I considered this fact as a 
natural development of my flair for painting and I rejoiced inwardly that the sphere of my artistic 
interests was thus enlarged. I had no notion that one day it would have to be otherwise. 

The question of my career was decided much sooner than I could have expected. 

When I was in my thirteenth year my father was suddenly taken from us. He was still in robust health 
when a stroke of apoplexy painlessly ended his earthly wanderings and left us all deeply bereaved. 
His most ardent longing was to be able to help his son to advance in a career and thus save me from 
the harsh ordeal that he himself had to go through. But it appeared to him then as if that longing were 
all in vain. And yet, though he himself was not conscious of it, he had sown the seeds of a future 
which neither of us foresaw at that time. 

At first nothing changed outwardly. 

My mother felt it her duty to continue my education in accordance with my fathers wishes, which 
meant that she would have me study for the civil service. For my own part I was even more firmly 
determined than ever before that under no circumstances would I become an official of the State. The 
curriculum and teaching methods followed in the middle school were so far removed from my ideals 
that I became profoundly indifferent. Illness suddenly came to my assistance. Within a few weeks it 
decided my future and put an end to the long-standing family conflict. My lungs became so seriously 
affected that the doctor advised my mother very strongly not under any circumstances to allow me to 
take up a career which would necessitate working in an office. He ordered that I should give up 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap1.htm (8 of 9) [04/06/2000 16:06:12] 


attendance at the Realschule for a year at least. What I had secretly desired for such a long time, and 
had persistently fought for, now became a reality almost at one stroke. 

Influenced by my illness, my mother agreed that I should leave the Realschule and attend the 

Those were happy days, which appeared to me almost as a dream; but they were bound to remain only 
a dream. Two years later my mothers death put a brutal end to all my fine projects. She succumbed to 
a long and painful illness which from the very beginning permitted little hope of recovery. Though 
expected, her death came as a terrible blow to me. I respected my father, but I loved my mother. 

Poverty and stern reality forced me to decide promptly. 

The meagre resources of the family had been almost entirely used up through my mothers severe 
illness. The allowance which came to me as an orphan was not enough for the bare necessities of life. 
Somehow or other I would have to earn my own bread. 

With my clothes and linen packed in a valise and with an indomitable resolution in my heart, I left for 
Vienna. I hoped to forestall fate, as my father had done fifty years before. I was determined to become 
something but certainly not a civil servant. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap1.htm (9 of 9) [04/06/2000 16:06:12] 




When my mother died my fate had already been decided in one respect. During the last months of her 
illness I went to Vienna to take the entrance examination for the Academy of Fine Arts. Armed with a 
bulky packet of sketches, I felt convinced that I should pass the examination quite easily. At the 
Realschule I was by far the best student in the drawing class, and since that time I had made more 
than ordinary progress in the practice of drawing. Therefore I was pleased with myself and was proud 
and happy at the prospect of what I considered an assured success. 

But there was one misgiving: It seemed to me that I was better qualified for drawing than for painting, 
especially in the various branches of architectural drawing. At the same time my interest in 
architecture was constantly increasing. And I advanced in this direction at a still more rapid pace after 
my first visit to Vienna, which lasted two weeks. I was not yet sixteen years old. I went to the Hof 
Museum to study the paintings in the art gallery there; but the building itself captured almost all my 
interest, from early morning until late at night I spent all my time visiting the various public buildings. 
And it was the buildings themselves that were always the principal attraction for me. For hours and 
hours I could stand in wonderment before the Opera and the Parliament. The whole Ring Strasse had a 
magic effect upon me, as if it were a scene from the Thousand-and-one-Nights. 

And now I was here for the second time in this beautiful city, impatiently waiting to hear the result of 
the entrance examination but proudly confident that I had got through. I was so convinced of my 
success that when the news that I had failed to pass was brought to me it struck me like a bolt from the 
skies. Yet the fact was that I had failed. I went to see the Rector and asked him to explain the reasons 
why they refused to accept me as a student in the general School of Painting, which was part of the 
Academy. He said that the sketches which I had brought with me unquestionably showed that painting 
was not what I was suited for but that the same sketches gave clear indications of my aptitude for 
architectural designing. Therefore the School of Painting did not come into question for me but rather 
the School of Architecture, which also formed part of the Academy. At first it was impossible to 
understand how this could be so, seeing that I had never been to a school for architecture and had 
never received any instruction in architectural designing. 

When I left the Hansen Palace, on the Schiller Platz, I was quite crestfallen. I felt out of sorts with 
myself for the first time in my young life. For what I had heard about my capabilities now appeared to 
me as a lightning flash which clearly revealed a dualism under which I had been suffering for a long 
time, but hitherto I could give no clear account whatsoever of the why and wherefore. 

Within a few days I myself also knew that I ought to become an architect. But of course the way was 
very difficult. I was now forced bitterly to rue my former conduct in neglecting and despising certain 
subjects at the Realschule. Before taking up the courses at the School of Architecture in the Academy 
it was necessary to attend the Technical Building School; but a necessary qualification for entrance 
into this school was a Leaving Certificate from the Middle School. And this I simply did not have. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (1 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


According to the human measure of things my dream of following an artistic calling seemed beyond 
the limits of possibility. 

After the death of my mother I came to Vienna for the third time. This visit was destined to last 
several years. Since I had been there before I had recovered my old calm and resoluteness. The former 
self-assurance had come back, and I had my eyes steadily fixed on the goal. I would be an architect. 
Obstacles are placed across our path in life, not to be boggled at but to be surmounted. And I was fully 
determined to surmount these obstacles, having the picture of my father constantly before my mind, 
who had raised himself by his own efforts to the position of a civil servant though he was the poor son 
of a village shoemaker. I had a better start, and the possibilities of struggling through were better. At 
that time my lot in life seemed to me a harsh one; but to-day I see in it the wise workings of 
Providence. The Goddess of Fate clutched me in her hands and often threatened to smash me; but the 
will grew stronger as the obstacles increased, and finally the will triumphed. 

I am thankful for that period of my life, because it hardened me and enabled me to be as tough as I 
now am. And I am even more thankful because I appreciate the fact that I was thus saved from the 
emptiness of a life of ease and that a mothers darling was taken from tender arms and handed over to 
Adversity as to a new mother. Though I then rebelled against it as too hard a fate, I am grateful that I 
was thrown into a world of misery and poverty and thus came to know the people for whom I was 
afterwards to fight. 

It was during this period that my eyes were opened to two perils, the names of which I scarcely knew 
hitherto and had no notion whatsoever of their terrible significance for the existence of the German 
people. These two perils were Marxism and Judaism. 

For many people the name of Vienna signifies innocent jollity, a festive place for happy mortals. For 
me, alas, it is a living memory of the saddest period in my life. Even to-day the mention of that city 
arouses only gloomy thoughts in my mind. Five years of poverty in that Phaecian 5 ) town. Five years 
in which, first as a casual labourer and then as a painter of little trifles, I had to earn my daily bread. 
And a meagre morsel indeed it was, not even sufficient to still the hunger which I constantly felt. That 
hunger was the faithful guardian which never left me but took part in everything I did. Every book 
that I bought meant renewed hunger, and every visit I paid to the opera meant the intrusion of that 
inalienabl companion during the following days. I was always struggling with my unsympathic friend. 
And yet during that time I learned more than I had ever learned before. Outside my architectural 
studies and rare visits to the opera, for which I had to deny myself food, I had no other pleasure in life 
except my books. 

I read a great deal then, and I pondered deeply over what I read. All the free time after work was 
devoted exclusively to study. Thus within a few years I was able to acquire a stock of knowledge 
which I find useful even to-day. 

But more than that. During those years a view of life and a definite outlook on the world took shape in 
my mind. These became the granite basis of my conduct at that time. Since then I have extended that 
foundation only very little, and I have changed nothing in it. 

On the contrary: I am firmly convinced to-day that, generally speaking, it is in youth that men lay the 
essential groundwork of their creative thought, wherever that creative thought exists. I make a 
distinction between the wisdom of age which can only arise from the greater profundity and 
foresight that are based on the experiences of a long life and the creative genius of youth, which 
blossoms out in thought and ideas with inexhaustible fertility, without being able to put these into 
practice immediately, because of their very superabundance. These furnish the building materials and 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (2 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


plans for the future; and it is from them that age takes the stones and builds the edifice, unless the 
so-called wisdom of the years may have smothered the creative genius of youth. 

The life which I had hitherto led at home with my parents differed in little or nothing from that of all 
the others. I looked forward without apprehension to the morrow, and there was no such thing as a 
social problem to be faced. Those among whom I passed my young days belonged to the small 
bourgeois class. Therefore it was a world that had very little contact with the world of genuine manual 
labourers. For, though at first this may appear astonishing, the ditch which separates that class, which 
is by no means economically well-off; from the manual labouring class is often deeper than people 
think. The reason for this division, which we may almost call enmity, lies in the fear that dominates a 
social group which has only just risen above the level of the manual labourer a fear lest it may fall 
back into its old condition or at least be classed with the labourers. Moreover, there is something 
repulsive in remembering the cultural indigence of that lower class and their rough manners with one 
another; so that people who are only on the first rung of the social ladder find it unbearable to be 
forced to have any contact with the cultural level and standard of living out of which they have 

And so it happens that very often those who belong to what can really be called the upper classes find 
it much easier than do the upstarts to descend to and intermingle with their fellow beings on the 
lowest social level. For by the word upstart I mean everyone who has raised himself through his own 
efforts to a social level higher than that to which he formerly belonged. In the case of such a person 
the hard struggle through which he passes often destroys his normal human sympathy. His own fight 
for existence kills his sensibility for the misery of those who have been left behind. 

From this point of view fate had been kind to me. Circumstances forced me to return to that world of 
poverty and economic insecurity above which my father had raised himself in his early days; and thus 
the blinkers of a narrow petit bourgeois education were torn from my eyes. Now for the first time I 
learned to know men and I learned to distinguish between empty appearances or brutal manners and 
the real inner nature of the people who outwardly appeared thus. 

At the beginning of the century Vienna had already taken rank among those cities where social 
conditions are iniquitous. Dazzling riches and loathsome destitution were intermingled in violent 
contrast. In the centre and in the Inner City one felt the pulse-beat of an Empire which had a 
population of fiity-two millions, with all the perilous charm of a State made up of multiple 
nationalities. The dazzling splendour of the Court acted like a magnet on the wealth and intelligence 
of the whole Empire. And this attraction was further strengthened by the dynastic policy of the 
Habsburg Monarchy in centralizing everything in itself and for itself. 

This centralizing policy was necessary in order to hold together that hotchpotch of heterogeneous 
nationalities. But the result of it was an extraordinary concentration of higher officials in the city, 
which was at one and the same time the metropolis and imperial residence. 

But Vienna was not merely the political and intellectual centre of the Danubian Monarchy; it was also 
the commercial centre. Besides the horde of military officers of high rank, State officials, artists and 
scientists, there was the still vaster horde of workers. Abject poverty confronted the wealth of the 
aristocracy and the merchant class face to face. Thousands of unemployed loitered in front of the 
palaces on the Ring Strasse; and below that Via Triumphalis of the old Austria the homeless huddled 
together in the murk and filth of the canals. 

There was hardly any other German city in which the social problem could be studied better than in 
Vienna. But here I must utter a warning against the illusion that this problem can be studied from 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (3 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


above downwards. The man who has never been in the clutches of that crushing viper can never know 
what its poison is. An attempt to study it in any other way will result only in superficial talk and 
sentimental delusions. Both are harmful. The first because it can never go to the root of the question, 
the second because it evades the question entirely. I do not know which is the more nefarious: to 
ignore social distress, as do the majority of those who have been favoured by fortune and those who 
have risen in the social scale through their own routine labour, or the equally supercilious and often 
tactless but always genteel condescension displayed by people who make a fad of being charitable and 
who plume themselves on sympathising with the people. Of course such persons sin more than they 
can imagine from lack of instinctive understanding. And thus they are astonished to find that the 
social conscience on which they pride themselves never produces any results, but often causes their 
good intentions to be resented; and then they talk of the ingratitude of the people. 

Such persons are slow to learn that here there is no place for merely social activities and that there can 
be no expectation of gratitude; for in this connection there is no question at all of distributing favours 
but essentially a matter of retributive justice. I was protected against the temptation to study the social 
question in the way just mentioned, for the simple reason that I was forced to live in the midst of 
poverty-stricken people. Therefore it was not a question of studying the problem objectively, but 
rather one of testing its effects on myself. Though the rabbit came through the ordeal of the 
experiment, this must not be taken as evidence of its harmlessness. 

When I try to-day to recall the succession of impressions received during that time I find that I can do 
so only with approximate completeness. Here I shall describe only the more essential impressions and 
those which personally affected me and often staggered me. And I shall mention the few lessons I 
then learned from this experience. 

At that time it was for the most part not very difficult to find work, because I had to seek work not as 
a skilled tradesman but as a so-called extra-hand ready to take any job that turned up by chance, just 
for the sake of earning my daily bread. 

Thus I found myself in the same situation as all those emigrants who shake the dust of Europe from 
their feet, with the cast-iron determination to lay the foundations of a new existence in the New World 
and acquire for themselves a new home. Liberated from all the paralysing prejudices of class and 
calling, environment and tradition, they enter any service that opens its doors to them, accepting any 
work that comes their way, filled more and more with the idea that honest work never disgraced 
anybody, no matter what kind it may be. And so I was resolved to set both feet in what was for me a 
new world and push forward on my own road. 

I soon found out that there was some kind of work always to be got, but I also learned that it could 
just as quickly and easily be lost. The uncertainty of being able to earn a regular daily livelihood soon 
appeared to me as the gloomiest feature in this new life that I had entered. 

Although the skilled worker was not so frequently thrown idle on the streets as the unskilled worker, 
yet the former was by no means protected against the same fate; because though he may not have to 
face hunger as a result of unemployment due to the lack of demand in the labour market, the lock-out 
and the strike deprived the skilled worker of the chance to earn his bread. Here the element of 
uncertainty in steadily earning ones daily bread was the bitterest feature of the whole social-economic 
system itself. 

The country lad who migrates to the big city feels attracted by what has been described as easy work 
which it may be in reality and few working hours. He is especially entranced by the magic glimmer 
spread over the big cities. Accustomed in the country to earn a steady wage, he has been taught not to 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (4 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


quit his former post until a new one is at least in sight. As there is a great scarcity of agricultural 
labour, the probability of long unemployment in the country has been very small. It is a mistake to 
presume that the lad who leaves the countryside for the town is not made of such sound material as 
those who remain at home to work on the land. On the contrary, experience shows that it is the more 
healthy and more vigorous that emigrate, and not the reverse. Among these emigrants I include not 
merely those who emigrate to America, but also the servant boy in the country who decides to leave 
his native village and migrate to the big city where he will be a stranger. He is ready to take the risk of 
an uncertain fate. In most cases he comes to town with a little money in his pocket and for the first 
few days he is not discouraged if he should not have the good fortune to find work. But if he finds a 
job and then loses it in a little while, the case is much worse. To find work anew, especially in winter, 
is often difficult and indeed sometimes impossible. For the first few weeks life is still bearable He 
receives his out-of-work money from his trade union and is thus enabled to carry on. But when the 
last of his own money is gone and his trade union ceases to pay out because of the prolonged 
unemployment, then comes the real distress. He now loiters about and is hungry. Often he pawns or 
sells the last of his belongings. His clothes begin to get shabby and with the increasing poverty of his 
outward appearance he descends to a lower social level and mixes up with a class of human beings 
through whom his mind is now poisoned, in addition to his physical misery. Then he has nowhere to 
sleep and if that happens in winter, which is very often the case, he is in dire distress. Finally he gets 
work. But the old story repeats itself. A second time the same thing happens. Then a third time; and 
now it is probably much worse. Little by little he becomes indifferent to this everlasting insecurity. 
Finally he grows used to the repetition. Thus even a man who is normally of industrious habits grows 
careless in his whole attitude towards life and gradually becomes an instrument in the hands of 
unscrupulous people who exploit him for the sake of their own ignoble aims. He has been so often 
thrown out of employment through no fault of his own that he is now more or less indifferent whether 
the strike in which he takes part be for the purpose of securing his economic rights or be aimed at the 
destruction of the State, the whole social order and even civilization itself. Though the idea of going 
on strike may not be to his natural liking, yet he joins in it out of sheer indifference. 

I saw this process exemplified before my eyes in thousands of cases. And the longer I observed it the 
greater became my dislike for that mammoth city which greedily attracts men to its bosom, in order to 
break them mercilessly in the end. When they came they still felt themselves in communion with their 
own people at home; if they remained that tie was broken. 

I was thrown about so much in the life of the metropolis that I experienced the workings of this fate in 
my own person and felt the effects of it in my own soul. One thing stood out clearly before my eyes: It 
was the sudden changes from work to idleness and vice versa; so that the constant fluctuations thus 
caused by earnings and expenditure finally destroyed the sense of thrift for many people and also the 
habit of regulating expenditure in an intelligent way. The body appeared to grow accustomed to the 
vicissitudes of food and hunger, eating heartily in good times and going hungry in bad. Indeed hunger 
shatters all plans for rationing expenditure on a regular scale in better times when employment is 
again found. The reason for this is that the deprivations which the unemployed worker has to endure 
must be compensated for psychologically by a persistent mental mirage in which he imagines himself 
eating heartily once again. And this dream develops into such a longing that it turns into a morbid 
impulse to cast off all self-restraint when work and wages turn up again. Therefore the moment work 
is found anew he forgets to regulate the expenditure of his earnings but spends them to the full 
without thinking of to-morrow. This leads to confusion in the little weekly housekeeping budget, 
because the expenditure is not rationally planned. When the phenomenon which I have mentioned 
first happens, the earnings will last perhaps for five days instead of seven; on subsequent occasions 
they will last only for three days; as the habit recurs, the earnings will last scarcely for a day; and 
finally they will disappear in one night of feasting. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (5 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


Often there are wife and children at home. And in many cases it happens that these become infected 
by such a way of living, especially if the husband is good to them and wants to do the best he can for 
them and loves them in his own way and according to his own lights. Then the weeks earnings are 
spent in common at home within two or three days. The family eat and drink together as long as the 
money lasts and at the end of the week they hunger together. Then the wife wanders about furtively in 
the neighbourhood, borrows a little, and runs up small debts with the shopkeepers in an effort to pull 
through the lean days towards the end of the week. They sit down together to the midday meal with 
only meagre fare on the table, and often even nothing to eat. They wait for the coming payday, talking 
of it and making plans; and while they are thus hungry they dream of the plenty that is to come. And 
so the little children become acquainted with misery in their early years. 

But the evil culminates when the husband goes his own way from the beginning of the week and the 
wife protests, simply out of love for the children. Then there are quarrels and bad feeling and the 
husband takes to drink according as he becomes estranged from his wife. He now becomes drunk 
every Saturday. Fighting for her own existence and that of the children, the wife has to hound him 
along the road from the factory to the tavern in order to get a few shillings from him on payday. Then 
when he finally comes home, maybe on the Sunday or the Monday, having parted with his last 
shillings and pence, pitiable scenes follow, scenes that cry out for Gods mercy. 

I have had actual experience of all this in hundreds of cases. At first I was disgusted and indignant; 
but later on I came to recognize the whole tragedy of their misfortune and to understand the profound 
causes of it. They were the unhappy victims of evil circumstances. 

Housing conditions were very bad at that time. The Vienna manual labourers lived in surroundings of 
appalling misery. I shudder even to-day when I think of the woeful dens in which people dwelt, the 
night shelters and the slums, and all the tenebrous spectacles of ordure, loathsome filth and 

What will happen one day when hordes of emancipated slaves come forth from these dens of misery 
to swoop down on their unsuspecting fellow men? For this other world does not think about such a 
possibility. They have allowed these things to go on without caring and even without suspecting in 
their total lack of instinctive understanding that sooner or later destiny will take its vengeance unless 
it will have been appeased in time. 

To-day I fervidly thank Providence for having sent me to such a school. There I could not refuse to 
take an interest in matters that did not please me. This school soon taught me a profound lesson. 

In order not to despair completely of the people among whom I then lived I had to set on one side the 
outward appearances of their lives and on the other the reasons why they had developed in that way. 
Then I could hear everything without discouragement; for those who emerged from all this misfortune 
and misery, from this filth and outward degradation, were not human beings as such but rather 
lamentable results of lamentable laws. In my own life similar hardships prevented me from giving 
way to a pitying sentimentality at the sight of these degraded products which had finally resulted from 
the pressure of circumstances. No, the sentimental attitude would be the wrong one to adopt. 

Even in those days I already saw that there was a two-fold method by which alone it would be 
possible to bring about an amelioration of these conditions. This method is: first, to create better 
fundamental conditions of social development by establishing a profound feeling for social 
responsibilities among the public; second, to combine this feeling for social responsibilities with a 
ruthless determination to prune away all excrescences which are incapable of being improved. 

Just as Nature concentrates its greatest attention, not to the maintenance of what already exists but on 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (6 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


the selective breeding of offspring in order to carry on the species, so in human life also it is less a 
matter of artificially improving the existing generation which, owing to human characteristics, is 
impossible in ninety-nine cases out of a hundred and more a matter of securing from the very start a 
better road for future development. 

During my struggle for existence in Vienna I perceived very clearly that the aim of all social activity 
must never be merely charitable relief, which is ridiculous and useless, but it must rather be a means 
to find a way of eliminating the fundamental deficiencies in our economic and cultural life 
deficiencies which necessarily bring about the degradation of the individual or at least lead him 
towards such degradation. The difficulty of employing every means, even the most drastic, to 
eradicate the hostility prevailing among the working classes towards the State is largely due to an 
attitude of uncertainty in deciding upon the inner motives and causes of this contemporary 
phenomenon. The grounds of this uncertainty are to be found exclusively in the sense of guilt which 
each individual feels for having permitted this tragedy of degradation. For that feeling paralyses every 
effort at making a serious and firm decision to act. And thus because the people whom it concerns are 
vacillating they are timid and half-hearted in putting into effect even the measures which are 
indispensable for self-preservation. When the individual is no longer burdened with his own 
consciousness of blame in this regard, then and only then will he have that inner tranquillity and outer 
force to cut off drastically and ruthlessly all the parasite growth and root out the weeds. 

But because the Austrian State had almost no sense of social rights or social legislation its inability to 
abolish those evil excrescences was manifest. 

I do not know what it was that appalled me most at that time: the economic misery of those who were 
then my companions, their crude customs and morals, or the low level of their intellectual culture. 

How often our bourgeoisie rises up in moral indignation on hearing from the mouth of some pitiable 
tramp that it is all the same to him whether he be a German or not and that he will find himself at 
home wherever he can get enough to keep body and soul together. They protest sternly against such a 
lack of national pride and strongly express their horror at such sentiments. 

But how many people really ask themselves why it is that their own sentiments are better? How many 
of them understand that their natural pride in being members of so favoured a nation arises from the 
innumerable succession of instances they have encountered which remind them of the greatness of the 
Fatherland and the Nation in all spheres of artistic and cultural life? How many of them realize that 
pride in the Fatherland is largely dependent on knowledge of its greatness in all those spheres? Do our 
bourgeois circles ever think what a ridiculously meagre share the people have in that knowledge 
which is a necessary prerequisite for the feeling of pride in ones fatherland? 

It cannot be objected here that in other countries similar conditions exist and that nevertheless the 
working classes in those countries have remained patriotic. Even if that were so, it would be no 
excuse for our negligent attitude. But it is not so. What we call chauvinistic education in the case of 
the French people, for example is only the excessive exaltation of the greatness of France in all 
spheres of culture or, as the French say, civilization. The French boy is not educated on purely 
objective principles. Wherever the importance of the political and cultural greatness of his country is 
concerned he is taught in the most subjective way that one can imagine. 

This education will always have to be confined to general ideas in a large perspective and these ought 
to be deeply engraven, by constant repetition if necessary, on the memories and feelings of the people. 

In our case, however, we are not merely guilty of negative sins of omission but also of positively 
perverting the little which some individuals had the luck to learn at school. The rats that poison our 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (7 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


body-politic gnaw from the hearts and memories of the broad masses even that little which distress 
and misery have left. 

Let the reader try to picture the following: 

There is a lodging in a cellar and this lodging consists of two damp rooms. In these rooms a workman 
and his family live seven people in all. Let us assume that one of the children is a boy of three years. 
That is the age at which children first become conscious of the impressions which they receive. In the 
case of highly gifted people traces of the impressions received in those early years last in the memory 
up to an advanced age. Now the narrowness and congestion of those living quarters do not conduce to 
pleasant inter-relations. Thus quarrels and fits of mutual anger arise. These people can hardly be said 
to live with one another, but rather down on top of one another. The small misunderstandings which 
disappear of themselves in a home where there is enough space for people to go apart from one 
another for a while, here become the source of chronic disputes. As far as the children are concerned 
the situation is tolerable from this point of view. In such conditions they are constantly quarrelling 
with one another, but the quarrels are quickly and entirely forgotten. But when the parents fall out 
with one another these daily bickerings often descend to rudeness such as cannot be adequately 
imagined. The results of such experiences must become apparent later on in the children. One must 
have practical experience of such a milieu so as to be able to picture the state of affairs that arises 
from these mutual recriminations when the father physically assaults the mother and maltreats her in a 
fit of drunken rage. At the age of six the child can no longer ignore those sordid details which even an 
adult would find revolting. Infected with moral poison, bodily undernourished, and the poor little head 
filled with vermin, the young citizen goes to the primary school. With difficulty he barely learns to 
read and write. There is no possibility of learning any lessons at home. Quite the contrary. The father 
and mother themselves talk before the children in the most disparaging way about the teacher and the 
school and they are much more inclined to insult the teachers than to put their offspring across the 
knee and knock sound reason into him. What the little fellow hears at home does not tend to increase 
respect for his human surroundings. Here nothing good is said of human nature as a whole and every 
institution, from the school to the government, is reviled. Whether religion and morals are concerned 
or the State and the social order, it is all the same; they are all scoffed at. When the young lad leaves 
school, at the age of fourteen, it would be difficult to say what are the most striking features of his 
character, incredible ignorance in so far as real knowledge is concerned or cynical impudence 
combined with an attitude towards morality which is really startling at so young an age. 

What station in life can such a person fill, to whom nothing is sacred, who has never experienced 
anything noble but, on the contrary, has been intimately acquainted with the lowest kind of human 
existence? This child of three has got into the habit of reviling all authority by the time he is fifteen. 
He has been acquainted only with moral filth and vileness, everything being excluded that might 
stimulate his thought towards higher things. And now this young specimen of humanity enters the 
school of life. 

He leads the same kind of life which was exemplified for him by his father during his childhood. He 
loiters about and comes home at all hours. He now even black-guards that broken-hearted being who 
gave him birth. He curses God and the world and finally ends up in a House of Correction for young 
people. There he gets the final polish. 

And his bourgeois contemporaries are astonished at the lack of patriotic enthusiasm which this 
young citizen manifests. 

Day after day the bourgeois world are witnesses to the phenomenon of spreading poison among the 
people through the instrumentality of the theatre and the cinema, gutter journalism and obscene 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (8 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


books; and yet they are astonished at the deplorable moral standards and national indifference of 
the masses. As if the cinema bilge and the gutter press and suchlike could inculcate knowledge of the 
greatness of ones country, apart entirely from the earlier education of the individual. 

I then came to understand, quickly and thoroughly, what I had never been aware of before. It was the 

The question of nationalizing a people is first and foremost one of establishing healthy social 
conditions which will furnish the grounds that are necessary for the education of the individual. For 
only when family upbringing and school education have inculcated in the individual a knowledge of 
the cultural and economic and, above all, the political greatness of his own country then, and then 
only, will it be possible for him to feel proud of being a citizen of such a country. I can fight only for 
something that I love. I can love only what I respect. And in order to respect a thing I must at least 
have some knowledge of it. 

As soon as my interest in social questions was once awakened I began to study them in a fundamental 
way. A new and hitherto unknown world was thus revealed to me. 

In the years 190910 I had so far improved my, position that I no longer had to earn my daily bread as 
a manual labourer. I was now working independently as draughtsman, and painter in water colours. 
This metier was a poor one indeed as far as earnings were concerned; for these were only sufficient to 
meet the bare exigencies of life. Yet it had an interest for me in view of the profession to which I 
aspired. Moreover, when I came home in the evenings I was now no longer dead-tired as formerly, 
when I used to be unable to look into a book without falling asleep almost immediately. My present 
occupation therefore was in line with the profession I aimed at for the future. Moreover, I was master 
of my own time and could distribute my working-hours now better than formerly. I painted in order to 
earn my bread, and I studied because I liked it. 

Thus I was able to acquire that theoretical knowledge of the social problem which was a necessary 
complement to what I was learning through actual experience. I studied all the books which I could 
find that dealt with this question and I thought deeply on what I read. I think that the milieu in which I 
then lived considered me an eccentric person. 

Besides my interest in the social question I naturally devoted myself with enthusiasm to the study of 
architecture. Side by side with music, I considered it queen of the arts. To study it was for me not 
work but pleasure. I could read or draw until the small hours of the morning without ever getting tired. 
And I became more and more confident that my dream of a brilliant future would become true, even 
though I should have to wait long years for its fulfilment. I was firmly convinced that one day I should 
make a name for myself as an architect. 

The fact that, side by side with my professional studies, I took the greatest interest in everything that 
had to do with politics did not seem to me to signify anything of great importance. On the contrary: I 
looked upon this practical interest in politics merely as part of an elementary obligation that devolves 
on every thinking man. Those who have no understanding of the political world around them have no 
right to criticize or complain. On political questions therefore I still continued to read and study a 
great deal. But reading had probably a different significance for me from that which it has for the 
average run of our so-called intellectuals. 

I know people who read interminably, book after book, from page to page, and yet I should not call 
them well-read people. Of course they know an immense amount; but their brain seems incapable 
of assorting and classifying the material which they have gathered from books. They have not the 
faculty of distinguishing between what is useful and useless in a book; so that they may retain the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (9 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


former in their minds and if possible skip over the latter while reading it, if that be not possible, then 
when once read throw it overboard as useless ballast. Reading is not an end in itself, but a means to 
an end. Its chief purpose is to help towards filling in the framework which is made up of the talents 
and capabilities that each individual possesses. Thus each one procures for himself the implements 
and materials necessary for the fulfilment of his calling in life, no matter whether this be the 
elementary task of earning ones daily bread or a calling that responds to higher human aspirations. 
Such is the first purpose of reading. And the second purpose is to give a general knowledge of the 
world in which we live. In both cases, however, the material which one has acquired through reading 
must not be stored up in the memory on a plan that corresponds to the successive chapters of the 
book; but each little piece of knowledge thus gained must be treated as if it were a little stone to be 
inserted into a mosaic, so that it finds its proper place among all the other pieces and particles that 
help to form a general world-picture in the brain of the reader. Otherwise only a confused jumble of 
chaotic notions will result from all this reading. That jumble is not merely useless, but it also tends to 
make the unfortunate possessor of it conceited. For he seriously considers himself a well-educated 
person and thinks that he understands something of life. He believes that he has acquired knowledge, 
whereas the truth is that every increase in such knowledge draws him more and more away from real 
life, until he finally ends up in some sanatorium or takes to politics and becomes a parliamentary 

Such a person never succeeds in turning his knowledge to practical account when the opportune 
moment arrives; for his mental equipment is not ordered with a view to meeting the demands of 
everyday life. His knowledge is stored in his brain as a literal transcript of the books he has read and 
the order of succession in which he has read them. And if Fate should one day call upon him to use 
some of his book- knowledge for certain practical ends in life that very call will have to name the book 
and give the number of the page; for the poor noodle himself would never be able to find the spot 
where he gathered the information now called for. But if the page is not mentioned at the critical 
moment the widely-read intellectual will find himself in a state of hopeless embarrassment. In a high 
state of agitation he searches for analogous cases and it is almost a dead certainty that he will finally 
deliver the wrong prescription. 

If that is not a correct description, then how can we explain the political achievements of our 
Parliamentary heroes who hold the highest positions in the government of the country? Otherwise we 
should have to attribute the doings of such political leaders, not to pathological conditions but simply 
to malice and chicanery. 

On the other hand, one who has cultivated the art of reading will instantly discern, in a book or journal 
or pamphlet, what ought to be remembered because it meets ones personal needs or is of value as 
general knowledge. What he thus learns is incorporated in his mental analogue of this or that problem 
or thing, further correcting the mental picture or enlarging it so that it becomes more exact and 
precise. Should some practical problem suddenly demand examination or solution, memory will 
immediately select the opportune information from the mass that has been acquired through years of 
reading and will place this information at the service of ones powers of judgment so as to get a new 
and clearer view of the problem in question or produce a definitive solution. 

Only thus can reading have any meaning or be worth while. 

The speaker, for example, who has not the sources of information ready to hand which are necessary 
to a proper treatment of his subject is unable to defend his opinions against an opponent, even though 
those opinions be perfectly sound and true. In every discussion his memory will leave him shamefully 
in the lurch. He cannot summon up arguments to support his statements or to refute his opponent. So 
long as the speaker has only to defend himself on his own personal account, the situation is not 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (10 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


serious; but the evil comes when Chance places at the head of public affairs such a soi-disant 
know-it-all, who in reality knows nothing. 

From early youth I endeavoured to read books in the right way and I was fortunate in having a good 
memory and intelligence to assist me. From that point of view my sojourn in Vienna was particularly 
useful and profitable. My experiences of everyday life there were a constant stimulus to study the 
most diverse problems from new angles. Inasmuch as I was in a position to put theory to the test of 
reality and reality to the test of theory, I was safe from the danger of pedantic theorizing on the one 
hand and, on the other, from being too impressed by the superficial aspects of reality. 

The experience of everyday life at that time determined me to make a fundamental theoretical study of 
two most important questions outside of the social question. 

It is impossible to say when I might have started to make a thorough study of the doctrine and 
characteristics of Marxism were it not for the fact that I then literally ran head foremost into the 

What I knew of Social Democracy in my youth was precious little and that little was for the most part 
wrong. The fact that it led the struggle for universal suffrage and the secret ballot gave me an inner 
satisfaction; for my reason then told me that this would weaken the Habsburg regime, which I so 
thoroughly detested. I was convinced that even if it should sacrifice the German element the Danubian 
State could not continue to exist. Even at the price of a long and slow Slaviz-ation of the Austrian 
Germans the State would secure no guarantee of a really durable Empire; because it was very 
questionable if and how far the Slavs possessed the necessary capacity for constructive politics. 
Therefore I welcomed every movement that might lead towards the final disruption of that impossible 
State which had decreed that it would stamp out the German character in ten millions of people. The 
more this babel of tongues wrought discord and disruption, even in the Parliament, the nearer the hour 
approached for the dissolution of this Babylonian Empire. That would mean the liberation of my 
German Austrian people, and only then would it become possible for them to be re-united to the 

Accordingly I had no feelings of antipathy towards the actual policy of the Social Democrats. That its 
avowed purpose was to raise the level of the working classes which in my ignorance I then foolishly 
believed was a further reason why I should speak in favour of Social Democracy rather than against 
it. But the features that contributed most to estrange me from the Social Democratic movement was its 
hostile attitude towards the struggle for the conservation of Germanism in Austria, its lamentable 
cocotting with the Slav comrades, who received these approaches favourably as long as any practical 
advantages were forthcoming but otherwise maintained a haughty reserve, thus giving the importunate 
mendicants the sort of answer their behaviour deserved. 

And so at the age of seventeen the word Marxism was very little known to me, while I looked on 
Social Democracy and Socialism as synonymous expressions. It was only as the result of a sudden 
blow from the rough hand of Fate that my eyes were opened to the nature of this unparalleled system 
for duping the public. 

Hitherto my acquaintance with the Social Democratic Party was only that of a mere spectator at some 
of their mass meetings. I had not the slightest idea of the social-democratic teaching or the mentality 
of its partisans. All of a sudden I was brought face to face with the products of their teaching and what 
they called their Weltanschhauung. In this way a few months sufficed for me to learn something 
which under other circumstances might have necessitated decades of study namely, that under the 
cloak of social virtue and love of ones neighbour a veritable pestilence was spreading abroad and that 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (11 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


if this pestilence be not stamped out of the world without delay it may eventually succeed in 
exterminating the human race. 

I first came into contact with the Social Democrats while working in the building trade. 

From the very time that I started work the situation was not very pleasant for me. My clothes were 
still rather decent. I was careful of my speech and I was reserved in manner. I was so occupied with 
thinking of my own present lot and future possibilities that I did not take much of an interest in my 
immediate surroundings. I had sought work so that I shouldnt starve and at the same time so as to be 
able to make further headway with my studies, though this headway might be slow. Possibly I should 
not have bothered to be interested in my companions were it not that on the third or fourth day an 
event occurred which forced me to take a definite stand. I was ordered to join the trade union. 

At that time I knew nothing about the trades unions. I had had no opportunity of forming an opinion 
on their utility or inutility, as the case might be. But when I was told that I must join the union I 
refused. The grounds which I gave for my refusal were simply that I knew nothing about the matter 
and that anyhow I would not allow myself to be forced into anything. Probably the former reason 
saved me from being thrown out right away. They probably thought that within a few days I might be 
converted and become more docile. But if they thought that they were profoundly mistaken. After 
two weeks I found it utterly impossible for me to take such a step, even if I had been willing to take it 
at first. During those fourteen days I came to know my fellow workmen better, and no power in the 
world could have moved me to join an organization whose representatives had meanwhile shown 
themselves in a light which I found so unfavourable. 

During the first days my resentment was aroused. 

At midday some of my fellow workers used to adjourn to the nearest tavern, while the others 
remained on the building premises and there ate their midday meal, which in most cases was a very 
scanty one. These were married men. Their wives brought them the midday soup in dilapidated 
vessels. Towards the end of the week there was a gradual increase in the number of those who 
remained to eat their midday meal on the building premises. I understood the reason for this 
afterwards. They now talked politics. 

I drank my bottle of milk and ate my morsel of bread somewhere on the outskirts, while I 
circumspectly studied my environment or else fell to meditating on my own harsh lot. Yet I heard 
more than enough. And I often thought that some of what they said was meant for my ears, in the 
hope of bringing me to a decision. But all that I heard had the effect of arousing the strongest 
antagonism in me. Everything was disparaged the nation, because it was held to be an invention of 
the capitalist class (how often I had to listen to that phrase!); the Fatherland, because it was held to 
be an instrument in the hands of the bourgeoisie for the exploitation of the working masses; the 
authority of the law, because that was a means of holding down the proletariat; religion, as a means of 
doping the people, so as to exploit them afterwards; morality, as a badge of stupid and sheepish 
docility. There was nothing that they did not drag in the mud. 

At first I remained silent; but that could not last very long. Then I began to take part in the discussion 
and to reply to their statements. I had to recognize, however, that this was bound to be entirely 
fruitless, as long as I did not have at least a certain amount of definite information about the questions 
that were discussed. So I decided to consult the source from which my interlocutors claimed to have 
drawn their so-called wisdom. I devoured book after book, pamphlet after pamphlet. 

Meanwhile, we argued with one another on the building premises. From day to day I was becoming 
better informed than my companions in the subjects on which they claimed to be experts. Then a day 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (12 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


came when the more redoubtable of my adversaries resorted to the most effective weapon they had to 
replace the force of reason. This was intimidation and physical force. Some of the leaders among my 
adversaries ordered me to leave the building or else get flung down from the scaffolding. As I was 
quite alone I could not put up any physical resistance; so I chose the first alternative and departed, 
richer however by an experience. 

I went away full of disgust; but at the same time so deeply moved that it was quite impossible for me 
to turn my back on the whole situation and think no more about it. When my anger began to calm 
down the spirit of obstinacy got the upper hand and I decided that at all costs I would get back to work 
again in the building trade. This decision became all the stronger a few weeks later, when my little 
savings had entirely run out and hunger clutched me once again in its merciless arms. No alternative 
was left to me. I got work again and had to leave it for the same reasons as before. 

Then I asked myself: Are these men worthy of belonging to a great people? The question was 
profoundly disturbing; for if the answer were Yes, then the struggle to defend ones nationality is no 
longer worth all the trouble and sacrifice we demand of our best elements if it be in the interests of 
such a rabble. On the other hand, if the answer had to be No these men are not worthy of the nation, 
then our nation is poor indeed in men. During those days of mental anguish and deep meditation I saw 
before my mind the ever-increasing and menacing army of people who could no longer be reckoned 
as belonging to their own nation. 

It was with quite a different feeling, some days later, that I gazed on the interminable ranks, four 
abreast, of Viennese workmen parading at a mass demonstration. I stood dumbfounded for almost two 
hours, watching that enormous human dragon which slowly uncoiled itself there before me. When I 
finally left the square and wandered in the direction of my lodgings I felt dismayed and depressed. On 
my way I noticed the Arbeiterzeitung (The Workmans Journal) in a tobacco shop. This was the chief 
press-organ of the old Austrian Social Democracy. In a cheap cafe, where the common people used to 
foregather and where I often went to read the papers, the Arbeiterzeitung was also displayed. But 
hitherto I could not bring myself to do more than glance at the wretched thing for a couple of minutes: 
for its whole tone was a sort of mental vitriol to me. Under the depressing influence of the 
demonstration I had witnessed, some interior voice urged me to buy the paper in that tobacco shop 
and read it through. So I brought it home with me and spent the whole evening reading it, despite the 
steadily mounting rage provoked by this ceaseless outpouring of falsehoods. 

I now found that in the social democratic daily papers I could study the inner character of this 
politico-philosophic system much better than in all their theoretical literature. 

For there was a striking discrepancy between the two. In the literary effusions which dealt with the 
theory of Social Democracy there was a display of high-sounding phraseology about liberty and 
human dignity and beauty, all promulgated with an air of profound wisdom and serene prophetic 
assurance; a meticulously-woven glitter of words to dazzle and mislead the reader. On the other hand, 
the daily Press inculcated this new doctrine of human redemption in the most brutal fashion. No 
means were too base, provided they could be exploited in the campaign of slander. These journalists 
were real virtuosos in the art of twisting facts and presenting them in a deceptive form. The theoretical 
literature was intended for the simpletons of the soi-disant intellectuals belonging to the middle and, 
naturally, the upper classes. The newspaper propaganda was intended for the masses. 

This probing into books and newspapers and studying the teachings of Social Democracy reawakened 
my love for my own people. And thus what at first seemed an impassable chasm became the occasion 
of a closer affection. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (13 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


Having once understood the working of the colossal system for poisoning the popular mind, only a 
fool could blame the victims of it. During the years that followed I became more independent and, as I 
did so, I became better able to understand the inner cause of the success achieved by this Social 
Democratic gospel. I now realized the meaning and purpose of those brutal orders which prohibited 
the reading of all books and newspapers that were not red and at the same time demanded that only 
the red meetings should be attended. In the clear light of brutal reality I was able to see what must 
have been the inevitable consequences of that intolerant teaching. 

The psyche of the broad masses is accessible only to what is strong and uncompromising. Like a 
woman whose inner sensibilities are not so much under the sway of abstract reasoning but are always 
subject to the influence of a vague emotional longing for the strength that completes her being, and 
who would rather bow to the strong man than dominate the weakling in like manner the masses of 
the people prefer the ruler to the suppliant and are filled with a stronger sense of mental security by a 
teaching that brooks no rival than by a teaching which offers them a liberal choice. They have very 
little idea of how to make such a choice and thus they are prone to feel that they have been 
abandoned. They feel very little shame at being terrorized intellectually and they are scarcely 
conscious of the fact that their freedom as human beings is impudently abused; and thus they have not 
the slightest suspicion of the intrinsic fallacy of the whole doctrine. They see only the ruthless force 
and brutality of its determined utterances, to which they always submit. 

If Social Democracy should be opposed by a more truthful teaching, then even, though the struggle be 
of the bitterest kind, this truthful teaching will finally prevail provided it be enforced with equal 

Within less than two years I had gained a clear understanding of Social Democracy, in its teaching 
and the technique of its operations. 

I recognized the infamy of that technique whereby the movement carried on a campaign of mental 
terrorism against the bourgeoisie, who are neither morally nor spiritually equipped to withstand such 
attacks. The tactics of Social Democracy consisted in opening, at a given signal, a veritable drum-fire 
of lies and calumnies against the man whom they believed to be the most redoubtable of their 
adversaries, until the nerves of the latter gave way and they sacrificed the man who was attacked, 
simply in the hope of being allowed to live in peace. But the hope proved always to be a foolish one, 
for they were never left in peace. 

The same tactics are repeated again and again, until fear of these mad dogs exercises, through 
suggestion, a paralysing effect on their Victims. 

Through its own experience Social Democracy learned the value of strength, and for that reason it 
attacks mostly those in whom it scents stuff of the more stalwart kind, which is indeed a very rare 
possession. On the other hand it praises every weakling among its adversaries, more or less 
cautiously, according to the measure of his mental qualities known or presumed. They have less fear 
of a man of genius who lacks will-power than of a vigorous character with mediocre intelligence and 
at the same time they highly commend those who are devoid of intelligence and will-power. 

The Social Democrats know how to create the impression that they alone are the protectors of peace. 
In this way, acting very circumspectly but never losing sight of their ultimate goal, they conquer one 
position after another, at one time by methods of quiet intimidation and at another time by sheer 
daylight robbery, employing these latter tactics at those moments when public attention is turned 
towards other matters from which it does not wish to be diverted, or when the public considers an 
incident too trivial to create a scandal about it and thus provoke the anger of a malignant opponent. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (14 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


These tactics are based on an accurate estimation of human frailties and must lead to success, with 
almost mathematical certainty, unless the other side also learns how to fight poison gas with poison 
gas. The weaker natures must be told that here it is a case of to be or not to be. 

I also came to understand that physical intimidation has its significance for the mass as well as for the 
individual. Here again the Socialists had calculated accurately on the psychological effect. 

Intimidation in workshops and in factories, in assembly halls and at mass demonstrations, will always 
meet with success as long as it does not have to encounter the same kind of terror in a stronger form. 

Then of course the Party will raise a horrified outcry, yelling blue murder and appealing to the 
authority of the State, which they have just repudiated. In doing this their aim generally is to add to 
the general confusion, so that they may have a better opportunity of reaching their own goal 
unobserved. Their idea is to find among the higher government officials some bovine creature who, in 
the stupid hope that he may win the good graces of these awe-inspiring opponents so that they may 
remember him in case of future eventualities, will help them now to break all those who may oppose 
this world pest. 

The impression which such successful tactics make on the minds of the broad masses, whether they be 
adherents or opponents, can be estimated only by one who knows the popular mind, not from books 
but from practical life. For the successes which are thus obtained are taken by the adherents of Social 
Democracy as a triumphant symbol of the righteousness of their own cause; on the other hand the 
beaten opponent very often loses faith in the effectiveness of any further resistance. 

The more I understood the methods of physical intimidation that were employed, the more sympathy I 
had for the multitude that had succumbed to it. 

I am thankful now for the ordeal which I had to go through at that time; for it was the means of 
bringing me to think kindly again of my own people, inasmuch as the experience enabled me to 
distinguish between the false leaders and the victims who have been led astray. 

We must look upon the latter simply as victims. I have just now tried to depict a few traits which 
express the mentality of those on the lowest rung of the social ladder; but my picture would be 
disproportionate if I do not add that amid the social depths I still found light; for I experienced a rare 
spirit of self-sacrifice and loyal comradeship among those men, who demanded little from life and 
were content amid their modest surroundings. This was true especially of the older generation of 
workmen. And although these qualities were disappearing more and more in the younger generation, 
owing to the all-pervading influence of the big city, yet among the younger generation also there were 
many who were sound at the core and who were able to maintain themselves uncontaminated amid the 
sordid surroundings of their everyday existence. If these men, who in many cases meant well and 
were upright in themselves, gave the support to the political activities carried on by the common 
enemies of our people, that was because those decent workpeople did not and could not grasp the 
downright infamy of the doctrine taught by the socialist agitators. Furthermore, it was because no 
other section of the community bothered itself about the lot of the working classes. Finally, the social 
conditions became such that men who otherwise would have acted differently were forced to submit 
to them, even though unwillingly at first. A day came when poverty gained the upper hand and drove 
those workmen into the Social Democratic ranks. 

On innumerable occasions the bourgeoisie took a definite stand against even the most legitimate 
human demands of the working classes. That conduct was ill-judged and indeed immoral and could 
bring no gain whatsoever to the bourgeois class. The result was that the honest workman abandoned 
the original concept of the trades union organization and was dragged into politics. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (15 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


There were millions and millions of workmen who began by being hostile to the Social Democratic 
Party; but their defences were repeatedly stormed and finally they had to surrender. Yet this defeat 
was due to the stupidity of the bourgeois parties, who had opposed every social demand put forward 
by the working class. The short-sighted refusal to make an effort towards improving labour 
conditions, the refusal to adopt measures which would insure the workman in case of accidents in the 
factories, the refusal to forbid child labour, the refusal to consider protective measures for female 
workers, especially expectant mothers all this was of assistance to the Social Democratic leaders, 
who were thankful for every opportunity which they could exploit for forcing the masses into their 
net. Our bourgeois parties can never repair the damage that resulted from the mistake they then made. 
For they sowed the seeds of hatred when they opposed all efforts at social reform. And thus they gave, 
at least, apparent grounds to justify the claim put forward by the Social Democrats namely, that they 
alone stand up for the interests of the working class. 

And this became the principal ground for the moral justification of the actual existence of the Trades 
Unions, so that the labour organization became from that time onwards the chief political recruiting 
ground to swell the ranks of the Social Democratic Party. 

While thus studying the social conditions around me I was forced, whether I liked it or not, to decide 
on the attitude I should take towards the Trades Unions. Because I looked upon them as inseparable 
from the Social Democratic Party, my decision was hasty and mistaken. I repudiated them as a 
matter of course. But on this essential question also Fate intervened and gave me a lesson, with the 
result that I changed the opinion which I had first formed. 

When I was twenty years old I had learned to distinguish between the Trades Union as a means of 
defending the social rights of the employees and fighting for better living conditions for them and, on 
the other hand, the Trades Union as a political instrument used by the Party in the class struggle. 

The Social Democrats understood the enormous importance of the Trades Union movement. They 
appropriated it as an instrument and used it with success, while the bourgeois parties failed to 
understand it and thus lost their political prestige. They thought that their own arrogant Veto would 
arrest the logical development of the movement and force it into an illogical position. But it is absurd 
and also untrue to say that the Trades Union movement is in itself hostile to the nation. The opposite 
is the more correct view. If the activities of the Trades Union are directed towards improving the 
condition of a class, and succeed in doing so, such activities are not against the Fatherland or the State 
but are, in the truest sense of the word, national. In that way the trades union organization helps to 
create the social conditions which are indispensable in a general system of national education. It 
deserves high recognition when it destroys the psychological and physical germs of social disease and 
thus fosters the general welfare of the nation. 

It is superfluous to ask whether the Trades Union is indispensable. 

So long as there are employers who attack social understanding and have wrong ideas of justice and 
fair play it is not only the right but also the duty of their employees who are, after all, an integral part 
of our people to protect the general interests against the greed and unreason of the individual. For to 
safeguard the loyalty and confidence of the people is as much in the interests of the nation as to 
safeguard public health. 

Both are seriously menaced by dishonourable employers who are not conscious of their duty as 
members of the national community. Their personal avidity or irresponsibility sows the seeds of 
future trouble. To eliminate the causes of such a development is an action that surely deserves well of 
the country. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (16 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


It must not be answered here that the individual workman is free at any time to escape from the 
consequences of an injustice which he has actually suffered at the hands of an employer, or which he 
thinks he has suffered in other words, he can leave. No. That argument is only a ruse to detract 
attention from the question at issue. Is it, or is it not, in the interests of the nation to remove the causes 
of social unrest? If it is, then the fight must be carried on with the only weapons that promise success. 
But the individual workman is never in a position to stand up against the might of the big employer; 
for the question here is not one that concerns the triumph of right. If in such a relation right had been 
recognized as the guiding principle, then the conflict could not have arisen at all. But here it is a 
question of who is the stronger. If the case were otherwise, the sentiment of justice alone would solve 
the dispute in an honourable way; or, to put the case more correctly, matters would not have come to 
such a dispute at all. 

No. If unsocial and dishonourable treatment of men provokes resistance, then the stronger party can 
impose its decision in the conflict until the constitutional legislative authorities do away with the evil 
through legislation. Therefore it is evident that if the individual workman is to have any chance at all 
of winning through in the struggle he must be grouped with his fellow workmen and present a united 
front before the individual employer, who incorporates in his own person the massed strength of the 
vested interests in the industrial or commercial undertaking which he conducts. 

Thus the trades unions can hope to inculcate and strengthen a sense of social responsibility in 
workaday life and open the road to practical results. In doing this they tend to remove those causes of 
friction which are a continual source of discontent and complaint. 

Blame for the fact that the trades unions do not fulfil this much-desired function must be laid at the 
doors of those who barred the road to legislative social reform, or rendered such a reform ineffective 
by sabotaging it through their political influence. 

The political bourgeoisie failed to understand or, rather, they did not wish to understand the 
importance of the trades union movement. The Social Democrats accordingly seized the advantage 
offered them by this mistaken policy and took the labour movement under their exclusive protection, 
without any protest from the other side. In this way they established for themselves a solid bulwark 
behind which they could safely retire whenever the struggle assumed a critical aspect. Thus the 
genuine purpose of the movement gradually fell into oblivion, and was replaced by new objectives. 
For the Social Democrats never troubled themselves to respect and uphold the original purpose for 
which the trade unionist movement was founded. They simply took over the Movement, lock, stock 
and barrel, to serve their own political ends. 

Within a few decades the Trades Union Movement was transformed, by the expert hand of Social 
Democracy, from an instrument which had been originally fashioned for the defence of human rights 
into an instrument for the destruction of the national economic structure. The interests of the working 
class were not allowed for a moment to cross the path of this purpose; for in politics the application of 
economic pressure is always possible if the one side be sufficiently unscrupulous and the other 
sufficiently inert and docile. In this case both conditions were fulfilled. 

By the beginning of the present century the Trades Unionist Movement had already ceased to 
recognize the purpose for which it had been founded. From year to year it fell more and more under 
the political control of the Social Democrats, until it finally came to be used as a battering-ram in the 
class struggle. The plan was to shatter, by means of constantly repeated blows, the economic edifice 
in the building of which so much time and care had been expended. Once this objective had been 
reached, the destruction of the State would become a matter of course, because the State would 
already have been deprived of its economic foundations. Attention to the real interests of the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (17 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


working-classes, on the part of the Social Democrats, steadily decreased until the cunning leaders saw 
that it would be in their immediate political interests if the social and cultural demands of the broad 
masses remained unheeded; for there was a danger that if these masses once felt content they could no 
longer be employed as mere passive material in the political struggle. 

The gloomy prospect which presented itself to the eyes of the condottieri of the class warfare, if the 
discontent of the masses were no longer available as a war weapon, created so much anxiety among 
them that they suppressed and opposed even the most elementary measures of social reform. And 
conditions were such that those leaders did not have to trouble about attempting to justify such an 
illogical policy. 

As the masses were taught to increase and heighten their demands the possibility of satisfying them 
dwindled and whatever ameliorative measures were taken became less and less significant; so that it 
was at that time possible to persuade the masses that this ridiculous measure in which the most sacred 
claims of the working-classes were being granted represented a diabolical plan to weaken their 
fighting power in this easy way and, if possible, to paralyse it. One will not be astonished at the 
success of these allegations if one remembers what a small measure of thinking power the broad 
masses possess. 

In the bourgeois camp there was high indignation over the bad faith of the Social Democratic tactics; 
but nothing was done to draw a practical conclusion and organize a counter attack from the bourgeois 
side. The fear of the Social Democrats, to improve the miserable conditions of the working-classes 
ought to have induced the bourgeois parties to make the most energetic efforts in this direction and 
thus snatch from the hands of the class-warfare leaders their most important weapon; but nothing of 
this kind happened. 

Instead of attacking the position of their adversaries the bourgeoisie allowed itself to be pressed and 
harried. Finally it adopted means that were so tardy and so insignificant that they were ineffective and 
were repudiated. So the whole situation remained just as it had been before the bourgeois intervention; 
but the discontent had thereby become more serious. 

Like a threatening storm, the Free Trades Union hovered above the political horizon and above the 
life of each individual. It was one of the most frightful instruments of terror that threatened the 
security and independence of the national economic structure, the foundations of the State and the 
liberty of the individual. Above all, it was the Free Trades Union that turned democracy into a 
ridiculous and scorned phrase, insulted the ideal of liberty and stigmatized that of fraternity with the 
slogan If you will not become our comrade we shall crack your skull. 

It was thus that I then came to know this friend of humanity. During the years that followed my 
knowledge of it became wider and deeper; but I have never changed anything in that regard. 

The more I became acquainted with the external forms of Social Democracy, the greater became my 
desire to understand the inner nature of its doctrines. 

For this purpose the official literature of the Party could not help very much. In discussing economic 
questions its statements were false and its proofs unsound. In treating of political aims its attitude was 
insincere. Furthermore, its modern methods of chicanery in the presentation of its arguments were 
profoundly repugnant to me. Its flamboyant sentences, its obscure and incomprehensible phrases, 
pretended to contain great thoughts, but they were devoid of thought, and meaningless. One would 
have to be a decadent Bohemian in one of our modern cities in order to feel at home in that labyrinth 
of mental aberration, so that he might discover intimate experiences amid the stinking fumes of this 
literary Dadism. These writers were obviously counting on the proverbial humility of a certain section 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (18 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


of our people, who believe that a person who is incomprehensible must be profoundly wise. 

In confronting the theoretical falsity and absurdity of that doctrine with the reality of its external 
manifestations, I gradually came to have a clear idea of the ends at which it aimed. 

During such moments I had dark presentiments and feared something evil. I had before me a teaching 
inspired by egoism and hatred, mathematically calculated to win its victory, but the triumph of which 
would be a mortal blow to humanity. 

Meanwhile I had discovered the relations existing between this destructive teaching and the specific 
character of a people, who up to that time had been to me almost unknown. 

Knowledge of the Jews is the only key whereby one may understand the inner nature and therefore the 
real aims of Social Democracy. 

The man who has come to know this race has succeeded in removing from his eyes the veil through 
which he had seen the aims and meaning of his Party in a false light; and then, out of the murk and 
fog of social phrases rises the grimacing figure of Marxism. 

To-day it is hard and almost impossible for me to say when the word Jew first began to raise any 
particular thought in my mind. I do not remember even having heard the word at home during my 
fathers lifetime. If this name were mentioned in a derogatory sense I think the old gentleman would 
just have considered those who used it in this way as being uneducated reactionaries. In the course of 
his career he had come to be more or less a cosmopolitan, with strong views on nationalism, which 
had its effect on me as well. In school, too, I found no reason to alter the picture of things I had 
formed at home. 

At the Realschule I knew one Jewish boy. We were all on our guard in our relations with him, but 
only because his reticence and certain actions of his warned us to be discreet. Beyond that my 
companions and myself formed no particular opinions in regard to him. 

It was not until I was fourteen or fifteen years old that I frequently ran up against the word Jew, 
partly in connection with political controversies. These references aroused a slight aversion in me, and 
I could not avoid an uncomfortable feeling which always came over me when I had to listen to 
religious disputes. But at that time I had no other feelings about the Jewish question. 

There were very few Jews in Linz. In the course of centuries the Jews who lived there had become 
Europeanized in external appearance and were so much like other human beings that I even looked 
upon them as Germans. The reason why I did not then perceive the absurdity of such an illusion was 
that the only external mark which I recognized as distinguishing them from us was the practice of 
their strange religion. As I thought that they were persecuted on account of their Faith my aversion to 
hearing remarks against them grew almost into a feeling of abhorrence. I did not in the least suspect 
that there could be such a thing as a systematic anti-Semitism. 

Then I came to Vienna. 

Confused by the mass of impressions I received from the architectural surroundings and depressed by 
my own troubles, I did not at first distinguish between the different social strata of which the 
population of that mammoth city was composed. Although Vienna then had about two hundred 
thousand Jews among its population of two millions, I did not notice them. During the first weeks of 
my sojourn my eyes and my mind were unable to cope with the onrush of new ideas and values. Not 
until I gradually settled down to my surroundings, and the confused picture began to grow clearer, did 
I acquire a more discriminating view of my new world. And with that I came up against the Jewish 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (19 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 



I will not say that the manner in which I first became acquainted with it was particularly unpleasant 
for me. In the Jew I still saw only a man who was of a different religion, and therefore, on grounds of 
human tolerance, I was against the idea that he should be attacked because he had a different faith. 
And so I considered that the tone adopted by the anti-Semitic Press in Vienna was unworthy of the 
cultural traditions of a great people. The memory of certain events which happened in the middle ages 
came into my mind, and I felt that I should not like to see them repeated. Generally speaking, these 
anti-Semitic newspapers did not belong to the first rank but I did not then understand the reason of 
this and so I regarded them more as the products of jealousy and envy rather than the expression of a 
sincere, though wrong-headed, feeling. 

My own opinions were confirmed by what I considered to be the infinitely more dignified manner in 
which the really great Press replied to those attacks or simply ignored them, which latter seemed to 
me the most respectable way. 

I diligently read what was generally called the World Press Neue Freie Presse, Wiener Tageblatt, etc. 
and I was astonished by the abundance of information they gave their readers and the impartial way 
in which they presented particular problems. I appreciated their dignified tone; but sometimes the 
flamboyancy of the style was unconvincing, and I did not like it. But I attributed all this to the 
overpowering influence of the world metropolis. 

Since I considered Vienna at that time as such a world metropolis, I thought this constituted sufficient 
grounds to excuse these shortcomings of the Press. But I was frequently disgusted by the grovelling 
way in which the Vienna Press played lackey to the Court. Scarcely a move took place at the Hofburg 
which was not presented in glorified colours to the readers. It was a foolish practice, which, especially 
when it had to do with The Wisest Monarch of all Times, reminded one almost of the dance which 
the mountain cock performs at pairing time to woo his mate. It was all empty nonsense. And I thought 
that such a policy was a stain on the ideal of liberal democracy. I thought that this way of currying 
favour at the Court was unworthy of the people. And that was the first blot that fell on my 
appreciation of the great Vienna Press. 

While in Vienna I continued to follow with a vivid interest all the events that were taking place in 
Germany, whether connected with political or cultural question. I had a feeling of pride and 
admiration when I compared the rise of the young German Empire with the decline of the Austrian 
State. But, although the foreign policy of that Empire was a source of real pleasure on the whole, the 
internal political happenings were not always so satisfactory. I did not approve of the campaign which 
at that time was being carried on against William II. I looked upon him not only as the German 
Emperor but, above all, as the creator of the German Navy. The fact that the Emperor was prohibited 
from speaking in the Reichstag made me very angry, because the prohibition came from a side which 
in my eyes had no authority to make it. For at a single sitting those same parliamentary ganders did 
more cackling together than the whole dynasty of Emperors, comprising even the weakest, had done 
in the course of centuries. 

It annoyed me to have to acknowledge that in a nation where any half-witted fellow could claim for 
himself the right to criticize and might even be let loose on the people as a Legislator in the 
Reichstag, the bearer of the Imperial Crown could be the subject of a reprimand on the part of the 
most miserable assembly of drivellers that had ever existed. 

I was even more disgusted at the way in which this same Vienna Press salaamed obsequiously before 
the meanest steed belonging to the Habsburg royal equipage and went off into wild ecstacies of 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (20 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


delight if the nag wagged its tail in response. And at the same time these newspapers took up an 
attitude of anxiety in matters that concerned the German Emperor, trying to cloak their enmity by the 
serious air they gave themselves. But in my eyes that enmity appeared to be only poorly cloaked. 
Naturally they protested that they had no intention of mixing in Germanys internal affairs God 
forbid! They pretended that by touching a delicate spot in such a friendly way they were fulfilling a 
duty that devolved upon them by reason of the mutual alliance between the two countries and at the 
same time discharging their obligations of journalistic truthfulness. Having thus excused themselves 
about tenderly touching a sore spot, they bored with the finger ruthlessly into the wound. 

That sort of thing made my blood boil. And now I began to be more and more on my guard when 
reading the great Vienna Press. 

I had to acknowledge, however, that on such subjects one of the anti-Semitic papers the Deutsche 
Volksblatt acted more decently. 

What got still more on my nerves was the repugnant manner in which the big newspapers cultivated 
admiration for France. One really had to feel ashamed of being a German when confronted by those 
mellifluous hymns of praise for the great culture- nation. This wretched Gallomania more often than 
once made me throw away one of those world newspapers. I now often turned to the Volksblatt, 
which was much smaller in size but which treated such subjects more decently. I was not in accord 
with its sharp anti-Semitic tone; but again and again I found that its arguments gave me grounds for 
serious thought. 

Anyhow, it was as a result of such reading that I came to know the man and the movement which then 
determined the fate of Vienna. These were Dr. Karl Lueger and the Christian Socialist Movement. At 
the time I came to Vienna I felt opposed to both. I looked on the man and the movement as 

But even an elementary sense of justice enforced me to change my opinion when I had the 
opportunity of knowing the man and his work, and slowly that opinion grew into outspoken 
admiration when I had better grounds for forming a judgment. To-day, as well as then, I hold Dr. Karl 
Lueger as the most eminent type of German Burgermeister. How many prejudices were thrown over 
through such a change in my attitude towards the Christian-Socialist Movement! 

My ideas about anti-Semitism changed also in the course of time, but that was the change which I 
found most difficult. It cost me a greater internal conflict with myself, and it was only after a struggle 
between reason and sentiment that victory began to be decided in favour of the former. Two years 
later sentiment rallied to the side of reasons and became a faithful guardian and counsellor. 

At the time of this bitter struggle, between calm reason and the sentiments in which I had been 
brought up, the lessons that I learned on the streets of Vienna rendered me invaluable assistance. A 
time came when I no longer passed blindly along the street of the mighty city, as I had done in the 
early days, but now with my eyes open not only to study the buildings but also the human beings. 

Once, when passing through the inner City, I suddenly encountered a phenomenon in a long caftan 
and wearing black side-locks. My first thought was: Is this a Jew? They certainly did not have this 
appearance in Linz. I watched the man stealthily and cautiously; but the longer I gazed at the strange 
countenance and examined it feature by feature, the more the question shaped itself in my brain: Is 
this a German? 

As was always my habit with such experiences, I turned to books for help in removing my doubts. For 
the first time in my life I bought myself some anti-Semitic pamphlets for a few pence. But 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (21 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


unfortunately they all began with the assumption that in principle the reader had at least a certain 
degree of information on the Jewish question or was even familiar with it. Moreover, the tone of most 
of these pamphlets was such that I became doubtful again, because the statements made were partly 
superficial and the proofs extraordinarily unscientific. For weeks, and indeed for months, I returned to 
my old way of thinking. The subject appeared so enormous and the accusations were so far-reaching 
that I was afraid of dealing with it unjustly and so I became again anxious and uncertain. 

Naturally I could no longer doubt that here there was not a question of Germans who happened to be 
of a different religion but rather that there was question of an entirely different people. For as soon as 
I began to investigate the matter and observe the Jews, then Vienna appeared to me in a different light. 
Wherever I now went I saw Jews, and the more I saw of them the more strikingly and clearly they 
stood out as a different people from the other citizens. Especially the Inner City and the district 
northwards from the Danube Canal swarmed with a people who, even in outer appearance, bore no 
similarity to the Germans. 

But any indecision which I may still have felt about that point was finally removed by the activities of 
a certain section of the Jews themselves. A great movement, called Zionism, arose among them. Its 
aim was to assert the national character of Judaism, and the movement was strongly represented in 

To outward appearances it seemed as if only one group of Jews championed this movement, while the 
great majority disapproved of it, or even repudiated it. But an investigation of the situation showed 
that those outward appearances were purposely misleading. These outward appearances emerged from 
a mist of theories which had been produced for reasons of expediency, if not for purposes of 
downright deception. For that part of Jewry which was styled Liberal did not disown the Zionists as if 
they were not members of their race but rather as brother Jews who publicly professed their faith in an 
unpractical way, so as to create a danger for Jewry itself. 

Thus there was no real rift in their internal solidarity. 

This fictitious conflict between the Zionists and the Liberal Jews soon disgusted me; for it was false 
through and through and in direct contradiction to the moral dignity and immaculate character on 
which that race had always prided itself. 

Cleanliness, whether moral or of another kind, had its own peculiar meaning for these people. That 
they were water-shy was obvious on looking at them and, unfortunately, very often also when not 
looking at them at all. The odour of those people in caftans often used to make me feel ill. Beyond 
that there were the unkempt clothes and the ignoble exterior. 

All these details were certainly not attractive; but the revolting feature was that beneath their unclean 
exterior one suddenly perceived the moral mildew of the chosen race. 

What soon gave me cause for very serious consideration were the activities of the Jews in certain 
branches of life, into the mystery of which I penetrated little by little. Was there any shady 
undertaking, any form of foulness, especially in cultural life, in which at least one Jew did not 
participate? On putting the probing knife carefully to that kind of abscess one immediately 
discovered, like a maggot in a putrescent body, a little Jew who was often blinded by the sudden light. 

In my eyes the charge against Judaism became a grave one the moment I discovered the Jewish 
activities in the Press, in art, in literature and the theatre. All unctuous protests were now more or less 
futile. One needed only to look at the posters announcing the hideous productions of the cinema and 
theatre, and study the names of the authors who were highly lauded there in order to become 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (22 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


permanently adamant on Jewish questions. Here was a pestilence, a moral pestilence, with which the 
public was being infected. It was worse than the Black Plague of long ago. And in what mighty doses 
this poison was manufactured and distributed. Naturally, the lower the moral and intellectual level of 
such an author of artistic products the more inexhaustible his fecundity. Sometimes it went so far that 
one of these fellows, acting like a sewage pump, would shoot his filth directly in the face of other 
members of the human race. In this connection we must remember there is no limit to the number of 
such people. One ought to realize that for one, Goethe, Nature may bring into existence ten thousand 
such despoilers who act as the worst kind of germ-carriers in poisoning human souls. It was a terrible 
thought, and yet it could not be avoided, that the greater number of the Jews seemed specially 
destined by Nature to play this shameful part. 

And is it for this reason that they can be called the chosen people? 

I began then to investigate carefully the names of all the fabricators of these unclean products in 
public cultural life. The result of that inquiry was still more disfavourable to the attitude which I had 
hitherto held in regard to the Jews. Though my feelings might rebel a thousand time, reason now had 
to draw its own conclusions. 

The fact that nine-tenths of all the smutty literature, artistic tripe and theatrical banalities, had to be 
charged to the account of people who formed scarcely one per cent, of the nation that fact could not 
be gainsaid. It was there, and had to be admitted. Then I began to examine my favourite World Press, 
with that fact before my mind. 

The deeper my soundings went the lesser grew my respect for that Press which I formerly admired. Its 
style became still more repellent and I was forced to reject its ideas as entirely shallow and superficial. 
To claim that in the presentation of facts and views its attitude was impartial seemed to me to contain 
more falsehood than truth. The writers were Jews. 

Thousands of details that I had scarcely noticed before seemed to me now to deserve attention. I 
began to grasp and understand things which I had formerly looked at in a different light. 

I saw the Liberal policy of that Press in another light. Its dignified tone in replying to the attacks of its 
adversaries and its dead silence in other cases now became clear to me as part of a cunning and 
despicable way of deceiving the readers. Its brilliant theatrical criticisms always praised the Jewish 
authors and its adverse, criticism was reserved exclusively for the Germans. 

The light pin-pricks against William II showed the persistency of its policy, just as did its systematic 
commendation of French culture and civilization. The subject matter of the feuilletons was trivial and 
often pornographic. The language of this Press as a whole had the accent of a foreign people. The 
general tone was openly derogatory to the Germans and this must have been definitely intentional. 

What were the interests that urged the Vienna Press to adopt such a policy? Or did they do so merely 
by chance? In attempting to find an answer to those questions I gradually became more and more 

Then something happened which helped me to come to an early decision. I began to see through the 
meaning of a whole series of events that were taking place in other branches of Viennese life. All 
these were inspired by a general concept of manners and morals which was openly put into practice 
by a large section of the Jews and could be established as attributable to them. Here, again, the life 
which I observed on the streets taught me what evil really is. 

The part which the Jews played in the social phenomenon of prostitution, and more especially in the 
white slave traffic, could be studied here better than in any other West-European city, with the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (23 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


possible exception of certain ports in Southern France. Walking by night along the streets of the 
Leopoldstadt, almost at every turn whether one wished it or not, one witnessed certain happenings of 
whose existence the Germans knew nothing until the War made it possible and indeed inevitable for 
the soldiers to see such things on the Eastern front. 

A cold shiver ran down my spine when I first ascertained that it was the same kind of cold-blooded, 
thick-skinned and shameless Jew who showed his consummate skill in conducting that revolting 
exploitation of the dregs of the big city. Then I became fired with wrath. 

I had now no more hesitation about bringing the Jewish problem to light in all its details. No. 
Henceforth I was determined to do so. But as I learned to track down the Jew in all the different 
spheres of cultural and artistic life, and in the various manifestations of this life everywhere, I 
suddenly came upon him in a position where I had least expected to find him. I now realized that the 
Jews were the leaders of Social Democracy. In face of that revelation the scales fell from my eyes. My 
long inner struggle was at an end. 

In my relations with my fellow workmen I was often astonished to find how easily and often they 
changed their opinions on the same questions, sometimes within a few days and sometimes even 
within the course of a few hours. I found it difficult to understand how men who always had 
reasonable ideas when they spoke as individuals with one another suddenly lost this reasonableness 
the moment they acted in the mass. That phenomenon often tempted one almost to despair. I used to 
dispute with them for hours and when I succeeded in bringing them to what I considered a reasonable 
way of thinking I rejoiced at my success. But next day I would find that it had been all in vain. It was 
saddening to think I had to begin it all over again. Like a pendulum in its eternal sway, they would fall 
back into their absurd opinions. 

I was able to understand their position fully. They were dissatisfied with their lot and cursed the fate 
which had hit them so hard. They hated their employers, whom they looked upon as the heartless 
administrators of their cruel destiny. Often they used abusive language against the public officials, 
whom they accused of having no sympathy with the situation of the working people. They made 
public protests against the cost of living and paraded through the streets in defence of their claims. At 
least all this could be explained on reasonable grounds. But what was impossible to understand was 
the boundless hatred they expressed against their own fellow citizens, how they disparaged their own 
nation, mocked at its greatness, reviled its history and dragged the names of its most illustrious men in 
the gutter. 

This hostility towards their own kith and kin, their own native land and home was as irrational as it 
was incomprehensible. It was against Nature. 

One could cure that malady temporarily, but only for some days or at least some weeks. But on 
meeting those whom one believed to have been converted one found that they had become as they 
were before. That malady against Nature held them once again in its clutches. 

I gradually discovered that the Social Democratic Press was predominantly controlled by Jews. But I 
did not attach special importance to this circumstance, for the same state of affairs existed also in 
other newspapers. But there was one striking fact in this connection. It was that there was not a single 
newspaper with which Jews were connected that could be spoken of as National, in the meaning that 
my education and convictions attached to that word. 

Making an effort to overcome my natural reluctance, I tried to read articles of this nature published in 
the Marxist Press; but in doing so my aversion increased all the more. And then I set about learning 
something of the people who wrote and published this mischievous stuff. From the publisher 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (24 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:24] 


downwards, all of them were Jews. I recalled to mind the names of the public leaders of Marxism, and 
then I realized that most of them belonged to the Chosen Race the Social Democratic representatives 
in the Imperial Cabinet as well as the secretaries of the Trades Unions and the street agitators. 
Everywhere the same sinister picture presented itself. I shall never forget the row of names 
Austerlitz, David, Adler, Ellenbogen, and others. One fact became quite evident to me. It was that this 
alien race held in its hands the leadership of that Social Democratic Party with whose minor 
representatives I had been disputing for months past. I was happy at last to know for certain that the 
Jew is not a German. 

Thus I finally discovered who were the evil spirits leading our people astray. The sojourn in Vienna 
for one year had proved long enough to convince me that no worker is so rooted in his preconceived 
notions that he will not surrender them in face of better and clearer arguments and explanations. 
Gradually I became an expert in the doctrine of the Marxists and used this knowledge as an 
instrument to drive home my own firm convictions. I was successful in nearly every case. The great 
masses can be rescued, but a lot of time and a large share of human patience must be devoted to such 

But a Jew can never be rescued from his fixed notions. 

It was then simple enough to attempt to show them the absurdity of their teaching. Within my small 
circle I talked to them until my throat ached and my voice grew hoarse. I believed that I could finally 
convince them of the danger inherent in the Marxist follies. But I only achieved the contrary result. It 
seemed to me that immediately the disastrous effects of the Marxist Theory and its application in 
practice became evident, the stronger became their obstinacy. 

The more I debated with them the more familiar I became with their argumentative tactics. At the 
outset they counted upon the stupidity of their opponents, but when they got so entangled that they 
could not find a way out they played the trick of acting as innocent simpletons. Should they fail, in 
spite of their tricks of logic, they acted as if they could not understand the counter arguments and 
bolted away to another field of discussion. They would lay down truisms and platitudes; and, if you 
accepted these, then they were applied to other problems and matters of an essentially different nature 
from the original theme. If you faced them with this point they would escape again, and you could not 
bring them to make any precise statement. Whenever one tried to get a firm grip on any of these 
apostles ones hand grasped only jelly and slime which slipped through the fingers and combined 
again into a solid mass a moment afterwards. If your adversary felt forced to give in to your argument, 
on account of the observers present, and if you then thought that at last you had gained ground, a 
surprise was in store for you on the following day. The Jew would be utterly oblivious to what had 
happened the day before, and he would start once again by repeating his former absurdities, as if 
nothing had happened. Should you become indignant and remind him of yesterdays defeat, he 
pretended astonishment and could not remember anything, except that on the previous day he had 
proved that his statements were correct. Sometimes I was dumbfounded. I do not know what amazed 
me the more the abundance of their verbiage or the artful way in which they dressed up their 
falsehoods. I gradually came to hate them. 

Yet all this had its good side; because the more I came to know the individual leaders, or at least the 
propagandists, of Social Democracy, my love for my own people increased correspondingly. 
Considering the Satanic skill which these evil counsellors displayed, how could their unfortunate 
victims be blamed? Indeed, I found it extremely difficult myself to be a match for the dialectical 
perfidy of that race. How futile it was to try to win over such people with argument, seeing that their 
very mouths distorted the truth, disowning the very words they had just used and adopting them again 
a few moments afterwards to serve their own ends in the argument! No. The more I came to know the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (25 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:25] 


Jew, the easier it was to excuse the workers. 

In my opinion the most culpable were not to be found among the workers but rather among those who 
did not think it worth while to take the trouble to sympathize with their own kinsfolk and give to the 
hard-working son of the national family what was his by the iron logic of justice, while at the same 
time placing his seducer and corrupter against the wall. 

Urged by my own daily experiences, I now began to investigate more thoroughly the sources of the 
Marxist teaching itself. Its effects were well known to me in detail. As a result of careful observation, 
its daily progress had become obvious to me. And one needed only a little imagination in order to be 
able to forecast the consequences which must result from it. The only question now was: Did the 
founders foresee the effects of their work in the form which those effects have shown themselves 
to-day, or were the founders themselves the victims of an error? To my mind both alternatives were 

If the second question must be answered in the affirmative, then it was the duty of every thinking 
person to oppose this sinister movement with a view to preventing it from producing its worst results. 
But if the first question must be answered in the affirmative, then it must be admitted that the original 
authors of this evil which has infected the nations were devils incarnate. For only in the brain of a 
monster, and not that of a man, could the plan of this organization take shape whose workings must 
finally bring about the collapse of human civilization and turn this world into a desert waste. 

Such being the case the only alternative left was to fight, and in that fight to employ all the weapons 
which the human spirit and intellect and will could furnish leaving it to Fate to decide in whose favour 
the balance should fall. 

And so I began to gather information about the authors of this teaching, with a view to studying the 
principles of the movement. The fact that I attained my object sooner than I could have anticipated 
was due to the deeper insight into the Jewish question which I then gained, my knowledge of this 
question being hitherto rather superficial. This newly acquired knowledge alone enabled me to make a 
practical comparison between the real content and the theoretical pretentiousness of the teaching laid 
down by the apostolic founders of Social Democracy; because I now understood the language of the 
Jew. I realized that the Jew uses language for the purpose of dissimulating his thought or at least 
veiling it, so that his real aim cannot be discovered by what he says but rather by reading between the 
lines. This knowledge was the occasion of the greatest inner revolution that I had yet experienced. 
From being a soft-hearted cosmopolitan I became an out-and-out anti-Semite. 

Only on one further occasion, and that for the last time, did I give way to oppressing thoughts which 
caused me some moments of profound anxiety. 

As I critically reviewed the activities of the Jewish people throughout long periods of history I became 
anxious and asked myself whether for some inscrutable reasons beyond the comprehension of poor 
mortals such as ourselves, Destiny may not have irrevocably decreed that the final victory must go to 
this small nation? May it not be that this people which has lived only for the earth has been promised 
the earth as a recompense? is our right to struggle for our own self-preservation based on reality, or is 
it a merely subjective thing? Fate answered the question for me inasmuch as it led me to make a 
detached and exhaustive inquiry into the Marxist teaching and the activities of the Jewish people in 
connection with it. 

The Jewish doctrine of Marxism repudiates the aristocratic principle of Nature and substitutes for it 
the eternal privilege of force and energy, numerical mass and its dead weight. Thus it denies the 
individual worth of the human personality, impugns the teaching that nationhood and race have a 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (26 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:25] 


primary significance, and by doing this it takes away the very foundations of human existence and 
human civilization. If the Marxist teaching were to be accepted as the foundation of the life of the 
universe, it would lead to the disappearance of all order that is conceivable to the human mind. And 
thus the adoption of such a law would provoke chaos in the structure of the greatest organism that we 
know, with the result that the inhabitants of this earthly planet would finally disappear. 

Should the Jew, with the aid of his Marxist creed, triumph over the people of this world, his Crown 
will be the funeral wreath of mankind, and this planet will once again follow its orbit through ether, 
without any human life on its surface, as it did millions of years ago. 

And so I believe to-day that my conduct is in accordance with the will of the Almighty Creator. In 
standing guard against the Jew I am defending the handiwork of the Lord. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap2.htm (27 of 27) [04/06/2000 16:07:25] 






Generally speaking a man should not publicly take part in politics before he has reached the age of 
thirty, though, of course, exceptions must be made in the case of those who are naturally gifted with 
extraordinary political abilities. That at least is my opinion to-day. And the reason for it is that until he 
reaches his thirtieth year or thereabouts a mans mental development will mostly consist in acquiring 
and sifting such knowledge as is necessary for the groundwork of a general platform from which he 
can examine the different political problems that arise from day to day and be able to adopt a definite 
attitude towards each. A man must first acquire a fund of general ideas and fit them together so as to 
form an organic structure of personal thought or outlook on life a Weltanschhauung. Then he will 
have that mental equipment without which he cannot form his own judgments on particular questions 
of the day, and he will have acquired those qualities that are necessary for consistency and 
steadfastness in the formation of political opinions. Such a man is now qualified, at least subjectively, 
to take his part in the political conduct of public affairs. 

If these pre-requisite conditions are not fulfilled, and if a man should enter political life without this 
equipment, he will run a twofold risk. In the first place, he may find during the course of events that 
the stand which he originally took in regard to some essential question was wrong. He will now have 
to abandon his former position or else stick to it against his better knowledge and riper wisdom and 
after his reason and convictions have already proved it untenable. If he adopt the former line of action 
he will find himself in a difficult personal situation; because in giving up a position hitherto 
maintained he will appear inconsistent and will have no right to expect his followers to remain as 
loyal to his leadership as they were before. And, as regards the followers themselves, they may easily 
look upon their leaders change of policy as showing a lack of judgment inherent in his character. 
Moreover, the change must cause in them a certain feeling of discomfiture vis-a-vis those whom the 
leader formerly opposed. 

If he adopts the second alternative which so very frequently happens to-day then public 
pronouncements of the leader have no longer his personal persuasion to support them. And the more 
that is the case the defence of his cause will be all the more hollow and superficial. He now descends 
to the adoption of vulgar means in his defence. While he himself no longer dreams seriously of 
standing by his political protestations to the last for no man will die in defence of something in 
which he does not believe he makes increasing demands on his followers. Indeed, the greater be the 
measure of his own insincerity, the more unfortunate and inconsiderate become his claims on his party 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (1 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:28] 


adherents. Finally, he throws aside the last vestiges of true leadership and begins to play politics. This 
means that he becomes one of those whose only consistency is their inconsistency, associated with 
overbearing insolence and oftentimes an artful mendacity developed to a shamelessly high degree. 

Should such a person, to the misfortune of all decent people, succeed in becoming a parliamentary 
deputy it will be clear from the outset that for him the essence of political activity consists in a heroic 
struggle to keep permanent hold on this milk-bottle as a source of livelihood for himself and his 
family. The more his wife and children are dependent on him, the more stubbornly will he fight to 
maintain for himself the representation of his parliamentary constituency. For that reason any other 
person who gives evidence of political capacity is his personal enemy. In every new movement he 
will apprehend the possible beginning of his own downfall. And everyone who is a better man than 
himself will appear to him in the light of a menace. 

I shall subsequently deal more fully with the problem to which this kind of parliamentary vermin give 

When a man has reached his thirtieth year he has still a great deal to learn. That is obvious. But 
henceforward what he learns will principally be an amplification of his basic ideas; it will be fitted in 
with them organically so as to fill up the framework of the fundamental Weltanschhauung which he 
already possesses. What he learns anew will not imply the abandonment of principles already held, 
but rather a deeper knowledge of those principles. And thus his colleagues will never have the 
discomforting feeling that they have been hitherto falsely led by him. On the contrary, their 
confidence is increased when they perceive that their leaders qualities are steadily developing along 
the lines of an organic growth which results from the constant assimilation of new ideas; so that the 
followers look upon this process as signifying an enrichment of the doctrines in which they 
themselves believe, in their eyes every such development is a new witness to the correctness of that 
whole body of opinion which has hitherto been held. 

A leader who has to abandon the platform founded on his general principles, because he recognizes 
the foundation as false, can act with honour only when he declares his readiness to accept the final 
consequences of his erroneous views. In such a case he ought to refrain from taking public part in any 
further political activity. Having once gone astray on essential things he may possibly go astray a 
second time. But, anyhow, he has no right whatsoever to expect or demand that his fellow citizens 
should continue to give him their support. 

How little such a line of conduct commends itself to our public leaders nowadays is proved by the 
general corruption prevalent among the cabal which at the present moment feels itself called to 
political leadership. In the whole cabal there is scarcely one who is properly equipped for this task. 

Although in those days I used to give more time than most others to the consideration of political 
question, yet I carefully refrained from taking an open part in politics. Only to a small circle did I 
speak of those things which agitated my mind or were the cause of constant preoccupation for me. 
The habit of discussing matters within such a restricted group had many advantages in itself. Rather 
than talk at them, I learned to feel my way into the modes of thought and views of those men around 
me. Oftentimes such ways of thinking and such views were quite primitive. Thus I took every possible 
occasion to increase my knowledge of men. 

Nowhere among the German people was the opportunity for making such a study so favourable as in 

In the old Danubian Monarchy political thought was wider in its range and had a richer variety of 
interests than in the Germany of that epoch excepting certain parts of Prussia, Hamburg and the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (2 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:28] 


districts bordering on the North Sea. When I speak of Austria here I mean that part of the great 
Habsburg Empire which, by reason of its German population, furnished not only the historic basis for 
the formation of this State but whose population was for several centuries also the exclusive source of 
cultural life in that political system whose structure was so artificial. As time went on the stability of 
the Austrian State and the guarantee of its continued existence depended more and more on the 
maintenance of this germ-cell of that Habsburg Empire. 

The hereditary imperial provinces constituted the heart of the Empire. And it was this heart that 
constantly sent the blood of life pulsating through the whole political and cultural system. 
Corresponding to the heart of the Empire, Vienna signified the brain and the will. At that time Vienna 
presented an appearance which made one think of her as an enthroned queen whose authoritative 
sway united the conglomeration of heterogenous nationalities that lived under the Habsburg sceptre. 
The radiant beauty of the capital city made one forget the sad symptoms of senile decay which the 
State manifested as a whole. 

Though the Empire was internally rickety because of the terrific conflict going on between the various 
nationalities, the outside world and Germany in particular saw only that lovely picture of the city. 
The illusion was all the greater because at that time Vienna seemed to have risen to its highest pitch of 
splendour. Under a Mayor, who had the true stamp of administrative genius, the venerable residential 
City of the Emperors of the old Empire seemed to have the glory of its youth renewed. The last great 
German who sprang from the ranks of the people that had colonized the East Mark was not a 
statesman, in the official sense. This Dr. Luegar, however, in his role as Mayor of the Imperial 
Capital and Residential City, had achieved so much in almost all spheres of municipal activity, 
whether economic or cultural, that the heart of the whole Empire throbbed with renewed vigour. He 
thus proved himself a much greater statesman than the so-called diplomats of that period. 

The fact that this political system of heterogeneous races called Austria, finally broke down is no 
evidence whatsoever of political incapacity on the part of the German element in the old East Mark. 
The collapse was the inevitable result of an impossible situation. Ten million people cannot 
permanently hold together a State of fifty millions, composed of different and convicting nationalities, 
unless certain definite pre-requisite conditions are at hand while there is still time to avail of them. 

The German- Austrian had very big ways of thinking. Accustomed to live in a great Empire, he had a 
keen sense of the obligations incumbent on him in such a situation. He was the only member of the 
Austrian State who looked beyond the borders of the narrow lands belonging to the Crown and took in 
all the frontiers of the Empire in the sweep of his mind. Indeed when destiny severed him from the 
common Fatherland he tried to master the tremendous task which was set before him as a 
consequence. This task was to maintain for the German-Austrians that patrimony which, through 
innumerable struggles, their ancestors had originally wrested from the East. It must be remembered 
that the German-Austrians could not put their undivided strength into this effort, because the hearts 
and minds of the best among them were constantly turning back towards their kinsfolk in the 
Motherland, so that only a fraction of their energy remained to be employed at home. 

The mental horizon of the German-Austrian was comparatively broad. His commercial interests 
comprised almost every section of the heterogeneous Empire. The conduct of almost all important 
undertakings was in his hands. He provided the State, for the most part, with its leading technical 
experts and civil servants. He was responsible for carrying on the foreign trade of the country, as far 
as that sphere of activity was not under Jewish control, The German- Austrian exclusively represented 
the political cement that held the State together. His military duties carried him far beyond the narrow 
frontiers of his homeland. Though the recruit might join a regiment made up of the German element, 
the regiment itself might be stationed in Herzegovina as well as in Vienna or Galicia. The officers in 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (3 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:28] 


the Habsburg armies were still Germans and so was the predominating element in the higher branches 
of the civil service. Art and science were in German hands. Apart from the new artistic trash, which 
might easily have been produced by a negro tribe, all genuine artistic inspiration came from the 
German section of the population. In music, architecture, sculpture and painting, Vienna abundantly 
supplied the entire Dual Monarchy. And the source never seemed to show signs of a possible 
exhaustion. Finally, it was the German element that determined the conduct of foreign policy, though 
a small number of Hungarians were also active in that field. 

All efforts, however, to save the unity of the State were doomed to end in failure, because the 
essential pre-requisites were missing. 

There was only one possible way to control and hold in check the centrifugal forces of the different 
and differing nationalities. This way was: to govern the Austrian State and organize it internally on 
the principle of centralization. In no other way imaginable could the existence of that State be assured. 

Now and again there were lucid intervals in the higher ruling quarters when this truth was recognized. 
But it was soon forgotten again, or else deliberately ignored, because of the difficulties to be 
overcome in putting it into practice. Every project which aimed at giving the Empire a more federal 
shape was bound to be ineffective because there was no strong central authority which could exercise 
sufficient power within the State to hold the federal elements together. It must be remembered in this 
connection that conditions in Austria were quite different from those which characterized the German 
State as founded by Bismarck. Germany was faced with only one difficulty, which was that of 
transforming the purely political traditions, because throughout the whole of Bismarcks Germany 
there was a common cultural basis. The German Empire contained only members of one and the same 
racial or national stock, with the exception of a few minor foreign fragments. 

Demographic conditions in Austria were quite the reverse. With the exception of Hungary there was 
no political tradition, coming down from a great past, in any of the various affiliated countries. If there 
had been, time had either wiped out all traces of it, or at least, rendered them obscure. Moreover, this 
was the epoch when the principle of nationality began to be in ascendant; and that phenomenon 
awakened the national instincts in the various countries affiliated under the Habsburg sceptre. It was 
difficult to control the action of these newly awakened national forces; because, adjacent to the 
frontiers of the Dual Monarchy, new national States were springing up whose people were of the same 
or kindred racial stock as the respective nationalities that constituted the Habsburg Empire. These new 
States were able to exercise a greater influence than the German element. 

Even Vienna could not hold out for a lengthy period in this conflict. When Budapest had developed 
into a metropolis a rival had grown up whose mission was, not to help in holding together the various 
divergent parts of the Empire, but rather to strengthen one part. Within a short time Prague followed 
the example of Budapest; and later on came Lemberg, Laibach and others. By raising these places 
which had formerly been provincial towns to the rank of national cities, rallying centres were 
provided for an independent cultural life. Through this the local national instincts acquired a spiritual 
foundation and therewith gained a more profound hold on the people. The time was bound to come 
when the particularist interests of those various countries would become stronger than their common 
imperial interests. Once that stage had been reached, Austrias doom was sealed. 

The course of this development was clearly perceptible since the death of Joseph II. Its rapidity 
depended on a number of factors, some of which had their source in the Monarchy itself; while others 
resulted from the position which the Empire had taken in foreign politics. 

It was impossible to make anything like a successful effort for the permanent consolidation of the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (4 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:28] 


Austrian State unless a firm and persistent policy of centralization were put into force. Before 
everything else the principle should have been adopted that only one common language could be used 
as the official language of the State. Thus it would be possible to emphasize the formal unity of that 
imperial commonwealth. And thus the administration would have in its hands a technical instrument 
without which the State could not endure as a political unity. In the same way the school and other 
forms of education should have been used to inculcate a feeling of common citizenship. Such an 
objective could not be reached within ten or twenty years. The effort would have to be envisaged in 
terms of centuries; just as in all problems of colonization, steady perseverance is a far more important 
element than the output of energetic effort at the moment. 

It goes without saying that in such circumstances the country must be governed and administered by 
strictly adhering to the principle of uniformity. 

For me it was quite instructive to discover why this did not take place, or rather why it was not done. 
Those who were guilty of the omission must be held responsible for the break-up of the Habsburg 

More than any other State, the existence of the old Austria depended on a strong and capable 
Government. The Habsburg Empire lacked ethnical uniformity, which constitutes the fundamental 
basis of a national State and will preserve the existence of such a State even though the ruling power 
should be grossly inefficient. When a State is composed of a homogeneous population, the natural 
inertia of such a population will hold the Stage together and maintain its existence through 
astonishingly long periods of misgovernment and maladministration. It may often seem as if the 
principle of life had died out in such a body-politic; but a time comes when the apparent corpse rises 
up and displays before the world an astonishing manifestation of its indestructible vitality. 

But the situation is utterly different in a country where the population is not homogeneous, where 
there is no bond of common blood but only that of one ruling hand. Should the ruling hand show signs 
of weakness in such a State the result will not be to cause a kind of hibernation of the State but rather 
to awaken the individualist instincts which are slumbering in the ethnological groups. These instincts 
do not make themselves felt as long as these groups are dominated by a strong central will-to-govern. 
The danger which exists in these slumbering separatist instincts can be rendered more or less 
innocuous only through centuries of common education, common traditions and common interests. 
The younger such States are, the more their existence will depend on the ability and strength of the 
central government. If their foundation was due only to the work of a strong personality or a leader 
who is a man of genius, in many cases they will break up as soon as the founder disappears; because, 
though great, he stood alone. But even after centuries of a common education and experiences these 
separatist instincts I have spoken of are not always completely overcome. They may be only dormant 
and may suddenly awaken when the central government shows weakness and the force of a common 
education as well as the prestige of a common tradition prove unable to withstand the vital energies of 
separatist nationalities forging ahead towards the shaping of their own individual existence. 

The failure to see the truth of all this constituted what may be called the tragic crime of the Habsburg 

Only before the eyes of one Habsburg ruler, and that for the last time, did the hand of Destiny hold 
aloft the torch that threw light on the future of his country. But the torch was then extinguished for 

Joseph II, Roman Emperor of the German nation, was filled with a growing anxiety when he realized 
the fact that his House was removed to an outlying frontier of his Empire and that the time would 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (5 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:28] 


soon be at hand when it would be overturned and engulfed in the whirlpool caused by that Babylon of 
nationalities, unless something was done at the eleventh hour to overcome the dire consequences 
resulting from the negligence of his ancestors. With superhuman energy this Friend of Mankind 
made every possible effort to counteract the effects of the carelessness and thoughtlessness of his 
predecessors. Within one decade he strove to repair the damage that had been done through centuries. 
If Destiny had only granted him forty years for his labours, and if only two generations had carried on 
the work which he had started, the miracle might have been performed. But when he died, broken in 
body and spirit after ten years of rulership, his work sank with him into the grave and rests with him 
there in the Capucin Crypt, sleeping its eternal sleep, having never again showed signs of awakening. 

His successors had neither the ability nor the will-power necessary for the task they had to face. 

When the first signs of a new revolutionary epoch appeared in Europe they gradually scattered the fire 
throughout Austria. And when the fire began to glow steadily it was fed and fanned not by the social 
or political conditions but by forces that had their origin in the nationalist yearnings of the various 
ethnic groups. 

The European revolutionary movement of 1848 primarily took the form of a class conflict in almost 
every other country, but in Austria it took the form of a new racial struggle. In so far as the 
German- Austrians there forgot the origins of the movement, or perhaps had failed to recognize them 
at the start and consequently took part in the revolutionary uprising, they sealed their own fate. For 
they thus helped to awaken the spirit of Western Democracy which, within a short while, shattered the 
foundations of their own existence. 

The setting up of a representative parliamentary body, without insisting on the preliminary that only 
one language should be used in all public intercourse under the State, was the first great blow to the 
predominance of the German element in the Dual Monarchy. From that moment the State was also 
doomed to collapse sooner or later. All that followed was nothing but the historical liquidation of an 

To watch that process of progressive disintegration was a tragic and at the same time an instructive 
experience. The execution of historys decree was carried out in thousands of details. The fact that 
great numbers of people went about blindfolded amid the manifest signs of dissolution only proves 
that the gods had decreed the destruction of Austria. 

I do not wish to dwell on details because that would lie outside the scope of this book. I want to treat 
in detail only those events which are typical among the causes that lead to the decline of nations and 
States and which are therefore of importance to our present age. Moreover, the study of these events 
helped to furnish the basis of my own political outlook. 

Among the institutions which most clearly manifested unmistakable signs of decay, even to the 
weak-sighted Philistine, was that which, of all the institutions of State, ought to have been the most 
firmly founded I mean the Parliament, or the Reichsrat (Imperial Council) as it was called in Austria. 

The pattern for this corporate body was obviously that which existed in England, the land of classic 
democracy. The whole of that excellent organization was bodily transferred to Austria with as little 
alteration as possible. 

As the Austrian counterpart to the British two-chamber system a Chamber of Deputies and a House of 
Lords (Herrenhaus) were established in Vienna. The Houses themselves, considered as buildings were 
somewhat different. When Barry built his palaces, or, as we say the Houses of Parliament, on the 
shore of the Thames, he could look to the history of the British Empire for the inspiration of his work. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (6 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


In that history he found sufficient material to fill and decorate the 1,200 niches, brackets, and pillars 
of his magnificent edifice. His statues and paintings made the House of Lords and the House of 
Commons temples dedicated to the glory of the nation. 

There it was that Vienna encountered the first difficulty. When Hansen, the Danish architect, had 
completed the last gable of the marble palace in which the new body of popular representatives was to 
be housed he had to turn to the ancient classical world for subjects to fill out his decorative plan. This 
theatrical shrine of Western Democracy was adorned with the statues and portraits of Greek and 
Roman statesmen and philosophers. As if it were meant for a symbol of irony, the horses of the 
quadriga that surmounts the two Houses are pulling apart from one another towards all four quarters 
of the globe. There could be no better symbol for the kind of activity going on within the walls of that 
same building. 

The nationalities were opposed to any kind of glorification of Austrian history in the decoration of 
this building, insisting that such would constitute an offence to them and a provocation. Much the 
same happened in Germany, where the Reich-stag, built by Wallot, was not dedicated to the German 
people until the cannons were thundering in the World War. And then it was dedicated by an 

I was not yet twenty years of age when I first entered the Palace on the Franzens-ring to watch and 
listen in the Chamber of Deputies. That first experience aroused in me a profound feeling of 

I had always hated the Parliament, but not as an institution in itself. Quite the contrary. As one who 
cherished ideals of political freedom I could not even imagine any other form of government. In the 
light of my attitude towards the House of Habsburg I should then have considered it a crime against 
liberty and reason to think of any kind of dictatorship as a possible form of government. 

A certain admiration which I had for the British Parliament contributed towards the formation of this 
opinion. I became imbued with that feeling of admiration almost without my being conscious of the 
effect of it through so much reading of newspapers while I was yet quite young. I could not discard 
that admiration all in a moment. The dignified way in which the British House of Commons fulfilled 
its function impressed me greatly, thanks largely to the glowing terms in which the Austrian Press 
reported these events. I used to ask myself whether there could be any nobler form of government 
than self-government by the people. 

But these considerations furnished the very motives of my hostility to the Austrian Parliament. The 
form in which parliamentary government was here represented seemed unworthy of its great 
prototype. The following considerations also influenced my attitude: 

The fate of the German element in the Austrian State depended on its position in Parliament. Up to the 
time that universal suffrage by secret ballot was introduced the German representatives had a majority 
in the Parliament, though that majority was not a very substantial one. This situation gave cause for 
anxiety because the Social-Democratic fraction of the German element could not be relied upon when 
national questions were at stake. In matters that were of critical concern for the German element, the 
Social-Democrats always took up an anti-German stand because they were afraid of losing their 
followers among the other national groups. Already at that time before the introduction of universal 
suffrage the Social-Democratic Party could no longer be considered as a German Party. The 
introduction of universal suffrage put an end even to the purely numerical predominance of the 
German element. The way was now clear for the further de-Germanization of the Austrian State. 

The national instinct of self-preservation made it impossible for me to welcome a representative 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (7 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


system in which the German element was not really represented as such, but always betrayed by the 
Social-Democratic fraction. Yet all these, and many others, were defects which could not be attributed 
to the parliamentary system as such, but rather to the Austrian State in particular. I still believed that if 
the German majority could be restored in the representative body there would be no occasion to 
oppose such a system as long as the old Austrian State continued to exist. 

Such was my general attitude at the time when I first entered those sacred and contentious halls. For 
me they were sacred only because of the radiant beauty of that majestic edifice. A Greek wonder on 
German soil. 

But I soon became enraged by the hideous spectacle that met my eyes. Several hundred 
representatives were there to discuss a problem of great economical importance and each 
representative had the right to have his say. 

That experience of a day was enough to supply me with food for thought during several weeks 

The intellectual level of the debate was quite low. Some times the debaters did not make themselves 
intelligible at all. Several of those present did not speak German but only their Slav vernaculars or 
dialects. Thus I had the opportunity of hearing with my own ears what I had been hitherto acquainted 
with only through reading the newspapers. A turbulent mass of people, all gesticulating and bawling 
against one another, with a pathetic old man shaking his bell and making frantic efforts to call the 
House to a sense of its dignity by friendly appeals, exhortations, and grave warnings. 

I could not refrain from laughing. 

Several weeks later I paid a second visit. This time the House presented an entirely different picture, 
so much so that one could hardly recognize it as the same place. The hall was practically empty. They 
were sleeping in the other rooms below. Only a few deputies were in their places, yawning in each 
others faces. One was speechifying. A deputy speaker was in the chair. When he looked round it was 
quite plain that he felt bored. 

Then I began to reflect seriously on the whole thing. I went to the Parliament whenever I had any time 
to spare and watched the spectacle silently but attentively. I listened to the debates, as far as they 
could be understood, and I studied the more or less intelligent features of those elect representatives 
of the various nationalities which composed that motley State. Gradually I formed my own ideas 
about what I saw. 

A year of such quiet observation was sufficient to transform or completely destroy my former 
convictions as to the character of this parliamentary institution. I no longer opposed merely the 
perverted form which the principle of parliamentary representation had assumed in Austria. No. It had 
become impossible for me to accept the system in itself. Up to that time I had believed that the 
disastrous deficiencies of the Austrian Parliament were due to the lack of a German majority, but now 
I recognized that the institution itself was wrong in its very essence and form. 

A number of problems presented themselves before my mind. I studied more closely the democratic 
principle of decision by the majority vote, and I scrutinized no less carefully the intellectual and 
moral worth of the gentlemen who, as the chosen representatives of the nation, were entrusted with 
the task of making this institution function. 

Thus it happened that at one and the same time I came to know the institution itself and those of 
whom it was composed. And it was thus that, within the course of a few years, I came to form a clear 
and vivid picture of the average type of that most lightly worshipped phenomenon of our time the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (8 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


parliamentary deputy. The picture of him which I then formed became deeply engraved on my mind 
and I have never altered it since, at least as far as essentials go. 

Once again these object-lessons taken from real life saved me from getting firmly entangled by a 
theory which at first sight seems so alluring to many people, though that theory itself is a symptom of 
human decadence. 

Democracy, as practised in Western Europe to-day, is the fore-runner of Marxism. In fact, the latter 
would not be conceivable without the former. Democracy is the breeding-ground in which the bacilli 
of the Marxist world pest can grow and spread. By the introduction of parliamentarianism, democracy 
produced an abortion of filth and fire 6 \ the creative fire of which, however, seems to have died out. 

I am more than grateful to Fate that this problem came to my notice when I was still in Vienna; for if I 
had been in Germany at that time I might easily have found only a superficial solution. If I had been 
in Berlin when I first discovered what an illogical thing this institution is which we call Parliament, I 
might easily have gone to the other extreme and believed as many people believed, and apparently 
not without good reason that the salvation of the people and the Empire could be secured only by 
restrengthening the principle of imperial authority. Those who had this belief did not discern the 
tendencies of their time and were blind to the aspirations of the people. 

In Austria one could not be so easily misled. There it was impossible to fall from one error into 
another. If the Parliament were worthless, the Habsburgs were worse; or at least not in the slightest 
degree better. The problem was not solved by rejecting the parliamentary system. Immediately the 
question arose: What then? To repudiate and abolish the Vienna Parliament would have resulted in 
leaving all power in the hands of the Habsburgs. For me, especially, that idea was impossible. 

Since this problem was specially difficult in regard to Austria, I was forced while still quite young to 
go into the essentials of the whole question more thoroughly than I otherwise should have done. 

The aspect of the situation that first made the most striking impression on me and gave me grounds 
for serious reflection was the manifest lack of any individual responsibility in the representative body. 

The parliament passes some acts or decree which may have the most devastating consequences, yet 
nobody bears the responsibility for it. Nobody can be called to account. For surely one cannot say that 
a Cabinet discharges its responsibility when it retires after having brought about a catastrophe. Or can 
we say that the responsibility is fully discharged when a new coalition is formed or parliament 
dissolved? Can the principle of responsibility mean anything else than the responsibility of a definite 

Is it at all possible actually to call to account the leaders of a parliamentary government for any kind 
of action which originated in the wishes of the whole multitude of deputies and was carried out under 
their orders or sanction? Instead of developing constructive ideas and plans, does the business of a 
statesman consist in the art of making a whole pack of blockheads understand his projects? Is it his 
business to entreat and coach them so that they will grant him their generous consent? 

Is it an indispensable quality in a statesman that he should possess a gift of persuasion commensurate 
with the statesmans ability to conceive great political measures and carry them through into practice? 

Does it really prove that a statesman is incompetent if he should fail to win over a majority of votes to 
support his policy in an assembly which has been called together as the chance result of an electoral 
system that is not always honestly administered. 

Has there ever been a case where such an assembly has worthily appraised a great political concept 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (9 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


before that concept was put into practice and its greatness openly demonstrated through its success? 

In this world is not the creative act of the genius always a protest against the inertia of the mass? 

What shall the statesman do if he does not succeed in coaxing the parliamentary multitude to give its 
consent to his policy? Shall he purchase that consent for some sort of consideration? 

Or, when confronted with the obstinate stupidity of his fellow citizens, should he then refrain from 
pushing forward the measures which he deems to be of vital necessity to the life of the nation? Should 
he retire or remain in power? 

In such circumstances does not a man of character find himself face to face with an insoluble 
contradiction between his own political insight on the one hand and, on the other, his moral integrity, 
or, better still, his sense of honesty? 

Where can we draw the line between public duty and personal honour? 

Must not every genuine leader renounce the idea of degrading himself to the level of a political 

And, on the other hand, does not every jobber feel the itch to play politics, seeing that the final 
responsibility will never rest with him personally but with an anonymous mass which can never be 
called to account for their deeds? 

Must not our parliamentary principle of government by numerical majority necessarily lead to the 
destruction of the principle of leadership? 

Does anybody honestly believe that human progress originates in the composite brain of the majority 
and not in the brain of the individual personality? 

Or may it be presumed that for the future human civilization will be able to dispense with this as a 
condition of its existence? 

But may it not be that, to-day, more than ever before, the creative brain of the individual is 

The parliamentary principle of vesting legislative power in the decision of the majority rejects the 
authority of the individual and puts a numerical quota of anonymous heads in its place. In doing so it 
contradicts the aristrocratic principle, which is a fundamental law of nature; but, of course, we must 
remember that in this decadent era of ours the aristrocratic principle need not be thought of as 
incorporated in the upper ten thousand. 

The devastating influence of this parliamentary institution might not easily be recognized by those 
who read the Jewish Press, unless the reader has learned how to think independently and examine the 
facts for himself. This institution is primarily responsible for the crowded inrush of mediocre people 
into the field of politics. Confronted with such a phenomenon, a man who is endowed with real 
qualities of leadership will be tempted to refrain from taking part in political life; because under these 
circumstances the situation does not call for a man who has a capacity for constructive statesmanship 
but rather for a man who is capable of bargaining for the favour of the majority. Thus the situation 
will appeal to small minds and will attract them accordingly. 

The narrower the mental outlook and the more meagre the amount of knowledge in a political jobber, 
the more accurate is his estimate of his own political stock, and thus he will be all the more inclined to 
appreciate a system which does not demand creative genius or even high-class talent; but rather that 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (10 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


crafty kind of sagacity which makes an efficient town clerk. Indeed, he values this kind of small 
craftiness more than the political genius of a Pericles. Such a mediocrity does not even have to worry 
about responsibility for what he does. From the beginning he knows that whatever be the results of his 
statesmanship his end is already prescribed by the stars; he will one day have to clear out and make 
room for another who is of similar mental calibre. For it is another sign of our decadent times that the 
number of eminent statesmen grows according as the calibre of individual personality dwindles. That 
calibre will become smaller and smaller the more the individual politician has to depend upon 
parliamentary majorities. A man of real political ability will refuse to be the beadle for a bevy of 
footling cacklers; and they in their turn, being the representatives of the majority which means the 
dunder-headed multitude hate nothing so much as a superior brain. 

For footling deputies it is always quite a consolation to be led by a person whose intellectual stature is 
on a level with their own. Thus each one may have the opportunity to shine in debate among such 
compeers and, above all, each one feels that he may one day rise to the top. If Peter be boss to-day, 
then why not Paul tomorrow ? 

This new invention of democracy is very closely connected with a peculiar phenomenon which has 
recently spread to a pernicious extent, namely the cowardice of a large section of our so-called 
political leaders. Whenever important decisions have to be made they always find themselves 
fortunate in being able to hide behind the backs of what they call the majority. 

In observing one of these political manipulators one notices how he wheedles the majority in order to 
get their sanction for whatever action he takes. He has to have accomplices in order to be able to shift 
responsibility to other shoulders whenever it is opportune to do so. That is the main reason why this 
kind of political activity is abhorrent to men of character and courage, while at the same time it 
attracts inferior types; for a person who is not willing to accept responsibility for his own actions, but 
is always seeking to be covered by something, must be classed among the knaves and the rascals. If a 
national leader should come from that lower class of politicians the evil consequences will soon 
manifest themselves. Nobody will then have the courage to take a decisive step. They will submit to 
abuse and defamation rather than pluck up courage to take a definite stand. And thus nobody is left 
who is willing to risk his position and his career, if needs be, in support of a determined line of policy. 

One truth which must always be borne in mind is that the majority can never replace the man. The 
majority represents not only ignorance but also cowardice. And just as a hundred blockheads do not 
equal one man of wisdom, so a hundred poltroons are incapable of any political line of action that 
requires moral strength and fortitude. 

The lighter the burden of responsibility on each individual leader, the greater will be the number of 
those who, in spite of their sorry mediocrity, will feel the call to place their immortal energies at the 
disposal of the nation. They are so much on the tip-toe of expectation that they find it hard to wait 
their turn. They stand in a long queue, painfully and sadly counting the number of those ahead of them 
and calculating the hours until they may eventually come forward. They watch every change that 
takes place in the personnel of the office towards which their hopes are directed, and they are grateful 
for every scandal which removes one of the aspirants waiting ahead of them in the queue. If 
somebody sticks too long to his office stool they consider this as almost a breach of a sacred 
understanding based on their mutual solidarity. They grow furious and give no peace until that 
inconsiderate person is finally driven out and forced to hand over his cosy berth for public disposal. 
After that he will have little chance of getting another opportunity. Usually those placemen who have 
been forced to give up their posts push themselves again into the waiting queue unless they are 
hounded away by the protestations of the other aspirants. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (11 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


The result of all this is that, in such a State, the succession of sudden changes in public positions and 
public offices has a very disquieting effect in general, which may easily lead to disaster when an 
adverse crisis arises. It is not only the ignorant and the incompetent person who may fall victim to 
those parliamentary conditions, for the genuine leader may be affected just as much as the others, if 
not more so, whenever Fate has chanced to place a capable man in the position of leader. Let the 
superior quality of such a leader be once recognized and the result will be that a joint front will be 
organized against him, particularly if that leader, though not coming from their ranks, should fall into 
the habit of intermingling with these illustrious nincompoops on their own level. They want to have 
only their own company and will quickly take a hostile attitude towards any man who might show 
himself obviously above and beyond them when he mingles in their ranks. Their instinct, which is so 
blind in other directions, is very sharp in this particular. 

The inevitable result is that the intellectual level of the ruling class sinks steadily. One can easily 
forecast how much the nation and State are bound to suffer from such a condition of affairs, provided 
one does not belong to that same class of leaders. 

The parliamentary regime in the old Austria was the very archetype of the institution as I have 
described it. 

Though the Austrian Prime Minister was appointed by the King-Emperor, this act of appointment 
merely gave practical effect to the will of the parliament. The huckstering and bargaining that went on 
in regard to every ministerial position showed all the typical marks of Western Democracy. The 
results that followed were in keeping with the principles applied. The intervals between the 
replacement of one person by another gradually became shorter, finally ending up in a wild relay 
chase. With each change the quality of the statesman in question deteriorated, until finally only the 
petty type of political huckster remained. In such people the qualities of statesmanship were measured 
and valued according to the adroitness with which they pieced together one coalition after another; in 
other words, their craftiness in manipulating the pettiest political transactions, which is the only kind 
of practical activity suited to the aptitudes of these representatives. 

In this sphere Vienna was the school which offered the most impressive examples. 

Another feature that engaged my attention quite as much as the features I have already spoken of was 
the contrast between the talents and knowledge of these representatives of the people on the one hand 
and, on the other, the nature of the tasks they had to face. Willingly or unwillingly, one could not help 
thinking seriously of the narrow intellectual outlook of these chosen representatives of the various 
constituent nationalities, and one could not avoid pondering on the methods through which these 
noble figures in our public life were first discovered. 

It was worth while to make a thorough study and examination of the way in which the real talents of 
these gentlemen were devoted to the service of their country; in other words, to analyse thoroughly 
the technical procedure of their activities. 

The whole spectacle of parliamentary life became more and more desolate the more one penetrated 
into its intimate structure and studied the persons and principles of the system in a spirit of ruthless 
objectivity. Indeed, it is very necessary to be strictly objective in the study of the institution whose 
sponsors talk of objectivity in every other sentence as the only fair basis of examination and 
judgment. If one studied these gentlemen and the laws of their strenuous existence the results were 

There is no other principle which turns out to be quite so ill-conceived as the parliamentary principle, 
if we examine it objectively. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (12 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


In our examination of it we may pass over the methods according to which the election of the 
representatives takes place, as well as the ways which bring them into office and bestow new titles on 
them. It is quite evident that only to a tiny degree are public wishes or public necessities satisfied by 
the manner in which an election takes place; for everybody who properly estimates the political 
intelligence of the masses can easily see that this is not sufficiently developed to enable them to form 
general political judgments on their own account, or to select the men who might be competent to 
carry out their ideas in practice. 

Whatever definition we may give of the term public opinion, only a very small part of it originates 
from personal experience or individual insight. The greater portion of it results from the manner in 
which public matters have been presented to the people through an overwhelmingly impressive and 
persistent system of information. 

In the religious sphere the profession of a denominational belief is largely the result of education, 
while the religious yearning itself slumbers in the soul; so too the political opinions of the masses are 
the final result of influences systematically operating on human sentiment and intelligence in virtue of 
a method which is applied sometimes with almost-incredible thoroughness and perseverance. 

By far the most effective branch of political education, which in this connection is best expressed by 
the word propaganda, is carried on by the Press. The Press is the chief means employed in the 
process of political enlightenment. It represents a kind of school for adults. This educational activity, 
however, is not in the hands of the State but in the clutches of powers which are partly of a very 
inferior character. While still a young man in Vienna I had excellent opportunities for coming to know 
the men who owned this machine for mass instruction, as well as those who supplied it with the ideas 
it distributed. At first I was quite surprised when I realized how little time was necessary for this 
dangerous Great Power within the State to produce a certain belief among the public; and in doing so 
the genuine will and convictions of the public were often completely misconstrued. It took the Press 
only a few days to transform some ridiculously trivial matter into an issue of national importance, 
while vital problems were completely ignored or filched and hidden away from public attention. 

The Press succeeded in the magical art of producing names from nowhere within the course of a few 
weeks. They made it appear that the great hopes of the masses were bound up with those names. And 
so they made those names more popular than any man of real ability could ever hope to be in a long 
lifetime. All this was done, despite the fact that such names were utterly unknown and indeed had 
never been heard of even up to a month before the Press publicly emblazoned them. At the same time 
old and tried figures in the political and other spheres of life quickly faded from the public memory 
and were forgotten as if they were dead, though still healthy and in the enjoyment of their full 
viguour. Or sometimes such men were so vilely abused that it looked as if their names would soon 
stand as permanent symbols of the worst kind of baseness. In order to estimate properly the really 
pernicious influence which the Press can exercise one had to study this infamous Jewish method 
whereby honourable and decent people were besmirched with mud and filth, in the form of low abuse 
and slander, from hundreds and hundreds of quarters simultaneously, as if commanded by some magic 

These highway robbers would grab at anything which might serve their evil ends. 

They would poke their noses into the most intimate family affairs and would not rest until they had 
sniffed out some petty item which could be used to destroy the reputation of their victim. But if the 
result of all this sniffing should be that nothing derogatory was discovered in the private or public life 
of the victim, they continued to hurl abuse at him, in the belief that some of their animadversions 
would stick even though refuted a thousand times. In most cases it finally turned out impossible for 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (13 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


the victim to continue his defence, because the accuser worked together with so many accomplices 
that his slanders were re-echoed interminably. But these slanderers would never own that they were 
acting from motives which influence the common run of humanity or are understood by them. Oh, no. 
The scoundrel who defamed his contemporaries in this villainous way would crown himself with a 
halo of heroic probity fashioned of unctuous phraseology and twaddle about his duties as a journalist 
and other mouldy nonsense of that kind. When these cuttle-fishes gathered together in large shoals at 
meetings and congresses they would give out a lot of slimy talk about a special kind of honour which 
they called the professional honour of the journalist. Then the assembled species would bow their 
respects to one another. 

These are the kind of beings that fabricate more than two-thirds of what is called public opinion, from 
the foam of which the parliamentary Aphrodite eventually arises. 

Several volumes would be needed if one were to give an adequate account of the whole procedure and 
fully describe all its hollow fallacies. But if we pass over the details and look at the product itself 
while it is in operation I think this alone will be sufficient to open the eyes of even the most innocent 
and credulous person, so that he may recognize the absurdity of this institution by looking at it 

In order to realize how this human aberration is as harmful as it is absurd, the test and easiest method 
is to compare democratic parliamentarianism with a genuine German democracy. 

The remarkable characteristic of the parliamentary form of democracy is the fact that a number of 
persons, let us say five hundred including, in recent time, women also are elected to parliament and 
invested with authority to give final judgment on anything and everything. In practice they alone are 
the governing body; for although they may appoint a Cabinet, which seems outwardly to direct the 
affairs of state, this Cabinet has not a real existence of its own. In reality the so-called Government 
cannot do anything against the will of the assembly. It can never be called to account for anything, 
since the right of decision is not vested in the Cabinet but in the parliamentary majority. The Cabinet 
always functions only as the executor of the will of the majority. Its political ability can be judged 
only according to how far it succeeds in adjusting itself to the will of the majority or in persuading the 
majority to agree to its proposals. But this means that it must descend from the level of a real 
governing power to that of a mendicant who has to beg the approval of a majority that may be got 
together for the time being. Indeed, the chief preoccupation of the Cabinet must be to secure for itself, 
in the case of each individual measure, the favour of the majority then in power or, failing that, to 
form a new majority that will be more favourably disposed. If it should succeed in either of these 
efforts it may go on governing for a little while. If it should fail to win or form a majority it must 
retire. The question whether its policy as such has been right or wrong does not matter at all. 

Thereby all responsibility is abolished in practice. To what consequences such a state of affairs can 
lead may easily be understood from the following simple considerations: 

Those five hundred deputies who have been elected by the people come from various dissimilar 
callings in life and show very varying degrees of political capacity, with the result that the whole 
combination is disjointed and sometimes presents quite a sorry picture. Surely nobody believes that 
these chosen representatives of the nation are the choice spirits or first-class intellects. Nobody, I 
hope, is foolish enough to pretend that hundreds of statesmen can emerge from papers placed in the 
ballot box by electors who are anything else but averagely intelligent. The absurd notion that men of 
genius are born out of universal suffrage cannot be too strongly repudiated. In the first place, those 
times may be really called blessed when one genuine statesman makes his appearance among a 
people. Such statesmen do not appear all at once in hundreds or more. Secondly, among the broad 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (14 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


masses there is instinctively a definite antipathy towards every outstanding genius. There is a better 
chance of seeing a camel pass through the eye of a needle than of seeing a really great man 
discovered through an election. 

Whatever has happened in history above the level of the average of the broad public has mostly been 
due to the driving force of an individual personality. 

But here five hundred persons of less than modest intellectual qualities pass judgment on the most 
important problems affecting the nation. They form governments which in turn learn to win the 
approval of the illustrious assembly for every legislative step that may be taken, which means that the 
policy to be carried out is actually the policy of the five hundred. 

And indeed, generally speaking, the policy bears the stamp of its origin. 

But let us pass over the intellectual qualities of these representatives and ask what is the nature of the 
task set before them. If we consider the fact that the problems which have to be discussed and solved 
belong to the most varied and diverse fields we can very well realize how inefficient a governing 
system must be which entrusts the right of decision to a mass assembly in which only very few 
possess the knowledge and experience such as would qualify them to deal with the matters that have 
to be settled. The most important economic measures are submitted to a tribunal in which not more 
than one-tenth of the members have studied the elements of economics. This means that final 
authority is vested in men who are utterly devoid of any preparatory training which might make them 
competent to decide on the questions at issue. 

The same holds true of every other problem. It is always a majority of ignorant and incompetent 
people who decide on each measure; for the composition of the institution does not vary, while the 
problems to be dealt with come from the most varied spheres of public life. An intelligent judgment 
would be possible only if different deputies had the authority to deal with different issues. It is out of 
the question to think that the same people are fitted to decide on transport questions as well as, let us 
say, on questions of foreign policy, unless each of them be a universal genius. But scarcely more than 
one genius appears in a century. Here we are scarcely ever dealing with real brains, but only with 
dilettanti who are as narrow-minded as they are conceited and arrogant, intellectual demi-mondes of 
the worst kind. This is why these honourable gentlemen show such astonishing levity in discussing 
and deciding on matters that would demand the most painstaking consideration even from great 
minds. Measures of momentous importance for the future existence of the State are framed and 
discussed in an atmosphere more suited to the card-table. Indeed the latter suggests a much more 
fitting occupation for these gentlemen than that of deciding the destinies of a people. 

Of course it would be unfair to assume that each member in such a parliament was endowed by nature 
with such a small sense of responsibility. That is out of the question. 

But this system, by forcing the individual to pass judgment on questions for which he is not competent 
gradually debases his moral character. Nobody will have the courage to say: "Gentlemen, I am afraid 
we know nothing about what we are talking about. I for one have no competency in the matter at all." 
Anyhow if such a declaration were made it would not change matters very much; for such outspoken 
honesty would not be understood. The person who made the declaration would be deemed an 
honourable ass who ought not to be allowed to spoil the game. Those who have a knowledge of 
human nature know that nobody likes to be considered a fool among his associates; and in certain 
circles honesty is taken as an index of stupidity. 

Thus it happens that a naturally upright man, once he finds himself elected to parliament, may 
eventually be induced by the force of circumstances to acquiesce in a general line of conduct which is 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (15 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


base in itself and amounts to a betrayal of the public trust. That feeling that if the individual refrained 
from taking part in a certain decision his attitude would not alter the situation in the least, destroys 
every real sense of honour which might occasionally arouse the conscience of one person or another. 
Finally, the otherwise upright deputy will succeed in persuading himself that he is by no means the 
worst of the lot and that by taking part in a certain line of action he may prevent something worse 
from happening. 

A counter argument may be put forward here. It may be said that of course the individual member 
may not have the knowledge which is requisite for the treatment of this or that question, yet his 
attitude towards it is taken on the advice of his Party as the guiding authority in each political matter; 
and it may further be said that the Party sets up special committees of experts who have even more 
than the requisite knowledge for dealing with the questions placed before them. 

At first sight, that argument seems sound. But then another question arises namely, why are five 
hundred persons elected if only a few have the wisdom which is required to deal with the more 
important problems? 

It is not the aim of our modern democratic parliamentary system to bring together an assembly of 
intelligent and well-informed deputies. Not at all. The aim rather is to bring together a group of 
nonentities who are dependent on others for their views and who can be all the more easily led, the 
narrower the mental outlook of each individual is. That is the only way in which a party policy, 
according to the evil meaning it has to-day, can be put into effect. And by this method alone it is 
possible for the wirepuller, who exercises the real control, to remain in the dark, so that personally he 
can never be brought to account for his actions. For under such circumstances none of the decisions 
taken, no matter how disastrous they may turn out for the nation as a whole, can be laid at the door of 
the individual whom everybody knows to be the evil genius responsible for the whole affair. All 
responsibility is shifted to the shoulders of the Party as a whole. 

In practice no actual responsibility remains. For responsibility arises only from personal duty and not 
from the obligations that rest with a parliamentary assembly of empty talkers. 

The parliamentary institution attracts people of the badger type, who do not like the open light. No 
upright man, who is ready to accept personal responsibility for his acts, will be attracted to such an 

That is the reason why this brand of democracy has become a tool in the hand of that race which, 
because of the inner purposes it wishes to attain, must shun the open light, as it has always done and 
always will do. Only a Jew can praise an institution which is as corrupt and false as himself. 

As a contrast to this kind of democracy we have the German democracy, which is a true democracy; 
for here the leader is freely chosen and is obliged to accept full responsibility for all his actions and 
omissions. The problems to be dealt with are not put to the vote of the majority; but they are decided 
upon by the individual, and as a guarantee of responsibility for those decisions he pledges all he has in 
the world and even his life. 

The objection may be raised here that under such conditions it would be very difficult to find a man 
who would be ready to devote himself to so fateful a task. The answer to that objection is as follows: 

We thank God that the inner spirit of our German democracy will of itself prevent the chance 
careerist, who may be intellectually worthless and a moral twister, from coming by devious ways to a 
position in which he may govern his fellow-citizens. The fear of undertaking such far-reaching 
responsibilities, under German democracy, will scare off the ignorant and the feckless. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (16 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


But should it happen that such a person might creep in surreptitiously it will be easy enough to 
identify him and apostrophize him ruthlessly, somewhat thus: "Be off, you scoundrel. Dont soil these 
steps with your feet; because these are the steps that lead to the portals of the Pantheon of History, and 
they are not meant for place-hunters but for men of noble character." 

Such were the views I formed after two years of attendance at the sessions of the Viennese 
Parliament. Then I went there no more. 

The parliamentary regime became one of the causes why the strength of the Habsburg State steadily 
declined during the last years of its existence. The more the predominance of the German element was 
whittled away through parliamentary procedure, the more prominent became the system of playing off 
one of the various constituent nationalities against the other. In the Imperial Parliament it was always 
the German element that suffered through the system, which meant that the results were detrimental to 
the Empire as a whole; for at the close of the century even the most simple-minded people could 
recognize that the cohesive forces within the Dual Monarchy no longer sufficed to counterbalance the 
separatist tendencies of the provincial nationalities. On the contrary! 

The measures which the State adopted for its own maintenance became more and more mean spirited 
and in a like degree the general disrespect for the State increased. Not only Hungary but also the 
various Slav provinces gradually ceased to identify themselves with the monarchy which embraced 
them all, and accordingly they did not feel its weakness as in any way detrimental to themselves. They 
rather welcomed those manifestations of senile decay. They looked forward to the final dissolution of 
the State, and not to its recovery. 

The complete collapse was still forestalled in Parliament by the humiliating concessions that were 
made to every kind of importunate demands, at the cost of the German element. Throughout the 
country the defence of the State rested on playing off the various nationalities against one another. But 
the general trend of this development was directed against the Germans. Especially since the right of 
succession to the throne conferred certain influence on the Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the policy of 
increasing the power of the Czechs was carried out systematically from the upper grades of the 
administration down to the lower. With all the means at his command the heir to the Dual Monarchy 
personally furthered the policy that aimed at eliminating the influence of the German element, or at 
least he acted as protector of that policy. By the use of State officials as tools, purely German districts 
were gradually but decisively brought within the danger zone of the mixed languages. Even in Lower 
Austria this process began to make headway with a constantly increasing tempo and Vienna was 
looked upon by the Czechs as their biggest city. 

In the family circle of this new Habsburger the Czech language was favoured. The wife of the 
Archduke had formerly been a Czech Countess and was wedded to the Prince by a morganatic 
marriage. She came from an environment where hostility to the Germans had been traditional. The 
leading idea in the mind of the Archduke was to establish a Slav State in Central Europe, which was 
to be constructed on a purely Catholic basis, so as to serve as a bulwark against Orthodox Russia. 

As had happened often in Habsburg history, religion was thus exploited to serve a purely political 
policy, and in this case a fatal policy, at least as far as German interests were concerned. The result 
was lamentable in many respects. 

Neither the House of Habsburg nor the Catholic Church received the reward which they expected. 
Habsburg lost the throne and the Church lost a great State. By employing religious motives in the 
service of politics, a spirit was aroused which the instigators of that policy had never thought possible. 

From the attempt to exterminate Germanism in the old monarchy by every available means arose the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (17 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


Pan-German Movement in Austria, as a response. 

In the eighties of the last century Manchester Liberalism, which was Jewish in its fundamental ideas, 
had reached the zenith of its influence in the Dual Monarchy, or had already passed that point. The 
reaction which set in did not arise from social but from nationalistic tendencies, as was always the 
case in the old Austria. The instinct of self-preservation drove the German element to defend itself 
energetically. Economic considerations only slowly began to gain an important influence; but they 
were of secondary concern. But of the general political chaos two party organizations emerged. The 
one was more of a national, and the other more of a social, character; but both were highly interesting 
and instructive for the future. 

After the war of 1866, which had resulted in the humiliation of Austria, the House of Habsburg 
contemplated a revanche on the battlefield. Only the tragic end of the Emperor Maximilian of Mexico 
prevented a still closer collaboration with France. The chief blame for Maximilians disastrous 
expedition was attributed to Napoleon III and the fact that the Frenchman left him in the lurch aroused 
a general feeling of indignation. Yet the Habsburgs were still lying in wait for their opportunity. If the 
war of 187071 had not been such a singular triumph, the Viennese Court might have chanced the 
game of blood in order to get its revenge for Sadowa. But when the first reports arrived from the 
Franco-German battlefield, which, though true, seemed miraculous and almost incredible, the most 
wise of all monarchs recognized that the moment was inopportune and tried to accept the 
unfavourable situation with as good a grace as possible. 

The heroic conflict of those two years (187071) produced a still greater miracle; for with the 
Habsburgs the change of attitude never came from an inner heartfelt urge but only from the pressure 
of circumstances. The German people of the East Mark, however, were entranced by the triumphant 
glory of the newly established German Empire and were profoundly moved when they saw the dream 
of their fathers resurgent in a magnificent reality. 

For let us make no mistake about it the true German- Austrian realized from this time onward, that 
Koniggratz was the tragic, though necessary, pre-condition for the re-establishment of an Empire 
which should no longer be burdened with the palsy of the old alliance and which indeed had no share 
in that morbid decay. Above all, the German- Austrian had come to feel in the very depths of his own 
being that the historical mission of the House of Habsburg had come to an end and that the new 
Empire could choose only an Emperor who was of heroic mould and was therefore worthy to wear the 
Crown of the Rhine. It was right and just that Destiny should be praised for having chosen a scion of 
that House of which Frederick the Great had in past times given the nation an elevated and 
resplendent symbol for all time to come. 

After the great war of 187071 the House of Habsburg set to work with all its determination to 
exterminate the dangerous German element about whose inner feelings and attitude there could be no 
doubt slowly but deliberately. I use the word exterminate, because that alone expresses what must 
have been the final result of the Slavophile policy. Then it was that the fire of rebellion blazed up 
among the people whose extermination had been decreed. That fire was such as had never been 
witnessed in modern German history. 

For the first time nationalists and patriots were transformed into rebels. 

Not rebels against the nation or the State as such but rebels against that form of government which 
they were convinced, would inevitably bring about the ruin of their own people. For the first time in 
modern history the traditional dynastic patriotism and national love of fatherland and people were in 
open conflict. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (18 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


It was to the merit of the Pan-German movement in Austria during the closing decade of the last 
century that it pointed out clearly and unequivocally that a State is entitled to demand respect and 
protection for its authority only when such authority is administered in accordance with the interests 
of the nation, or at least not in a manner detrimental to those interests. 

The authority of the State can never be an end in itself; for, if that were so, any kind of tyranny would 
be inviolable and sacred. 

If a government uses the instruments of power in its hands for the purpose of leading a people to ruin, 
then rebellion is not only the right but also the duty of every individual citizen. 

The question of whether and when such a situation exists cannot be answered by theoretical 
dissertations but only by the exercise of force, and it is success that decides the issue. 

Every government, even though it may be the worst possible and even though it may have betrayed 
the nations trust in thousands of ways, will claim that its duty is to uphold the authority of the State. 
Its adversaries, who are fighting for national self-preservation, must use the same weapons which the 
government uses if they are to prevail against such a rule and secure their own freedom and 
independence. Therefore the conflict will be fought out with legal means as long as the power which 
is to be overthrown uses them; but the insurgents will not hesitate to apply illegal means if the 
oppressor himself employs them. 

Generally speaking, we must not forget that the highest aim of human existence is not the 
maintenance of a State of Government but rather the conservation of the race. 

If the race is in danger of being oppressed or even exterminated the question of legality is only of 
secondary importance. The established power may in such a case employ only those means which are 
recognized as legal, yet the instinct of self-preservation on the part of the oppressed will always 
justify, to the highest degree, the employment of all possible resources. 

Only on the recognition of this principle was it possible for those struggles to be carried through, of 
which history furnishes magnificent examples in abundance, against foreign bondage or oppression at 

Human rights are above the rights of the State. But if a people be defeated in the struggle for its 
human rights this means that its weight has proved too light in the scale of Destiny to have the luck of 
being able to endure in this terrestrial world. 

The world is not there to be possessed by the faint-hearted races. 

Austria affords a very clear and striking example of how easy it is for tyranny to hide its head under 
the cloak of what is called legality. 

The legal exercise of power in the Habsburg State was then based on the anti-German attitude of the 
parliament, with its non-German majorities, and on the dynastic House, which was also hostile to the 
German element. The whole authority of the State was incorporated in these two factors. To attempt 
to alter the lot of the German element through these two factors would have been senseless. Those 
who advised the legal way as the only possible way, and also obedience to the State authority, could 
offer no resistance; because a policy of resistance could not have been put into effect through legal 
measures. To follow the advice of the legalist counsellors would have meant the inevitable ruin of the 
German element within the Monarchy, and this disaster would not have taken long to come. The 
German element has actually been saved only because the State as such collapsed. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (19 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


The spectacled theorist would have given his life for his doctrine rather than for his people. 

Because man has made laws he subsequently comes to think that he exists for the sake of the laws. 

A great service rendered by the pan-German movement then was that it abolished all such nonsense, 
though the doctrinaire theorists and other fetish worshippers were shocked. 

When the Habsburgs attempted to come to close quarters with the German element, by the 
employment of all the means of attack which they had at their command, the Pan-German Party hit 
out ruthlessly against the illustrious dynasty. This Party was the first to probe into and expose the 
corrupt condition of the State; and in doing so they opened the eyes of hundreds of thousands. To 
have liberated the high ideal of love for ones country from the embrace of this deplorable dynasty 
was one of the great services rendered by the Pan-German movement. 

When that Party first made its appearance it secured a large following indeed, the movement 
threatened to become almost an avalanche. But the first successes were not maintained. At the time I 
came to Vienna the pan-German Party had been eclipsed by the Christian-Socialist Party, which had 
come into power in the meantime. Indeed, the Pan-German Party had sunk to a level of almost 
complete insignificance. 

The rise and decline of the Pan-German movement on the one hand and the marvellous progress of 
the Christian-Socialist Party on the other, became a classic object of study for me, and as such they 
played an important part in the development of my own views. 

When I came to Vienna all my sympathies were exclusively with the Pan-German Movement. 

I was just as much impressed by the fact that they had the courage to shout Heil Hohenzollern as I 
rejoiced at their determination to consider themselves an integral part of the German Empire, from 
which they were separated only provisionally. They never missed an opportunity to explain their 
attitude in public, which raised my enthusiasm and confidence. To avow ones principles publicly on 
every problem that concerned Germanism, and never to make any compromises, seemed to me the 
only way of saving our people. What I could not understand was how this movement broke down so 
soon after such a magnificent start; and it was no less incomprehensible that the Christian-Socialists 
should gain such tremendous power within such a short time. They had just reached the pinnacle of 
their popularity. 

When I began to compare those two movements Fate placed before me the best means of 
understanding the causes of this puzzling problem. The action of Fate in this case was hastened by my 
own straitened circumstances. 

I shall begin my analysis with an account of the two men who must be regarded as the founders and 
leaders of the two movements. These were George von Schonerer and Dr. Karl Lueger. 

As far as personality goes, both were far above the level and stature of the so-called parliamentary 
figures. They lived lives of immaculate and irreproachable probity amidst the miasma of all-round 
political corruption. Personally I first liked the Pan-German representative, Schonerer, and it was only 
afterwards and gradually that I felt an equal liking for the Christian-Socialist leader. 

When I compared their respective abilities Schonerer seemed to me a better and more profound 
thinker on fundamental problems. He foresaw the inevitable downfall of the Austrian State more 
clearly and accurately than anyone else. If this warning in regard to the Habsburg Empire had been 
heeded in Germany the disastrous world war, which involved Germany against the whole of Europe, 
would never have taken place. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (20 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


But though Schonerer succeeded in penetrating to the essentials of a problem he was very often much 
mistaken in his judgment of men. 

And herein lay Dr. Luegers special talent. He had a rare gift of insight into human nature and he was 
very careful not to take men as something better than they were in reality. He based his plans on the 
practical possibilities which human life offered him, whereas Schonerer had only little discrimination 
in that respect. All ideas that this Pan-German had were right in the abstract, but he did not have the 
forcefulness or understanding necessary to put his ideas across to the broad masses. He was not able 
to formulate them so that they could be easily grasped by the masses, whose powers of 
comprehension are limited and will always remain so. Therefore all Schonerers knowledge was only 
the wisdom of a prophet and he never could succeed in having it put into practice. 

This lack of insight into human nature led him to form a wrong estimate of the forces behind certain 
movements and the inherent strength of old institutions. 

Schonerer indeed realized that the problems he had to deal with were in the nature of a 
Weltanschhauung; but he did not understand that only the broad masses of a nation can make such 
convictions prevail, which are almost of a religious nature. 

Unfortunately he understood only very imperfectly how feeble is the fighting spirit of the so-called 
bourgeoisie. That weakness is due to their business interests, which individuals are too much afraid of 
risking and which therefore deter them from taking action. And, generally speaking, a 
Weltanschhauung can have no prospect of success unless the broad masses declare themselves ready 
to act as its standard-bearers and to fight on its behalf wherever and to whatever extent that may be 

This failure to understand the importance of the lower strata of the population resulted in a very 
inadequate concept of the social problem. 

In all this Dr. Lueger was the opposite of Schonerer. His profound knowledge of human nature 
enabled him to form a correct estimate of the various social forces and it saved him from under-rating 
the power of existing institutions. And it was perhaps this very quality which enabled him to utilize 
those institutions as a means to serve the purposes of his policy. 

He saw only too clearly that, in our epoch, the political fighting power of the upper classes is quite 
insignificant and not at all capable of fighting for a great new movement until the triumph of that 
movement be secured. Thus he devoted the greatest part of his political activity to the task of winning 
over those sections of the population whose existence was in danger and fostering the militant spirit in 
them rather than attempting to paralyse it. He was also quick to adopt all available means for winning 
the support of long-established institutions, so as to be able to derive the greatest possible advantage 
for his movement from those old sources of power. 

Thus it was that, first of all, he chose as the social basis of his new Party that middle class which was 
threatened with extinction. In this way he secured a solid following which was willing to make great 
sacrifices and had good fighting stamina. His extremely wise attitude towards the Catholic Church 
rapidly won over the younger clergy in such large numbers that the old Clerical Party was forced to 
retire from the field of action or else, which was the wiser course, join the new Party, in the hope of 
gradually winning back one position after another. 

But it would be a serious injustice to the man if we were to regard this as his essential characteristic. 
For he possessed the qualities of an able tactician, and had the true genius of a great reformer; but all 
these were limited by his exact perception of the possibilities at hand and also of his own capabilities. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (21 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


The aims which this really eminent man decided to pursue were intensely practical. He wished to 
conquer Vienna, the heart of the Monarchy. It was from Vienna that the last pulses of life beat through 
the diseased and worn-out body of the decrepit Empire. If the heart could be made healthier the others 
parts of the body were bound to revive. That idea was correct in principle; but the time within which it 
could be applied in practice was strictly limited. And that was the mans weak point. 

His achievements as Burgomaster of the City of Vienna are immortal, in the best sense of the word. 
But all that could not save the Monarchy. It came too late. 

His rival, Schonerer, saw this more clearly. What Dr. Lueger undertook to put into practice turned out 
marvellously successful. But the results which he expected to follow these achievements did not 
come. Schonerer did not attain the ends he had proposed to himself; but his fears were realized, alas, 
in a terrible fashion. Thus both these men failed to attain their further objectives. Lueger could not 
save Austria and Schonerer could not prevent the downfall of the German people in Austria. 

To study the causes of failure in the case of these two parties is to learn a lesson that is highly 
instructive for our own epoch. This is specially useful for my friends, because in many points the 
circumstances of our own day are similar to those of that time. Therefore such a lesson may help us to 
guard against the mistakes which brought one of those movements to an end and rendered the other 
barren of results. 

In my opinion, the wreck of the Pan-German Movement in Austria must be attributed to three causes. 

The first of these consisted in the fact that the leaders did not have a clear concept of the importance 
of the social problem, particularly for a new movement which had an essentially revolutionary 
character. Schonerer and his followers directed their attention principally to the bourgeois classes. For 
that reason their movement was bound to turn out mediocre and tame. The German bourgeoisie, 
especially in its upper circles, is pacifist even to the point of complete self-abnegation though the 
individual may not be aware of this wherever the internal affairs of the nation or State are concerned. 
In good times, which in this case means times of good government, such a psychological attitude 
makes this social layer extraordinarily valuable to the State. But when there is a bad government, such 
a quality has a destructive effect. In order to assure the possibility of carrying through a really 
strenuous struggle, the Pan-German Movement should have devoted its efforts to winning over the 
masses. The failure to do this left the movement from the very beginning without the elementary 
impulse which such a wave needs if it is not to ebb within a short while. 

In failing to see the truth of this principle clearly at the very outset of the movement and in neglecting 
to put it into practice the new Party made an initial mistake which could not possibly be rectified 
afterwards. For the numerous moderate bourgeois elements admitted into the movements increasingly 
determined its internal orientation and thus forestalled all further prospects of gaining any appreciable 
support among the masses of the people. Under such conditions such a movement could not get 
beyond mere discussion and criticism. Quasi-religious faith and the spirit of sacrifice were not to be 
found in the movement any more. Their place was taken by the effort towards positive collaboration, 
which in this case meant the acknowledgment of the existing state of affairs, gradually whittling away 
the rough corners of the questions in dispute, and ending up with the making of a dishonourable 

Such was the fate of the Pan-German Movement, because at the start the leaders did not realize that 
the most important condition of success was that they should recruit their following from the broad 
masses of the people. The Movement thus became bourgeois and respectable and radical only in 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (22 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


From this failure resulted the second cause of its rapid decline. 

The position of the Germans in Austria was already desperate when Pan-Germanism arose. Year after 
year Parliament was being used more and more as an instrument for the gradual extinction of the 
German- Austrian population. The only hope for any eleventh-hour effort to save it lay in the 
overthrow of the parliamentary system; but there was very little prospect of this happening. 

Therewith the Pan-German Movement was confronted with a question of primary importance. 

To overthrow the Parliament, should the Pan-Germanists have entered it to undermine it from within, 
as the current phrase was? Or should they have assailed the institution as such from the outside? 

They entered the Parliament and came out defeated. But they had found themselves obliged to enter. 

For in order to wage an effective war against such a power from the outside, indomitable courage and 
a ready spirit of sacrifice were necessary weapons. In such cases the bull must be seized by the horns. 
Furious drives may bring the assailant to the ground again and again; but if he has a stout heart he will 
stand up, even though some bones may be broken, and only after a long and tough struggle will he 
achieve his triumph. New champions are attracted to a cause by the appeal of great sacrifices made for 
its sake, until that indomitable spirit is finally crowned with success. 

For such a result, however, the children of the people from the great masses are necessary. They alone 
have the requisite determination and tenacity to fight a sanguinary issue through to the end. But the 
Pan-German Movement did not have these broad masses as its champions, and so no other means of 
solution could be tried out except that of entering Parliament. 

It would be a mistake to think that this decision resulted from a long series of internal hesitations of a 
moral kind, or that it was the outcome of careful calculation. No. They did not even think of another 
solution. Those who participated in this blunder were actuated by general considerations and vague 
notions as to what would be the significance and effect of taking part in such a special way in that 
institution which they had condemned on principle. In general they hoped that they would thus have 
the means of expounding their cause to the great masses of the people, because they would be able to 
speak before the forum of the whole nation. Also, it seemed reasonable to believe that by attacking 
the evil in the root they would be more effective than if the attack came from outside. They believed 
that, if protected by the immunity of Parliament, the position of the individual protagonists would be 
strengthened and that thus the force of their attacks would be enhanced. 

In reality everything turned out quite otherwise. 

The Forum before which the Pan-German representatives spoke had not grown greater, but had 
actually become smaller; for each spoke only to the circle that was ready to listen to him or could read 
the report of his speech in the newspapers. 

But the greater forum of immediate listeners is not the parliamentary auditorium: it is the large public 
meeting. For here alone will there be thousands of men who have come simply to hear what a speaker 
has to say, whereas in the parliamentary sittings only a few hundred are present; and for the most part 
these are there only to earn their daily allowance for attendance and not to be enlightened by the 
wisdom of one or other of the representatives of the people. 

The most important consideration is that the same public is always present and that this public does 
not wish to learn anything new; because, setting aside the question of its intelligence, it lacks even 
that modest quantum of will-power which is necessary for the effort of learning. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (23 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


Not one of the representatives of the people will pay homage to a superior truth and devote himself to 
its service. No. Not one of these gentry will act thus, except he has grounds for hoping that by such a 
conversion he may be able to retain the representation of his constituency in the coming legislature. 
Therefore, only when it becomes quite clear that the old party is likely to have a bad time of it at the 
forthcoming elections only then will those models of manly virtue set out in search of a new party or 
a new policy which may have better electoral prospects; but of course this change of position will be 
accompanied by a veritable deluge of high moral motives to justify it. And thus it always happens that 
when an existing Party has incurred such general disfavour among the public that it is threatened with 
the probability of a crushing defeat, then a great migration commences. The parliamentary rats leave 
the Party ship. 

All this happens not because the individuals in the case have become better informed on the questions 
at issue and have resolved to act accordingly. These changes of front are evidence only of that gift of 
clairvoyance which warns the parliamentary flea at the right moment and enables him to hop into 
another warm Party bed. 

To speak before such a forum signifies casting pearls before certain animals. 

Verily it does not repay the pains taken; for the result must always be negative. 

And that is actually what happened. The Pan-German representatives might have talked themselves 
hoarse, but to no effect whatsoever. 

The Press either ignored them totally or so mutilated their speeches that the logical consistency was 
destroyed or the meaning twisted round in such a way that the public got only a very wrong 
impression regarding the aims of the new movement. What the individual members said was not of 
importance. The important matter was what people read as coming from them. This consisted of mere 
extracts which had been torn out of the context of the speeches and gave an impression of incoherent 
nonsense, which indeed was purposely meant. Thus the only public before which they really spoke 
consisted merely of five hundred parliamentarians; and that says enough. 

The worst was the following: 

The Pan-German Movement could hope for success only if the leaders realized from the very first 
moment that here there was no question so much of a new Party as of a new Weltanschhauung. This 
alone could arouse the inner moral forces that were necessary for such a gigantic struggle. And for 
this struggle the leaders must be men of first-class brains and indomitable courage. If the struggle on 
behalf of a Weltanschhauung is not conducted by men of heroic spirit who are ready to sacrifice, 
everything, within a short while it will become impossible to find real fighting followers who are 
ready to lay down their lives for the cause. A man who fights only for his own existence has not much 
left over for the service of the community. 

In order to secure the conditions that are necessary for success, everybody concerned must be made to 
understand that the new movement looks to posterity for its honour and glory but that it has no 
recompense to offer to the present-day members. If a movement should offer a large number of 
positions and offices that are easily accessible the number of unworthy candidates admitted to 
membership will be constantly on the increase and eventually a day will come when there will be such 
a preponderance of political profiteers among the membership of a successful Party that the 
combatants who bore the brunt of the battle in the earlier stages of the movement can now scarcely 
recognize their own Party and may be ejected by the later arrivals as unwanted ballast. Therewith the 
movement will no longer have a mission to fulfil. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (24 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


Once the Pan-Germanists decided to collaborate with Parliament they were no longer leaders and 
combatants in a popular movement, but merely parliamentarians. Thus the Movement sank to the 
common political party level of the day and no longer had the strength to face a hostile fate and defy 
the risk of martyrdom. Instead of fighting, the Pan-German leaders fell into the habit of talking and 
negotiating. The new parliamentarians soon found that it was a more satisfactory, because less risky, 
way of fulfilling their task if they would defend the new Weltanschhauung with the spiritual weapon 
of parliamentary rhetoric rather than take up a fight in which they placed their lives in danger, the 
outcome of which also was uncertain and even at the best could offer no prospect of personal gain for 

When they had taken their seats in Parliament their adherents outside hoped and waited for miracles to 
happen. Naturally no such miracles happened or could happen. Whereupon the adherents of the 
movement soon grew impatient, because reports they read about their own deputies did not in the least 
come up to what had been expected when they voted for these deputies at the elections. The reason for 
this was not far to seek. It was due to the fact that an unfriendly Press refrained from giving a true 
account of what the Pan-German representatives of the people were actually doing. 

According as the new deputies got to like this mild form of revolutionary struggle in Parliament and 
in the provincial diets they gradually became reluctant to resume the more hazardous work of 
expounding the principles of the movement before the broad masses of the people. 

Mass meetings in public became more and more rare, though these are the only means of exercising a 
really effective influence on the people; because here the influence comes from direct personal contact 
and in this way the support of large sections of the people can be obtained. 

When the tables on which the speakers used to stand in the great beer-halls, addressing an assembly of 
thousands, were deserted for the parliamentary tribune and the speeches were no longer addressed to 
the people directly but to the so-called chosen representatives, the Pan-German Movement lost its 
popular character and in a little while degenerated to the level of a more or less serious club where 
problems of the day are discussed academically. 

The wrong impression created by the Press was no longer corrected by personal contact with the 
people through public meetings, whereby the individual representatives might have given a true 
account of their activities. The final result of this neglect was that the word Pan-German came to 
have an unpleasant sound in the ears of the masses. 

The knights of the pen and the literary snobs of to-day should be made to realize that the great 
transformations which have taken place in this world were never conducted by a goosequill. No. The 
task of the pen must always be that of presenting the theoretical concepts which motivate such 
changes. The force which has ever and always set in motion great historical avalanches of religious 
and political movements is the magic power of the spoken word. 

The broad masses of a population are more amenable to the appeal of rhetoric than to any other force. 
All great movements are popular movements. They are the volcanic eruptions of human passions and 
emotions, stirred into activity by the ruthless Goddess of Distress or by the torch of the spoken word 
cast into the midst of the people. In no case have great movements been set afoot by the syrupy 
effusions of aesthetic litterateurs and drawing-room heroes. 

The doom of a nation can be averted only by a storm of glowing passion; but only those who are 
passionate themselves can arouse passion in others. It is only through the capacity for passionate 
feeling that chosen leaders can wield the power of the word which, like hammer blows, will open the 
door to the hearts of the people. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (25 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


He who is not capable of passionate feeling and speech was never chosen by Providence to be the 
herald of its will. Therefore a writer should stick to his ink-bottle and busy himself with theoretical 
questions if he has the requisite ability and knowledge. He has not been born or chosen to be a leader. 

A movement which has great ends to achieve must carefully guard against the danger of losing 
contact with the masses of the people. Every problem encountered must be examined from this 
viewpoint first of all and the decision to be made must always be in harmony with this principle. 

The movement must avoid everything which might lessen or weaken its power of influencing the 
masses; not from demagogical motives but because of the simple fact that no great idea, no matter 
how sublime and exalted it may appear, can be realized in practice without the effective power which 
resides in the popular masses. Stern reality alone must mark the way to the goal. To be unwilling to 
walk the road of hardship means, only too often in this world, the total renunciation of our aims and 
purposes, whether that renunciation be consciously willed or not. 

The moment the Pan-German leaders, in virtue of their acceptance of the parliamentary principle, 
moved the centre of their activities away from the people and into Parliament, in that moment they 
sacrificed the future for the sake of a cheap momentary success. They chose the easier way in the 
struggle and in doing so rendered themselves unworthy of the final victory. 

While in Vienna I used to ponder seriously over these two questions, and I saw that the main reason 
for the collapse of the Pan-German Movement lay in the fact that these very questions were not 
rightly appreciated. To my mind at that time the Movement seemed chosen to take in its hands the 
leadership of the German element in Austria. 

These first two blunders which led to the downfall of the Pan-German Movement were very closely 
connected with one another. Faulty recognition of the inner driving forces that urge great movements 
forward led to an inadequate appreciation of the part which the broad masses play in bringing about 
such changes. The result was that too little attention was given to the social problem and that the 
attempts made by the movement to capture the minds of the lower classes were too few and too weak. 
Another result was the acceptance of the parliamentary policy, which had a similar effect in regard to 
the importance of the masses. 

If there had been a proper appreciation of the tremendous powers of endurance always shown by the 
masses in revolutionary movements a different attitude towards the social problem would have been 
taken, and also a different policy in the matter of propaganda. Then the centre of gravity of the 
movement would not have been transferred to the Parliament but would have remained in the 
workshops and in the streets. 

There was a third mistake, which also had its roots in the failure to understand the worth of the 
masses. The masses are first set in motion, along a definite direction, by men of superior talents; but 
then these masses once in motion are like a flywheel inasmuch as they sustain the momentum and 
steady balance of the offensive. 

The policy of the Pan-German leaders in deciding to carry through a difficult fight against the 
Catholic Church can be explained only by attributing it to an inadequate understanding of the spiritual 
character of the people. 

The reasons why the new Party engaged in a violent campaign against Rome were as follows: 

As soon as the House of Habsburg had definitely decided to transform Austria into a Slav State all 
sorts of means were adopted which seemed in any way serviceable for that purpose. The Habsburg 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (26 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


rulers had no scruples of conscience about exploiting even religious institutions in the service of this 
new State Idea. One of the many methods thus employed was the use of Czech parishes and their 
clergy as instruments for spreading Slav hegemony throughout Austria. This proceeding was carried 
out as follows: 

Parish priests of Czech nationality were appointed in purely German districts. Gradually but steadily 
pushing forward the interests of the Czech people before those of the Church, the parishes and their 
priests became generative cells in the process of de-Germanization. 

Unfortunately the German- Austrian clergy completely failed to counter this procedure. Not only were 
they incapable of taking a similar initiative on the German side, but they showed themselves unable to 
meet the Czech offensive with adequate resistance. The German element was accordingly pushed 
backwards, slowly but steadily, through the perversion of religious belief for political ends on the one 
side, and the Jack of proper resistance on the other side. Such were the tactics used in dealing with the 
smaller problems; but those used in dealing with the larger problems were not very different. 

The anti-German aims pursued by the Habsburgs, especially through the instrumentality of the higher 
clergy, did not meet with any vigorous resistance, while the clerical representatives of the German 
interests withdrew completely to the rear. The general impression created could not be other than that 
the Catholic clergy as such were grossly neglecting the rights of the German population. 

Therefore it looked as if the Catholic Church was not in sympathy with the German people but that it 
unjustly supported their adversaries. The root of the whole evil, especially according to Schonerers 
opinion, lay in the fact that the leadership of the Catholic Church was not in Germany, and that this 
fact alone was sufficient reason for the hostile attitude of the Church towards the demands of our 

The so-called cultural problem receded almost completely into the background, as was generally the 
case everywhere throughout Austria at that time. In assuming a hostile attitude towards the Catholic 
Church, the Pan-German leaders were influenced not so much by the Churchs position in questions of 
science but principally by the fact that the Church did not defend German rights, as it should have 
done, but always supported those who encroached on these rights, especially then Slavs. 

George Schonerer was not a man who did things by halves. He went into battle against the Church 
because he was convinced that this was the only way in which the German people could be saved. The 
Los-von-Rom (Away from Rome) Movement seemed the most formidable, but at the same time most 
difficult, method of attacking and destroying the adversarys citadel. Schonerer believed that if this 
movement could be carried through successfully the unfortunate division between the two great 
religious denominations in Germany would be wiped out and that the inner forces of the German 
Empire and Nation would be enormously enhanced by such a victory. 

But the premises as well as the conclusions in this case were both erroneous. 

It was undoubtedly true that the national powers of resistance, in everything concerning Germanism 
as such, were much weaker among the German Catholic clergy than among their non-German 
confreres, especially the Czechs. And only an ignorant person could be unaware of the fact that it 
scarcely ever entered the mind of the German clergy to take the offensive on behalf of German 

But at the same time everybody who is not blind to facts must admit that all this should be attributed 
to a characteristic under which we Germans have all been doomed to suffer. This characteristic shows 
itself in our objective way of regarding our own nationality, as if it were something that lay outside of 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (27 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


While the Czech priest adopted a subjective attitude towards his own people and only an objective 
attitude towards the Church, the German parish priest showed a subjective devotion to his Church and 
remained objective in regard to his nation. It is a phenomenon which, unfortunately for us, can be 
observed occurring in exactly the same way in thousands of other cases. 

It is by no means a peculiar inheritance from Catholicism; but it is something in us which does not 
take long to gnaw the vitals of almost every institution, especially institutions of State and those 
which have ideal aims. Take, for example, the attitude of our State officials in regard to the efforts 
made for bringing about a national resurgence and compare that attitude with the stand which the 
public officials of any other nation would have taken in such a case. Or is it to be believed that the 
military officers of any other country in the world would refuse to come forward on behalf of the 
national aspirations, but would rather hide behind the phrase Authority of the State, as has been the 
case in our country during the last five years and has even been deemed a meritorious attitude? Or let 
us take another example. In regard to the Jewish problem, do not the two Christian denominations 
take up a standpoint to-day which does not respond to the national exigencies or even the interests of 
religion? Consider the attitude of a Jewish Rabbi towards any question, even one of quite insignificant 
importance, concerning the Jews as a race, and compare his attitude with that of the majority of our 
clergy, whether Catholic or Protestant. 

We observe the same phenomenon wherever it is a matter of standing up for some abstract idea. 

Authority of the State, Democracy, Pacifism, International Solidarity, etc., all such notions 

become rigid, dogmatic concepts with us; and the more vital the general necessities of the nation, the 

more will they be judged exclusively in the light of those concepts. 

This unfortunate habit of looking at all national demands from the viewpoint of a pre-conceived 
notion makes it impossible for us to see the subjective side of a thing which objectively contradicts 
ones own doctrine. It finally leads to a complete reversion in the relation of means to an end. Any 
attempt at a national revival will be opposed if the preliminary condition of such a revival be that a 
bad and pernicious regime must first of all be overthrown; because such an action will be considered 
as a violation of the Authority of the State. In the eyes of those who take that standpoint, the 
Authority of the State is not a means which is there to serve an end but rather, to the mind of the 
dogmatic believer in objectivity, it is an end in itself; and he looks upon that as sufficient apology for 
his own miserable existence. Such people would raise an outcry, if, for instance, anyone should 
attempt to set up a dictatorship, even though the man responsible for it were Frederick the Great and 
even though the politicians for the time being, who constituted the parliamentary majority, were small 
and incompetent men or maybe even on a lower grade of inferiority; because to such sticklers for 
abstract principles the law of democracy is more sacred than the welfare of the nation. In accordance 
with his principles, one of these gentry will defend the worst kind of tyranny, though it may be 
leading a people to ruin, because it is the fleeting embodiment of the Authority of the State, and 
another will reject even a highly beneficent government if it should happen not to be in accord with 
his notion of democracy. 

In the same way our German pacifist will remain silent while the nation is groaning under an 
oppression which is being exercised by a sanguinary military power, when this state of affairs gives 
rise to active resistance; because such resistance means the employment of physical force, which is 
against the spirit of the pacifist associations. The German International Socialist may be rooked and 
plundered by his comrades in all the other countries of the world in the name of solidarity, but he 
responds with fraternal kindness and never thinks of trying to get his own back, or even of defending 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (28 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


himself. And why? Because he is a German. 

It may be unpleasant to dwell on such truths, but if something is to be changed we must start by 
diagnosing the disease. 

The phenomenon which I have just described also accounts for the feeble manner in which German 
interests are promoted and defended by a section of the clergy. 

Such conduct is not the manifestation of a malicious intent, nor is it the outcome of orders given from 
above, as we say; but such a lack of national grit and determination is due to defects in our 
educational system. For, instead of inculcating in the youth a lively sense of their German nationality, 
the aim of the educational system is to make the youth prostrate themselves in homage to the idea, as 
if the idea were an idol. 

The education which makes them the devotees of such abstract notions as Democracy, International 
Socialism, Pacifism, etc., is so hard-and-fast and exclusive and, operating as it does from within 
outwards, is so purely subjective that in forming their general picture of outside life as a whole they 
are fundamentally influenced by these a priori notions. But, on the other hand, the attitude towards 
their own German nationality has been very objective from youth upwards. The Pacifist in so far as 
he is a German who surrenders himself subjectively, body and soul, to the dictates of his dogmatic 
principles, will always first consider the objective right or wrong of a situation when danger threatens 
his own people, even though that danger be grave and unjustly wrought from outside. But he will 
never take his stand in the ranks of his own people and fight for and with them from the sheer instinct 
of self-preservation. 

Another example may further illustrate how far this applies to the different religious denominations. 
In so far as its origin and tradition are based on German ideals, Protestantism of itself defends those 
ideals better. But it fails the moment it is called upon to defend national interests which do not belong 
to the sphere of its ideals and traditional development, or which, for some reason or other, may be 
rejected by that sphere. 

Therefore Protestantism will always take its part in promoting German ideals as far as concerns moral 
integrity or national education, when the German spiritual being or language or spiritual freedom are 
to be defended: because these represent the principles on which Protestantism itself is grounded. But 
this same Protestantism violently opposes every attempt to rescue the nation from the clutches of its 
mortal enemy; because the Protestant attitude towards the Jews is more or less rigidly and 
dogmatically fixed. And yet this is the first problem which has to be solved, unless all attempts to 
bring about a German resurgence or to raise the level of the nations standing are doomed to turn out 
nonsensical and impossible. 

During my sojourn in Vienna I had ample leisure and opportunity to study this problem without 
allowing any prejudices to intervene; and in my daily intercourse with people I was able to establish 
the correctness of the opinion I formed by the test of thousands of instances. 

In this focus where the greatest varieties of nationality had converged it was quite clear and open to 
everybody to see that the German pacifist was always and exclusively the one who tried to consider 
the interests of his own nation objectively; but you could never find a Jew who took a similar attitude 
towards his own race. Furthermore, I found that only the German Socialist is international in the 
sense that he feels himself obliged not to demand justice for his own people in any other manner than 
by whining and wailing to his international comrades. Nobody could ever reproach Czechs or Poles or 
other nations with such conduct. In short, even at that time, already I recognized that this evil is only 
partly a result of the doctrines taught by Socialism, Pacifism, etc., but mainly the result of our totally 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (29 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


inadequate system of education, the defects of which are responsible for the lack of devotion to our 
own national ideals. 

Therefore the first theoretical argument advanced by the Pan-German leaders as the basis of their 
offensive against Catholicism was quite entenable. 

The only way to remedy the evil I have been speaking of is to train the Germans from youth upwards 
to an absolute recognition of the rights of their own people, instead of poisoning their minds, while 
they are still only children, with the virus of this curbed objectivity, even in matters concerning the 
very maintenance of our own existence. The result of this would be that the Catholic in Germany, just 
as in Ireland, Poland or France, will be a German first and foremost. But all this presupposes a radical 
change in the national government. 

The strongest proof in support of my contention is furnished by what took place at that historical 
juncture when our people were called for the last time before the tribunal of History to defend their 
own existence, in a life-or-death struggle. 

As long as there was no lack of leadership in the higher circles, the people fulfilled their duty and 
obligations to an overwhelming extent. Whether Protestant pastor or Catholic priest, each did his very 
utmost in helping our powers of resistance to hold out, not only in the trenches but also, and even 
more so, at home. During those years, and especially during the first outburst of enthusiasm, in both 
religious camps there was one undivided and sacred German Empire for whose preservation and 
future existence they all prayed to Heaven. 

The Pan-German Movement in Austria ought to have asked itself this one question: Is the 
maintenance of the German element in Austria possible or not, as long as that element remains within 
the fold of the Catholic Faith? If that question should have been answered in the affirmative, then the 
political Party should not have meddled in religious and denominational questions. But if the question 
had to be answered in the negative, then a religious reformation should have been started and not a 
political party movement. 

Anyone who believes that a religious reformation can be achieved through the agency of a political 
organization shows that he has no idea of the development of religious conceptions and doctrines of 
faith and how these are given practical effect by the Church. 

No man can serve two masters. And I hold that the foundation or overthrow of a religion has far 
greater consequences than the foundation or overthrow of a State, to say nothing of a Party. 

It is no argument to the contrary to say that the attacks were only defensive measures against attacks 
from the other side. 

Undoubtedly there have always been unscrupulous rogues who did not hesitate to degrade religion to 
the base uses of politics. Nearly always such a people had nothing else in their minds except to make a 
business of religions and politics. But on the other hand it would be wrong to hold religion itself, or a 
religious denomination, responsible for a number of rascals who exploit the Church for their own base 
interests just as they would exploit anything else in which they had a part. 

Nothing could be more to the taste of one of these parliamentary loungers and tricksters than to be 
able to find a scapegoat for his political sharp-practice after the event, of course. The moment 
religion or a religious denomination is attacked and made responsible for his personal misdeeds this 
shrewd fellow will raise a row at once and call the world to witness how justified he was in acting as 
he did, proclaiming that he and his eloquence alone have saved religion and the Church. The public, 
which is mostly stupid and has a very short memory, is not capable of recognizing the real instigator 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (30 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


of the quarrel in the midst of the turmoil that has been raised. Frequently it does not remember the 
beginning of the fight and so the rogue gets by with his stunt. 

A cunning fellow of that sort is quite well aware that his misdeeds have nothing to do with religion. 
And so he will laugh up his sleeve all the more heartily when his honest but artless adversary loses the 
game and, one day losing all faith in humanity, retires from the activities of public life. 

But from another viewpoint also it would be wrong to make religion, or the Church as such, 
responsible for the misdeeds of individuals. If one compares the magnitude of the organization, as it 
stands visible to every eye, with the average weakness of human nature we shall have to admit that the 
proportion of good to bad is more favourable here than anywhere else. Among the priests there may, 
of course, be some who use their sacred calling to further their political ambitions. There are clergy 
who unfortunately forget that in the political melee they ought to be the paladins of the more sublime 
truths and not the abettors of falsehood and slander. But for each one of these unworthy specimens we 
can find a thousand or more who fulfil their mission nobly as the trustworthy guardians of souls and 
who tower above the level of our corrupt epoch, as little islands above the seaswamp. 

I cannot condemn the Church as such, and I should feel quite as little justified in doing so if some 
depraved person in the robe of a priest commits some offence against the moral law. Nor should I for 
a moment think of blaming the Church if one of its innumerable members betrays and besmirches his 
compatriots, especially not in epochs when such conduct is quite common. We must not forget, 
particularly in our day, that for one such Ephialtes 7 ) there are a thousand whose hearts bleed in 
sympathy with their people during these years of misfortune and who, together with the best of our 
nation, yearn for the hour when fortune will smile on us again. 

If it be objected that here we are concerned not with the petty problems of everyday life but 
principally with fundamental truths and questions of dogma, the only way of answering that objection 
is to ask a question: 

Do you feel that Providence has called you to proclaim the Truth to the world? If so, then go and do it. 
But you ought to have the courage to do it directly and not use some political party as your 
mouthpiece; for in this way you shirk your vocation. In the place of something that now exists and is 
bad put something else that is better and will last into the future. 

If you lack the requisite courage or if you yourself do not know clearly what your better substitute 
ought to be, leave the whole thing alone. But, whatever happens, do not try to reach the goal by the 
roundabout way of a political party if you are not brave enough to fight with your visor lifted. 

Political parties have no right to meddle in religious questions except when these relate to something 
that is alien to the national well-being and thus calculated to undermine racial customs and morals. 

If some ecclesiastical dignitaries should misuse religious ceremonies or religious teaching to injure 
their own nation their opponents ought never to take the same road and fight them with the same 

To a political leader the religious teachings and practices of his people should be sacred and 
inviolable. Otherwise he should not be a statesman but a reformer, if he has the necessary qualities for 
such a mission. 

Any other line of conduct will lead to disaster, especially in Germany. 

In studying the Pan-German Movement and its conflict with Rome I was then firmly persuaded, and 
especially in the course of later years, that by their failure to understand the importance of the social 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (31 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


problem the Pan-Germanists lost the support of the broad masses, who are the indispensable 
combatants in such a movement. By entering Parliament the Pan-German leaders deprived themselves 
of the great driving force which resides in the masses and at the same time they laid on their own 
shoulders all the defects of the parliamentary institution. Their struggle against the Church made their 
position impossible in numerous circles of the lower and middle class, while at the same time it 
robbed them of innumerable high-class elements some of the best indeed that the nation possessed. 
The practical outcome of the Austrian Kulturkampf was negative. 

Although they succeeded in winning 100,000 members away from the Church, that did not do much 
harm to the latter. The Church did not really need to shed any tears over these lost sheep, for it lost 
only those who had for a long time ceased to belong to it in their inner hearts. The difference between 
this new reformation and the great Reformation was that in the historic epoch of the great 
Reformation some of the best members left the Church because of religious convictions, whereas in 
this new reformation only those left who had been indifferent before and who were now influenced by 
political considerations. From the political point of view alone the result was as ridiculous as it was 

Once again a political movement which had promised so much for the German nation collapsed, 
because it was not conducted in a spirit of unflinching adherence to naked reality, but lost itself in 
fields where it was bound to get broken up. 

The Pan-German Movement would never have made this mistake if it had properly understood the 
psyche of the broad masses. If the leaders had known that, for psychological reasons alone, it is not 
expedient to place two or more sets of adversaries before the masses since that leads to a complete 
splitting up of their fighting strength they would have concentrated the full and undivided force of 
their attack against a single adversary. Nothing in the policy of a political party is so fraught with 
danger as to allow its decisions to be directed by people who want to have their fingers in every pie 
though they do not know how to cook the simplest dish. 

But even though there is much that can really be said against the various religious denominations, 
political leaders must not forget that the experience of history teaches us that no purely political party 
in similar circumstances ever succeeded in bringing about a religious reformation. One does not study 
history for the purpose of forgetting or mistrusting its lessons afterwards, when the time comes to 
apply these lessons in practice. It would be a mistake to believe that in this particular case things were 
different, so that the eternal truths of history were no longer applicable. One learns history in order to 
be able to apply its lessons to the present time and whoever fails to do this cannot pretend to be a 
political leader. In reality he is quite a superficial person or, as is mostly the case, a conceited 
simpleton whose good intentions cannot make up for his incompetence in practical affairs. 

The art of leadership, as displayed by really great popular leaders in all ages, consists in consolidating 
the attention of the people against a single adversary and taking care that nothing will split up that 
attention into sections. The more the militant energies of the people are directed towards one objective 
the more will new recruits join the movement, attracted by the magnetism of its unified action, and 
thus the striking power will be all the more enhanced. The leader of genius must have the ability to 
make different opponents appear as if they belonged to the one category; for weak and wavering 
natures among a leaders following may easily begin to be dubious about the justice of their own 
cause if they have to face different enemies. 

As soon as the vacillating masses find themselves facing an opposition that is made up of different 
groups of enemies their sense of objectivity will be aroused and they will ask how is it that all the 
others can be in the wrong and they themselves, and their movement, alone in the right. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (32 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


Such a feeling would be the first step towards a paralysis of their fighting vigour. Where there are 
various enemies who are split up into divergent groups it will be necessary to block them all together 
as forming one solid front, so that the mass of followers in a popular movement may see only one 
common enemy against whom they have to fight. Such uniformity intensifies their belief in the justice 
of their own cause and strengthens their feeling of hostility towards the opponent. 

The Pan-German Movement was unsuccessful because the leaders did not grasp the significance of 
that truth. They saw the goal clearly and their intentions were right; but they took the wrong road. 
Their action may be compared to that of an Alpine climber who never loses sight of the peak he wants 
to reach, who has set out with the greatest determination and energy, but pays no attention to the road 
beneath his feet. With his eye always fixed firmly on the goal he does not think over or notice the 
nature of the ascent and finally he fails. 

The manner in which the great rival of the Pan-German Party set out to attain its goal was quite 
different. The way it took was well and shrewdly chosen; but it did not have a clear vision of the goal. 
In almost all the questions where the Pan-German Movement failed, the policy of the 
Christian-Socialist Party was correct and systematic. 

They assessed the importance of the masses correctly, and thus they gained the support of large 
numbers of the popular masses by emphasizing the social character of the Movement from the very 
start. By directing their appeal especially to the lower middle class and the artisans, they gained 
adherents who were faithful, persevering and self-sacrificing. The Christian-Socialist leaders took 
care to avoid all controversy with the institutions of religion and thus they secured the support of that 
mighty organization, the Catholic Church. Those leaders recognized the value of propaganda on a 
large scale and they were veritable virtuosos in working up the spiritual instincts of the broad masses 
of their adherents. 

The failure of this Party to carry into effect the dream of saving Austria from dissolution must be 
attributed to two main defects in the means they employed and also the lack of a clear perception of 
the ends they wished to reach. 

The anti-Semitism of the Christian-Socialists was based on religious instead of racial principles. The 
reason for this mistake gave rise to the second error also. 

The founders of the Christian-Socialist Party were of the opinion that they could not base their 
position on the racial principle if they wished to save Austria, because they felt that a general 
disintegration of the State might quickly result from the adoption of such a policy. In the opinion of 
the Party chiefs the situation in Vienna demanded that all factors which tended to estrange the 
nationalities from one another should be carefully avoided and that all factors making for unity should 
be encouraged. 

At that time Vienna was so honeycombed with foreign elements, especially the Czechs, that the 
greatest amount of tolerance was necessary if these elements were to be enlisted in the ranks of any 
party that was not anti-German on principle. If Austria was to be saved those elements were 
indispensable. And so attempts were made to win the support of the small traders, a great number of 
whom were Czechs, by combating the liberalism of the Manchester School; and they believed that by 
adopting this attitude they had found a slogan against Jewry which, because of its religious 
implications, would unite all the different nationalities which made up the population of the old 

It was obvious, however, that this kind of anti-Semitism did not upset the Jews very much, simply 
because it had a purely religious foundation. If the worst came to the worst a few drops of baptismal 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (33 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


water would settle the matter, hereupon the Jew could still carry on his business safely and at the same 
time retain his Jewish nationality. 

On such superficial grounds it was impossible to deal with the whole problem in an earnest and 
rational way. The consequence was that many people could not understand this kind of anti-Semitism 
and therefore refused to take part in it. 

The attractive force of the idea was thus restricted exclusively to narrow-minded circles, because the 
leaders failed to go beyond the mere emotional appeal and did not ground their position on a truly 
rational basis. The intellectuals were opposed to such a policy on principle. It looked more and more 
as if the whole movement was a new attempt to proselytize the Jews, or, on the other hand, as if it 
were merely organized from the wish to compete with other contemporary movements. Thus the 
struggle lost all traces of having been organized for a spiritual and sublime mission. Indeed, it seemed 
to some people and these were by no means worthless elements to be immoral and reprehensible. 
The movement failed to awaken a belief that here there was a problem of vital importance for the 
whole of humanity and on the solution of which the destiny of the whole Gentile world depended. 

Through this shilly-shally way of dealing with the problem the anti-Semitism of the 
Christian-Socialists turned out to be quite ineffective. 

It was anti-Semitic only in outward appearance. And this was worse than if it had made no pretences 
at all to anti-Semitism; for the pretence gave rise to a false sense of security among people who 
believed that the enemy had been taken by the ears; but, as a matter of fact, the people themselves 
were being led by the nose. 

The Jew readily adjusted himself to this form of anti-Semitism and found its continuance more 
profitable to him than its abolition would be. 

This whole movement led to great sacrifices being made for the sake of that State which was 
composed of many heterogeneous nationalities; but much greater sacrifices had to be made by the 
trustees of the German element. 

One did not dare to be nationalist, even in Vienna, lest the ground should fall away from under ones 
feet. It was hoped that the Habsburg State might be saved by a silent evasion of the nationalist 
question; but this policy led that State to ruin. The same policy also led to the collapse of Christian 
Socialism, for thus the Movement was deprived of the only source of energy from which a political 
party can draw the necessary driving force. 

During those years I carefully followed the two movements and observed how they developed, one 
because my heart was with it and the other because of my admiration for that remarkable man who 
then appeared to me as a bitter symbol of the whole German population in Austria. 

When the imposing funeral cortege of the dead Burgomaster wound its way from the City Hall 
towards the Ring Strasse I stood among the hundreds of thousands who watched the solemn 
procession pass by. As I stood there I felt deeply moved, and my instinct clearly told me that the work 
of this man was all in vain, because a sinister Fate was inexorably leading this State to its downfall. If 
Dr. Karl Lueger had lived in Germany he would have been ranked among the great leaders of our 
people. It was a misfortune for his work and for himseif that he had to live in this impossible State. 

When he died the fire had already been enkindled in the Balkans and was spreading month by month. 
Fate had been merciful in sparing him the sight of what, even to the last, he had hoped to prevent. 

I endeavoured to analyse the cause which rendered one of those movements futile and wrecked the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (34 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


progress of the other. The result of this investigation was the profound conviction that, apart from the 
inherent impossibility of consolidating the position of the State in the old Austria, the two parties 
made the following fatal mistake: 

The Pan-German Party was perfectly right in its fundamental ideas regarding the aim of the 
Movement, which was to bring about a German restoration, but it was unfortunate in its choice of 
means. It was nationalist, but unfortunately it paid too little heed to the social problem, and thus it 
failed to gain the support of the masses. Its anti- Jewish policy, however, was grounded on a correct 
perception of the significance of the racial problem and not on religious principles. But it was 
mistaken in its assessment of facts and adopted the wrong tactics when it made war against one of the 
religious denominations. 

The Christian-Socialist Movement had only a vague concept of a German revival as part of its object, 
but it was intelligent and fortunate in the choice of means to carry out its policy as a Party. The 
Christian-Socialists grasped the significance of the social question; but they adopted the wrong 
principles in their struggle against Jewry, and they utterly failed to appreciate the value of the national 
idea as a source of political energy. 

If the Christian-Socialist Party, together with its shrewd judgment in regard to the worth of the 
popular masses, had only judged rightly also on the importance of the racial problem which was 
properly grasped by the Pan-German Movement and if this party had been really nationalist; or if the 
Pan-German leaders, on the other hand, in addition to their correct judgment of the Jewish problem 
and of the national idea, had adopted the practical wisdom of the Christian-Socialist Party, and 
particularly their attitude towards Socialism then a movement would have developed which, in my 
opinion, might at that time have successfully altered the course of German destiny. 

If things did not turn out thus, the fault lay for the most part in the inherent nature of the Austrian 

I did not find my own convictions upheld by any party then in existence, and so I could not bring 
myself to enlist as a member in any of the existing organizations or even lend a hand in their struggle. 
Even at that time all those organizations seemed to me to be already jaded in their energies and were 
therefore incapable of bringing about a national revival of the German people in a really profound 
way, not merely outwardly. 

My inner aversion to the Habsburg State was increasing daily. 

The more I paid special attention to questions of foreign policy, the more the conviction grew upon 
me that this phantom State would surely bring misfortune on the Germans. I realized more and more 
that the destiny of the German nation could not be decisively influenced from here but only in the 
German Empire itself. And this was true not only in regard to general political questions but also and 
in no less a degree in regard to the whole sphere of cultural life. 

Here, also, in all matters affecting the national culture and art, the Austrian State showed all the signs 
of senile decrepitude, or at least it was ceasing to be of any consequence to the German nation, as far 
as these matters were concerned. This was especially true of its architecture. Modern architecture 
could not produce any great results in Austria because, since the building of the Ring Strasse at least 
in Vienna architectural activities had become insignificant when compared with the progressive 
plans which were being thought out in Germany. 

And so I came more and more to lead what may be called a twofold existence. Reason and reality 
forced me to continue my harsh apprenticeship in Austria, though I must now say that this 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (35 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


apprenticeship turned out fortunate in the end. But my heart was elsewhere. 

A feeling of discontent grew upon me and made me depressed the more I came to realize the inside 
hollowness of this State and the impossibility of saving it from collapse. At the same time I felt 
perfectly certain that it would bring all kinds of misfortune to the German people. 

I was convinced that the Habsburg State would balk and hinder every German who might show signs 
of real greatness, while at the same time it would aid and abet every non-German activity. 

This conglomerate spectacle of heterogeneous races which the capital of the Dual Monarchy 
presented, this motley of Czechs, Poles, Hungarians, Ruthenians, Serbs and Croats, etc., and always 
that bacillus which is the solvent of human society, the Jew, here and there and everywhere the 
whole spectacle was repugnant to me. The gigantic city seemed to be the incarnation of mongrel 

The German language, which I had spoken from the time of my boyhood, was the vernacular idiom of 
Lower Bavaria. I never forgot that particular style of speech, and I could never learn the Viennese 
dialect. The longer I lived in that city the stronger became my hatred for the promiscuous swarm of 
foreign peoples which had begun to batten on that old nursery ground of German culture. The idea 
that this State could maintain its further existence for any considerable time was quite absurd. 

Austria was then like a piece of ancient mosaic in which the cohesive cement had dried up and 
become old and friable. As long as such a work of art remains untouched it may hold together and 
continue to exist; but the moment some blow is struck on it then it breaks up into thousands of 
fragments. Therefore it was now only a question of when the blow would come. 

Because my heart was always with the German Empire and not with the Austrian Monarchy, the hour 
of Austrias dissolution as a State appeared to me only as the first step towards the emancipation of 
the German nation. 

All these considerations intensified my yearning to depart for that country for which my heart had 
been secretly longing since the days of my youth. 

I hoped that one day I might be able to make my mark as an architect and that I could devote my 
talents to the service of my country on a large or small scale, according to the will of Fate. 

A final reason was that I longed to be among those who lived and worked in that land from which the 
movement should be launched, the object of which would be the fulfilment of what my heart had 
always longed for, namely, the union of the country in which I was born with our common fatherland, 
the German Empire. 

There are many who may not understand how such a yearning can be so strong; but I appeal 
especially to two groups of people. The first includes all those who are still denied the happiness I 
have spoken of, and the second embraces those who once enjoyed that happiness but had it torn from 
them by a harsh fate. I turn to all those who have been torn from their motherland and who have to 
struggle for the preservation of their most sacred patrimony, their native language, persecuted and 
harried because of their loyalty and love for the homeland, yearning sadly for the hour when they will 
be allowed to return to the bosom of their fathers household. To these I address my words, and I 
know that they will understand. 

Only he who has experienced in his own inner life what it means to be German and yet to be denied 
the right of belonging to his fatherland can appreciate the profound nostalgia which that enforced 
exile causes. It is a perpetual heartache, and there is no place for joy and contentment until the doors 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (36 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 


of paternal home are thrown open and all those through whose veins kindred blood is flowing will 
find peace and rest in their common Reich. 

Vienna was a hard school for me; but it taught me the most profound lessons of my life. I was 
scarcely more than a boy when I came to live there, and when I left it I had grown to be a man of a 
grave and pensive nature. In Vienna I acquired the foundations of a Weltanschhauung in general and 
developed a faculty for analysing political questions in particular. That Weltanschhauung and the 
political ideas then formed have never been abandoned, though they were expanded later on in some 
directions. It is only now that I can fully appreciate how valuable those years of apprenticeship were 
for me. 

That is why I have given a detailed account of this period. There, in Vienna, stark reality taught me 
the truths that now form the fundamental principles of the Party which within the course of five years 
has grown from modest beginnings to a great mass movement. I do not know what my attitude 
towards Jewry, Social-Democracy, or rather Marxism in general, to the social problem, etc., would be 
to-day if I had not acquired a stock of personal beliefs at such an early age, by dint of hard study and 
under the duress of Fate. 

For, although the misfortunes of the Fatherland may have stimulated thousands and thousands to 
ponder over the inner causes of the collapse, that could not lead to such a thorough knowledge and 
deep insight as a man may develop who has fought a hard struggle for many years so that he might be 
master of his own fate. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap3.htm (37 of 37) [04/06/2000 16:08:29] 




At last I came to Munich, in the spring of 1912. 

The city itself was as familiar to me as if I had lived for years within its walls. 

This was because my studies in architecture had been constantly turning my attention to the 
metropolis of German art. One must know Munich if one would know Germany, and it is impossible 
to acquire a knowledge of German art without seeing Munich. 

All things considered, this pre-war sojourn was by far the happiest and most contented time of my 
life. My earnings were very slender; but after all I did not live for the sake of painting. I painted in 
order to get the bare necessities of existence while I continued my studies. I was firmly convinced that 
I should finally succeed in reaching the goal I had marked out for myself. And this conviction alone 
was strong enough to enable me to bear the petty hardships of everyday life without worrying very 
much about them. 

Moreover, almost from the very first moment of my sojourn there I came to love that city more than 
any other place known to me. A German city! I said to myself. How different to Vienna. It was with a 
feeling of disgust that my imagination reverted to that Babylon of races. Another pleasant feature here 
was the way the people spoke German, which was much nearer my own way of speaking than the 
Viennese idiom. The Munich idiom recalled the days of my youth, especially when I spoke with those 
who had come to Munich from Lower Bavaria. There were a thousand or more things which I 
inwardly loved or which I came to love during the course of my stay. But what attracted me most was 
the marvellous wedlock of native folk-energy with the fine artistic spirit of the city, that unique 
harmony from the Hofbrauhaus to the Odeon, from the October Festival to the Pinakothek, etc. The 
reason why my hearts strings are entwined around this city as around no other spot in this world is 
probably because Munich is and will remain inseparably connected with the development of my own 
career; and the fact that from the beginning of my visit I felt inwardly happy and contented is to be 
attributed to the charm of the marvellous Wittelsbach Capital, which has attracted probably everybody 
who is blessed with a feeling for beauty instead of commercial instincts. 

Apart from my professional work, I was most interested in the study of current political events, 
particularly those which were connected with foreign relations. I approached these by way of the 
German policy of alliances which, ever since my Austrian days, I had considered to be an utterly 
mistaken one. But in Vienna I had not yet seen quite clearly how far the German Empire had gone in 
the process of self-delusion. In Vienna I was inclined to assume, or probably I persuaded myself to do 
so in order to excuse the German mistake, that possibly the authorities in Berlin knew how weak and 
unreliable their ally would prove to be when brought face to face with realities, but that, for more or 
less mysterious reasons, they refrained from allowing their opinions on this point to be known in 
public. Their idea was that they should support the policy of alliances which Bismarck had initiated 
and the sudden discontinuance of which might be undesirable, if for no other reason than that it might 
arouse those foreign countries which were lying in wait for their chance or might alarm the Philistines 
at home. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (1 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:15] 


But my contact with the people soon taught me, to my horror, that my assumptions were wrong. I was 
amazed to find everywhere, even in circles otherwise well informed, that nobody had the slightest 
intimation of the real character of the Habsburg Monarchy. Among the common people in particular 
there was a prevalent illusion that the Austrian ally was a Power which would have to be seriously 
reckoned with and would rally its man-power in the hour of need. The mass of the people continued to 
look upon the Dual Monarchy as a German State and believed that it could be relied upon. They 
assumed that its strength could be measured by the millions of its subjects, as was the case in 
Germany. First of all, they did not realize that Austria had ceased to be a German State and, secondly, 
that the conditions prevailing within the Austrian Empire were steadily pushing it headlong to the 
brink of disaster. 

At that time I knew the condition of affairs in the Austrian State better than the professional 
diplomats. Blindfolded, as nearly always, these diplomats stumbled along on their way to disaster. 
The opinions prevailing among the bulk of the people reflected only what had been drummed into 
them from official quarters above. And these higher authorities grovelled before the Ally, as the 
people of old bowed down before the Golden Calf. They probably thought that by being polite and 
amiable they might balance the lack of honesty on the other side. Thus they took every declaration at 
its full face value. 

Even while in Vienna I used to be annoyed again and again by the discrepancy between the speeches 
of the official statesmen and the contents of the Viennese Press. And yet Vienna was still a German 
city, at least as far as appearances went. But one encountered an utterly different state of things on 
leaving Vienna, or rather German- Austria, and coming into the Slav provinces. It needed only a 
glance at the Prague newspapers in order to see how the whole exalted hocus-pocus of the Triple 
Alliance was judged from there. In Prague there was nothing but gibes and sneers for that masterpiece 
of statesmanship. Even in the piping times of peace, when the two emperors kissed each other on the 
brow in token of friendship, those papers did not cloak their belief that the alliance would be 
liquidated the moment a first attempt was made to bring it down from the shimmering glory of a 
Nibelungen ideal to the plane of practical affairs. 

Great indignation was aroused a few years later, when the alliances were put to the first practical test. 
Italy not only withdrew from the Triple Alliance, leaving the other two members to march by 
themselves, but she even joined their enemies. That anybody should believe even for a moment in the 
possibility of such a miracle as that of Italy fighting on the same side as Austria would be simply 
incredible to anyone who did not suffer from the blindness of official diplomacy. And that was just 
how people felt in Austria also. 

In Austria only the Habsburgs and the German- Austrians supported the alliance. The Habsburgs did 
so from shrewd calculation of their own interests and from necessity. The Germans did it out of good 
faith and political ignorance. They acted in good faith inasmuch as they believed that by establishing 
the Triple Alliance they were doing a great service to the German Empire and were thus helping to 
strengthen it and consolidate its defence. They showed their political ignorance, however, in holding 
such ideas, because, instead of helping the German Empire they really chained it to a moribund State 
which might bring its associate into the grave with itself; and, above all, by championing this alliance 
they fell more and more a prey to the Habsburg policy of de-Germanization. For the alliance gave the 
Habsburgs good grounds for believing that the German Empire would not interfere in their domestic 
affairs and thus they were in a position to carry into effect, with more ease and less risk, their 
domestic policy of gradually eliminating the German element. Not only could the objectiveness of 
the German Government be counted upon, and thus there need be no fear of protest from that quarter, 
but one could always remind the German- Austrians of the alliance and thus silence them in case they 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (2 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:15] 


should ever object to the reprehensible means that were being employed to establish a Slav hegemony 
in the Dual Monarchy. 

What could the German- Austrians do, when the people of the German Empire itself had openly 
proclaimed their trust and confidence in the Habsburg regime? 

Should they resist, and thus be branded openly before their kinsfolk in the Reich as traitors to their 
own national interests? They, who for so many decades had sacrificed so much for the sake of their 
German tradition! 

Once the influence of the Germans in Austria had been wiped out, what then would be the value of the 
alliance? If the Triple Alliance were to be advantageous to Germany, was it not a necessary condition 
that the predominance of the German element in Austria should be maintained? Or did anyone really 
believe that Germany could continue to be the ally of a Habsburg Empire under the hegemony of the 

The official attitude of German diplomacy, as well as that of the general public towards internal 
problems affecting the Austrian nationalities was not merely stupid, it was insane. On the alliance, as 
on a solid foundation, they grounded the security and future existence of a nation of seventy millions, 
while at the same time they allowed their partner to continue his policy of undermining the sole 
foundation of that alliance methodically and resolutely, from year to year. A day must come when 
nothing but a formal contract with Viennese diplomats would be left. The alliance itself, as an 
effective support, would be lost to Germany. 

As far as concerned Italy, such had been the case from the outset. 

If people in Germany had studied history and the psychology of nations a little more carefully not one 
of them could have believed for a single hour that the Quirinal and the Viennese Hofburg could ever 
stand shoulder to shoulder on a common battle front. Italy would have exploded like a volcano if any 
Italian government had dared to send a single Italian soldier to fight for the Habsburg State. So 
fanatically hated was this State that the Italians could stand in no other relation to it on a battle front 
except as enemies. More than once in Vienna I have witnessed explosions of the contempt and 
profound hatred which allied the Italian to the Austrian State. The crimes which the House of 
Habsburg committed against Italian freedom and independence during several centuries were too 
grave to be forgiven, even with the best of goodwill. But this goodwill did not exist, either among the 
rank and file of the population or in the government. Therefore for Italy there were only two ways of 
co-existing with Austria alliance or war. By choosing the first it was possible to prepare leisurely for 
the second. 

Especially since relations between Russia and Austria tended more and more towards the arbitrament 
of war, the German policy of alliances was as senseless as it was dangerous. Here was a classical 
instance which demonstrated the lack of any broad or logical lines of thought. 

But what was the reason for forming the alliance at all? It could not have been other than the wish to 
secure the future of the Reich better than if it were to depend exclusively on its own resources. But the 
future of the Reich could not have meant anything else than the problem of securing the means of 
existence for the German people. 

The only questions therefore were the following: What form shall the life of the nation assume in the 
near future that is to say within such a period as we can forecast? And by what means can the 
necessary foundation and security be guaranteed for this development within the framework of the 
general distribution of power among the European nations? A clear analysis of the principles on 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (3 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:15] 


which the foreign policy of German statecraft were to be based should have led to the following 

The annual increase of population in Germany amounts to almost 900,000 souls. The difficulties of 
providing for this army of new citizens must grow from year to year and must finally lead to a 
catastrophe, unless ways and means are found which will forestall the danger of misery and hunger. 
There were four ways of providing against this terrible calamity: 

(1) It was possible to adopt the French example and artificially restrict the number of births, thus 
avoiding an excess of population. 

Under certain circumstances, in periods of distress or under bad climatic condition, or if the soil yields 
too poor a return, Nature herself tends to check the increase of population in some countries and 
among some races, but by a method which is quite as ruthless as it is wise. It does not impede the 
procreative faculty as such; but it does impede the further existence of the offspring by submitting it 
to such tests and privations that everything which is less strong or less healthy is forced to retreat into 
the bosom of tile unknown. Whatever survives these hardships of existence has been tested and tried a 
thousandfold, hardened and renders fit to continue the process of procreation; so that the same 
thorough selection will begin all over again. By thus dealing brutally with the individual and recalling 
him the very moment he shows that he is not fitted for the trials of life, Nature preserves the strength 
of the race and the species and raises it to the highest degree of efficiency. 

The decrease in numbers therefore implies an increase of strength, as far as the individual is 
concerned, and this finally means the invigoration of the species. 

But the case is different when man himself starts the process of numerical restriction. Man is not 
carved from Natures wood. He is made of human material. He knows more than the ruthless Queen 
of Wisdom. He does not impede the preservation of the individual but prevents procreation itself. To 
the individual, who always sees only himself and not the race, this line of action seems more humane 
and just than the opposite way. But, unfortunately, the consequences are also the opposite. 

By leaving the process of procreation unchecked and by submitting the individual to the hardest 
preparatory tests in life, Nature selects the best from an abundance of single elements and stamps 
them as fit to live and carry on the conservation of the species. But man restricts the procreative 
faculty and strives obstinately to keep alive at any cost whatever has once been born. This correction 
of the Divine Will seems to him to be wise and humane, and he rejoices at having trumped Natures 
card in one game at least and thus proved that she is not entirely reliable. The dear little ape of an 
all-mighty father is delighted to see and hear that he has succeeded in effecting a numerical 
restriction; but he would be very displeased if told that this, his system, brings about a degeneration in 
personal quality. 

For as soon as the procreative faculty is thwarted and the number of births diminished, the natural 
struggle for existence which allows only healthy and strong individuals to survive is replaced by a 
sheer craze to save feeble and even diseased creatures at any cost. And thus the seeds are sown for a 
human progeny which will become more and more miserable from one generation to another, as long 
as Natures will is scorned. 

But if that policy be carried out the final results must be that such a nation will eventually terminate 
its own existence on this earth; for though man may defy the eternal laws of procreation during a 
certain period, vengeance will follow sooner or later. A stronger race will oust that which has grown 
weak; for the vital urge, in its ultimate form, will burst asunder all the absurd chains of this so-called 
humane consideration for the individual and will replace it with the humanity of Nature, which wipes 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (4 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:15] 


out what is weak in order to give place to the strong. 

Any policy which aims at securing the existence of a nation by restricting the birth-rate robs that 
nation of its future. 

(2) A second solution is that of internal colonization. This is a proposal which is frequently made in 
our own time and one hears it lauded a good deal. It is a suggestion that is well-meant but it is 
misunderstood by most people, so that it is the source of more mischief than can be imagined. 

It is certainly true that the productivity of the soil can be increased within certain limits; but only 
within defined limits and not indefinitely. By increasing the productive powers of the soil it will be 
possible to balance the effect of a surplus birth-rate in Germany for a certain period of time, without 
running any danger of hunger. But we have to face the fact that the general standard of living is rising 
more quickly than even the birth rate. The requirements of food and clothing are becoming greater 
from year to year and are out of proportion to those of our ancestors of, let us say, a hundred years 
ago. It would, therefore, be a mistaken view that every increase in the productive powers of the soil 
will supply the requisite conditions for an increase in the population. No. That is true up to a certain 
point only, for at least a portion of the increased produce of the soil will be consumed by the margin 
of increased demands caused by the steady rise in the standard of living. But even if these demands 
were to be curtailed to the narrowest limits possible and if at the same time we were to use all our 
available energies in the intenser cultivation, we should here reach a definite limit which is 
conditioned by the inherent nature of the soil itself. No matter how industriously we may labour we 
cannot increase agricultural production beyond this limit. Therefore, though we may postpone the evil 
hour of distress for a certain time, it will arrive at last. The first phenomenon will be the recurrence of 
famine periods from time to time, after bad harvests, etc. The intervals between these famines will 
become shorter and shorter the more the population increases; and, finally, the famine times will 
disappear only in those rare years of plenty when the granaries are full. And a time will ultimately 
come when even in those years of plenty there will not be enough to go round; so that hunger will dog 
the footsteps of the nation. Nature must now step in once more and select those who are to survive, or 
else man will help himself by artificially preventing his own increase, with all the fatal consequences 
for the race and the species which have been already mentioned. 

It may be objected here that, in one form or another, this future is in store for all mankind and that the 
individual nation or race cannot escape the general fate. 

At first glance, that objection seems logical enough; but we have to take the following into account: 

The day will certainly come when the whole of mankind will be forced to check the augmentation of 
the human species, because there will be no further possibility of adjusting the productivity of the soil 
to the perpetual increase in the population. Nature must then be allowed to use her own methods or 
man may possibly take the task of regulation into his own hands and establish the necessary 
equilibrium by the application of better means than we have at our disposal to-day. But then it will be 
a problem for mankind as a whole, whereas now only those races have to suffer from want which no 
longer have the strength and daring to acquire sufficient soil to fulfil their needs. For, as things stand 
to-day, vast spaces still lie uncultivated all over the surface of the globe. Those spaces are only 
waiting for the ploughshare. And it is quite certain that Nature did not set those territories apart as the 
exclusive pastures of any one nation or race to be held unutilized in reserve for the future. Such land 
awaits the people who have the strength to acquire it and the diligence to cultivate it. 

Nature knows no political frontiers. She begins by establishing life on this globe and then watches the 
free play of forces. Those who show the greatest courage and industry are the children nearest to her 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (5 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:15] 


heart and they will be granted the sovereign right of existence. 

If a nation confines itself to internal colonization while other races are perpetually increasing their 
territorial annexations all over the globe, that nation will be forced to restrict the numerical growth of 
its population at a time when the other nations are increasing theirs. This situation must eventually 
arrive. It will arrive soon if the territory which the nation has at its disposal be small. Now it is 
unfortunately true that only too often the best nations or, to speak more exactly, the only really 
cultured nations, who at the same time are the chief bearers of human progress have decided, in their 
blind pacifism, to refrain from the acquisition of new territory and to be content with internal 
colonization. But at the same time nations of inferior quality succeed in getting hold of large spaces 
for colonization all over the globe. The state of affairs which must result from this contrast is the 

Races which are culturally superior but less ruthless would be forced to restrict their increase, because 
of insufficient territory to support the population, while less civilized races could increase indefinitely, 
owing to the vast territories at their disposal. In other words: should that state of affairs continue, then 
the world will one day be possessed by that portion of mankind which is culturally inferior but more 
active and energetic. 

A time will come, even though in the distant future, when there can be only two alternatives: Either 
the world will be ruled according to our modern concept of democracy, and then every decision will 
be in favour of the numerically stronger races; or the world will be governed by the law of natural 
distribution of power, and then those nations will be victorious who are of more brutal will and are not 
the nations who have practised self-denial. 

Nobody can doubt that this world will one day be the scene of dreadful struggles for existence on the 
part of mankind. In the end the instinct of self-preservation alone will triumph. Before its consuming 
fire this so-called humanitarianism, which connotes only a mixture of fatuous timidity and 
self-conceit, will melt away as under the March sunshine. Man has become great through perpetual 
struggle. In perpetual peace his greatness must decline. 

For us Germans, the slogan of internal colonization is fatal, because it encourages the belief that we 
have discovered a means which is in accordance with our innate pacifism and which will enable us to 
work for our livelihood in a half slumbering existence. Such a teaching, once it were taken seriously 
by our people, would mean the end of all effort to acquire for ourselves that place in the world which 
we deserve. If. the average German were once convinced that by this measure he has the chance of 
ensuring his livelihood and guaranteeing his future, any attempt to take an active and profitable part in 
sustaining the vital demands of his country would be out of the question. Should the nation agree to 
such an attitude then any really useful foreign policy might be looked upon as dead and buried, 
together with all hope for the future of the German people. 

Once we know what the consequences of this internal colonization theory would be we can no longer 
consider as a mere accident the fact that among those who inculcate this quite pernicious mentality 
among our people the Jew is always in the first line. He knows his softies only too well not to know 
that they are ready to be the grateful victims of every swindle which promises them a gold-block in 
the shape of a discovery that will enable them to outwit Nature and thus render superfluous the hard 
and inexorable struggle for existence; so that finally they may become lords of the planet partly by 
sheer dolce far niente and partly by working when a pleasing opportunity arises. 

It cannot be too strongly emphasised that any German internal colonization must first of all be 
considered as suited only for the relief of social grievances. To carry out a system of internal 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (6 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:16] 


colonization, the most important preliminary measure would be to free the soil from the grip of the 
speculator and assure that freedom. But such a system could never suffice to assure the future of the 
nation without the acquisition of new territory. 

If we adopt a different plan we shall soon reach a point beyond which the resources of our soil can no 
longer be exploited, and at the same time we shall reach a point beyond which our man-power cannot 

In conclusion, the following must be said: 

The fact that only up to a limited extent can internal colonization be practised in a national territory 
which is of definitely small area and the restriction of the procreative faculty which follows as a result 
of such conditions these two factors have a very unfavourable effect on the military and political 
standing of a nation. 

The extent of the national territory is a determining factor in the external security of the nation. The 
larger the territory which a people has at its disposal the stronger are the national defences of that 
people. Military decisions are more quickly, more easily, more completely and more effectively 
gained against a people occupying a national territory which is restricted in area, than against States 
which have extensive territories. Moreover, the magnitude of a national territory is in itself a certain 
assurance that an outside Power will not hastily risk the adventure of an invasion; for in that case the 
struggle would have to be long and exhausting before victory could be hoped for. The risk being so 
great, there would have to be extraordinary reasons for such an aggressive adventure. Hence it is that 
the territorial magnitude of a State furnishes a basis whereon national liberty and independence can be 
maintained with relative ease; while, on the contrary, a State whose territory is small offers a natural 
temptation to the invader. 

As a matter of fact, so-called national circles in the German Reich rejected those first two possibilities 
of establishing a balance between the constant numerical increase in the population and a national 
territory which could not expand proportionately. But the reasons given for that rejection were 
different from those which I have just expounded. It was mainly on the basis of certain moral 
sentiments that restriction of the birth-rate was objected to. Proposals for internal colonization were 
rejected indignantly because it was suspected that such a policy might mean an attack on the big 
landowners, and that this attack might be the forerunner of a general assault against the principle of 
private property as a whole. The form in which the latter solution internal colonization was 
recommended justified the misgivings of the big landowners. 

But the form in which the colonization proposal was rejected was not very clever, as regards the 
impression which such rejection might be calculated to make on the mass of the people, and anyhow it 
did not go to the root of the problem at all. 

Only two further ways were left open in which work and bread could be secured for the increasing 

(3) It was possible to think of acquiring new territory on which a certain portion of the increasing 
population could be settled each year; or else 

(4) Our industry and commerce had to be organized in such a manner as to secure an increase in the 
exports and thus be able to support our people by the increased purchasing power accruing from the 
profits made on foreign markets. 

Therefore the problem was: A policy of territorial expansion or a colonial and commercial policy. 
Both policies were taken into consideration, examined, recommended and rejected, from various 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (7 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:16] 


standpoints, with the result that the second alternative was finally adopted. The sounder alternative, 
however, was undoubtedly the first. 

The principle of acquiring new territory, on which the surplus population could be settled, has many 
advantages to recommend it, especially if we take the future as well as the present into account. 

In the first place, too much importance cannot be placed on the necessity for adopting a policy which 
will make it possible to maintain a healthy peasant class as the basis of the national community. Many 
of our present evils have their origin exclusively in the disproportion between the urban and rural 
portions of the population. A solid stock of small and medium farmers has at all times been the best 
protection which a nation could have against the social diseases that are prevalent to-day. Moreover, 
that is the only solution which guarantees the daily bread of a nation within the framework of its 
domestic national economy. With this condition once guaranteed, industry and commerce would retire 
from the unhealthy position of foremost importance which they hold to-day and would take their due 
place within the general scheme of national economy, adjusting the balance between demand and 
supply. Thus industry and commerce would no longer constitute the basis of the national subsistence, 
but would be auxiliary institutions. By fulfilling their proper function, which is to adjust the balance 
between national production and national consumption, they render the national subsistence more or 
less independent of foreign countries and thus assure the freedom and independence of the nation, 
especially at critical junctures in its history. 

Such a territorial policy, however, cannot find its fulfilment in the Cameroons but almost exclusively 
here in Europe. One must calmly and squarely face the truth that it certainly cannot be part of the 
dispensation of Divine Providence to give a fifty times larger share of the soil of this world to one 
nation than to another. In considering this state of affairs to-day, one must not allow existing political 
frontiers to distract attention from what ought to exist on principles of strict justice. If this earth has 
sufficient room for all, then we ought to have that share of the soil which is absolutely necessary for 
our existence. 

Of course people will not voluntarily make that accommodation. At this point the right of 
self-preservation comes into effect. And when attempts to settle the difficulty in an amicable way are 
rejected the clenched hand must take by force that which was refused to the open hand of friendship. 
If in the past our ancestors had based their political decisions on similar pacifist nonsense as our 
present generation does, we should not possess more than one-third of the national territory that we 
possess to-day and probably there would be no German nation to worry about its future in Europe. 
No. We owe the two Eastern Marks 8 ) of the Empire to the natural determination of our forefathers in 
their struggle for existence, and thus it is to the same determined policy that we owe the inner strength 
which is based on the extent of our political and racial territories and which alone has made it possible 
for us to exist up to now. 

And there is still another reason why that solution would have been the correct one: 

Many contemporary European States are like pyramids standing on their apexes. The European 
territory which these States possess is ridiculously small when compared with the enormous overhead 
weight of their colonies, foreign trade, etc. It may be said that they have the apex in Europe and the 
base of the pyramid all over the world; quite different from the United States of America, which has 
its base on the American Continent and is in contact with the rest of the world only through its apex. 
Out of that situation arises the incomparable inner strength of the U.S.A. and the contrary situation is 
responsible for the weakness of most of the colonial European Powers. 

England cannot be suggested as an argument against this assertion, though in glancing casually over 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (8 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:16] 


the map of the British Empire one is inclined easily to overlook the existence of a whole Anglo-Saxon 
world. Englands position cannot be compared with that of any other State in Europe, since it forms a 
vast community of language and culture together with the U.S.A. 

Therefore the only possibility which Germany had of carrying a sound territorial policy into effect 
was that of acquiring new territory in Europe itself. Colonies cannot serve this purpose as long as they 
are not suited for settlement by Europeans on a large scale. In the nineteenth century it was no longer 
possible to acquire such colonies by peaceful means. Therefore any attempt at such a colonial 
expansion would have meant an enormous military struggle. Consequently it would have been more 
practical to undertake that military struggle for new territory in Europe rather than to wage war for the 
acquisition of possessions abroad. 

Such a decision naturally demanded that the nations undivided energies should be devoted to it. A 
policy of that kind which requires for its fulfilment every ounce of available energy on the part of 
everybody concerned, cannot be carried into effect by half-measures or in a hesitating manner. The 
political leadership of the German Empire should then have been directed exclusively to this goal. No 
political step should have been taken in response to other considerations than this task and the means 
of accomplishing it. Germany should have been alive to the fact that such a goal could have been 
reached only by war, and the prospect of war should have been faced with calm and collected 

The whole system of alliances should have been envisaged and valued from that standpoint. If new 
territory were to be acquired in Europe it must have been mainly at Russias cost, and once again the 
new German Empire should have set out on its march along the same road as was formerly trodden by 
the Teutonic Knights, this time to acquire soil for the German plough by means of the German sword 
and thus provide the nation with its daily bread. 

For such a policy, however, there was only one possible ally in Europe. That was England. 

Only by alliance with England was it possible to safeguard the rear of the new German crusade. The 
justification for undertaking such an expedition was stronger than the justification which our 
forefathers had for setting out on theirs. Not one of our pacifists refuses to eat the bread made from 
the grain grown in the East; and yet the first plough here was that called the Sword. 

No sacrifice should have been considered too great if it was a necessary means of gaining Englands 
friendship. Colonial and naval ambitions should have been abandoned and attempts should not have 
been made to compete against British industries. 

Only a clear and definite policy could lead to such an achievement. Such a policy would have 
demanded a renunciation of the endeavour to conquer the worlds markets, also a renunciation of 
colonial intentions and naval power. All the means of power at the disposal of the State should have 
been concentrated in the military forces on land. This policy would have involved a period of 
temporary self-denial, for the sake of a great and powerful future. 

There was a time when England might have entered into negotiations with us, on the grounds of that 
proposal. For England would have well understood that the problems arising from the steady increase 
in population were forcing Germany to look for a solution either in Europe with the help of England 
or, without England, in some other part of the world. 

This outlook was probably the chief reason why London tried to draw nearer to Germany about the 
turn of the century. For the first time in Germany an attitude was then manifested which afterwards 
displayed itself in a most tragic way. People then gave expression to an unpleasant feeling that we 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (9 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:16] 


might thus find ourselves obliged to pull Englands chestnuts out of the fire. As if an alliance could be 
based on anything else than mutual give-and-take! And England would have become a party to such a 
mutual bargain. British diplomats were still wise enough to know that an equivalent must be 
forthcoming as a consideration for any services rendered. 

Let us suppose that in 1904 our German foreign policy was managed astutely enough to enable us to 
take the part which Japan played. It is not easy to measure the greatness of the results that might have 
accrued to Germany from such a policy. 

There would have been no world war. The blood which would have been shed in 1904 would not have 
been a tenth of that shed from 1914 to 1918. And what a position Germany would hold in the world 

In any case the alliance with Austria was then an absurdity. 

For this mummy of a State did not attach itself to Germany for the purpose of carrying through a war, 
but rather to maintain a perpetual state of peace which was meant to be exploited for the purpose of 
slowly but persistently exterminating the German element in the Dual Monarchy. 

Another reason for the impossible character of this alliance was that nobody could expect such a State 
to take an active part in defending German national interests, seeing that it did not have sufficient 
strength and determination to put an end to the policy of de-Germanization within its own frontiers. If 
Germany herself was not moved by a sufficiently powerful national sentiment and was not sufficiently 
ruthless to take away from that absurd Habsburg State the right to decide the destinies of ten million 
inhabitants who were of the same nationality as the Germans themselves, surely it was out of the 
question to expect the Habsburg State to be a collaborating party in any great and courageous German 
undertaking. The attitude of the old Reich towards the Austrian question might have been taken as a 
test of its stamina for the struggle where the destinies of the whole nation were at stake. 

In any case, the policy of oppression against the German population in Austria should not have been 
allowed to be carried on and to grow stronger from year to year; for the value of Austria as an ally 
could be assured only by upholding the German element there. But that course was not followed. 

Nothing was dreaded so much as the possibility of an armed conflict; but finally, and at a most 
unfavourable moment, the conflict had to be faced and accepted. They thought to cut loose from the 
cords of destiny, but destiny held them fast. 

They dreamt of maintaining a world peace and woke up to find themselves in a world war. 

And that dream of peace was a most significant reason why the above-mentioned third alternative for 
the future development of Germany was not even taken into consideration. The fact was recognized 
that new territory could be gained only in the East; but this meant that there would be fighting ahead, 
whereas they wanted peace at any cost. The slogan of German foreign policy at one time used to be: 
The use of all possible means for the maintenance of the German nation. Now it was changed to: 
Maintenance of world peace by all possible means. We know what the result was. I shall resume the 
discussion of this point in detail later on. 

There remained still another alternative, which we may call the fourth. This was: Industry and world 
trade, naval power and colonies. 

Such a development might certainly have been attained more easily and more rapidly. To colonize a 
territory is a slow process, often extending over centuries. Yet this fact is the source of its inner 
strength, for it is not through a sudden burst of enthusiasm that it can be put into effect, but rather 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (10 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:16] 


through a gradual and enduring process of growth quite different from industrial progress, which can 
be urged on by advertisement within a few years. The result thus achieved, however, is not of lasting 
quality but something frail, like a soap-bubble. It is much easier to build quickly than to carry through 
the tough task of settling a territory with farmers and establishing farmsteads. But the former is more 
quickly destroyed than the latter. 

In adopting such a course Germany must have known that to follow it out would necessarily mean 
war sooner or later. Only children could believe that sweet and unctuous expressions of goodness and 
persistent avowals of peaceful intentions could get them their bananas through this friendly 
competition between the nations, with the prospect of never having to fight for them. 

No. Once we had taken this road, England was bound to be our enemy at some time or other to come. 
Of course it fitted in nicely with our innocent assumptions, but still it was absurd to grow indignant at 
the fact that a day came when the English took the liberty of opposing our peaceful penetration with 
the brutality of violent egoists. 

Naturally, we on our side would never have done such a thing. 

If a European territorial policy against Russia could have been put into practice only in case we had 
England as our ally, on the other hand a colonial and world-trade policy could have been carried into 
effect only against English interests and with the support of Russia. But then this policy should have 
been adopted in full consciousness of all the consequences it involved and, above all things, Austria 
should have been discarded as quickly as possible. 

At the turn of the century the alliance with Austria had become a veritable absurdity from all points of 

But nobody thought of forming an alliance with Russia against England, just as nobody thought of 
making England an ally against Russia; for in either case the final result would inevitably have meant 
war. And to avoid war was the very reason why a commercial and industrial policy was decided upon. 
It was believed that the peaceful conquest of the world by commercial means provided a method 
which would permanently supplant the policy of force. Occasionally, however, there were doubts 
about the efficiency of this principle, especially when some quite incomprehensible warnings came 
from England now and again. That was the reason why the fleet was built. It was not for the purpose 
of attacking or annihilating England but merely to defend the concept of world-peace, mentioned 
above, and also to protect the principle of conquering the world by peaceful means. Therefore this 
fleet was kept within modest limits, not only as regards the number and tonnage of the vessels but also 
in regard to their armament, the idea being to furnish new proofs of peaceful intentions. 

The chatter about the peaceful conquest of the world by commercial means was probably the most 
completely nonsensical stuff ever raised to the dignity of a guiding principle in the policy of a State, 
This nonsense became even more foolish when England was pointed out as a typical example to prove 
how the thing could be put into practice. Our doctrinal way of regarding history and our professorial 
ideas in that domain have done irreparable harm and offer a striking proof of how people learn 
history without understanding anything of it. As a matter of fact, England ought to have been looked 
upon as a convincing argument against the theory of the pacific conquest of the world by commercial 
means. No nation prepared the way for its commercial conquests more brutally than England did by 
means of the sword, and no other nation has defended such conquests more ruthlessly. Is it not a 
characteristic quality of British statecraft that it knows how to use political power in order to gain 
economic advantages and, inversely, to turn economic conquests into political power? What an 
astounding error it was to believe that England would not have the courage to give its own blood for 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (11 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:16] 


the purposes of its own economic expansion! The fact that England did not possess a national army 
proved nothing; for it is not the actual military structure of the moment that matters but rather the will 
and determination to use whatever military strength is available. England has always had the 
armament which she needed. She always fought with those weapons which were necessary for 
success. She sent mercenary troops, to fight as long as mercenaries sufficed; but she never hesitated to 
draw heavily and deeply from the best blood of the whole nation when victory could be obtained only 
by such a sacrifice. And in every case the fighting spirit, dogged determination, and use of brutal 
means in conducting military operations have always remained the same. 

But in Germany, through the medium of the schools, the Press and the comic papers, an idea of the 
Englishman was gradually formed which was bound eventually to lead to the worst kind of 
self-deception. This absurdity slowly but persistently spread into every quarter of German life. The 
result was an undervaluation for which we have had to pay a heavy penalty. The delusion was so 
profound that the Englishman was looked upon as a shrewd business man, but personally a coward 
even to an incredible degree. Unfortunately our lofty teachers of professorial history did not bring 
home to the minds of their pupils the truth that it is not possible to build up such a mighty 
organization as the British Empire by mere swindle and fraud. The few who called attention to that 
truth were either ignored or silenced. I can vividly recall to mind the astonished looks of my comrades 
when they found themselves personally face to face for the first time with the Tommies in Flanders. 
After a few days of fighting the consciousness slowly dawned on our soldiers that those Scotsmen 
were not like the ones we had seen described and caricatured in the comic papers and mentioned in 
the communiques. 

It was then that I formed my first ideas of the efficiency of various forms of propaganda. 

Such a falsification, however, served the purpose of those who had fabricated it. This caricature of the 
Englishman, though false, could be used to prove the possibility of conquering the world peacefully 
by commercial means. Where the Englishman succeeded we should also succeed. Our far greater 
honesty and our freedom from that specifically English perfidy would be assets on our side. Thereby 
it was hoped that the sympathy of the smaller nations and the confidence of the greater nations could 
be gained more easily. 

We did not realize that our honesty was an object of profound aversion for other people because we 
ourselves believed in it. The rest of the world looked on our behaviour as the manifestation of a 
shrewd deceitfulness; but when the revolution came, then they were amazed at the deeper insight it 
gave them into our mentality, sincere even beyond the limits of stupidity. 

Once we understand the part played by that absurd notion of conquering the world by peaceful 
commercial means we can clearly understand how that other absurdity, the Triple Alliance, came to 
exist. With what State then could an alliance have been made? In alliance with Austria we could not 
acquire new territory by military means, even in Europe. And this very fact was the real reason for the 
inner weakness of the Triple Alliance. A Bismarck could permit himself such a makeshift for the 
necessities of the moment, but certainly not any of his bungling successors, and least of all when the 
foundations no longer existed on which Bismarck had formed the Triple Alliance. In Bismarcks time 
Austria could still be looked upon as a German State; but the gradual introduction of universal 
suffrage turned the country into a parliamentary Babel, in which the German voice was scarcely 

From the viewpoint of racial policy, this alliance with Austria was simply disastrous. A new Slavic 
Great Power was allowed to grow up close to the frontiers of the German Empire. Later on this Power 
was bound to adopt towards Germany an attitude different from that of Russia, for example. The 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (12 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:16] 


Alliance was thus bound to become more empty and more feeble, because the only supporters of it 
were losing their influence and were being systematically pushed out of the more important public 

About the year 1 900 the Alliance with Austria had already entered the same phase as the Alliance 
between Austria and Italy. 

Here also only one alternative was possible: Either to take the side of the Habsburg Monarchy or to 
raise a protest against the oppression of the German element in Austria. But, generally speaking, when 
one takes such a course it is bound eventually to lead to open conflict. 

From the psychological point of view also, the Triple decreases according as such an alliance limits its 
object to the defence of the status quo. But, on the other hand, an alliance will increase its cohesive 
strength the more the parties concerned in it may hope to use it as a means of reaching some practical 
goal of expansion. Here, as everywhere else, strength does not lie in defence but in attack. 

This truth was recognized in various quarters but, unfortunately, not by the so-called elected 
representatives of the people. As early as 1912 Ludendorff, who was then Colonel and an Officer of 
the General Staff, pointed out these weak features of the Alliance in a memorandum which he then 
drew up. But of course the statesmen did not attach any importance or value to that document. In 
general it would seem as if reason were a faculty that is active only in the case of ordinary mortals but 
that it is entirely absent when we come to deal with that branch of the species known as diplomats. 

It was lucky for Germany that the war of 1914 broke out with Austria as its direct cause, for thus the 
Habsburgs were compelled to participate. Had the origin of the War been otherwise, Germany would 
have been left to her own resources. The Habsburg State would never have been ready or willing to 
take part in a war for the origin of which Germany was responsible. What was the object of so much 
obloquy later in the case of Italys decision would have taken place, only earlier, in the case of 
Austria. In other words, if Germany had been forced to go to war for some reason of its own, Austria 
would have remained neutral in order to safeguard the State against a revolution which might begin 
immediately after the war had started. The Slav element would have preferred to smash up the Dual 
Monarchy in 1914 rather than permit it to come to the assistance of Germany. But at that time there 
were only a few who understood all the dangers and aggravations which resulted from the alliance 
with the Danubian Monarchy. 

In the first place, Austria had too many enemies who were eagerly looking forward to obtain the 
heritage of that decrepit State, so that these people gradually developed a certain animosity against 
Germany, because Germany was an obstacle to their desires inasmuch as it kept the Dual Monarchy 
from falling to pieces, a consummation that was hoped for and yearned for on all sides. The 
conviction developed that Vienna could be reached only by passing through Berlin. 

In the second place, by adopting this policy Germany lost its best and most promising chances of 
other alliances. In place of these possibilities one now observed a growing tension in the relations 
with Russia and even with Italy. And this in spite of the fact that the general attitude in Rome was just 
as favourable to Germany as it was hostile to Austria, a hostility which lay dormant in the individual 
Italian and broke out violently on occasion. 

Since a commercial and industrial policy had been adopted, no motive was left for waging war against 
Russia. Only the enemies of the two countries, Germany and Russia, could have an active interest in 
such a war under these circumstances. As a matter of fact, it was only the Jews and the Marxists who 
tried to stir up bad blood between the two States. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (13 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:16] 


In the third place, the Alliance constituted a permanent danger to German security; for any great 
Power that was hostile to Bismarcks Empire could mobilize a whole lot of other States in a war 
against Germany by promising them tempting spoils at the expense of the Austrian ally. 

It was possible to arouse the whole of Eastern Europe against Austria, especially Russia, and Italy 
also. The world coalition which had developed under the leadership of King Edward could never have 
become a reality if Germanys ally, Austria, had not offered such an alluring prospect of booty. It was 
this fact alone which made it possible to combine so many heterogeneous States with divergent 
interests into one common phalanx of attack. Every member could hope to enrich himself at the 
expense of Austria if he joined in the general attack against Germany. The fact that Turkey was also a 
tacit party to the unfortunate alliance with Austria augmented Germanys peril to an extraordinary 

Jewish international finance needed this bait of the Austrian heritage in order to carry out its plans of 
ruining Germany; for Germany had not yet surrendered to the general control which the international 
captains of finance and trade exercised over the other States. Thus it was possible to consolidate that 
coalition and make it strong enough and brave enough, through the sheer weight of numbers, to join in 
bodily conflict with the horned Siegfried. 9 ) 

The alliance with the Habsburg Monarchy, which I loathed while still in Austria, was the subject of 
grave concern on my part and caused me to meditate on it so persistently that finally I came to the 
conclusions which I have mentioned above. 

In the small circles which I frequented at that time I did not conceal my conviction that this sinister 
agreement with a State doomed to collapse would also bring catastrophe to Germany if she did not 
free herself from it in time. I never for a moment wavered in that firm conviction, even when the 
tempest of the World War seemed to have made shipwreck of the reasoning faculty itself and had put 
blind enthusiasm in its place, even among those circles where the coolest and hardest objective 
thinking ought to have held sway. In the trenches I voiced and upheld my own opinion whenever 
these problems came under discussion. I held that to abandon the Habsburg Monarchy would involve 
no sacrifice if Germany could thereby reduce the number of her own enemies; for the millions of 
Germans who had donned the steel helmet had done so not to fight for the maintenance of a corrupt 
dynasty but rather for the salvation of the German people. 

Before the War there were occasions on which it seemed that at least one section of the German 
public had some slight misgivings about the political wisdom of the alliance with Austria. From time 
to time German conservative circles issued warnings against being over-confident about the worth of 
that alliance; but, like every other reasonable suggestion made at that time, it was thrown to the winds. 
The general conviction was that the right measures had been adopted to conquer the world, that the 
success of these measures would be enormous and the sacrifices negligible. 

Once again the uninitiated layman could do nothing but observe how the elect were marching 
straight ahead towards disaster and enticing their beloved people to follow them, as the rats followed 
the Pied Piper of Hamelin. 

If we would look for the deeper grounds which made it possible to foist on the people this absurd 
notion of peacefully conquering the world through commercial penetration, and how it was possible to 
put forward the maintenance of world-peace as a national aim, we shall find that these grounds lay in 
a general morbid condition that had pervaded the whole body of German political thought. 

The triumphant progress of technical science in Germany and the marvellous development of German 
industries and commerce led us to forget that a powerful State had been the necessary pre-requisite of 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (14 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:16] 


that success. On the contrary, certain circles went even so far as to give vent to the theory that the 
State owed its very existence to these phenomena; that it was, above all, an economic institution and 
should be constituted in accordance with economic interests. Therefore, it was held, the State was 
dependent on the economic structure. This condition of things was looked upon and glorified as the 
soundest and most normal arrangement. 

Now, the truth is that the State in itself has nothing whatsoever to do with any definite economic 
concept or a definite economic development. It does not arise from a compact made between 
contracting parties, within a certain delimited territory, for the purpose of serving economic ends. The 
State is a community of living beings who have kindred physical and spiritual natures, organized for 
the purpose of assuring the conservation of their own kind and to help towards fulfilling those ends 
which Providence has assigned to that particular race or racial branch. Therein, and therein alone, lie 
the purpose and meaning of a State. Economic activity is one of the many auxiliary means which are 
necessary for the attainment of those aims. But economic activity is never the origin or purpose of a 
State, except where a State has been originally founded on a false and unnatural basis. And this alone 
explains why a State as such does not necessarily need a certain delimited territory as a condition of 
its establishment. This condition becomes a necessary pre-requisite only among those people who 
would provide and assure subsistence for their kinsfolk through their own industry, which means that 
they are ready to carry on the struggle for existence by means of their own work. People who can 
sneak their way, like parasites, into the human body politic and make others work for them under 
various pretences can form a State without possessing any definite delimited territory. This is chiefly 
applicable to that parasitic nation which, particularly at the present time preys upon the honest portion 
of mankind; I mean the Jews. 

The Jewish State has never been delimited in space. It has been spread all over the world, without any 
frontiers whatsoever, and has always been constituted from the membership of one race exclusively. 
That is why the Jews have always formed a State within the State. One of the most ingenious tricks 
ever devised has been that of sailing the Jewish ship-of-state under the flag of Religion and thus 
securing that tolerance which Aryans are always ready to grant to different religious faiths. But the 
Mosaic Law is really nothing else than the doctrine of the preservation of the Jewish race. Therefore 
this Law takes in all spheres of sociological, political and economic science which have a bearing on 
the main end in view. 

The instinct for the preservation of ones own species is the primary cause that leads to the formation 
of human communities. Hence the State is a racial organism, and not an economic organization. The 
difference between the two is so great as to be incomprehensible to our contemporary so-called 
statesmen. That is why they like to believe that the State may be constituted as an economic 
structure, whereas the truth is that it has always resulted from the exercise of those qualities which are 
part of the will to preserve the species and the race. But these qualities always exist and operate 
through the heroic virtues and have nothing to do with commercial egoism; for the conservation of the 
species always presupposes that the individual is ready to sacrifice himself. Such is the meaning of the 
poets lines: 

Und setzet ihr nicht das Leben ein, 

Nie wird euch das Leben gewonnen sein. 

{And if you do not stake your life, 

You will never win life for yourself .) 10 ) 

The sacrifice of the individual existence is necessary in order to assure the conservation of the race. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (15 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:16] 


Hence it is that the most essential condition for the establishment and maintenance of a State is a 
certain feeling of solidarity, wounded in an identity of character and race and in a resolute readiness to 
defend these at all costs. With people who live on their own territory this will result in a development 
of the heroic virtues; with a parasitic people it will develop the arts of subterfuge and gross perfidy 
unless we admit that these characteristics are innate and that the varying political forms through which 
the parasitic race expresses itself are only the outward manifestations of innate characteristics. At least 
in the beginning, the formation of a State can result only from a manifestation of the heroic qualities I 
have spoken of. And the people who fail in the struggle for existence, that is to say those, who become 
vassals and are thereby condemned to disappear entirely sooner or later, are those who do not display 
the heroic virtues in the struggle, or those who fall victims to the perfidy of the parasites. And even in 
this latter case the failure is not so much due to lack of intellectual powers, but rather to a lack of 
courage and determination. An attempt is made to conceal the real nature of this failing by saying that 
it is the humane feeling. 

The qualities which are employed for the foundation and preservation of a State have accordingly 
little or nothing to do with the economic situation. And this is conspicuously demonstrated by the fact 
that the inner strength of a State only very rarely coincides with what is called its economic 
expansion. On the contrary, there are numerous examples to show that a period of economic 
prosperity indicates the approaching decline of a State. If it were correct to attribute the foundation of 
human communities to economic forces, then the power of the State as such would be at its highest 
pitch during periods of economic prosperity, and not vice versa. 

It is specially difficult to understand how the belief that the State is brought into being and preserved 
by economic forces could gain currency in a country which has given proof of the opposite in every 
phase of its history. The history of Prussia shows in a manner particularly clear and distinct, that it is 
out of the moral virtues of the people and not from their economic circumstances that a State is 
formed. It is only under the protection of those virtues that economic activities can be developed and 
the latter will continue to flourish until a time comes when the creative political capacity declines. 
Therewith the economic structure will also break down, a phenomenon which is now happening in an 
alarming manner before our eyes. The material interest of mankind can prosper only in the shade of 
the heroic virtues. The moment they become the primary considerations of life they wreck the basis of 
their own existence. 

Whenever the political power of Germany was specially strong the economic situation also improved. 
But whenever economic interests alone occupied the foremost place in the life of the people, and 
thrust transcendent ideals into the back.-ground, the State collapsed and economic ruin followed 

If we consider the question of what those forces actually are which are necessary to the creation and 
preservation of a State, we shall find that they are: The capacity and readiness to sacrifice the 
individual to the common welfare. That these qualities have nothing at all to do with economics can 
be proved by referring to the simple fact that man does not sacrifice himself for material interests. In 
other words, he will die for an ideal but not for a business. The marvellous gift for public psychology 
which the English have was never shown better than the way in which they presented their case in the 
World War. We were fighting for our bread; but the English declared that they were fighting for 
freedom, and not at all for their own freedom. Oh, no, but for the freedom of the small nations. 
German people laughed at that effrontery and were angered by it; but in doing so they showed how 
political thought had declined among our so-called diplomats in Germany even before the War. These 
diplomatists did not have the slightest notion of what that force was which brought men to face death 
of their own free will and determination. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (16 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:16] 


As long as the German people, in the War of 1914, continued to believe that they were fighting for 
ideals they stood firm. As soon as they were told that they were fighting only for their daily bread they 
began to give up the struggle. 

Our clever statesmen were greatly amazed at this change of feeling. They never understood that as 
soon as man is called upon to struggle for purely material causes he will avoid death as best he can; 
for death and the enjoyment of the material fruits of a victory are quite incompatible concepts. The 
frailest woman will become a heroine when the life of her own child is at stake. And only the will to 
save the race and native land or the State, which offers protection to the race, has in all ages been the 
urge which has forced men to face the weapons of their enemies. 

The following may be proclaimed as a truth that always holds good: 

A State has never arisen from commercial causes for the purpose of peacefully serving commercial 
ends; but States have always arisen from the instinct to maintain the racial group, whether this instinct 
manifest itself in the heroic sphere or in the sphere of cunning and chicanery. In the first case we have 
the Aryan States, based on the principles of work and cultural development. In the second case we 
have the Jewish parasitic colonies. But as soon as economic interests begin to predominate over the 
racial and cultural instincts in a people or a State, these economic interests unloose the causes that 
lead to subjugation and oppression. 

The belief, which prevailed in Germany before the War, that the world could be opened up and even 
conquered for Germany through a system of peaceful commercial penetration and a colonial policy 
was a typical symptom which indicated the decline of those real qualities whereby States are created 
and preserved, and indicated also the decline of that insight, will-power and practical determination 
which belong to those qualities. The World War with its consequences, was the natural liquidation of 
that decline. 

To anyone who had not thought over the matter deeply, this attitude of the German people which 
was quite general must have seemed an insoluble enigma. After all, Germany herself was a 
magnificent example of an empire that had been built up purely by a policy of power. Prussia, which 
was the generative cell of the German Empire, had been created by brilliant heroic deeds and not by a 
financial or commercial compact. And the Empire itself was but the magnificent recompense for a 
leadership that had been conducted on a policy of power and military valour. 

How then did it happen that the political instincts of this very same German people became so 
degenerate? For it was not merely one isolated phenomenon which pointed to this decadence, but 
morbid symptoms which appeared in alarming numbers, now all over the body politic, or eating into 
the body of the nation like a gangrenous ulcer. It seemed as if some all-pervading poisonous fluid had 
been injected by some mysterious hand into the bloodstream of this once heroic body, bringing about 
a creeping paralysis that affected the reason and the elementary instinct of self-preservation. 

During the years 191219141 used to ponder perpetually on those problems which related to the 
policy of the Triple Alliance and the economic policy then being pursued by the German Empire. 
Once again I came to the conclusion that the only explanation of this enigma lay in the operation of 
that force which I had already become acquainted with in Vienna, though from a different angle of 
vision. The force to which I refer was the Marxist teaching and Weltanschhauung and its organized 
action throughout the nation. 

For the second time in my life I plunged deep into the study of that destructive teaching. This time, 
however, I was not urged by the study of the question by the impressions and influences of my daily 
environment, but directed rather by the observation of general phenomena in the political life of 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (17 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:16] 


Germany. In delving again into the theoretical literature of this new world and endeavouring to get a 
clear view of the possible consequences of its teaching, I compared the theoretical principles of 
Marxism with the phenomena and happenings brought about by its activities in the political, cultural, 
and economic spheres. 

For the first time in my life I now turned my attention to the efforts that were being made to subdue 
this universal pest. 

I studied Bismarcks exceptional legislation in its original concept, its operation and its results. 
Gradually I formed a basis for my own opinions, which has proved as solid as a rock, so that never 
since have I had to change my attitude towards the general problem. I also made a further and more 
thorough analysis of the relations between Marxism and Jewry. 

During my sojourn in Vienna I used to look upon Germany as an imperturbable colossus; but even 
then serious doubts and misgivings would often disturb me. In my own mind and in my conversation 
with my small circle of acquaintances I used to criticize Germanys foreign policy and the incredibly 
superficial way, according to my thinking, in which Marxism was dealt with, though it was then the 
most important problem in Germany. I could not understand how they could stumble blindfolded into 
the midst of this peril, the effects of which would be momentous if the openly declared aims of 
Marxism could be put into practice. Even as early as that time I warned people around me, just as I am 
warning a wider audience now, against that soothing slogan of all indolent and feckless nature: 
Nothing can happen to us. A similar mental contagion had already destroyed a mighty empire. Can 
Germany escape the operation of those laws to which all other human communities are subject? 

In the years 1913 and 19141 expressed my opinion for the first time in various circles, some of which 
are now members of the National Socialist Movement, that the problem of how the future of the 
German nation can be secured is the problem of how Marxism can be exterminated. 

I considered the disastrous policy of the Triple Alliance as one of the consequences resulting from the 
disintegrating effects of the Marxist teaching; for the alarming feature was that this teaching was 
invisibly corrupting the foundations of a healthy political and economic outlook. Those who had been 
themselves contaminated frequently did not realise that their aims and actions sprang from this 
Weltanschhauung, which they otherwise openly repudiated. 

Long before then the spiritual and moral decline of the German people had set in, though those who 
were affected by the morbid decadence were frequently unaware as often happens of the forces 
which were breaking up their very existence. Sometimes they tried to cure the disease by doctoring 
the symptoms, which were taken as the cause. But since nobody recognized, or wanted to recognize, 
the real cause of the disease this way of combating Marxism was no more effective than the 
application of some quacks ointment. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap4.htm (18 of 18) [04/06/2000 16:09:16] 




During the boisterous years of my youth nothing used to damp my wild spirits so much as to think 
that I was born at a time when the world had manifestly decided not to erect any more temples of 
fame except in honour of business people and State officials. The tempest of historical achievements 
seemed to have permanently subsided, so much so that the future appeared to be irrevocably delivered 
over to what was called peaceful competition between the nations. This simply meant a system of 
mutual exploitation by fraudulent means, the principle of resorting to the use of force in self-defence 
being formally excluded. Individual countries increasingly assumed the appearance of commercial 
undertakings, grabbing territory and clients and concessions from each other under any and every kind 
of pretext. And it was all staged to an accompaniment of loud but innocuous shouting. This trend of 
affairs seemed destined to develop steadily and permanently. Having the support of public 
approbation, it seemed bound eventually to transform the world into a mammoth department store. In 
the vestibule of this emporium there would be rows of monumental busts which would confer 
immortality on those profiteers who had proved themselves the shrewdest at their trade and those 
administrative officials who had shown themselves the most innocuous. The salesmen could be 
represented by the English and the administrative functionaries by the Germans; whereas the Jews 
would be sacrificed to the unprofitable calling of proprietorship, for they are constantly avowing that 
they make no profits and are always being called upon to pay out. Moreover they have the advantage 
of being versed in the foreign languages. 

Why could I not have been born a hundred years ago? I used to ask myself. Somewhere about the time 
of the Wars of Liberation, when a man was still of some value even though he had no business. 

Thus I used to think it an ill-deserved stroke of bad luck that I had arrived too late on this terrestrial 
globe, and I felt chagrined at the idea that my life would have to run its course along peaceful and 
orderly lines. As a boy I was anything but a pacifist and all attempts to make me so turned out futile. 

Then the Boer War came, like a glow of lightning on the far horizon. Day after day I used to gaze 
intently at the newspapers and I almost devoured the telegrams and communiques, overjoyed to 
think that I could witness that heroic struggle, even though from so great a distance. 

When the Russo-Japanese War came I was older and better able to judge for myself. For national 
reasons I then took the side of the Japanese in our discussions. I looked upon the defeat of the 
Russians as a blow to Austrian Slavism. 

Many years had passed between that time and my arrival in Munich. I now realized that what I 
formerly believed to be a morbid decadence was only the lull before the storm. During my Vienna 
days the Balkans were already in the grip of that sultry pause which presages the violent storm. Here 
and there a flash of lightning could be occasionally seen; but it rapidly disappeared in sinister gloom. 
Then the Balkan War broke out; and therewith the first gusts of the forthcoming tornado swept across 
a highly-strung Europe. In the supervening calm men felt the atmosphere oppressive and foreboding, 
so much so that the sense of an impending catastrophe became transformed into a feeling of impatient 
expectance. They wished that Heaven would give free rein to the fate which could now no longer be 
curbed. Then the first great bolt of lightning struck the earth. The storm broke and the thunder of the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap5.htm (1 of 10) [04/06/2000 16:10:03] 


heavens intermingled with the roar of the cannons in the World War. 

When the news came to Munich that the Archduke Franz Ferdinand had been murdered, I had been at 
home all day and did not get the particulars of how it happened. At first I feared that the shots may 
have been fired by some German- Austrian students who had been aroused to a state of furious 
indignation by the persistent pro-Slav activities of the Heir to the Habsburg Throne and therefore 
wished to liberate the German population from this internal enemy. It was quite easy to imagine what 
the result of such a mistake would have been. It would have brought on a new wave of persecution, 
the motives of which would have been justified before the whole world. But soon afterwards I heard 
the names of the presumed assassins and also that they were known to be Serbs. I felt somewhat 
dumbfounded in face of the inexorable vengeance which Destiny had wrought. The greatest friend of 
the Slavs had fallen a victim to the bullets of Slav patriots. 

It is unjust to the Vienna government of that time to blame it now for the form and tenor of the 
ultimatum which was then presented. In a similar position and under similar circumstances, no other 
Power in the world would have acted otherwise. On her southern frontiers Austria had a relentless 
mortal foe who indulged in acts of provocation against the Dual Monarchy at intervals which were 
becoming more and more frequent. This persistent line of conduct would not have been relaxed until 
the arrival of the opportune moment for the destruction of the Empire. In Austria there was good 
reason to fear that, at the latest, this moment would come with the death of the old Emperor. Once that 
had taken place, it was quite possible that the Monarchy would not be able to offer any serious 
resistance. For some years past the State had been so completely identified with the personality of 
Francis Joseph that, in the eyes of the great mass of the people, the death of this venerable 
personification of the Empire would be tantamount to the death of the Empire itself. Indeed it was one 
of the clever artifices of Slav policy to foster the impression that the Austrian State owed its very 
existence exclusively to the prodigies and rare talents of that monarch. This kind of flattery was 
particularly welcomed at the Hofburg, all the more because it had no relation whatsoever to the 
services actually rendered by the Emperor. No effort whatsoever was made to locate the carefully 
prepared sting which lay hidden in this glorifying praise. One fact which was entirely overlooked, 
perhaps intentionally, was that the more the Empire remained dependent on the so-called 
administrative talents of the wisest Monarch of all times, the more catastrophic would be the 
situation when Fate came to knock at the door and demand its tribute. 

Was it possible even to imagine the Austrian Empire without its venerable ruler? Would not the 
tragedy which befell Maria Theresa be repeated at once? 

It is really unjust to the Vienna governmental circles to reproach them with having instigated a war 
which might have been prevented. The war was bound to come. Perhaps it might have been postponed 
for a year or two at the most. But it had always been the misfortune of German, as well as Austrian, 
diplomats that they endeavoured to put off the inevitable day of reckoning, with the result that they 
were finally compelled to deliver their blow at a most inopportune moment. 

No. Those who did not wish this war ought to have had the courage to take the consequences of the 
refusal upon themselves. Those consequences must necessarily have meant the sacrifice of Austria. 
And even then war would have come, not as a war in which all the nations would have been banded 
against us but in the form of a dismemberment of the Habsburg Monarchy. In that case we should 
have had to decide whether we should come to the assistance of the Habsburg or stand aside as 
spectators, with our arms folded, and thus allow Fate to run its course. 

Just those who are loudest in their imprecations to-day and make a great parade of wisdom in judging 
the causes of the war are the very same people whose collaboration was the most fatal factor in 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap5.htm (2 of 10) [04/06/2000 16:10:03] 


steering towards the war. 

For several decades previously the German Social-Democrats had been agitating in an underhand and 
knavish way for war against Russia; whereas the German Centre Party, with religious ends in view, 
had worked to make the Austrian State the chief centre and turning-point of German policy. The 
consequences of this folly had now to be borne. What came was bound to come and under no 
circumstances could it have been avoided. The fault of the German Government lay in the fact that, 
merely for the sake of preserving peace at all costs, it continued to miss the occasions that were 
favourable for action, got entangled in an alliance for the purpose of preserving the peace of the 
world, and thus finally became the victim of a world coalition which opposed the German effort for 
the maintenance of peace and was determined to bring about the world war. 

Had the Vienna Government of that time formulated its ultimatum in less drastic terms, that would not 
have altered the situation at all: but such a course might have aroused public indignation. For, in the 
eyes of the great masses, the ultimatum was too moderate and certainly not excessive or brutal. Those 
who would deny this to-day are either simpletons with feeble memories or else deliberate 

The War of 1914 was certainly not forced on the masses; it was even desired by the whole people. 

There was a desire to bring the general feeling of uncertainty to an end once and for all. And it is only 
in the light of this fact that we can understand how more than two million German men and youths 
voluntarily joined the colours, ready to shed the last drop of their blood for the cause. 

For me these hours came as a deliverance from the distress that had weighed upon me during the days 
of my youth. I am not ashamed to acknowledge to-day that I was carried away by the enthusiasm of 
the moment and that I sank down upon my knees and thanked Heaven out of the fullness of my heart 
for the favour of having been permitted to live in such a time. 

The fight for freedom had broken out on an unparalleled scale in the history of the world. From the 
moment that Fate took the helm in hand the conviction grew among the mass of the people that now it 
was not a question of deciding the destinies of Austria or Serbia but that the very existence of the 
German nation itself was at stake. 

At last, after many years of blindness, the people saw clearly into the future. Therefore, almost 
immediately after the gigantic struggle had begun, an excessive enthusiasm was replaced by a more 
earnest and more fitting undertone, because the exaltation of the popular spirit was not a mere passing 
frenzy. It was only too necessary that the gravity of the situation should be recognized. At that time 
there was, generally speaking, not the slightest presentiment or conception of how long the war might 
last. People dreamed of the soldiers being home by Christmas and that then they would resume their 
daily work in peace. 

Whatever mankind desires, that it will hope for and believe in. The overwhelming majority of the 
people had long since grown weary of the perpetual insecurity in the general condition of public 
affairs. Hence it was only natural that no one believed that the Austro-Serbian conflict could be 
shelved. Therefore they looked forward to a radical settlement of accounts. I also belonged to the 
millions that desired this. 

The moment the news of the Sarajevo outrage reached Munich two ideas came into my mind: First, 
that war was absolutely inevitable and, second, that the Habsburg State would now be forced to 
honour its signature to the alliance. For what I had feared most was that one day Germany herself, 
perhaps as a result of the Alliance, would become involved in a conflict the first direct cause of which 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap5.htm (3 of 10) [04/06/2000 16:10:03] 


did not affect Austria. In such a contingency, I feared that the Austrian State, for domestic political 
reasons, would find itself unable to decide in favour of its ally. But now this danger was removed. The 
old State was compelled to fight, whether it wished to do so or not. 

My own attitude towards the conflict was equally simple and clear. I believed that it was not a case of 
Austria fighting to get satisfaction from Serbia but rather a case of Germany fighting for her own 
existence the German nation for its own to-be-or-not-to-be, for its freedom and for its future. The 
work of Bismarck must now be carried on. Young Germany must show itself worthy of the blood 
shed by our fathers on so many heroic fields of battle, from Weissenburg to Sedan and Paris. And if 
this struggle should bring us victory our people will again rank foremost among the great nations. 
Only then could the German Empire assert itself as the mighty champion of peace, without the 
necessity of restricting the daily bread of its children for the sake of maintaining the peace. 

As a boy and as a young man, I often longed for the occasion to prove that my national enthusiasm 
was not mere vapouring. Hurrahing sometimes seemed to me to be a kind of sinful indulgence, though 
I could not give any justification for that feeling; for, after all, who has the right to shout that 
triumphant word if he has not won the right to it there where there is no play-acting and where the 
hand of the Goddess of Destiny puts the truth and sincerity of nations and men through her inexorable 
test? Just as millions of others, I felt a proud joy in being permitted to go through this test. I had so 
often sung Deutschland iiber Alles and so often roared Heil that I now thought it was as a kind of 
retro-active grace that I was granted the right of appearing before the Court of Eternal Justice to 
testify to the truth of those sentiments. 

One thing was clear to me from the very beginning, namely, that in the event of war, which now 
seemed inevitable, my books would have to be thrown aside forthwith. I also realized that my place 
would have to be there where the inner voice of conscience called me. 

I had left Austria principally for political reasons. What therefore could be more rational than that I 
should put into practice the logical consequences of my political opinions, now that the war had 
begun. I had no desire to fight for the Habsburg cause, but I was prepared to die at any time for my 
own kinsfolk and the Empire to which they really belonged. 

On August 3rd, 1914, 1 presented an urgent petition to His Majesty, King Ludwig III, requesting to be 
allowed to serve in a Bavarian regiment. In those days the Chancellery had its hands quite full and 
therefore I was all the more pleased when I received the answer a day later, that my request had been 
granted. I opened the document with trembling hands; and no words of mine could now describe the 
satisfaction I felt on reading that I was instructed to report to a Bavarian regiment. Within a few days I 
was wearing that uniform which I was not to put oft again for nearly six years. 

For me, as for every German, the most memorable period of my life now began. Face to face with that 
mighty struggle, all the past fell away into oblivion. With a wistful pride I look back on those days, 
especially because we are now approaching the tenth anniversary of that memorable happening. I 
recall those early weeks of war when kind fortune permitted me to take my place in that heroic 
struggle among the nations. 

As the scene unfolds itself before my mind, it seems only like yesterday. I see myself among my 
young comrades on our first parade drill, and so on until at last the day came on which we were to 
leave for the front. 

In common with the others, I had one worry during those days. This was a fear that we might arrive 
too late for the fighting at the front. Time and again that thought disturbed me and every 
announcement of a victorious engagement left a bitter taste, which increased as the news of further 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap5.htm (4 of 10) [04/06/2000 16:10:03] 


victories arrived. 

At long last the day came when we left Munich on war service. For the first time in my life I saw the 
Rhine, as we journeyed westwards to stand guard before that historic German river against its 
traditional and grasping enemy. As the first soft rays of the morning sun broke through the light mist 
and disclosed to us the Niederwald Statue, with one accord the whole troop train broke into the strains 
of Die Wacht am Rhein. I then felt as if my heart could not contain its spirit. 

And then followed a damp, cold night in Flanders. We marched in silence throughout the night and as 
the morning sun came through the mist an iron greeting suddenly burst above our heads. Shrapnel 
exploded in our midst and spluttered in the damp ground. But before the smoke of the explosion 
disappeared a wild Hurrah was shouted from two hundred throats, in response to this first greeting of 
Death. Then began the whistling of bullets and the booming of cannons, the shouting and singing of 
the combatants. With eyes straining feverishly, we pressed forward, quicker and quicker, until we 
finally came to close-quarter fighting, there beyond the beet-fields and the meadows. Soon the strains 
of a song reached us from afar. Nearer and nearer, from company to company, it came. And while 
Death began to make havoc in our ranks we passed the song on to those beside us: Deutschland, 
Deutschland tiber Alles, tiber Alles in der Welt. 

After four days in the trenches we came back. Even our step was no longer what it had been. Boys of 
seventeen looked now like grown men. The rank and file of the List Regiment n ) had not been 
properly trained in the art of warfare, but they knew how to die like old soldiers. 

That was the beginning. And thus we carried on from year to year. A feeling of horror replaced the 
romantic fighting spirit. Enthusiasm cooled down gradually and exuberant spirits were quelled by the 
fear of the ever-present Death. A time came when there arose within each one of us a conflict between 
the urge to self-preservation and the call of duty. And I had to go through that conflict too. As Death 
sought its prey everywhere and unrelentingly a nameless Something rebelled within the weak body 
and tried to introduce itself under the name of Common Sense; but in reality it was Fear, which had 
taken on this cloak in order to impose itself on the individual. But the more the voice which advised 
prudence increased its efforts and the more clear and persuasive became its appeal, resistance became 
all the stronger; until finally the internal strife was over and the call of duty was triumphant. Already 
in the winter of 1915161 had come through that inner struggle. The will had asserted its incontestable 
mastery. Whereas in the early days I went into the fight with a cheer and a laugh, I was now habitually 
calm and resolute. And that frame of mind endured. Fate might now put me through the final test 
without my nerves or reason giving way. The young volunteer had become an old soldier. 

This same transformation took place throughout the whole army. Constant fighting had aged and 
toughened it and hardened it, so that it stood firm and dauntless against every assault. 

Only now was it possible to judge that army. After two and three years of continuous fighting, having 
been thrown into one battle after another, standing up stoutly against superior numbers and superior 
armament, suffering hunger and privation, the time had come when one could assess the value of that 
singular fighting force. 

For a thousand years to come nobody will dare to speak of heroism without recalling the German 
Army of the World War. And then from the dim past will emerge the immortal vision of those solid 
ranks of steel helmets that never flinched and never faltered. And as long as Germans live they will be 
proud to remember that these men were the sons of their forefathers. 

I was then a soldier and did not wish to meddle in politics, all the more so because the time was 
inopportune. I still believe that the most modest stable-boy of those days served his country better 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap5.htm (5 of 10) [04/06/2000 16:10:03] 


than the best of, let us say, the parliamentary deputies. My hatred for those footlers was never greater 
than in those days when all decent men who had anything to say said it point-blank in the enemys 
face; or, failing this, kept their mouths shut and did their duty elsewhere. I despised those political 
fellows and if I had had my way I would have formed them into a Labour Battalion and given them 
the opportunity of babbling amongst themselves to their hearts content, without offence or harm to 
decent people. 

In those days I cared nothing for politics; but I could not help forming an opinion on certain 
manifestations which affected not only the whole nation but also us soldiers in particular. There were 
two things which caused me the greatest anxiety at that time and which I had come to regard as 
detrimental to our interests. 

Shortly after our first series of victories a certain section of the Press already began to throw cold 
water, drip by drip, on the enthusiasm of the public. At first this was not obvious to many people. It 
was done under the mask of good intentions and a spirit of anxious care. The public was told that big 
celebrations of victories were somewhat out of place and were not worthy expressions of the spirit of 
a great nation. The fortitude and valour of German soldiers were accepted facts which did not 
necessarily call for outbursts of celebration. Furthermore, it was asked, what would foreign opinion 
have to say about these manifestations? Would not foreign opinion react more favourably to a quiet 
and sober form of celebration rather than to all this wild jubilation? Surely the time had come so the 
Press declared for us Germans to remember that this war was not our work and that hence there need 
be no feeling of shame in declaring our willingness to do our share towards effecting an understanding 
among the nations. For this reason it would not be wise to sully the radiant deeds of our army with 
unbecoming jubilation; for the rest of the world would never understand this. Furthermore, nothing is 
more appreciated than the modesty with which a true hero quietly and unassumingly carries on and 
forgets. Such was the gist of their warning. 

Instead of catching these fellows by their long ears and dragging them to some ditch and looping a 
cord around their necks, so that the victorious enthusiasm of the nation should no longer offend the 
aesthetic sensibilities of these knights of the pen, a general Press campaign was now allowed to go on 
against what was called unbecoming and undignified forms of victorious celebration. 

No one seemed to have the faintest idea that when public enthusiasm is once damped, nothing can 
enkindle it again, when the necessity arises. This enthusiasm is an intoxication and must be kept up in 
that form. Without the support of this enthusiastic spirit how would it be possible to endure in a 
struggle which, according to human standards, made such immense demands on the spiritual stamina 
of the nation? 

I was only too well acquainted with the psychology of the broad masses not to know that in such cases 
a magnaminous aestheticism cannot fan the fire which is needed to keep the iron hot. In my eyes it 
was even a mistake not to have tried to raise the pitch of public enthusiasm still higher. Therefore I 
could not at all understand why the contrary policy was adopted, that is to say, the policy of damping 
the public spirit. 

Another thing which irritated me was the manner in which Marxism was regarded and accepted. I 
thought that all this proved how little they knew about the Marxist plague. It was believed in all 
seriousness that the abolition of party distinctions during the War had made Marxism a mild and 
moderate thing. 

But here there was no question of party. There was question of a doctrine which was being expounded 
for the express purpose of leading humanity to its destruction. The purport of this doctrine was not 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap5.htm (6 of 10) [04/06/2000 16:10:03] 


understood because nothing was said about that side of the question in our Jew-ridden universities and 
because our supercilious bureaucratic officials did not think it worth while to read up a subject which 
had not been prescribed in their university course. This mighty revolutionary trend was going on 
beside them; but those intellectuals would not deign to give it their attention. That is why State 
enterprise nearly always lags behind private enterprise. Of these gentry once can truly say that their 
maxim is: What we dont know wont bother us. In the August of 1914 the German worker was 
looked upon as an adherent of Marxist socialism. That was a gross error. When those fateful hours 
dawned the German worker shook off the poisonous clutches of that plague; otherwise he would not 
have been so willing and ready to fight. And people were stupid enough to imagine that Marxism had 
now become national, another apt illustration of the fact that those in authority had never taken the 
trouble to study the real tenor of the Marxist teaching. If they had done so, such foolish errors would 
not have been committed. 

Marxism, whose final objective was and is and will continue to be the destruction of all non- Jewish 
national States, had to witness in those days of July 1914 how the German working classes, which it 
had been inveigling, were aroused by the national spirit and rapidly ranged themselves on the side of 
the Fatherland. Within a few days the deceptive smoke-screen of that infamous national betrayal had 
vanished into thin air and the Jewish bosses suddenly found themselves alone and deserted. It was as 
if not a vestige had been left of that folly and madness with which the masses of the German people 
had been inoculated for sixty years. That was indeed an evil day for the betrayers of German Labour. 
The moment, however, that the leaders realized the danger which threatened them they pulled the 
magic cap of deceit over their ears and, without being identified, played the part of mimes in the 
national reawakening. 

The time seemed to have arrived for proceeding against the whole Jewish gang of public pests. Then it 
was that action should have been taken regardless of any consequent whining or protestation. At one 
stroke, in the August of 1914, all the empty nonsense about international solidarity was knocked out 
of the heads of the German working classes. A few weeks later, instead of this stupid talk sounding in 
their ears, they heard the noise of American-manufactured shrapnel bursting above the heads of the 
marching columns, as a symbol of international comradeship. Now that the German worker had 
rediscovered the road to nationhood, it ought to have been the duty of any Government which had the 
care of the people in its keeping, to take this opportunity of mercilessly rooting out everything that 
was opposed to the national spirit. 

While the flower of the nations manhood was dying at the front, there was time enough at home at 
least to exterminate this vermin. But, instead of doing so, His Majesty the Kaiser held out his hand to 
these hoary criminals, thus assuring them his protection and allowing them to regain their mental 

And so the viper could begin his work again. This time, however, more carefully than before, but still 
more destructively. While honest people dreamt of reconciliation these perjured criminals were 
making preparations for a revolution. 

Naturally I was distressed at the half-measures which were adopted at that time; but I never thought it 
possible that the final consequences could have been so disastrous? 

But what should have been done then? Throw the ringleaders into gaol, prosecute them and rid the 
nation of them? Uncompromising military measures should have been adopted to root out the evil. 
Parties should have been abolished and the Reichstag brought to its senses at the point of the bayonet, 
if necessary. It would have been still better if the Reichstag had been dissolved immediately. Just as 
the Republic to-day dissolves the parties when it wants to, so in those days there was even more 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap5.htm (7 of 10) [04/06/2000 16:10:03] 


justification for applying that measure, seeing that the very existence of the nation was at stake. Of 
course this suggestion would give rise to the question: Is it possible to eradicate ideas by force of 
arms? Could a Weltanschhauung be attacked by means of physical force? 

At that time I turned these questions over and over again in my mind. By studying analogous cases, 
exemplified in history, particularly those which had arisen from religious circumstances, I came to the 
following fundamental conclusion: 

Ideas and philosophical systems as well as movements grounded on a definite spiritual foundation, 
whether true or not, can never be broken by the use of force after a certain stage, except on one 
condition: namely, that this use of force is in the service of a new idea or Weltanschhauung which 
burns with a new flame. 

The application of force alone, without moral support based on a spiritual concept, can never bring 
about the destruction of an idea or arrest the propagation of it, unless one is ready and able ruthlessly 
to exterminate the last upholders of that idea even to a man, and also wipe out any tradition which it 
may tend to leave behind. Now in the majority of cases the result of such a course has been to exclude 
such a State, either temporarily or for ever, from the comity of States that are of political significance; 
but experience has also shown that such a sanguinary method of extirpation arouses the better section 
of the population under the persecuting power. As a matter of fact, every persecution which has no 
spiritual motives to support it is morally unjust and raises opposition among the best elements of the 
population; so much so that these are driven more and more to champion the ideas that are unjustly 
persecuted. With many individuals this arises from the sheer spirit of opposition to every attempt at 
suppressing spiritual things by brute force. 

In this way the number of convinced adherents of the persecuted doctrine increases as the persecution 
progresses. Hence the total destruction of a new doctrine can be accomplished only by a vast plan of 
extermination; but this, in the final analysis, means the loss of some of the best blood in a nation or 
State. And that blood is then avenged, because such an internal and total clean-up brings about the 
collapse of the nations strength. And such a procedure is always condemned to futility from the very 
start if the attacked doctrine should happen to have spread beyond a small circle. 

That is why in this case, as with all other growths, the doctrine can be exterminated in its earliest 
stages. As time goes on its powers of resistance increase, until at the approach of age it gives way to 
younger elements, but under another form and from other motives. 

The fact remains that nearly all attempts to exterminate a doctrine, without having some spiritual basis 
of attack against it, and also to wipe out all the organizations it has created, have led in many cases to 
the very opposite being achieved; and that for the following reasons: 

When sheer force is used to combat the spread of a doctrine, then that force must be employed 
systematically and persistently. This means that the chances of success in the suppression of a 
doctrine lie only in the persistent and uniform application of the methods chosen. The moment 
hesitation is shown, and periods of tolerance alternate with the application of force, the doctrine 
against which these measures are directed will not only recover strength but every successive 
persecution will bring to its support new adherents who have been shocked by the oppressive methods 
employed. The old adherents will become more embittered and their allegiance will thereby be 
strengthened. Therefore when force is employed success is dependent on the consistent manner in 
which it is used. This persistence, however, is nothing less than the product of definite spiritual 
convictions. Every form of force that is not supported by a spiritual backing will be always indecisive 
and uncertain. Such a force lacks the stability that can be found only in a Weltanschhauung which has 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap5.htm (8 of 10) [04/06/2000 16:10:03] 


devoted champions. Such a force is the expression of the individual energies; therefore it is from time 
to time dependent on the change of persons in whose hands it is employed and also on their characters 
and capacities. 

But there is something else to be said: Every Weltanschhauung, whether religious or political and it 
is sometimes difficult to say where the one ends and the other begins fights not so much for the 
negative destruction of the opposing world of ideas as for the positive realization of its own ideas. 
Thus its struggle lies in attack rather than in defence. It has the advantage of knowing where its 
objective lies, as this objective represents the realization of its own ideas. Inversely, it is difficult to 
say when the negative aim for the destruction of a hostile doctrine is reached and secured. For this 
reason alone a Weltanschhauung which is of an aggressive character is more definite in plan and more 
powerful and decisive in action than a Weltanschhauung which takes up a merely defensive attitude. 
If force be used to combat a spiritual power, that force remains a defensive measure only so long as 
the wielders of it are not the standard-bearers and apostles of a new spiritual doctrine. 

To sum up, the following must be borne in mind: That every attempt to combat a Weltanschhauung by 
means of force will turn out futile in the end if the struggle fails to take the form of an offensive for 
the establishment of an entirely new spiritual order of things. It is only in the struggle between two 
Weltan-schauungen that physical force, consistently and ruthlessly applied, will eventually turn the 
scales in its own favour. It was here that the fight against Marxism had hitherto failed. 

This was also the reason why Bismarcks anti- socialist legislation failed and was bound to fail in the 
long run, despite everything. It lacked the basis of a new Weltanschhauung for whose development 
and extension the struggle might have been taken up. To say that the serving up of drivel about a 
so-called State- Authority or Law-and-Order was an adequate foundation for the spiritual driving 
force in a life-or-death struggle is only what one would expect to hear from the wiseacres in high 
official positions. 

It was because there were no adequate spiritual motives back of this offensive that Bismarck was 
compelled to hand over the administration of his socialist legislative measures to the judgment and 
approval of those circles which were themselves the product of the Marxist teaching. Thus a very 
ludicrous state of affairs prevailed when the Iron Chancellor surrendered the fate of his struggle 
against Marxism to the goodwill of the bourgeois democracy. He left the goat to take care of the 
garden. But this was only the necessary result of the failure to find a fundamentally new 
Weltanschhauung which would attract devoted champions to its cause and could be established on the 
ground from which Marxism had been driven out. And thus the result of the Bismarckian campaign 
was deplorable. 

During the World War, or at the beginning of it, were the conditions any different? Unfortunately, 
they were not. 

The more I then pondered over the necessity for a change in the attitude of the executive government 
towards Social-Democracy, as the incorporation of contemporary Marxism, the more I realized the 
want of a practical substitute for this doctrine. Supposing Social-Democracy were overthrown, what 
had one to offer the masses in its stead? Not a single movement existed which promised any success 
in attracting vast numbers of workers who would be now more or less without leaders, and holding 
these workers in its train. It is nonsensical to imagine that the international fanatic who has just 
severed his connection with a class party would forthwith join a bourgeois party, or, in other words, 
another class organization. For however unsatisfactory these various organizations may appear to be, 
it cannot be denied that bourgeois politicians look on the distinction between classes as a very 
important factor in social life, provided it does not turn out politically disadvantageous to them. If 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap5.htm (9 of 10) [04/06/2000 16:10:03] 


they deny this fact they show themselves not only impudent but also mendacious. 

Generally speaking, one should guard against considering the broad masses more stupid than they 
really are. In political matters it frequently happens that feeling judges more correctly than intellect. 
But the opinion that this feeling on the part of the masses is sufficient proof of their stupid 
international attitude can be immediately and definitely refuted by the simple fact that pacifist 
democracy is no less fatuous, though it draws its supporters almost exclusively from bourgeois circles. 
As long as millions of citizens daily gulp down what the social-democratic Press tells them, it ill 
becomes the Masters to joke at the expense of the Comrades; for in the long run they all swallow 
the same hash, even though it be dished up with different spices. In both cases the cook is one and the 
same the Jew. 

One should be careful about contradicting established facts. It is an undeniable fact that the class 
question has nothing to do with questions concerning ideals, though that dope is administered at 
election time. Class arrogance among a large section of our people, as well as a prevailing tendency to 
look down on the manual labourer, are obvious facts and not the fancies of some day-dreamer. 
Nevertheless it only illustrates the mentality of our so-called intellectual circles, that they have not yet 
grasped the fact that circumstances which are incapable of preventing the growth of such a plague as 
Marxism are certainly not capable of restoring what has been lost. 

The bourgeois parties a name coined by themselves will never again be able to win over and hold 
the proletarian masses in their train. That is because two worlds stand opposed to one another here, in 
part naturally and in part artificially divided. These two camps have one leading thought, and that is 
that they must fight one another. But in such a fight the younger will come off victorious; and that is 

In 1914a fight against Social-Democracy was indeed quite conceivable. But the lack of any practical 
substitute made it doubtful how long the fight could be kept up. In this respect there was a gaping 

Long before the War I was of the same opinion and that was the reason why I could not decide to join 
any of the parties then existing. During the course of the World War my conviction was still further 
confirmed by the manifest impossibility of fighting Social-Democracy in anything like a thorough 
way: because for that purpose there should have been a movement that was something more than a 
mere parliamentary party, and there was none such. 

I frequently discussed that want with my intimate comrades. And it was then that I first conceived the 
idea of taking up political work later on. As I have often assured my friends, it was just this that 
induced me to become active on the public hustings after the War, in addition to my professional 
work. And I am sure that this decision was arrived at after much earnest thought. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap5.htm (10 of 10) [04/06/2000 16:10:03] 




In watching the course of political events I was always struck by the active part which propaganda 
played in them. I saw that it was an instrument, which the Marxist Socialists knew how to handle in a 
masterly way and how to put it to practical uses. Thus I soon came to realize that the right use of 
propaganda was an art in itself and that this art was practically unknown to our bourgeois parties. The 
Christian-Socialist Party alone, especially in Luegers time, showed a certain efficiency in the 
employment of this instrument and owed much of their success to it. 

It was during the War, however, that we had the best chance of estimating the tremendous results 
which could be obtained by a propagandist system properly carried out. Here again, unfortunately, 
everything was left to the other side, the work done on our side being worse than insignificant. It was 
the total failure of the whole German system of information a failure which was perfectly obvious to 
every soldier that urged me to consider the problem of propaganda in a comprehensive way. I had 
ample opportunity to learn a practical lesson in this matter; for unfortunately it was only too well 
taught us by the enemy. The lack on our side was exploited by the enemy in such an efficient manner 
that one could say it showed itself as a real work of genius. In that propaganda carried on by the 
enemy I found admirable sources of instruction. The lesson to be learned from this had unfortunately 
no attraction for the geniuses on our own side. They were simply above all such things, too clever to 
accept any teaching. Anyhow they did not honestly wish to learn anything. 

Had we any propaganda at all? Alas, I can reply only in the negative. All that was undertaken in this 
direction was so utterly inadequate and misconceived from the very beginning that not only did it 
prove useless but at times harmful. In substance it was insufficient. Psychologically it was all wrong. 
Anybody who had carefully investigated the German propaganda must have formed that judgment of 
it. Our people did not seem to be clear even about the primary question itself: Whether propaganda is 
a means or an end? 

Propaganda is a means and must, therefore, be judged in relation to the end it is intended to serve. It 
must be organized in such a way as to be capable of attaining its objective. And, as it is quite clear 
that the importance of the objective may vary from the standpoint of general necessity, the essential 
internal character of the propaganda must vary accordingly. The cause for which we fought during the 
War was the noblest and highest that man could strive for. We were fighting for the freedom and 
independence of our country, for the security of our future welfare and the honour of the nation. 
Despite all views to the contrary, this honour does actually exist, or rather it will have to exist; for a 
nation without honour will sooner or later lose its freedom and independence. This is in accordance 
with the ruling of a higher justice, for a generation of poltroons is not entitled to freedom. He who 
would be a slave cannot have honour; for such honour would soon become an object of general scorn. 

Germany was waging war for its very existence. The purpose of its war propaganda should have been 
to strengthen the fighting spirit in that struggle and help it to victory. 

But when nations are fighting for their existence on this earth, when the question of to be or not to be 
has to be answered, then all humane and aesthetic considerations must be set aside; for these ideals do 
not exist of themselves somewhere in the air but are the product of mans creative imagination and 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap6.htm (1 of 6) [04/06/2000 16:10:43] 


disappear when he disappears. Nature knows nothing of them. Moreover, they are characteristic of 
only a small number of nations, or rather of races, and their value depends on the measure in which 
they spring from the racial feeling of the latter. Humane and aesthetic ideals will disappear from the 
inhabited earth when those races disappear which are the creators and standard-bearers of them. 

All such ideals are only of secondary importance when a nation is struggling for its existence. They 
must be prevented from entering into the struggle the moment they threaten to weaken the stamina of 
the nation that is waging war. That is always the only visible effect whereby their place in the struggle 
is to be judged. 

In regard to the part played by humane feeling, Moltke stated that in time of war the essential thing is 
to get a decision as quickly as possible and that the most ruthless methods of fighting are at the same 
time the most humane. When people attempt to answer this reasoning by highfalutin talk about 
aesthetics, etc., only one answer can be given. It is that the vital questions involved in the struggle of a 
nation for its existence must not be subordinated to any eesthetic considerations. The yoke of slavery 
is and always will remain the most unpleasant experience that mankind can endure. Do the Schwabing 
12 ) decadents look upon Germanys lot to-day as aesthetic? Of course, one doesnt discuss such a 
question with the Jews, because they are the modern inventors of this cultural perfume. Their very 
existence is an incarnate denial of the beauty of Gods image in His creation. 

Since these ideas of what is beautiful and humane have no place in warfare, they are not to be used as 
standards of war propaganda. 

During the War, propaganda was a means to an end. And this end was the struggle for existence of the 
German nation. Propaganda, therefore, should have been regarded from the standpoint of its utility for 
that purpose. The most cruel weapons were then the most humane, provided they helped towards a 
speedier decision; and only those methods were good and beautiful which helped towards securing the 
dignity and freedom of the nation. Such was the only possible attitude to adopt towards war 
propaganda in the life-or-death struggle. 

If those in what are called positions of authority had realized this there would have been no 
uncertainty about the form and employment of war propaganda as a weapon; for it is nothing but a 
weapon, and indeed a most terrifying weapon in the hands of those who know how to use it. 

The second question of decisive importance is this: To whom should propaganda be made to appeal? 
To the educated intellectual classes? Or to the less intellectual? 

Propaganda must always address itself to the broad masses of the people. For the intellectual classes, 
or what are called the intellectual classes to-day, propaganda is not suited, but only scientific 
exposition. Propaganda has as little to do with science as an advertisement poster has to do with art, as 
far as concerns the form in which it presents its message. The art of the advertisement poster consists 
in the ability of the designer to attract the attention of the crowd through the form and colours he 
chooses. The advertisement poster announcing an exhibition of art has no other aim than to convince 
the public of the importance of the exhibition. The better it does that, the better is the art of the poster 
as such. Being meant accordingly to impress upon the public the meaning of the exposition, the poster 
can never take the place of the artistic objects displayed in the exposition hall. They are something 
entirely different. Therefore, those who wish to study the artistic display must study something that is 
quite different from the poster; indeed for that purpose a mere wandering through the exhibition 
galleries is of no use. The student of art must carefully and thoroughly study each exhibit in order 
slowly to form a judicious opinion about it. 

The situation is the same in regard to what we understand by the word, propaganda. The purpose of 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap6.htm (2 of 6) [04/06/2000 16:10:43] 


propaganda is not the personal instruction of the individual, but rather to attract public attention to 
certain things, the importance of which can be brought home to the masses only by this means. 

Here the art of propaganda consists in putting a matter so clearly and forcibly before the minds of the 
people as to create a general conviction regarding the reality of a certain fact, the necessity of certain 
things and the just character of something that is essential. But as this art is not an end in itself and 
because its purpose must be exactly that of the advertisement poster, to attract the attention of the 
masses and not by any means to dispense individual instructions to those who already have an 
educated opinion on things or who wish to form such an opinion on grounds of objective study 
because that is not the purpose of propaganda, it must appeal to the feelings of the public rather than 
to their reasoning powers. 

All propaganda must be presented in a popular form and must fix its intellectual level so as not to be 
above the heads of the least intellectual of those to whom it is directed. Thus its purely intellectual 
level will have to be that of the lowest mental common denominator among the public it is desired to 
reach. When there is question of bringing a whole nation within the circle of its influence, as happens 
in the case of war propaganda, then too much attention cannot be paid to the necessity of avoiding a 
high level, which presupposes a relatively high degree of intelligence among the public. 

The more modest the scientific tenor of this propaganda and the more it is addressed exclusively to 
public sentiment, the more decisive will be its success. This is the best test of the value of a 
propaganda, and not the approbation of a small group of intellectuals or artistic people. 

The art of propaganda consists precisely in being able to awaken the imagination of the public through 
an appeal to their feelings, in finding the appropriate psychological form that will arrest the attention 
and appeal to the hearts of the national masses. That this is not understood by those among us whose 
wits are supposed to have been sharpened to the highest pitch is only another proof of their vanity or 
mental inertia. 

Once we have understood how necessary it is to concentrate the persuasive forces of propaganda on 
the broad masses of the people, the following lessons result therefrom: 

That it is a mistake to organize the direct propaganda as if it were a manifold system of scientific 

The receptive powers of the masses are very restricted, and their understanding is feeble. On the other 
hand, they quickly forget. Such being the case, all effective propaganda must be confined to a few 
bare essentials and those must be expressed as far as possible in stereotyped formulas. These slogans 
should be persistently repeated until the very last individual has come to grasp the idea that has been 
put forward. If this principle be forgotten and if an attempt be made to be abstract and general, the 
propaganda will turn out ineffective; for the public will not be able to digest or retain what is offered 
to them in this way. Therefore, the greater the scope of the message that has to be presented, the more 
necessary it is for the propaganda to discover that plan of action which is psychologically the most 

It was, for example, a fundamental mistake to ridicule the worth of the enemy as the Austrian and 
German comic papers made a chief point of doing in their propaganda. The very principle here is a 
mistaken one; for, when they came face to face with the enemy, our soldiers had quite a different 
impression. Therefore, the mistake had disastrous results. Once the German soldier realised what a 
tough enemy he had to fight he felt that he had been deceived by the manufacturers of the information 
which had been given him. Therefore, instead of strengthening and stimulating his fighting spirit, this 
information had quite the contrary effect. Finally he lost heart. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap6.htm (3 of 6) [04/06/2000 16:10:43] 


On the other hand, British and American war propaganda was psychologically efficient. By picturing 
the Germans to their own people as Barbarians and Huns, they were preparing their soldiers for the 
horrors of war and safeguarding them against illusions. The most terrific weapons which those 
soldiers encountered in the field merely confirmed the information that they had already received and 
their belief in the truth of the assertions made by their respective governments was accordingly 
reinforced. Thus their rage and hatred against the infamous foe was increased. The terrible havoc 
caused by the German weapons of war was only another illustration of the Hunnish brutality of those 
barbarians; whereas on the side of the Entente no time was left the soldiers to meditate on the similar 
havoc which their own weapons were capable of. Thus the British soldier was never allowed to feel 
that the information which he received at home was untrue. Unfortunately the opposite was the case 
with the Germans, who finally wound up by rejecting everything from home as pure swindle and 
humbug. This result was made possible because at home they thought that the work of propaganda 
could be entrusted to the first ass that came along, braying of his own special talents, and they had no 
conception of the fact that propaganda demands the most skilled brains that can be found. 

Thus the German war propaganda afforded us an incomparable example of how the work of 
enlightenment should not be done and how such an example was the result of an entire failure to take 
any psychological considerations whatsoever into account. 

From the enemy, however, a fund of valuable knowledge could be gained by those who kept their 
eyes open, whose powers of perception had not yet become sclerotic, and who during four-and-a-half 
years had to experience the perpetual flood of enemy propaganda. 

The worst of all was that our people did not understand the very first condition which has to be 
fulfilled in every kind of propaganda; namely, a systematically one-sided attitude towards every 
problem that has to be dealt with. In this regard so many errors were committed, even from the very 
beginning of the war, that it was justifiable to doubt whether so much folly could be attributed solely 
to the stupidity of people in higher quarters. 

What, for example, should we say of a poster which purported to advertise some new brand of soap by 
insisting on the excellent qualities of the competitive brands? We should naturally shake our heads. 
And it ought to be just the same in a similar kind of political advertisement. The aim of propaganda is 
not to try to pass judgment on conflicting rights, giving each its due, but exclusively to emphasize the 
right which we are asserting. Propaganda must not investigate the truth objectively and, in so far as it 
is favourable to the other side, present it according to the theoretical rules of justice; yet it must 
present only that aspect of the truth which is favourable to its own side. 

It was a fundamental mistake to discuss the question of who was responsible for the outbreak of the 
war and declare that the sole responsibility could not be attributed to Germany. The sole responsibility 
should have been laid on the shoulders of the enemy, without any discussion whatsoever. 

And what was the consequence of these half- measures? The broad masses of the people are not made 
up of diplomats or professors of public jurisprudence nor simply of persons who are able to form 
reasoned judgment in given cases, but a vacillating crowd of human children who are constantly 
wavering between one idea and another. As soon as our own propaganda made the slightest 
suggestion that the enemy had a certain amount of justice on his side, then we laid down the basis on 
which the justice of our own cause could be questioned. The masses are not in a position to discern 
where the enemys fault ends and where our own begins. In such a case they become hesitant and 
distrustful, especially when the enemy does not make the same mistake but heaps all the blame on his 
adversary. Could there be any clearer proof of this than the fact that finally our own people believed 
what was said by the enemys propaganda, which was uniform and consistent in its assertions, rather 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap6.htm (4 of 6) [04/06/2000 16:10:43] 


than what our own propaganda said? And that, of course, was increased by the mania for objectivity 
which addicts our people. Everybody began to be careful about doing an injustice to the enemy, even 
at the cost of seriously injuring, and even ruining his own people and State. 

Naturally the masses were not conscious of the fact that those in authority had failed to study the 
subject from this angle. 

The great majority of a nation is so feminine in its character and outlook that its thought and conduct 
are ruled by sentiment rather than by sober reasoning. This sentiment, however, is not complex, but 
simple and consistent. It is not highly differentiated, but has only the negative and positive notions of 
love and hatred, right and wrong, truth and falsehood. Its notions are never partly this and partly that. 
English propaganda especially understood this in a marvellous way and put what they understood into 
practice. They allowed no half-measures which might have given rise to some doubt. 

Proof of how brilliantly they understood that the feeling of the masses is something primitive was 
shown in their policy of publishing tales of horror and outrages which fitted in with the real horrors of 
the time, thereby cleverly and ruthlessly preparing the ground for moral solidarity at the front, even in 
times of great defeats. Further, the way in which they pilloried the German enemy as solely 
responsible for the war which was a brutal and absolute falsehood and the way in which they 
proclaimed his guilt was excellently calculated to reach the masses, realizing that these are always 
extremist in their feelings. And thus it was that this atrocious lie was positively believed. 

The effectiveness of this kind of propaganda is well illustrated by the fact that after four-and-a-half 
years, not only was the enemy still carrying on his propagandist work, but it was already undermining 
the stamina of our people at home. 

That our propaganda did not achieve similar results is not to be wondered at, because it had the germs 
of inefficiency lodged in its very being by reason of its ambiguity. And because of the very nature of 
its content one could not expect it to make the necessary impression on the masses. Only our feckless 
statesmen could have imagined that on pacifists slops of such a kind the enthusiasm could be 
nourished which is necessary to enkindle that spirit which leads men to die for their country. 

And so this product of ours was not only worthless but detrimental. 

No matter what an amount of talent employed in the organization of propaganda, it will have no result 
if due account is not taken of these fundamental principles. Propaganda must be limited to a few 
simple themes and these must be represented again and again. Here, as in innumerable other cases, 
perseverance is the first and most important condition of success. 

Particularly in the field of propaganda, placid aesthetes and blase intellectuals should never be allowed 
to take the lead. The former would readily transform the impressive character of real propaganda into 
something suitable only for literary tea parties. As to the second class of people, one must always 
beware of this pest; for, in consequence of their insensibility to normal impressions, they are 
constantly seeking new excitements. 

Such people grow sick and tired of everything. They always long for change and will always be 
incapable of putting themselves in the position of picturing the wants of their less callous 
fellow-creatures in their immediate neighbourhood, let alone trying to understand them. The blase 
intellectuals are always the first to criticize propaganda, or rather its message, because this appears to 
them to be outmoded and trivial. They are always looking for something new, always yearning for 
change; and thus they become the mortal enemies of every effort that may be made to influence the 
masses in an effective way. The moment the organization and message of a propagandist movement 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap6.htm (5 of 6) [04/06/2000 16:10:43] 


begins to be orientated according to their tastes it becomes incoherent and scattered. 

It is not the purpose of propaganda to create a series of alterations in sentiment with a view to pleasing 
these blase gentry. Its chief function is to convince the masses, whose slowness of understanding 
needs to be given time in order that they may absorb information; and only constant repetition will 
finally succeed in imprinting an idea on the memory of the crowd. 

Every change that is made in the subject of a propagandist message must always emphasize the same 
conclusion. The leading slogan must of course be illustrated in many ways and from several angles, 
but in the end one must always return to the assertion of the same formula. In this way alone can 
propaganda be consistent and dynamic in its effects. 

Only by following these general lines and sticking to them steadfastly, with uniform and concise 
emphasis, can final success be reached. Then one will be rewarded by the surprising and almost 
incredible results that such a persistent policy secures. 

The success of any advertisement, whether of a business or political nature, depends on the 
consistency and perseverance with which it is employed. 

In this respect also the propaganda organized by our enemies set us an excellent example. It confined 
itself to a few themes, which were meant exclusively for mass consumption, and it repeated these 
themes with untiring perseverance. Once these fundamental themes and the manner of placing them 
before the world were recognized as effective, they adhered to them without the slightest alteration for 
the whole duration of the War. At first all of it appeared to be idiotic in its impudent assertiveness. 
Later on it was looked upon as disturbing, but finally it was believed. 

But in England they came to understand something further: namely, that the possibility of success in 
the use of this spiritual weapon consists in the mass employment of it, and that when employed in this 
way it brings full returns for the large expenses incurred. 

In England propaganda was regarded as a weapon of the first order, whereas with us it represented the 
last hope of a livelihood for our unemployed politicians and a snug job for shirkers of the modest hero 

Taken all in all, its results were negative. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap6.htm (6 of 6) [04/06/2000 16:10:43] 




In 1915 the enemy started his propaganda among our soldiers. From 1916 onwards it steadily became 
more intensive, and at the beginning of 1918 it had swollen into a storm flood. One could now judge 
the effects of this proselytizing movement step by step. Gradually our soldiers began to think just in 
the way the enemy wished them to think. On the German side there was no counter-propaganda. 

At that time the army authorities, under our able and resolute Commander, were willing and ready to 
take up the fight in the propaganda domain also, but unfortunately they did not have the necessary 
means to carry that intention into effect. Moreover, the army authorities would have made a 
psychological mistake had they undertaken this task of mental training. To be efficacious it had come 
from the home front. For only thus could it be successful among men who for nearly four years now 
had been performing immortal deeds of heroism and undergoing all sorts of privations for the sake of 
that home. But what were the people at home doing? Was their failure to act merely due to 
unintelligence or bad faith? 

In the midsummer of 1918, after the evacuation of the southern bank of the hearne, the German Press 
adopted a policy which was so woefully inopportune, and even criminally stupid, that I used to ask 
myself a question which made me more and more furious day after day: Is it really true that we have 
nobody who will dare to put an end to this process of spiritual sabotage which is being carried on 
among our heroic troops? 

What happened in France during those days of 1914, when our armies invaded that country and were 
marching in triumph from one victory to another? What happened in Italy when their armies collapsed 
on the Isonzo front? What happened in France again during the spring of 1918, when German 
divisions took the main French positions by storm and heavy long-distance artillery bombarded Paris? 

How they whipped up the flagging courage of those troops who were retreating and fanned the fires of 
national enthusiasm among them! How their propaganda and their marvellous aptitude in the exercise 
of mass-influence reawakened the fighting spirit in that broken front and hammered into the heads of 
the soldiers a, firm belief in final victory! 

Meanwhile, what were our people doing in this sphere? Nothing, or even worse than nothing. Again 
and again I used to become enraged and indignant as I read the latest papers and realized the nature of 
the mass-murder they were committing: through their influence on the minds of the people and the 
soldiers. More than once I was tormented by the thought that if Providence had put the conduct of 
German propaganda into my hands, instead of into the hands of those incompetent and even criminal 
ignoramuses and weaklings, the outcome of the struggle might have been different. 

During those months I felt for the first time that Fate was dealing adversely with me in keeping me on 
the fighting front and in a position where any chance bullet from some nigger or other might finish 
me, whereas I could have done the Fatherland a real service in another sphere. For I was then 
presumptuous enough to believe that I would have been successful in managing the propaganda 

But I was a being without a name, one among eight millions. Hence it was better for me to keep my 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap7.htm (1 of 11) [04/06/2000 16:11:13] 


mouth shut and do my duty as well as I could in the position to which I had been assigned. 

In the summer of 1915 the first enemy leaflets were dropped on our trenches. They all told more or 
less the same story, with some variations in the form of it. The story was that distress was steadily on 
the increase in Germany; that the War would last indefinitely; that the prospect of victory for us was 
becoming fainter day after day; that the people at home were yearning for peace, but that Militarism 
and the Kaiser would not permit it; that the world which knew this very well was not waging war 
against the German people but only against the man who was exclusively responsible, the Kaiser; that 
until this enemy of world-peace was removed there could be no end to the conflict; but that when the 
War was over the liberal and democratic nations would receive the Germans as colleagues in the 
League for World Peace. This would be done the moment Prussian Militarism had been finally 

To illustrate and substantiate all these statements, the leaflets very often contained Letters from Home 
, the contents of which appeared to confirm the enemys propagandist message. 

Generally speaking, we only laughed at all these efforts. The leaflets were read, sent to base 
headquarters, then forgotten until a favourable wind once again blew a fresh contingent into the 
trenches. These were mostly dropped from aeroplanes which were used specially for that purpose. 

One feature of this propaganda was very striking. It was that in sections where Bavarian troops were 
stationed every effort was made by the enemy propagandists to stir up feeling against the Prussians, 
assuring the soldiers that Prussia and Prussia alone was the guilty party who was responsible for 
bringing on and continuing the War, and that there was no hostility whatsoever towards the Bavarians; 
but that there could be no possibility of coming to their assistance so long as they continued to serve 
Prussian interests and helped to pull the Prussian chestnuts out of the fire. 

This persistent propaganda began to have a real influence on our soldiers in 1915. The feeling against 
Prussia grew quite noticeable among the Bavarian troops, but those in authority did nothing to 
counteract it. This was something more than a mere crime of omission; for sooner or later not only the 
Prussians were bound to have to atone severely for it but the whole German nation and consequently 
the Bavarians themselves also. 

In this direction the enemy propaganda began to achieve undoubted success from 1916 onwards. 

In a similar way letters coming directly from home had long since been exercising their effect. There 
was now no further necessity for the enemy to broadcast such letters in leaflet form. And also against 
this influence from home nothing was done except a few supremely stupid warnings uttered by the 
executive government. The whole front was drenched in this poison which thoughtless women at 
home sent out, without suspecting for a moment that the enemys chances of final victory were thus 
strengthened or that the sufferings of their own men at the front were thus being prolonged and 
rendered more severe. These stupid letters written by German women eventually cost the lives of 
hundreds of thousands of our men. 

Thus in 1916 several distressing phenomena were already manifest. The whole front was complaining 
and grousing, discontented over many things and often justifiably so. While they were hungry and yet 
patient, and their relatives at home were in distress, in other quarters there was feasting and revelry. 
Yes; even on the front itself everything was not as it ought to have been in this regard. 

Even in the early stages of the war the soldiers were sometimes prone to complain; but such criticism 
was confined to internal affairs. The man who at one moment groused and grumbled ceased his 
murmur after a few moments and went about his duty silently, as if everything were in order. The 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap7.htm (2 of 11) [04/06/2000 16:11:13] 


company which had given signs of discontent a moment earlier hung on now to its bit of trench, 
defending it tooth and nail, as if Germanys fate depended on these few hundred yards of mud and 
shell-holes. The glorious old army was still at its post. A sudden change in my own fortunes soon 
placed me in a position where I had first-hand experience of the contrast between this old army and 
the home front. At the end of September 1916 my division was sent into the Battle of the Somme. For 
us this was the first of a series of heavy engagements, and the impression created was that of a 
veritable inferno, rather than war. Through weeks of incessant artillery bombardment we stood firm, 
at times ceding a little ground but then taking it back again, and never giving way. On October 7th, 
1916, 1 was wounded but had the luck of being able to get back to our lines and was then ordered to 
be sent by ambulance train to Germany. 

Two years had passed since I had left home, an almost endless period in such circumstances. I could 
hardly imagine what Germans looked like without uniforms. In the clearing hospital at Hermies I was 
startled when I suddenly heard the voice of a German woman who was acting as nursing sister and 
talking with one of the wounded men lying near me. Two years! And then this voice for the first time! 

The nearer our ambulance train approached the German frontier the more restless each one of us 
became. En route we recognised all these places through which we passed two years before as young 
volunteers Brussels, Louvain, Liege and finally we thought we recognized the first German 
homestead, with its familiar high gables and picturesque window-shutters. Home! 

What a change! From the mud of the Somme battlefields to the spotless white beds in this wonderful 
building. One hesitated at first before entering them. It was only by slow stages that one could grow 
accustomed to this new world again. But unfortunately there were certain other aspects also in which 
this new world was different. 

The spirit of the army at the front appeared to be out of place here. For the first time I encountered 
something which up to then was unknown at the front: namely, boasting of ones own cowardice. For, 
though we certainly heard complaining and grousing at the front, this was never in the spirit of any 
agitation to insubordination and certainly not an attempt to glorify ones fear. No; there at the front a 
coward was a coward and nothing else, And the contempt which his weakness aroused in the others 
was quite general, just as the real hero was admired all round. But here in hospital the spirit was quite 
different in some respects. Loudmouthed agitators were busy here in heaping ridicule on the good 
soldier and painting the weak-kneed poltroon in glorious colours. A couple of miserable human 
specimens were the ringleaders in this process of defamation. One of them boasted of having 
intentionally injured his hand in barbed-wire entanglements in order to get sent to hospital. Although 
his wound was only a slight one, it appeared that he had been here for a very long time and would be 
here interminably. Some arrangement for him seemed to be worked by some sort of swindle, just as 
he got sent here in the ambulance train through a swindle. This pestilential specimen actually had the 
audacity to parade his knavery as the manifestation of a courage which was superior to that of the 
brave soldier who dies a heros death. There were many who heard this talk in silence; but there were 
others who expressed their assent to what the fellow said. 

Personally I was disgusted at the thought that a seditious agitator of this kind should be allowed to 
remain in such an institution. What could be done? The hospital authorities here must have known 
who and what he was; and actually they did know. But still they did nothing about it. 

As soon as I was able to walk once again I obtained leave to visit Berlin. 

Bitter want was in evidence everywhere. The metropolis, with its teeming millions, was suffering 
from hunger. The talk that was current in the various places of refreshment and hospices visited by the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap7.htm (3 of 11) [04/06/2000 16:11:13] 


soldiers was much the same as that in our hospital. The impression given was that these agitators 
purposely singled out such places in order to spread their views. 

But in Munich conditions were far worse. After my discharge from hospital, I was sent to a reserve 
battalion there. I felt as in some strange town. Anger, discontent, complaints met ones ears wherever 
one went. To a certain extent this was due to the infinitely maladroit manner in which the soldiers 
who had returned from the front were treated by the non-commissioned officers who had never seen a 
days active service and who on that account were partly incapable of adopting the proper attitude 
towards the old soldiers. Naturally those old soldiers displayed certain characteristics which had been 
developed from the experiences in the trenches. The officers of the reserve units could not understand 
these peculiarities, whereas the officer home from active service was at least in a position to 
understand them for himself. As a result he received more respect from the men than officers at the 
home headquarters. But, apart from all this, the general spirit was deplorable. The art of shirking was 
looked upon as almost a proof of higher intelligence, and devotion to duty was considered a sign of 
weakness or bigotry. Government offices were staffed by Jews. Almost every clerk was a Jew and 
every Jew was a clerk. I was amazed at this multitude of combatants who belonged to the chosen 
people and could not help comparing it with their slender numbers in the fighting lines. 

In the business world the situation was even worse. Here the Jews had actually become indispensable 
. Like leeches, they were slowly sucking the blood from the pores of the national body. By means of 
newly floated War Companies an instrument had been discovered whereby all national trade was 
throttled so that no business could be carried on freely 

Special emphasis was laid on the necessity for unhampered centralization. Hence as early as 191617 
practically all production was under the control of Jewish finance. 

But against whom was the anger of the people directed? It was then that I already saw the fateful day 
approaching which must finally bring the debacle, unless timely preventive measures were taken. 

While Jewry was busy despoiling the nation and tightening the screws of its despotism, the work of 
inciting the people against the Prussians increased. And just as nothing was done at the front to put a 
stop to the venomous propaganda, so here at home no official steps were taken against it. Nobody 
seemed capable of understanding that the collapse of Prussia could never bring about the rise of 
Bavaria. On the contrary, the collapse of the one must necessarily drag the other down with it. 

This kind of behaviour affected me very deeply. In it I could see only a clever Jewish trick for 
diverting public attention from themselves to others. While Prussians and Bavarians were squabbling, 
the Jews were taking away the sustenance of both from under their very noses. While Prussians were 
being abused in Bavaria the Jews organized the revolution and with one stroke smashed both Prussia 
and Bavaria. 

I could not tolerate this execrable squabbling among people of the same German stock and preferred 
to be at the front once again. Therefore, just after my arrival in Munich I reported myself for service 
again. At the beginning of March 1917 1 rejoined my old regiment at the front. 

Towards the end of 1917 it seemed as if we had got over the worst phases of moral depression at the 
front. After the Russian collapse the whole army recovered its courage and hope, and all were 
gradually becoming more and more convinced that the struggle would end in our favour. We could 
sing once again. The ravens were ceasing to croak. Faith in the future of the Fatherland was once 
more in the ascendant. 

The Italian collapse in the autumn of 1917 had a wonderful effect; for this victory proved that it was 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap7.htm (4 of 11) [04/06/2000 16:11:13] 


possible to break through another front besides the Russian. This inspiring thought now became 
dominant in the minds of millions at the front and encouraged them to look forward with confidence 
to the spring of 1918. It was quite obvious that the enemy was in a state of depression. During this 
winter the front was somewhat quieter than usual. But that was the calm before the storm. 

Just when preparations were being made to launch a final offensive which would bring this seemingly 
eternal struggle to an end, while endless columns of transports were bringing men and munitions to 
the front, and while the men were being trained for that final onslaught, then it was that the greatest 
act of treachery during the whole War was accomplished in Germany. 

Germany must not win the War. At that moment when victory seemed ready to alight on the German 
standards, a conspiracy was arranged for the purpose of striking at the heart of the German spring 
offensive with one blow from the rear and thus making victory impossible. A general strike in the 
munition factories was organized. 

If this conspiracy could achieve its purpose the German front would have collapsed and the wishes of 
the Vorwarts (the organ of the Social-Democratic Party) that this time victory should not take the side 
of the German banners, would have been fulfilled. For want of munitions the front would be broken 
through within a few weeks, the offensive would be effectively stopped and the Entente saved. Then 
International Finance would assume control over Germany and the internal objective of the Marxist 
national betrayal would be achieved. That objective was the destruction of the national economic 
system and the establishment of international capitalistic domination in its stead. And this goal has 
really been reached, thanks to the stupid credulity of the one side and the unspeakable treachery of the 

The munition strike, however, did not bring the final success that had been hoped for: namely, to 
starve the front of ammunition. It lasted too short a time for the lack of ammunitions as such to bring 
disaster to the army, as was originally planned. But the moral damage was much more terrible. 

In the first place, what was the army fighting for if the people at home did not wish it to be victorious? 
For whom then were these enormous sacrifices and privations being made and endured? Must the 
soldiers fight for victory while the home front goes on strike against it? 

In the second place, what effect did this move have on the enemy? 

In the winter of 191718 dark clouds hovered in the firmament of the Entente. For nearly four years 
onslaught after onslaught has been made against the German giant, but they failed to bring him to the 
ground. He had to keep them at bay with one arm that held the defensive shield because his other arm 
had to be free to wield the sword against his enemies, now in the East and now in the South. But at 
last these enemies were overcome and his rear was now free for the conflict in the West. Rivers of 
blood had been shed for the accomplishment of that task; but now the sword was free to combine in 
battle with the shield on the Western Front. And since the enemy had hitherto failed to break the 
German defence here, the Germans themselves had now to launch the attack. The enemy feared and 
trembled before the prospect of this German victory. 

At Paris and London conferences followed one another in unending series. Even the enemy 
propaganda encountered difficulties. It was no longer so easy to demonstrate that the prospect of a 
German victory was hopeless. A prudent silence reigned at the front, even among the troops of the 
Entente. The insolence of their masters had suddenly subsided. A disturbing truth began to dawn on 
them. Their opinion of the German soldier had changed. Hitherto they were able to picture him as a 
kind of fool whose end would be destruction; but now they found themselves face to face with the 
soldier who had overcome their Russian ally. The policy of restricting the offensive to the East, which 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap7.htm (5 of 11) [04/06/2000 16:11:13] 


had been imposed on the German military authorities by the necessities of the situation, now seemed 
to the Entente as a tactical stroke of genius. For three years these Germans had been battering away at 
the Russian front without any apparent success at first. Those fruitless efforts were almost sneered at; 
for it was thought that in the long run the Russian giant would triumph through sheer force of 
numbers. Germany would be worn out through shedding so much blood. And facts appeared to 
confirm this hope. 

Since the September days of 1914, when for the first time interminable columns of Russian war 
prisoners poured into Germany after the Battle of Tannenberg, it seemed as if the stream would never 
end but that as soon as one army was defeated and routed another would take its place. The supply of 
soldiers which the gigantic Empire placed at the disposal of the Czar seemed inexhaustible; new 
victims were always at hand for the holocaust of war. How long could Germany hold out in this 
competition? Would not the day finally have to come when, after the last victory which the Germans 
would achieve, there would still remain reserve armies in Russia to be mustered for the final battle? 
And what then? According to human standards a Russian victory over Germany might be delayed but 
it would have to come in the long run. 

All the hopes that had been based on Russia were now lost. The Ally who had sacrificed the most 
blood on the altar of their mutual interests had come to the end of his resources and lay prostrate 
before his unrelenting foe. A feeling of terror and dismay came over the Entente soldiers who had 
hitherto been buoyed up by blind faith. They feared the coming spring. For, seeing that hitherto they 
had failed to break the Germans when the latter could concentrate only part of the fighting strength on 
the Western Front, how could they count on victory now that the undivided forces of that amazing 
land of heroes appeared to be gathered for a massed attack in the West? 

The shadow of the events which had taken place in South Tyrol, the spectre of General Cadornas 
defeated armies, were reflected in the gloomy faces of the Entente troops in Flanders. Faith in victory 
gave way to fear of defeat to come. 

Then, on those cold nights, when one almost heard the tread of the German armies advancing to the 
great assault, and the decision was being awaited in fear and trembling, suddenly a lurid light was set 
aglow in Germany and sent its rays into the last shell-hole on the enemys front. At the very moment 
when the German divisions were receiving their final orders for the great offensive a general strike 
broke out in Germany. 

At first the world was dumbfounded. Then the enemy propaganda began activities once again and 
pounced on this theme at the eleventh hour. All of a sudden a means had come which could be utilized 
to revive the sinking confidence of the Entente soldiers. The probabilities of victory could now be 
presented as certain, and the anxious foreboding in regard to coming events could now be transformed 
into a feeling of resolute assurance. The regiments that had to bear the brunt of the Greatest German 
onslaught in history could now be inspired with the conviction that the final decision in this war 
would not be won by the audacity of the German assault but rather by the powers of endurance on the 
side of the defence. Let the Germans now have whatever victories they liked, the revolution and not 
the victorious army was welcomed in the Fatherland. 

British, French and American newspapers began to spread this belief among their readers while a very 
ably managed propaganda encouraged the morale of their troops at the front. 

Germany Facing Revolution! An Allied Victory Inevitable! That was the best medicine to set the 
staggering Poilu and Tommy on their feet once again. Our rifles and machine-guns could now open 
fire once again; but instead of effecting a panic-stricken retreat they were now met with a determined 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap7.htm (6 of 11) [04/06/2000 16:11:13] 


resistance that was full of confidence. 

That was the result of the strike in the munitions factories. Throughout the enemy countries faith in 
victory was thus revived and strengthened, and that paralysing feeling of despair which had hitherto 
made itself felt on the Entente front was banished. Consequently the strike cost the lives of thousands 
of German soldiers. But the despicable instigators of that dastardly strike were candidates for the 
highest public positions in the Germany of the Revolution. 

At first it was apparently possible to overcome the repercussion of these events on the German 
soldiers, but on the enemys side they had a lasting effect. Here the resistance had lost all the character 
of an army fighting for a lost cause. In its place there was now a grim determination to struggle 
through to victory. For, according to all human rules of judgment, victory would now be assured if the 
Western front could hold out against the German offensive even for only a few months. The Allied 
parliaments recognized the possibilities of a better future and voted huge sums of money for the 
continuation of the propaganda which was employed for the purpose of breaking up the internal 
cohesion of Germany. 

It was my luck that I was able to take part in the first two offensives and in the final offensive. These 
have left on me the most stupendous impressions of my life stupendous, because now for the last 
time the struggle lost its defensive character and assumed the character of an offensive, just as it was 
in 1914. A sigh of relief went up from the German trenches and dug-outs when finally, after three 
years of endurance in that inferno, the day for the settling of accounts had come. Once again the lusty 
cheering of victorious battalions was heard, as they hung the last crowns of the immortal laurel on the 
standards which they consecrated to Victory. Once again the strains of patriotic songs soared upwards 
to the heavens above the endless columns of marching troops, and for the last time the Lord smiled on 
his ungrateful children. 

In the midsummer of 1918 a feeling of sultry oppression hung over the front. At home they were 
quarrelling. About what? We heard a great deal among various units at the front. The War was now a 
hopeless affair, and only the foolhardy could think of victory. It was not the people but the capitalists 
and the Monarchy who were interested in carrying on. Such were the ideas that came from home and 
were discussed at the front. 

At first this gave rise to only very slight reaction. What did universal suffrage matter to us? Is this 
what we had been fighting for during four years? It was a dastardly piece of robbery thus to filch from 
the graves of our heroes the ideals for which they had fallen. It was not to the slogan, Long Live 
Universal Suffrage, that our troops in Flanders once faced certain death but with the cry, 
Deutschland iiber Alles in der Welt. A small but by no means an unimportant difference. And the 
majority of those who were shouting for this suffrage were absent when it came to fighting for it. All 
this political rabble were strangers to us at the front. During those days only a fraction of these 
parliamentarian gentry were to be seen where honest Germans foregathered. 

The old soldiers who had fought at the front had little liking for those new war aims of Messrs. Ebert, 
Scheidemann, Barth, Liebknecht and others. We could not understand why, all of a sudden, the 
shirkers should abrogate all executive powers to themselves, without having any regard to the army. 

From the very beginning I had my own definite personal views. I intensely loathed the whole gang of 
miserable party politicians who had betrayed the people. I had long ago realized that the interests of 
the nation played only a very small part with this disreputable crew and that what counted with them 
was the possibility of filling their own empty pockets. My opinion was that those people thoroughly 
deserved to be hanged, because they were ready to sacrifice the peace and if necessary allow Germany 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap7.htm (7 of 11) [04/06/2000 16:11:13] 


to be defeated just to serve their own ends. To consider their wishes would mean to sacrifice the 
interests of the working classes for the benefit of a gang of thieves. To meet their wishes meant that 
one should agree to sacrifice Germany. 

Such, too, was the opinion still held by the majority of the army. But the reinforcements which came 
from home were fast becoming worse and worse; so much so that their arrival was a source of 
weakness rather than of strength to our fighting forces. The young recruits in particular were for the 
most part useless. Sometimes it was hard to believe that they were sons of the same nation that sent its 
youth into the battles that were fought round Ypres. 

In August and September the symptoms of moral disintegration increased more and more rapidly, 
although the enemys offensive was not at all comparable to the frightfulness of our own former 
defensive battles. In comparison with this offensive the battles fought on the Somme and in Flanders 
remained in our memories as the most terrible of all horrors. 

At the end of September my division occupied, for the third time, those positions which we had once 
taken by storm as young volunteers. What a memory! 

Here we had received our baptism of fire, in October and November 1914. With a burning love of the 
homeland in their hearts and a song on their lips, our young regiment went into action as if going to a 
dance. The dearest blood was given freely here in the belief that it was shed to protect the freedom 
and independence of the Fatherland. 

In July 1917 we set foot for the second time on what we regarded as sacred soil. Were not our best 
comrades at rest here, some of them little more than boys the soldiers who had rushed into death for 
their countrys sake, their eyes glowing with enthusiastic love. 

The older ones among us, who had been with the regiment from the beginning, were deeply moved as 
we stood on this sacred spot where we had sworn Loyalty and Duty unto Death. Three years ago the 
regiment had taken this position by storm; now it was called upon to defend it in a gruelling struggle. 

With an artillery bombardment that lasted three weeks the English prepared for their great offensive in 
Flanders. There the spirits of the dead seemed to live again. The regiment dug itself into the mud, 
clung to its shell-holes and craters, neither flinching nor wavering, but growing smaller in numbers 
day after day. Finally the British launched their attack on July 31st, 1917. 

We were relieved in the beginning of August. The regiment had dwindled down to a few companies, 
who staggered back, mud-crusted, more like phantoms than human beings. Besides a few hundred 
yards of shell-holes, death was the only reward which the English gained. 

Now in the autumn of 1918 we stood for the third time on the ground we had stormed in 1914. The 
village of Comines, which formerly had served us as a base, was now within the fighting zone. 
Although little had changed in the surrounding district itself, yet the men had become different, 
somehow or other. They now talked politics. Like everywhere else, the poison from home was having 
its effect here also. The young drafts succumbed to it completely. They had come directly from home. 

During the night of October 13th- 14th, the British opened an attack with gas on the front south of 
Ypres. They used the yellow gas whose effect was unknown to us, at least from personal experience. I 
was destined to experience it that very night. On a hill south of Werwick, in the evening of October 
13th, we were subjected for several hours to a heavy bombardment with gas bombs, which continued 
throughout the night with more or less intensity. About midnight a number of us were put out of 
action, some for ever. Towards morning I also began to feel pain. It increased with every quarter of an 
hour; and about seven oclock my eyes were scorching as I staggered back and delivered the last 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf chap7.htm (8 of 1 1 ) [04/06/2000 16:11:14] 


dispatch I was destined to carry in this war. A few hours later my eyes were like glowing coals and all 
was darkness around me. 

I was sent into hospital at Pasewalk in Pomerania, and there it was that I had to hear of the 

For a long time there had been something in the air which was indefinable and repulsive. People were 
saying that something was bound to happen within the next few weeks, although I could not imagine 
what this meant. In the first instance I thought of a strike similar to the one which had taken place in 
spring. Unfavourable rumours were constantly coming from the Navy, which was said to be in a state 
of ferment. But this seemed to be a fanciful creation of a few isolated young people. It is true that at 
the hospital they were all talking abut the end of the war and hoping that this was not far off, but 
nobody thought that the decision would come immediately. I was not able to read the newspapers. 

In November the general tension increased. Then one day disaster broke in upon us suddenly and 
without warning. Sailors came in motor-lorries and called on us to rise in revolt. A few Jew-boys were 
the leaders in that combat for the Liberty, Beauty, and Dignity of our National Being. Not one of 
them had seen active service at the front. Through the medium of a hospital for venereal diseases 
these three Orientals had been sent back home. Now their red rags were being hoisted here. 

During the last few days I had begun to feel somewhat better. The burning pain in the eye-sockets had 
become less severe. Gradually I was able to distinguish the general outlines of my immediate 
surroundings. And it was permissible to hope that at least I would recover my sight sufficiently to be 
able to take up some profession later on. That I would ever be able to draw or design once again was 
naturally out of the question. Thus I was on the way to recovery when the frightful hour came. 

My first thought was that this outbreak of high treason was only a local affair. I tried to enforce this 
belief among my comrades. My Bavarian hospital mates, in particular, were readily responsive. Their 
inclinations were anything but revolutionary. I could not imagine this madness breaking out in 
Munich; for it seemed to me that loyalty to the House of Wittelsbach was, after all, stronger than the 
will of a few Jews. And so I could not help believing that this was merely a revolt in the Navy and 
that it would be suppressed within the next few days. 

With the next few days came the most astounding information of my life. The rumours grew more and 
more persistent. I was told that what I had considered to be a local affair was in reality a general 
revolution. In addition to this, from the front came the shameful news that they wished to capitulate! 
What! Was such a thing possible? 

On November 10th the local pastor visited the hospital for the purpose of delivering a short address. 
And that was how we came to know the whole story. 

I was in a fever of excitement as I listened to the address. The reverend old gentleman seemed to be 
trembling when he informed us that the House of Hohen-zollern should no longer wear the Imperial 
Crown, that the Fatherland had become a Republic, that we should pray to the Almighty not to 
withhold His blessing from the new order of things and not to abandon our people in the days to 
come. In delivering this message he could not do more than briefly express appreciation of the Royal 
House, its services to Pomerania, to Prussia, indeed, to the whole of the German Fatherland, and here 
he began to weep. A feeling of profound dismay fell on the people in that assembly, and I do not think 
there was a single eye that withheld its tears. As for myself, I broke down completely when the old 
gentleman tried to resume his story by informing us that we must now end this long war, because the 
war was lost, he said, and we were at the mercy of the victor. The Fatherland would have to bear 
heavy burdens in the future. We were to accept the terms of the Armistice and trust to the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf chap7.htm (9 of 1 1 ) [04/06/2000 16:11:14] 


magnanimity of our former enemies. It was impossible for me to stay and listen any longer. Darkness 
surrounded me as I staggered and stumbled back to my ward and buried my aching head between the 
blankets and pillow. 

I had not cried since the day that I stood beside my mothers grave. Whenever Fate dealt cruelly with 
me in my young days the spirit of determination within me grew stronger and stronger. During all 
those long years of war, when Death claimed many a true friend and comrade from our ranks, to me it 
would have appeared sinful to have uttered a word of complaint. Did they not die for Germany? And, 
finally, almost in the last few days of that titanic struggle, when the waves of poison gas enveloped 
me and began to penetrate my eyes, the thought of becoming permanently blind unnerved me; but the 
voice of conscience cried out immediately: Poor miserable fellow, will you start howling when there 
are thousands of others whose lot is a hundred times worse than yours? And so I accepted my 
misfortune in silence, realizing that this was the only thing to be done and that personal suffering was 
nothing when compared with the misfortune of ones country. 

So all had been in vain. In vain all the sacrifices and privations, in vain the hunger and thirst for 
endless months, in vain those hours that we stuck to our posts though the fear of death gripped our 
souls, and in vain the deaths of two millions who fell in discharging this duty. Think of those 
hundreds of thousands who set out with hearts full of faith in their fatherland, and never returned; 
ought not their graves to open, so that the spirits of those heroes bespattered with mud and blood 
should come home and take vengeance on those who had so despicably betrayed the greatest sacrifice 
which a human being can make for his country? Was it for this that the soldiers died in August and 
September 1914, for this that the volunteer regiments followed the old comrades in the autumn of the 
same year? Was it for this that those boys of seventeen years of age were mingled with the earth of 
Flanders? Was this meant to be the fruits of the sacrifice which German mothers made for their 
Fatherland when, with heavy hearts, they said good-bye to their sons who never returned? Has all this 
been done in order to enable a gang of despicable criminals to lay hands on the Fatherland? 

Was this then what the German soldier struggled for through sweltering heat and blinding snowstorm, 
enduring hunger and thirst and cold, fatigued from sleepless nights and endless marches? Was it for 
this that he lived through an inferno of artillery bombardments, lay gasping and choking during gas 
attacks, neither flinching nor faltering, but remaining staunch to the thought of defending the 
Fatherland against the enemy? Certainly these heroes also deserved the epitaph: Traveller, when you 
come to Germany, tell the Homeland that we lie here, true to the Fatherland and faithful to our duty. 

And at Home? But was this the only sacrifice that we had to consider? Was the Germany of the past 
a country of little worth? Did she not owe a certain duty to her own history? Were we still worthy to 
partake in the glory of the past? How could we justify this act to future generations? 

What a gang of despicable and depraved criminals ! 

The more I tried then to glean some definite information of the terrible events that had happened the 
more my head became afire with rage and shame. What was all the pain I suffered in my eyes 
compared with this tragedy? 

The following days were terrible to bear, and the nights still worse. To depend on the mercy of the 
enemy was a precept which only fools or criminal liars could recommend. During those nights my 
hatred increased hatred for the orignators of this dastardly crime. 

During the following days my own fate became clear to me. I was forced now to scoff at the thought 
of my personal future, which hitherto had been the cause of so much worry to me. Was it not 
ludicrous to think of building up anything on such a foundation? Finally, it also became clear to me 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf chap7.htm (1 of 1 1 ) [04/06/2000 16:11:14] 


that it was the inevitable that had happened, something which I had feared for a long time, though I 
really did not have the heart to believe it. 

Emperor William II was the first German Emperor to offer the hand of friendship to the Marxist 
leaders, not suspecting that they were scoundrels without any sense of honour. While they held the 
imperial hand in theirs, the other hand was already feeling for the dagger. 

There is no such thing as coming to an understanding with the Jews. It must be the hard-and-fast 

For my part I then decided that I would take up political work. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap7.htm (11 of 11) [04/06/2000 16:11:14] 




Towards the end of November I returned to Munich. I went to the depot of my regiment, which was 
now in the hands of the Soldiers Councils. As the whole administration was quite repulsive to me, I 
decided to leave it as soon as I possibly could. With my faithful war-comrade, Ernst-Schmidt, I came 
to Traunstein and remained there until the camp was broken up. In March 1919 we were back again in 

The situation there could not last as it was. It tended irresistibly to a further extension of the 
Revolution. Eisners death served only to hasten this development and finally led to the dictatorship of 
the Councils or, to put it more correctly, to a Jewish hegemony, which turned out to be transitory but 
which was the original aim of those who had contrived the Revolution. 

At that juncture innumerable plans took shape in my mind. I spent whole days pondering on the 
problem of what could be done, but unfortunately every project had to give way before the hard fact 
that I was quite unknown and therefore did not have even the first pre-requisite necessary for effective 
action. Later on I shall explain the reasons why I could not decide to join any of the parties then in 

As the new Soviet Revolution began to run its course in Munich my first activities drew upon me the 
ill-will of the Central Council. In the early morning of April 27th, 1919, 1 was to have been arrested; 
but the three fellows who came to arrest me did not have the courage to face my rifle and withdrew 
just as they had arrived. 

A few days after the liberation of Munich I was ordered to appear before the Inquiry Commission 
which had been set up in the 2nd Infantry Regiment for the purpose of watching revolutionary 
activities. That was my first incursion into the more or less political field. 

After another few weeks I received orders to attend a course of lectures which were being given to 
members of the army. This course was meant to inculcate certain fundamental principles on which the 
soldier could base his political ideas. For me the advantage of this organization was that it gave me a 
chance of meeting fellow soldiers who were of the same way of thinking and with whom I could 
discuss the actual situation. We were all more or less firmly convinced that Germany could not be 
saved from imminent disaster by those who had participated in the November treachery that is to 
say, the Centre and the Social-Democrats; and also that the so-called Bourgeois-National group could 
not make good the damage that had been done, even if they had the best intentions. They lacked a 
number of requisites without which such a task could never be successfully undertaken. The years that 
followed have justified the opinions which we held at that time. 

In our small circle we discussed the project of forming a new party. The leading ideas which we then 
proposed were the same as those which were carried into effect afterwards, when the German Labour 
Party was founded. The name of the new movement which was to be founded should be such that of 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap8.htm (1 of 6) [04/06/2000 16:13:47] 


itself, it would appeal to the mass of the people; for all our efforts would turn out vain and useless if 
this condition were lacking. And that was the reason why we chose the name Social-Revolutionary 
Party, particularly because the social principles of our new organization were indeed revolutionary. 

But there was also a more fundamental reason. The attention which I had given to economic problems 
during my earlier years was more or less confined to considerations arising directly out of the social 
problem. Subsequently this outlook broadened as I came to study the German policy of the Triple 
Alliance. This policy was very largely the result of an erroneous valuation of the economic situation, 
together with a confused notion as to the basis on which the future subsistence of the German people 
could be guaranteed. All these ideas were based on the principle that capital is exclusively the product 
of labour and that, just like labour, it was subject to all the factors which can hinder or promote human 
activity. Hence, from the national standpoint, the significance of capital depended on the greatness 
and freedom and power of the State, that is to say, of the nation, and that it is this dependence alone 
which leads capital to promote the interests of the State and the nation, from the instinct of 
self-preservation and for the sake of its own development. 

On such principles the attitude of the State towards capital would be comparatively simple and clear. 
Its only object would be to make sure that capital remained subservient to the State and did not 
allocate to itself the right to dominate national interests. Thus it could confine its activities within the 
two following limits: on the one side, to assure a vital and independent system of national economy 
and, on the other, to safeguard the social rights of the workers. 

Previously I did not recognize with adequate clearness the difference between capital which is purely 
the product of creative labour and the existence and nature of capital which is exclusively the result of 
financial speculation. Here I needed an impulse to set my mind thinking in this direction; but that 
impulse had hitherto been lacking. 

The requisite impulse now came from one of the men who delivered lectures in the course I have 
already mentioned. This was Gottfried Feder. 

For the first time in my life I heard a discussion which dealt with the principles of stock-exchange 
capital and capital which was used for loan activities. After hearing the first lecture delivered by 
Feder, the idea immediately came into my head that I had now found a way to one of the most 
essential pre-requisites for the founding of a new party. 

To my mind, Feders merit consisted in the ruthless and trenchant way in which he described the 
double character of the capital engaged in stock-exchange and loan transaction, laying bare the fact 
that this capital is ever and always dependent on the payment of interest. In fundamental questions his 
statements were so full of common sense that those who criticized him did not deny that au fond his 
ideas were sound but they doubted whether it be possible to put these ideas into practice. To me this 
seemed the strongest point in Feders teaching, though others considered it a weak point. 

It is not the business of him who lays down a theoretical programme to explain the various ways in 
which something can be put into practice. His task is to deal with the problem as such; and, therefore, 
he has to look to the end rather than the means. The important question is whether an idea is 
fundamentally right or not. The question of whether or not it may be difficult to carry it out in practice 
is quite another matter. When a man whose task it is to lay down the principles of a programme or 
policy begins to busy himself with the question as to whether it is expedient and practical, instead of 
confining himself to the statement of the absolute truth, his work will cease to be a guiding star to 
those who are looking about for light and leading and will become merely a recipe for every-day iife. 
The man who lays down the programme of a movement must consider only the goal. It is for the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap8.htm (2 of 6) [04/06/2000 16:13:47] 


political leader to point out the way in which that goal may be reached. The thought of the former 
will, therefore, be determined by those truths that are everlasting, whereas the activity of the latter 
must always be guided by taking practical account of the circumstances under which those truths have 
to be carried into effect. 

The greatness of the one will depend on the absolute truth of his idea, considered in the abstract; 
whereas that of the other will depend on whether or not he correctly judges the given realities and how 
they may be utilized under the guidance of the truths established by the former. The test of greatness 
as applied to a political leader is the success of his plans and his enterprises, which means his ability 
to reach the goal for which he sets out; whereas the final goal set up by the political philosopher can 
never be reached; for human thought may grasp truths and picture ends which it sees like clear crystal, 
though such ends can never be completely fulfilled because human nature is weak and imperfect. The 
more an idea is correct in the abstract, and, therefore, all the more powerful, the smaller is the 
possibility of putting it into practice, at least as far as this latter depends on human beings. The 
significance of a political philosopher does not depend on the practical success of the plans he lays 
down but rather on their absolute truth and the influence they exert on the progress of mankind. If it 
were otherwise, the founders of religions could not be considered as the greatest men who have ever 
lived, because their moral aims will never be completely or even approximately carried out in 
practice. Even that religion which is called the Religion of Love is really no more than a faint reflex of 
the will of its sublime Founder. But its significance lies in the orientation which it endeavoured to 
give to human civilization, and human virtue and morals. 

This very wide difference between the functions of a political philosopher and a practical political 
leader is the reason why the qualifications necessary for both functions are scarcely ever found 
associated in the same person. This applies especially to the so-called successful politician of the 
smaller kind, whose activity is indeed hardly more than practising the art of doing the possible, as 
Bismarck modestly defined the art of politics in general. If such a politician resolutely avoids great 
ideas his success will be all the easier to attain; it will be attained more expeditely and frequently will 
be more tangible. By reason of this very fact, however, such success is doomed to futility and 
sometimes does not even survive the death of its author. Generally speaking, the work of politicians is 
without significance for the following generation, because their temporary success was based on the 
expediency of avoiding all really great decisive problems and ideas which would be valid also for 
future generations. 

To pursue ideals which will still be of value and significance for the future is generally not a very 
profitable undertaking and he who follows such a course is only very rarely understood by the mass of 
the people, who find beer and milk a more persuasive index of political values than far-sighted plans 
for the future, the realization of which can only take place later on and the advantages of which can be 
reaped only by posterity. 

Because of a certain vanity, which is always one of the blood-relations of unintelligence, the general 
run of politicians will always eschew those schemes for the future which are really difficult to put into 
practice; and they will practise this avoidance so that they may not lose the immediate favour of the 
mob. The importance and the success of such politicians belong exclusively to the present and will be 
of no consequence for the future. But that does not worry small-minded people; they are quite content 
with momentary results. 

The position of the constructive political philosopher is quite different. The importance of his work 
must always be judged from the standpoint of the future; and he is frequently described by the word 
Weltfremd, or dreamer. While the ability of the politician consists in mastering the art of the possible, 
the founder of a political system belongs to those who are said to please the gods only because they 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap8.htm (3 of 6) [04/06/2000 16:13:47] 


wish for and demand the impossible. They will always have to renounce contemporary fame; but if 
their ideas be immortal, posterity will grant them its acknowledgment. 

Within long spans of human progress it may occasionally happen that the practical politician and 
political philosopher are one. The more intimate this union is, the greater will be the obstacles which 
the activity of the politician will have to encounter. Such a man does not labour for the purpose of 
satisfying demands that are obvious to every philistine, but he reaches out towards ends which can be 
understood only by the few. His life is torn asunder by hatred and love. The protest of his 
contemporaries, who do not understand the man, is in conflict with the recognition of posterity, for 
whom he also works. 

For the greater the work which a man does for the future, the less will he be appreciated by his 
contemporaries. His struggle will accordingly be all the more severe, and his success all the rarer. 
When, in the course of centuries, such a man appears who is blessed with success then, towards the 
end of his days, he may have a faint prevision of his future fame. But such great men are only the 
Marathon runners of history. The laurels of contemporary fame are only for the brow of the dying 

The great protagonists are those who fight for their ideas and ideals despite the fact that they receive 
no recognition at the hands of their contemporaries. They are the men whose memories will be 
enshrined in the hearts of the future generations. It seems then as if each individual felt it his duty to 
make retroactive atonement for the wrong which great men have suffered at the hands of their 
contemporaries. Their lives and their work are then studied with touching and grateful admiration. 
Especially in dark days of distress, such men have the power of healing broken hearts and elevating 
the despairing spirit of a people. 

To this group belong not only the genuinely great statesmen but all the great reformers as well. Beside 
Frederick the Great we have such men as Martin Luther and Richard Wagner. 

When I heard Gottfried Feders first lecture on The Abolition of the Interest-Servitude, I understood 
immediately that here was a truth of transcendental importance for the future of the German people. 
The absolute separation of stock-exchange capital from the economic life of the nation would make it 
possible to oppose the process of internationalization in German business without at the same time 
attacking capital as such, for to do this would jeopardize the foundations of our national 
independence. I clearly saw what was developing in Germany and I realized then that the stiffest fight 
we would have to wage would not be against the enemy nations but against international capital. In 
Feders speech I found an effective rallying-cry for our coming struggle. 

Here, again, later events proved how correct was the impression we then had. The fools among our 
bourgeois politicians do not mock at us on this point any more; for even those politicians now see if 
they would speak the truth that international stock-exchange capital was not only the chief 
instigating factor in bringing on the War but that now when the War is over it turns the peace into a 

The struggle against international finance capital and loan-capital has become one of the most 
important points in the programme on which the German nation has based its fight for economic 
freedom and independence. 

Regarding the objections raised by so-called practical people, the following answer must suffice: All 
apprehensions concerning the fearful economic consequences that would follow the abolition of the 
servitude that results from interest-capital are ill-timed; for, in the first place, the economic principles 
hitherto followed have proved quite fatal to the interests of the German people. The attitude adopted 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap8.htm (4 of 6) [04/06/2000 16:13:47] 


when the question of maintaining our national existence arose vividly recalls similar advice once 
given by experts the Bavarian Medical College, for example on the question of introducing 
railroads. The fears expressed by that august body of experts were not realized. Those who travelled 
in the coaches of the new Steam-horse did not suffer from vertigo. Those who looked on did not 
become ill and the hoardings which had been erected to conceal the new invention were eventually 
taken down. Only those blinds which obscure the vision of the would-be experts, have remained. 
And that will be always so. 

In the second place, the following must be borne in mind: Any idea may be a source of danger if it be 
looked upon as an end in itself, when really it is only the means to an end. For me and for all genuine 
National-Socialists there is only one doctrine. People and Fatherland. 

What we have to fight for is the necessary security for the existence and increase of our race and 
people, the subsistence of its children and the maintenance of our racial stock unmixed, the 
freedom and independence of the Fatherland; so that our people may be enabled to fulfil the 
mission assigned to it by the Creator. 

All ideas and ideals, all teaching and all knowledge, must serve these ends. It is from this standpoint 
that everything must be examined and turned to practical uses or else discarded. Thus a theory can 
never become a mere dead dogma since everything will have to serve the practical ends of everyday 

Thus the judgment arrived at by Gottfried Feder determined me to make a fundamental study of a 
question with which I had hitherto not been very familiar. 

I began to study again and thus it was that I first came to understand perfectly what was the substance 
and purpose of the life-work of the Jew, Karl Marx. His Capital became intelligible to me now for the 
first time. And in the light of it I now exactly understood the fight of the Social-Democrats against 
national economics, a fight which was to prepare the ground for the hegemony of a real international 
and stock-exchange capital. 

In another direction also this course of lectures had important consequences for me. 

One day I put my name down as wishing to take part in the discussion. Another of the participants 
thought that he would break a lance for the Jews and entered into a lengthy defence of them. This 
aroused my opposition. An overwhelming number of those who attended the lecture course supported 
my views. The consequence of it all was that, a few days later, I was assigned to a regiment then 
stationed at Munich and given a position there as instruction officer. 

At that time the spirit of discipline was rather weak among those troops. It was still suffering from the 
after-effects of the period when the Soldiers Councils were in control. Only gradually and carefully 
could a new spirit of military discipline and obedience be introduced in place of voluntary obedience 
, a term which had been used to express the ideal of military discipline under Kurt Eisners 
higgledy-piggledy regime. The soldiers had to be taught to think and feel in a national and patriotic 
way. In these two directions lay my future line of action. 

I took up my work with the greatest delight and devotion. Here I was presented with an opportunity of 
speaking before quite a large audience. I was now able to confirm what I had hitherto merely felt, 
namely, that I had a talent for public speaking. My voice had become so much better that I could be 
well understood, at least in all parts of the small hall where the soldiers assembled. 

No task could have been more pleasing to me than this one; for now, before being demobilized, I was 
in a position to render useful service to an institution which had been infinitely dear to my heart: 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap8.htm (5 of 6) [04/06/2000 16:13:47] 


namely, the army. 

I am able to state that my talks were successful. During the course of my lectures I have led back 
hundreds and even thousands of my fellow countrymen to their people and their fatherland. I 
nationalized these troops and by so doing I helped to restore general discipline. 

Here again I made the acquaintance of several comrades whose thought ran along the same lines as 
my own and who later became members of the first group out of which the new movement developed. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap8.htm (6 of 6) [04/06/2000 16:13:47] 





One day I received an order from my superiors to investigate the nature of an association which was 
apparently political. It called itself The German Labour Party and was soon to hold a meeting at 
which Gottfried Feder would speak. I was ordered to attend this meeting and report on the situation. 

The spirit of curiosity in which the army authorities then regarded political parties can be very well 
understood. The Revolution had granted the soldiers the right to take an active part in politics and it 
was particularly those with the smallest experience who had availed themselves of this right. But not 
until the Centre and the Social-Democratic parties were reluctantly forced to recognize that the 
sympathies of the soldiers had turned away from the revolutionary parties towards the national 
movement and the national reawakening, did they feel obliged to withdraw from the army the right to 
vote and to forbid it all political activity. 

The fact that the Centre and Marxism had adopted this policy was instructive, because if they had not 
thus curtailed the rights of the citizen as they described the political rights of the soldiers after the 
Revolution the government which had been established in November 1918 would have been 
overthrown within a few years and the dishonour and disgrace of the nation would not have been 
further prolonged. At that time the soldiers were on the point of taking the best way to rid the nation 
of the vampires and valets who served the cause of the Entente in the interior of the country. But the 
fact that the so-called national parties voted enthusiastically for the doctrinaire policy of the 
criminals who organized the Revolution in November (1918) helped also to render the army 
ineffective as an instrument of national restoration and thus showed once again where men might be 
led by the purely abstract notions accepted by these most gullible people. 

The minds of the bourgeois middle classes had become so fossilized that they sincerely believed the 
army could once again become what it had previously been, namely, a rampart of German valour; 
while the Centre Party and the Marxists intended only to extract the poisonous tooth of nationalism, 
without which an army must always remain just a police force but can never be in the position of a 
military organization capable of fighting against the outside enemy. This truth was sufficiently proved 
by subsequent events. 

Or did our national politicians believe, after all, that the development of our army could be other 
than national? This belief might be possible and could be explained by the fact that during the War 
they were not soldiers but merely talkers. In other words, they were parliamentarians, and, as such, 
they did not have the slightest idea of what was passing in the hearts of those men who remembered 
the greatness of their own past and also remembered that they had once been the first soldiers in the 

I decided to attend the meeting of this Party, which had hitherto been entirely unknown to me. When I 
arrived that evening in the guest room of the former Sternecker Brewery which has now become a 
place of historical significance for us I found approximately 2025 persons present, most of them 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap9.htm (1 of 5) [04/06/2000 16:14:24] 


belonging to the lower classes. 

The theme of Feders lecture was already familiar to me; for I had heard it in the lecture course I have 
spoken of. Therefore, I could concentrate my attention on studying the society itself. 

The impression it made upon me was neither good nor bad. I felt that here was just another one of 
these many new societies which were being formed at that time. In those days everybody felt called 
upon to found a new Party whenever he felt displeased with the course of events and had lost 
confidence in all the parties already existing. Thus it was that new associations sprouted up all round, 
to disappear just as quickly, without exercising any effect or making any noise whatsoever. Generally 
speaking, the founders of such associations did not have the slightest idea of what it means to bring 
together a number of people for the foundations of a party or a movement. Therefore these 
associations disappeared because of their woeful lack of anything like an adequate grasp of the 
necessities of the situation. 

My opinion of the German Labour Party was not very different after I had listened to their 
proceedings for about two hours. I was glad when Feder finally came to a close. I had observed 
enough and was just about to leave when it was announced that anybody who wished was free to open 
a discussion. Thereupon, I decided to remain. But the discussion seemed to proceed without anything 
of vital importance being mentioned, when suddenly a professor commenced to speak. He opened by 
throwing doubt on the accuracy of what Feder had said, and then, after Feder had replied very 
effectively, the professor suddenly took up his position on what he called the basis of facts, but 
before this he recommended the young party most urgently to introduce the secession of Bavaria from 
Prussia as one of the leading proposals in its programme. In the most self-assured way, this man kept 
on insisting that German- Austria would join Bavaria and that the peace would then function much 
better. He made other similarly extravagant statements. At this juncture I felt bound to ask for 
permission to speak and to tell the learned gentleman what I thought. The result was that the 
honourable gentleman who had last spoken slipped out of his place, like a whipped cur, without 
uttering a sound. While I was speaking the audience listened with an expression of surprise on their 
faces. When I was just about to say good-night to the assembly and to leave, a man came after me 
quickly and introduced himself. I did not grasp the name correctly; but he placed a little book in my 
hand, which was obviously a political pamphlet, and asked me very earnestly to read it. 

I was quite pleased; because in this way, I could come to know about this association without having 
to attend its tiresome meetings. Moreover, this man, who had the appearance of a workman, made a 
good impression on me. Thereupon, I left the hall. 

At that time I was living in one of the barracks of the 2nd Infantry Regiment. I had a little room which 
still bore the unmistakable traces of the Revolution. During the day I was mostly out, at the quarters of 
Light Infantry No. 41 or else attending meetings or lectures, held at some other branch of the army. I 
spent only the night at the quarters where I lodged. Since I usually woke up about five oclock every 
morning I got into the habit of amusing myself with watching little mice which played around in my 
small room. I used to place a few pieces of hard bread or crust on the floor and watch the funny little 
beasts playing around and enjoying themselves with these delicacies. I had suffered so many 
privations in my own life that I well knew what hunger was and could only too well picture to myself 
the pleasure these little creatures were experiencing. 

So on the morning after the meeting I have mentioned, it happened that about five oclock I lay fully 
awake in bed, watching the mice playing and vying with each other. As I was not able to go to sleep 
again, I suddenly remembered the pamphlet that one of the workers had given me at the meeting. It 
was a small pamphlet of which this worker was the author. In his little book he described how his 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap9.htm (2 of 5) [04/06/2000 16:14:24] 


mind had thrown off the shackles of the Marxist and trades-union phraseology, and that he had come 
back to the nationalist ideals. That was the reason why he had entitled his little book: "My Political 
Awakening". The pamphlet secured my attention the moment I began to read, and I read it with 
interest to the end. The process here described was similar to that which I had experienced in my own 
case ten years previously. Unconsciously my own experiences began to stir again in my mind. During 
that day my thoughts returned several times to what I had read; but I finally decided to give the matter 
no further attention. A week or so later, however, I received a postcard which informed me, to my 
astonishment, that I had been admitted into the German Labour Party. I was asked to answer this 
communication and to attend a meeting of the Party Committee on Wednesday next. 

This manner of getting members rather amazed me, and I did not know whether to be angry or laugh 
at it. Hitherto I had not any idea of entering a party already in existence but wanted to found one of 
my own. Such an invitation as I now had received I looked upon as entirely out of the question for me. 

I was about to send a written reply when my curiosity got the better of me, and I decided to attend the 
gathering at the date assigned, so that I might expound my principles to these gentlemen in person. 

Wednesday came. The tavern in which the meeting was to take place was the Alte Rosenbad in the 
Herrnstrasse, into which apparently only an occasional guest wandered. This was not very surprising 
in the year 1919, when the bills of fare even at the larger restaurants were only very modest and 
scanty in their pretensions and thus not very attractive to clients. But I had never before heard of this 

I went through the badly-lighted guest-room, where not a single guest was to be seen, and searched 
for the door which led to the side room; and there I was face-to-face with the Congress. Under the 
dim light shed by a grimy gas-lamp I could see four young people sitting around a table, one of them 
the author of the pamphlet. He greeted me cordially and welcomed me as a new member of the 
German Labour Party. 

I was taken somewhat aback on being informed that actually the National President of the Party had 
not yet come; so I decided that I would keep back my own exposition for the time being. Finally the 
President appeared. He was the man who had been chairman of the meeting held in the Sternecker 
Brewery, when Feder spoke. 

My curiosity was stimulated anew and I sat waiting for what was going to happen. Now I got at least 
as far as learning the names of the gentlemen who had been parties to the whole affair. The Reich 
National President of the Association was a certain Herr Harrer and the President for the Munich 
district was Anton Drexler. 

The minutes of the previous meeting were read out and a vote of confidence in the secretary was 
passed. Then came the treasurers report. The Society possessed a total fund of seven marks and fifty 
pfennigs (a sum corresponding to 7s. 6d. in English money at par), whereupon the treasurer was 
assured that he had the confidence of the members. This was now inserted in the minutes. Then letters 
of reply which had been written by the Chairman were read; first, to a letter received from Kiel, then 
to one from Dusseldorf and finally to one from Berlin. All three replies received the approval of all 
present. Then the incoming letters were read one from Berlin, one from Dusseldorf and one from 
Kiel. The reception of these letters seemed to cause great satisfaction. This increasing bulk of 
correspondence was taken as the best and most obvious sign of the growing importance of the German 
Labour Party. And then? Well, there followed a long discussion of the replies which would be given 
to these newly-received letters. 

It was all very awful. This was the worst kind of parish-pump clubbism. And was I supposed to 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap9.htm (3 of 5) [04/06/2000 16:14:24] 


become a member of such a club? 

The question of new members was next discussed that is to say, the question of catching myself in 
the trap. 

I now began to ask questions. But I found that, apart from a few general principles, there was nothing 
no programme, no pamphlet, nothing at all in print, no card of membership, not even a party stamp, 
nothing but obvious good faith and good intentions. 

I no longer felt inclined to laugh; for what else was all this but a typical sign of the most complete 
perplexity and deepest despair in regard to all political parties, their programmes and views and 
activities? The feeling which had induced those few young people to join in what seemed such a 
ridiculous enterprise was nothing but the call of the inner voice which told them though more 
intuitively than consciously that the whole party system as it had hitherto existed was not the kind of 
force that could restore the German nation or repair the damages that had been done to the German 
people by those who hitherto controlled the internal affairs of the nation. I quickly read through the 
list of principles that formed the platform of the party. These principles were stated on typewritten 
sheets. Here again I found evidence of the spirit of longing and searching, but no sign whatever of a 
knowledge of the conflict that had to be fought. I myself had experienced the feelings which inspired 
those people. It was the longing for a movement which should be more than a party, in the hitherto 
accepted meaning of that word. 

When I returned to my room in the barracks that evening I had formed a definite opinion on this 
association and I was facing the most difficult problem of my life. Should I join this party or refuse? 

From the side of the intellect alone, every consideration urged me to refuse; but my feelings troubled 
me. The more I tried to prove to myself how senseless this club was, on the whole, the more did my 
feelings incline me to favour it. During the following days I was restless. 

I began to consider all the pros and cons. I had long ago decided to take an active part in politics. The 
fact that I could do so only through a new movement was quite clear to me; but I had hitherto lacked 
the impulse to take concrete action. I am not one of those people who will begin something to-day and 
just give it up the next day for the sake of something new. That was the main reason which made it so 
difficult for me to decide in joining something newly founded; for this must become the real 
fulfilment of everything I dreamt, or else it had better not be started at all. I knew that such a decision 
should bind me for ever and that there could be no turning back. For me there could be no idle 
dallying but only a cause to be championed ardently. I had already an instinctive feeling against 
people who took up everything, but never carried anything through to the end. I loathed these 
Jacks-of-all-Trades, and considered the activities of such people to be worse than if they were to 
remain entirely quiescent. 

Fate herself now seemed to supply the finger-post that pointed out the way. I should never have 
entered one of the big parties already in existence and shall explain my reasons for this later on. This 
ludicrous little formation, with its handful of members, seemed to have the unique advantage of not 
yet being fossilized into an organization and still offered a chance for real personal activity on the 
part of the individual. Here it might still be possible to do some effective work; and, as the movement 
was still small, one could all the easier give it the required shape. Here it was still possible to 
determine the character of the movement, the aims to be achieved and the road to be taken, which 
would have been impossible in the case of the big parties already existing. 

The longer I reflected on the problem, the more my opinion developed that just such a small 
movement would best serve as an instrument to prepare the way for the national resurgence, but that 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap9.htm (4 of 5) [04/06/2000 16:14:24] 


this could never be done by the political parliamentary parties which were too firmly attached to 
obsolete ideas or had an interest in supporting the new regime. What had to be proclaimed here was a 
new Weltanschhauung and not a new election cry. 

It was, however, infinitely difficult to decide on putting the intention into practice. What were the 
qualifications which I could bring to the accomplishment of such a task? 

The fact that I was poor and without resources could, in my opinion, be the easiest to bear. But the 
fact that I was utterly unknown raised a more difficult problem. I was only one of the millions which 
Chance allows to exist or cease to exist, whom even their next-door neighbours will not consent to 
know. Another difficulty arose from the fact that I had not gone through the regular school 

The so-called intellectuals still look down with infinite superciliousness on anyone who has not been 
through the prescribed schools and allowed them to pump the necessary knowledge into him. The 
question of what a man can do is never asked but rather, what has he learned? Educated people look 
upon any imbecile who is plastered with a number of academic certificates as superior to the ablest 
young fellow who lacks these precious documents. I could therefore easily imagine how this educated 
world would receive me and I was wrong only in so far as I then believed men to be for the most part 
better than they proved to be in the cold light of reality. Because of their being as they are, the few 
exceptions stand out all the more conspicuously. I learned more and more to distinguish between 
those who will always be at school and those who will one day come to know something in reality. 

After two days of careful brooding and reflection I became convinced that I must take the 
contemplated step. 

It was the most fateful decision of my life. No retreat was possible. 

Thus I declared myself ready to accept the membership tendered me by the German Labour Party and 
received a provisional certificate of membership. I was numbered seven. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap9.htm (5 of 5) [04/06/2000 16:14:24] 





The depth of a fall is always measured by the difference between the level of the original position 
from which a body has fallen and that in which it is now found. The same holds good for Nations and 
States. The matter of greatest importance here is the height of the original level, or rather the greatest 
height that had been attained before the descent began. 

For only the profound decline or collapse of that which was capable of reaching extraordinary heights 
can make a striking impression on the eye of the beholder. The collapse of the Second Reich was all 
the more bewildering for those who could ponder over it and feel the effect of it in their hearts, 
because the Reich had fallen from a height which can hardly be imagined in these days of misery and 

The Second Reich was founded in circumstances of such dazzling splendour that the whole nation had 
become entranced and exalted by it. Following an unparalleled series of victories, that Empire was 
handed over as the guerdon of immortal heroism to the children and grandchildren of the heroes. 
Whether they were fully conscious of it or not does not matter; anyhow, the Germans felt that this 
Empire had not been brought into existence by a series of able political negotiations through 
parliamentary channels, but that it was different from political institutions founded elsewhere by 
reason of the nobler circumstances that had accompanied its establishment. When its foundations were 
laid the accompanying music was not the chatter of parliamentary debates but the thunder and boom 
of war along the battle front that encircled Paris. It was thus that an act of statesmanship was 
accomplished whereby the Germans, princes as well as people, established the future Reich and 
restored the symbol of the Imperial Crown. Bismarcks State was not founded on treason and 
assassination by deserters and shirkers but by the regiments that had fought at the front. This unique 
birth and baptism of fire sufficed of themselves to surround the Second Empire with an aureole of 
historical splendour such as few of the older States could lay claim to. 

And what an ascension then began! A position of independence in regard to the outside world 
guaranteed the means of livelihood at home. The nation increased in numbers and in worldly wealth. 
The honour of the State and therewith the honour of the people as a whole were secured and protected 
by an army which was the most striking witness of the difference between this new Reich and the old 
German Confederation. 

But the downfall of the Second Empire and the German people has been so profound that they all 
seem to have been struck dumbfounded and rendered incapable of feeling the significance of this 
downfall or reflecting on it. It seems as if people were utterly unable to picture in their minds the 
heights to which the Empire formerly attained, so visionary and unreal appears the greatness and 
splendour of those days in contrast to the misery of the present. Bearing this in mind we can 
understand why and how people become so dazed when they try to look back to the sublime past that 
they forget to look for the symptoms of the great collapse which must certainly have been present in 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (1 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


some form or other. Naturally this applies only to those for whom Germany was more than merely a 
place of abode and a source of livelihood. These are the only people who have been able to feel the 
present conditions as really catastrophic, whereas others have considered these conditions as the 
fulfilment of what they had looked forward to and hitherto silently wished. 

The symptoms of future collapse were definitely to be perceived in those earlier days, although very 
few made any attempt to draw a practical lesson from their significance. But this is now a greater 
necessity than it ever was before. For just as bodily ailments can be cured only when their origin has 
been diagnosed, so also political disease can be treated only when it has been diagnosed. It is obvious 
of course that the external symptoms of any disease can be more readily detected than its internal 
causes, for these symptoms strike the eye more easily. This is also the reason why so many people 
recognize only external effects and mistake them for causes. Indeed they will sometimes try to deny 
the existence of such causes. And that is why the majority of people among us recognize the German 
collapse only in the prevailing economic distress and the results that have followed therefrom. Almost 
everyone has to carry his share of this burden, and that is why each one looks on the economic 
catastrophe as the cause of the present deplorable state of affairs. The broad masses of the people see 
little of the cultural, political, and moral background of this collapse. Many of them completely lack 
both the necessary feeling and powers of understanding for it. 

That the masses of the people should thus estimate the causes of Germanys downfall is quite 
understandable. But the fact that intelligent sections of the community regard the German collapse 
primarily as an economic catastrophe, and consequently think that a cure for it may be found in an 
economic solution, seems to me to be the reason why hitherto no improvement has been brought 
about. No improvement can be brought about until it be understood that economics play only a second 
or third role, while the main part is played by political, moral and racial factors. Only when this is 
understood will it be possible to understand the causes of the present evil and consequently to find the 
ways and means of remedying them. 

Therefore the question of why Germany really collapsed is one of the most urgent significance, 
especially for a political movement which aims at overcoming this disaster. 

In scrutinizing the past with a view to discovering the causes of the German break-up, it is necessary 
to be careful lest we may be unduly impressed by external results that readily strike the eye and thus 
ignore the less manifest causes of these results. 

The most facile, and therefore the most generally accepted, way of accounting for the present 
misfortune is to say that it is the result of a lost war, and that this is the real cause of the present 
misfortune. Probably there are many who honestly believe in this absurd explanation but there are 
many more in whose mouths it is a deliberate and conscious falsehood. This applies to all those who 
are now feeding at the Government troughs. For the prophets of the Revolution again and again 
declared to the people that it would be immaterial to the great masses what the result of the War might 
be. On the contrary, they solemnly assured the public that it was High Finance which was principally 
interested in a victorious outcome of this gigantic struggle among the nations but that the German 
people and the German workers had no interest whatsoever in such an outcome. Indeed the apostles of 
world conciliation habitually asserted that, far from any German downfall, the opposite was bound to 
take place namely, the resurgence of the German people once militarism had been crushed. Did 
not these self-same circles sing the praises of the Entente and did they not also lay the whole blame 
for the sanguinary struggle on the shoulders of Germany? Without this explanation, would they have 
been able to put forward the theory that a military defeat would have no political consequences for the 
German people? Was not the whole Revolution dressed up in gala colours as blocking the victorious 
advance of the German banners and that thus the German people would be assured its liberty both at 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (2 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


home and abroad? 

Is not that so, you miserable, lying rascals? 

That kind of impudence which is typical of the Jews was necessary in order to proclaim the defeat of 
the army as the cause of the German collapse. Indeed the Berlin Vorwarts, that organ and mouthpiece 
of sedition then wrote on this occasion that the German nation should not be permitted to bring home 
its banners triumphantly. 

And yet they attribute our collapse to the military defeat. 

Of course it would be out of the question to enter into an argument with these liars who deny at one 
moment what they said the moment before. I should waste no further words on them were it not for 
the fact that there are many thoughtless people who repeat all this in parrot fashion, without being 
necessarily inspired by any evil motives. But the observations I am making here are also meant for our 
fighting followers, seeing that nowadays ones spoken words are often forgotten and twisted in their 

The assertion that the loss of the War was the cause of the German collapse can best be answered as 

It is admittedly a fact that the loss of the War was of tragic importance for the future of our country. 
But that loss was not in itself a cause. It was rather the consequence of other causes. That a disastrous 
ending to this life-or-death conflict must have involved catastrophes in its train was clearly seen by 
everyone of insight who could think in a straightforward manner. But unfortunately there were also 
people whose powers of understanding seemed to fail them at that critical moment. And there were 
other people who had first questioned that truth and then altogether denied it. And there were people 
who, after their secret desire had been fulfilled, were suddenly faced with the subsequent facts that 
resulted from their own collaboration. Such people are responsible for the collapse, and not the lost 
war, though they now want to attribute everything to this. As a matter of fact the loss of the War was a 
result of their activities and not the result of bad leadership as they now would like to maintain. Our 
enemies were not cowards. They also know how to die. From the very first day of the War they 
outnumbered the German Army, and the arsenals and armament factories of the whole world were at 
their disposal for the replenishment of military equipment. Indeed it is universally admitted that the 
German victories, which had been steadily won during four years of warfare against the whole world, 
were due to superior leadership, apart of course from the heroism of the troops. And the organization 
was solely due to the German military leadership. That organization and leadership of the German 
Army was the most mighty thing that the world has ever seen. Any shortcomings which became 
evident were humanly unavoidable. The collapse of that army was not the cause of our present 
distress. It was itself the consequence of other faults. But this consequence in its turn ushered in a 
further collapse, which was more visible. That such was actually the case can be shown as follows: 

Must a military defeat necessarily lead to such a complete overthrow of the State and Nation? 
Whenever has this been the result of an unlucky war? As a matter of fact, are nations ever ruined by a 
lost war and by that alone? The answer to this question can be briefly stated by referring to the fact 
that military defeats are the result of internal decay, cowardice, want of character, and are a retribution 
for such things. If such were not the causes then a military defeat would lead to a national resurgence 
and bring the nation to a higher pitch of effort. A military defeat is not the tombstone of national life. 
History affords innumerable examples to confirm the truth of that statement. 

Unfortunately Germanys military overthrow was not an undeserved catastrophe, but a well-merited 
punishment which was in the nature of an eternal retribution. This defeat was more than deserved by 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (3 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


us; for it represented the greatest external phenomenon of decomposition among a series of internal 
phenomena, which, although they were visible, were not recognized by the majority of the people, 
who follow the tactics of the ostrich and see only what they want to see. 

Let us examine the symptoms that were evident in Germany at the time that the German people 
accepted this defeat. Is it not true that in several circles the misfortunes of the Fatherland were even 
joyfully welcomed in the most shameful manner? Who could act in such a way without thereby 
meriting vengeance for his attitude? Were there not people who even went further and boasted that 
they had gone to the extent of weakening the front and causing a collapse? Therefore it was not the 
enemy who brought this disgrace upon our shoulders but rather our own countrymen. If they suffered 
misfortune for it afterwards, was that misfortune undeserved? Was there ever a case in history where a 
people declared itself guilty of a war, and that even against its better conscience and its better 

No, and again no. In the manner in which the German nation reacted to its defeat we can see that the 
real cause of our collapse must be looked for elsewhere and not in the purely military loss of a few 
positions or the failure of an offensive. For if the front as such had given way and thus brought about 
a national disaster, then the German nation would have accepted the defeat in quite another spirit. 
They would have borne the subsequent misfortune with clenched teeth, or they would have been 
overwhelmed by sorrow. Regret and fury would have filled their hearts against an enemy into whose 
hands victory had been given by a chance event or the decree of Fate; and in that case the nation, 
following the example of the Roman Senate, would have faced the defeated legions on their return 
and expressed their thanks for the sacrifices that had been made and would have requested them not to 
lose faith in the Empire. Even the capitulation would have been signed under the sway of calm reason, 
while the heart would have beaten in the hope of the coming revanche. 

That is the reception that would have been given to a military defeat which had to be attributed only to 
the adverse decree of Fortune. There would have been neither joy-making nor dancing. Cowardice 
would not have been boasted of, and the defeat would not have been honoured. On returning from the 
Front, the troops would not have been mocked at, and the colours would not have been dragged in the 
dust. But above all, that disgraceful state of affairs could never have arisen which induced a British 
officer, Colonel Repington, to declare with scorn: Every third German is a traitor! No, in such a case 
this plague would never have assumed the proportions of a veritable flood which, for the past five 
years, has smothered every vestige of respect for the German nation in the outside world. 

This shows only too clearly how false it is to say that the loss of the War was the cause of the German 
break-up. No. The military defeat was itself but the consequence of a whole series of morbid 
symptoms and their causes which had become active in the German nation before the War broke out. 
The War was the first catastrophal consequence, visible to all, of how traditions and national morale 
had been poisoned and how the instinct of self-preservation had degenerated. These were the 
preliminary causes which for many years had been undermining the foundations of the nation and the 

But it remained for the Jews, with their unqualified capacity for falsehood, and their fighting 
comrades, the Marxists, to impute responsibility for the downfall precisely to the man who alone had 
shown a superhuman will and energy in his effort to prevent the catastrophe which he had foreseen 
and to save the nation from that hour of complete overthrow and shame. By placing responsibility for 
the loss of the world war on the shoulders of Ludendorff they took away the weapon of moral right 
from the only adversary dangerous enough to be likely to succeed in bringing the betrayers of the 
Fatherland to Justice. All this was inspired by the principle which is quite true in itself that in the 
big lie there is always a certain force of credibility; because the broad masses of a nation are always 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (4 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


more easily corrupted in the deeper strata of their emotional nature than consciously or voluntarily; 
and thus in the primitive simplicity of their minds they more readily fall victims to the big lie than the 
small lie, since they themselves often tell small lies in little matters but would be ashamed to resort to 
large-scale falsehoods. It would never come into their heads to fabricate colossal untruths, and they 
would not believe that others could have the impudence to distort the truth so infamously. Even 
though the facts which prove this to be so may be brought clearly to their minds, they will still doubt 
and waver and will continue to think that there may be some other explanation. For the grossly 
impudent lie always leaves traces behind it, even after it has been nailed down, a fact which is known 
to all expert liars in this world and to all who conspire together in the art of lying. These people know 
only too well how to use falsehood for the basest purposes. 

From time immemorial, however, the Jews have known better than any others how falsehood and 
calumny can be exploited. Is not their very existence founded on one great lie, namely, that they are a 
religious community, whereas in reality they are a race? And what a race! One of the greatest thinkers 
that mankind has produced has branded the Jews for all time with a statement which is profoundly and 
exactly true. He (Schopenhauer) called the Jew "The Great Master of Lies". Those who do not realize 
the truth of that statement, or do not wish to believe it, will never be able to lend a hand in helping 
Truth to prevail. 

We may regard it as a great stroke of fortune for the German nation that its period of lingering 
suffering was so suddenly curtailed and transformed into such a terrible catastrophe. For if things had 
gone on as they were the nation would have more slowly, but more surely, gone to ruin. The disease 
would have become chronic; whereas, in the acute form of the disaster, it at least showed itself clearly 
to the eyes of a considerable number of observers. It was not by accident that man conquered the 
black plague more easily than he conquered tuberculosis. The first appeared in terrifying waves of 
death that shook the whole of mankind, the other advances insidiously; the first induces terror, the 
other gradual indifference. The result is, however, that men opposed the first with all the energy they 
were capable of, whilst they try to arrest tuberculosis by feeble means. Thus man has mastered the 
black plague, while tuberculosis still gets the better of him. 

The same applies to diseases in nations. So long as these diseases are not of a catastrophic character, 
the population will slowly accustom itself to them and later succumb. It is then a stroke of luck 
although a bitter one when Fate decides to interfere in this slow process of decay and suddenly 
brings the victim face to face with the final stage of the disease. More often than not the result of a 
catastrophe is that a cure is at once undertaken and carried through with rigid determination. 

But even in such a case the essential preliminary condition is always the recognition of the internal 
causes which have given rise to the disease in question. 

The important question here is the differentiation of the root causes from the circumstances 
developing out of them. This becomes all the more difficult the longer the germs of disease remain in 
the national body and the longer they are allowed to become an integral part of that body. It may 
easily happen that, as time goes on, it will become so difficult to recognize certain definite virulent 
poisons as such that they are accepted as belonging to the national being; or they are merely tolerated 
as a necessary evil, so that drastic attempts to locate those alien germs are not held to be necessary. 

During the long period of peace prior to the last war certain evils were apparent here and there 
although, with one or two exceptions, very little effort was made to discover their origin. Here again 
these exceptions were first and foremost those phenomena in the economic life of the nation which 
were more apparent to the individual than the evil conditions existing in a good many other spheres. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (5 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


There were many signs of decay which ought to have been given serious thought. As far as economics 
were concerned, the following may be said: 

The amazing increase of population in Germany before the war brought the question of providing 
daily bread into a more and more prominent position in all spheres of political and economic thought 
and action. But unfortunately those responsible could not make up their minds to arrive at the only 
correct solution and preferred to reach their objective by cheaper methods. Repudiation of the idea of 
acquiring fresh territory and the substitution for it of the mad desire for the commercial conquest of 
the world was bound to lead eventually to unlimited and injurious industrialization. 

The first and most fatal result brought about in this way was the weakening of the agricultural classes, 
whose decline was proportionate to the increase in the proletariat of the urban areas, until finally the 
equilibrium was completely upset. 

The big barrier dividing rich and poor now became apparent. Luxury and poverty lived so close to 
each other that the consequences were bound to be deplorable. Want and frequent unemployment 
began to play havoc with the people and left discontent and embitterment behind them. The result of 
this was to divide the population into political classes. Discontent increased in spite of commercial 
prosperity. Matters finally reached that stage which brought about the general conviction that things 
cannot go on as they are, although no one seemed able to visualize what was really going to happen. 

These were typical and visible signs of the depths which the prevailing discontent had reached. Far 
worse than these, however, were other consequences which became apparent as a result of the 
industrialization of the nation. 

In proportion to the extent that commerce assumed definite control of the State, money became more 
and more of a God whom all had to serve and bow down to. Heavenly Gods became more and more 
old-fashioned and were laid away in the corners to make room for the worship of mammon. And thus 
began a period of utter degeneration which became specially pernicious because it set in at a time 
when the nation was more than ever in need of an exalted idea, for a critical hour was threatening. 
Germany should have been prepared to protect with the sword her efforts to win her own daily bread 
in a peaceful way. 

Unfortunately, the predominance of money received support and sanction in the very quarter which 
ought to have been opposed to it. His Majesty, the Kaiser, made a mistake when he raised 
representatives of the new finance capital to the ranks of the nobility. Admittedly, it may be offered as 
an excuse that even Bismarck failed to realize the threatening danger in this respect. In practice, 
however, all ideal virtues became secondary considerations to those of money, for it was clear that 
having once taken this road, the nobility of the sword would very soon rank second to that of finance. 

Financial operations succeed easier than war operations. Hence it was no longer any great attraction 
for a true hero or even a statesman to be brought into touch with the nearest Jew banker. Real merit 
was not interested in receiving cheap decorations and therefore declined them with thanks. But from 
the standpoint of good breeding such a development was deeply regrettable. The nobility began to 
lose more and more of the racial qualities that were a condition of its very existence, with the result 
that in many cases the term plebeian would have been more appropriate. 

A serious state of economic disruption was being brought about by the slow elimination of the 
personal control of vested interests and the gradual transference of the whole economic structure into 
the hands of joint stock companies. 

In this way labour became degraded into an object of speculation in the hands of unscrupulous 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (6 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 



The de-personalization of property ownership increased on a vast scale. Financial exchange circles 
began to triumph and made slow but sure progress in assuming control of the whole of national life. 

Before the War the internationalization of the German economic structure had already begun by the 
roundabout way of share issues. It is true that a section of the German industrialists made a 
determined attempt to avert the danger, but in the end they gave way before the united attacks of 
money-grabbing capitalism, which was assisted in this fight by its faithful henchmen in the Marxist 

The persistent war against German heavy industries was the visible start of the internationalization of 
German economic life as envisaged by the Marxists. This, however, could only be brought to a 
successful conclusion by the victory which Marxism was able to gain in the Revolution. As I write 
these words, success is attending the general attack on the German State Railways which are now to 
be turned over to international capitalists. Thus International Social-Democracy has once again 
attained one of its main objectives. 

The best evidence of how far this commercialization of the German nation was able to go can be 
plainly seen in the fact that when the War was over one of the leading captains of German industry 
and commerce gave it as his opinion that commerce as such was the only force which could put 
Germany on its feet again. 

This sort of nonsense was uttered just at the time when France was restoring public education on a 
humanitarian basis, thus doing away with the idea that national life is dependent on commerce rather 
than ideal values. The statement which Stinnes broadcasted to the world at that time caused incredible 
confusion. It was immediately taken up and has become the leading motto of all those humbugs and 
babblers the statesmen whom Fate let loose on Germany after the Revolution. 

One of the worst evidences of decadence in Germany before the War was the ever increasing habit of 
doing things by halves. This was one of the consequences of the insecurity that was felt all round. And 
it is to be attributed also to a certain timidity which resulted from one cause or another. And the latter 
malady was aggravated by the educational system. 

German education in pre- War times had an extraordinary number of weak features. It was simply and 
exclusively limited to the production of pure knowledge and paid little attention to the development of 
practical ability. Still less attention was given to the development of individual character, in so far as 
this is ever possible. And hardly any attention at all was paid to the development of a sense of 
responsibility, to strengthening the will and the powers of decision. The result of this method was to 
produce erudite people who had a passion for knowing everything. Before the War we Germans were 
accepted and estimated accordingly. The German was liked because good use could be made of him; 
but there was little esteem for him personally, on account of this weakness of character. For those who 
can read its significance aright, there is much instruction in the fact that among all nationalities 
Germans were the first to part with their national citizenship when they found themselves in a foreign 
country. And there is a world of meaning in the saying that was then prevalent: With the hat in the 
hand one can go through the whole country. 

This kind of social etiquette turned out disastrous when it prescribed the exclusive forms that had to 
be observed in the presence of His Majesty. These forms insisted that there should be no contradiction 
whatsoever, but that everything should be praised which His Majesty condescended to like. 

It was just here that the frank expression of manly dignity, and not subservience, was most needed. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (7 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


Servility in the presence of monarchs may be good enough for the professional lackey and 
place-hunter, in fact for all those decadent beings who are more pleased to be found moving in the 
high circles of royalty than among honest citizens. These exceedingly humble creatures however, 
though they grovel before their lord and bread-giver, invariably put on airs of boundless 
superciliousness towards other mortals, which was particularly impudent when they posed as the only 
people who had the right to be called monarchists. This was a gross piece of impertinence such as 
only despicable specimens among the newly-ennobled or yet-to-be-ennobled could be capable of. 

And these have always been just the people who have prepared the way for the downfall of monarchy 
and the monarchical principle. It could not be otherwise. For when a man is prepared to stand up for a 
cause, come what may, he never grovels before its representative. A man who is serious about the 
maintenance and welfare of an institution will not allow himself to be discouraged when the 
representatives of that institution show certain faults and failings. And he certainly will not run around 
to tell the world about it, as certain false democratic friends of the monarchy have done; but he will 
approach His Majesty, the bearer of the Crown himself, to warn him of the seriousness of a situation 
and persuade the monarch to act. Furthermore, he will not take up the standpoint that it must be left to 
His Majesty to act as the latter thinks fit, even though the course which he would take must plainly 
lead to disaster. But the man I am thinking of will deem it his duty to protect the monarchy against the 
monarch himself, no matter what personal risk he may run in doing so. If the worth of the monarchical 
institution be dependent on the person of the monarch himself, then it would be the worst institution 
imaginable; for only in rare cases are kings found to be models of wisdom and understanding, and 
integrity of character, though we might like to think otherwise. But this fact is unpalatable to the 
professional knaves and lackeys. Yet all upright men, and they are the backbone of the nation, 
repudiate the nonsensical fiction that all monarchs are wise, etc. For such men history is history and 
truth is truth, even where monarchs are concerned. But if a nation should have the good luck to 
possess a great king or a great man it ought to consider itself as specially favoured above all the other 
nations, and these may be thankful if an adverse fortune has not allotted the worst to them. 

It is clear that the worth and significance of the monarchical principle cannot rest in the person of the 
monarch alone, unless Heaven decrees that the crown should be set on the head of a brilliant hero like 
Frederick the Great, or a sagacious person like William I. This may happen once in several centuries, 
but hardly oftener than that. The ideal of the monarchy takes precedence of the person of the monarch, 
inasmuch as the meaning of the institution must lie in the institution it self. Thus the monarchy may 
be reckoned in the category of those whose duty it is to serve. He, too, is but a wheel in this machine 
and as such he is obliged to do his duty towards it. He has to adapt himself for the fulfilment of high 
aims. If, therefore , there were no significance attached to the idea itself and everything merely 
centred around the sacred person, then it would never be possible to depose a ruler who has shown 
himself to be an imbecile. 

It is essential to insist upon this truth at the present time, because recently those phenomena have 
appeared again and were in no small measure responsible for the collapse of the monarchy. With a 
certain amount of native impudence these persons once again talk about their King that is to say, 
the man whom they shamefully deserted a few years ago at a most critical hour. Those who refrain 
from participating in this chorus of lies are summarily classified as bad Germans. They who make 
the charge are the same class of quitters who ran away in 1918 and took to wearing red badges. They 
thought that discretion was the better part of valour. They were indifferent about what happened to the 
Kaiser. They camouflaged themselves as peaceful citizens but more often than not they vanished 
altogether. All of a sudden these champions of royalty were nowhere to be found at that time. 
Circumspectly, one by one, these servants and counsellors of the Crown reappeared, to resume their 
lip-service to royalty but only after others had borne the brunt of the anti-royalist attack and 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (8 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


suppressed the Revolution for them. Once again they were all there, remembering wistfully the 
flesh-pots of Egypt and almost bursting with devotion for the royal cause. This went on until the day 
came when red badges were again in the ascendant. Then this whole ramshackle assembly of royal 
worshippers scuttled anew like mice from the cats. 

If monarchs were not themselves responsible for such things one could not help sympathizing with 
them. But they must realize that with such champions thrones can be lost but certainly never gained. 

All this devotion was a mistake and was the result of our whole system of education, which in this 
case brought about a particularly severe retribution. Such lamentable trumpery was kept up at the 
various courts that the monarchy was slowly becoming under mined. When finally it did begin to 
totter, everything was swept away. Naturally, grovellers and lick-spittles are never willing to die for 
their masters. That monarchs never realize this, and almost on principle never really take the trouble 
to learn it, has always been their undoing. 

One visible result of wrong educational system was the fear of shouldering responsibility and the 
resultant weakness in dealing with obvious vital problems of existence. 

The starting point of this epidemic, however, was in our parliamentary institution where the shirking 
of responsibility is particularly fostered. Unfortunately the disease slowly spread to all branches of 
everyday life but particularly affected the sphere of public affairs. Responsibility was being shirked 
everywhere and this led to insufficient or half-hearted measures being taken, personal responsibility 
for each act being reduced to a minimum. 

If we consider the attitude of various Governments towards a whole series of really pernicious 
phenomena in public life, we shall at once recognize the fearful significance of this policy of 
half-measures and the lack of courage to undertake responsibilities. I shall single out only a few from 
the large numbers of instances known to me. 

In journalistic circles it is a pleasing custom to speak of the Press as a Great Power within the State. 
As a matter of fact its importance is immense. One cannot easily overestimate it, for the Press 
continues the work of education even in adult life. Generally, readers of the Press can be classified 
into three groups: 

First, those who believe everything they read; 

Second, those who no longer believe anything; 

Third, those who critically examine what they read and form their judgments accordingly. 

Numerically, the first group is by far the strongest, being composed of the broad masses of the people. 
Intellectually, it forms the simplest portion of the nation. It cannot be classified according to 
occupation but only into grades of intelligence. Under this category come all those who have not been 
born to think for themselves or who have not learnt to do so and who, partly through incompetence 
and partly through ignorance, believe everything that is set before them in print. To these we must add 
that type of lazy individual who, although capable of thinking for himself out of sheer laziness 
gratefully absorbs everything that others had thought over, modestly believing this to have been 
thoroughly done. The influence which the Press has on all these people is therefore enormous; for 
after all they constitute the broad masses of a nation. But, somehow they are not in a position or are 
not willing personally to sift what is being served up to them; so that their whole attitude towards 
daily problems is almost solely the result of extraneous influence. All this can be advantageous where 
public enlightenment is of a serious and truthful character, but great harm is done when scoundrels 
and liars take a hand at this work. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (9 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


The second group is numerically smaller, being partly composed of those who were formerly in the 
first group and after a series of bitter disappointments are now prepared to believe nothing of what 
they see in print. They hate all newspapers. Either they do not read them at all or they become 
exceptionally annoyed at their contents, which they hold to be nothing but a congeries of lies and 
misstatements. These people are difficult to handle; for they will always be sceptical of the truth. 
Consequently, they are useless for any form of positive work. 

The third group is easily the smallest, being composed of real intellectuals whom natural aptitude and 
education have taught to think for themselves and who in all things try to form their own judgments, 
while at the same time carefully sifting what they read. They will not read any newspaper without 
using their own intelligence to collaborate with that of the writer and naturally this does not set writers 
an easy task. Journalists appreciate this type of reader only with a certain amount of reservation. 

Hence the trash that newspapers are capable of serving up is of little danger much less of importance 
to the members of the third group of readers. In the majority of cases these readers have learnt to 
regard every journalist as fundamentally a rogue who sometimes speaks the truth. Most unfortunately, 
the value of these readers lies in their intelligence and not in their numerical strength, an unhappy 
state of affairs in a period where wisdom counts for nothing and majorities for everything. Nowadays 
when the voting papers of the masses are the deciding factor; the decision lies in the hands of the 
numerically strongest group; that is to say the first group, the crowd of simpletons and the credulous. 

It is an all-important interest of the State and a national duty to prevent these people from falling into 
the hands of false, ignorant or even evil-minded teachers. Therefore it is the duty of the State to 
supervise their education and prevent every form of offence in this respect. Particular attention should 
be paid to the Press; for its influence on these people is by far the strongest and most penetrating of 
all; since its effect is not transitory but continual. Its immense significance lies in the uniform and 
persistent repetition of its teaching. Here, if anywhere, the State should never forget that all means 
should converge towards the same end. It must not be led astray by the will-o-the-wisp of so-called 
freedom of the Press, or be talked into neglecting its duty, and withholding from the nation that 
which is good and which does good. With ruthless determination the State must keep control of this 
instrument of popular education and place it at the service of the State and the Nation. 

But what sort of pabulum was it that the German Press served up for the consumption of its readers in 
pre-War days? Was it not the worst virulent poison imaginable? Was not pacifism in its worst form 
inoculated into our people at a time when others were preparing slowly but surely to pounce upon 
Germany? Did not this self-same Press of ours in peace time already instil into the public mind a 
doubt as to the sovereign rights of the State itself, thereby already handicapping the State in choosing 
its means of defence? Was it not the German Press that under stood how to make all the nonsensical 
talk about Western democracy palatable to our people, until an exuberant public was eventually 
prepared to entrust its future to the League of Nations? Was not this Press instrumental in bringing in 
a state of moral degradation among our people? Were not morals and public decency made to look 
ridiculous and classed as out-of-date and banal, until finally our people also became modernized? By 
means of persistent attacks, did not the Press keep on undermining the authority of the State, until one 
blow sufficed to bring this institution tottering to the ground? Did not the Press oppose with all its 
might every movement to give the State that which belongs to the State, and by means of constant 
criticism, injure the reputation of the army, sabotage general conscription and demand refusal of 
military credits, etc. until the success of this campaign was assured? 

The function of the so-called liberal Press was to dig the grave for the German people and Reich. No 
mention need be made of the lying Marxist Press. To them the spreading of falsehood is as much a 
vital necessity as the mouse is to a cat. Their sole task is to break the national backbone of the people, 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (10 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


thus preparing the nation to become the slaves of international finance and its masters, the Jews. 

And what measures did the State take to counteract this wholesale poisoning of the public mind? 
None, absolutely nothing at all. By this policy it was hoped to win the favour of this pest by means 
of flattery, by a recognition of the value of the Press, its importance, its educative mission and 
similar nonsense. The Jews acknowledged all this with a knowing smile and returned thanks. 

The reason for this ignominious failure on the part of the State lay not so much in its refusal to realize 
the danger as in the out-and-out cowardly way of meeting the situation by the adoption of faulty and 
ineffective measures. No one had the courage to employ any energetic and radical methods. Everyone 
temporised in some way or other; and instead of striking at its heart, the viper was only further 
irritated. The result was that not only did everything remain as it was, but the power of this institution 
which should have been combated grew greater from year to year. 

The defence put up by the Government in those days against a mainly Jew-controlled Press that was 
slowly corrupting the nation, followed no definite line of action, it had no determination behind it and 
above all, no fixed objective whatsoever in view. This is where official understanding of the situation 
completely failed both in estimating the importance of the struggle, choosing the means and deciding 
on a definite plan. They merely tinkered with the problem. Occasionally, when bitten, they imprisoned 
one or another journalistic viper for a few weeks or months, but the whole poisonous brood was 
allowed to carry on in peace. 

It must be admitted that all this was partly the result of extraordinary crafty tactics on the part of 
Jewry on the one hand, and obvious official stupidity or naivete on the other hand. The Jews were too 
clever to allow a simultaneous attack to be made on the whole of their Press. No one section 
functioned as cover for the other. While the Marxist newspaper, in the most despicable manner 
possible, reviled everything that was sacred, furiously attacked the State and Government and incited 
certain classes of the community against each other, the bourgeois-democratic papers, also in Jewish 
hands, knew how to camouflage themselves as model examples of objectivity. They studiously 
avoided harsh language, knowing well that block-heads are capable of judging only by external 
appearances and never able to penetrate to the real depth and meaning of anything. They measure the 
worth of an object by its exterior and not by its content. This form of human frailty was carefully 
studied and understood by the Press. 

For this class of blockheads the Frankfurter Zeitung would be acknowledged as the essence of 
respectability. It always carefully avoided calling a spade a spade. It deprecated the use of every form 
of physical force and persistently appealed to the nobility of fighting with intellectual weapons. But 
this fight, curiously enough, was most popular with the least intellectual classes. That is one of the 
results of our defective education, which turns the youth away from the instinctive dictates of Nature, 
pumps into them a certain amount of knowledge without however being able to bring them to what is 
the supreme act of knowing. To this end diligence and goodwill are of no avail, if innate 
understanding fail. This final knowledge at which man must aim is the understanding of causes which 
are instinctively perceived. 

Let me explain: Man must not fall into the error of thinking that he was ever meant to become lord 
and master of Nature. A lopsided education has helped to encourage that illusion. Man must realize 
that a fundamental law of necessity reigns throughout the whole realm of Nature and that his existence 
is subject to the law of eternal struggle and strife. He will then feel that there cannot be a separate law 
for mankind in a world in which planets and suns follow their orbits, where moons and planets trace 
their destined paths, where the strong are always the masters of the weak and where those subject to 
such laws must obey them or be destroyed. Man must also submit to the eternal principles of this 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (11 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


supreme wisdom. He may try to understand them but he can never free himself from their sway. 

It is just for intellectual demi-monde that the Jew writes those papers which he calls his intellectual 
Press. For them the Frankfurter Zeitung and Berliner Tageblatt are written, the tone being adapted to 
them, and it is over these people that such papers have an influence. While studiously avoiding all 
forms of expression that might strike the reader as crude, the poison is injected from other vials into 
the hearts of the clientele. The effervescent tone and the fine phraseology lug the readers into 
believing that a love for knowledge and moral principle is the sole driving force that determines the 
policy of such papers, whereas in reality these features represent a cunning way of disarming any 
opposition that might be directed against the Jews and their Press. 

They make such a parade of respectability that the imbecile readers are all the more ready to believe 
that the excesses which other papers indulge in are only of a mild nature and not such as to warrant 
legal action being taken against them. Indeed such action might trespass on the freedom of the Press, 
that expression being a euphemism under which such papers escape legal punishment for deceiving 
the public and poisoning the public mind. Hence the authorities are very slow indeed to take any steps 
against these journalistic bandits for fear of immediately alienating the sympathy of the so-called 
respectable Press. A fear that is only too well founded, for the moment any attempt is made to proceed 
against any member of the gutter press all the others rush to its assistance at once, not indeed to 
support its policy but simply and solely to defend the principle of freedom of the Press and liberty of 
public opinion. This outcry will succeed in cowering the most stalwart; for it comes from the mouth of 
what is called decent journalism. 

And so this poison was allowed to enter the national bloodstream and infect public life without the 
Government taking any effectual measures to master the course of the disease. The ridiculous 
half-measures that were taken were in themselves an indication of the process of disintegration that 
was already threatening to break up the Empire. For an institution practically surrenders its existence 
when it is no longer determined to defend itself with all the weapons at its command. Every 
half-measure is the outward expression of an internal process of decay which must lead to an external 
collapse sooner or later. 

I believe that our present generation would easily master this danger if they were rightly led. For this 
generation has gone through certain experiences which must have strengthened the nerves of all those 
who did not become nervously broken by them. Certainly in days to come the Jews will raise a 
tremendous cry throughout their newspapers once a hand is laid on their favourite nest, once a move is 
made to put an end to this scandalous Press and once this instrument which shapes public opinion is 
brought under State control and no longer left in the hands of aliens and enemies of the people. I am 
certain that this will be easier for us than it was for our fathers. The scream of the twelve-inch 
shrapnel is more penetrating than the hiss from a thousand Jewish newspaper vipers. Therefore let 
them go on with their hissing. 

A further example of the weak and hesitating way in which vital national problems were dealt with in 
pre-War Germany is the following: Hand in hand with the political and moral process of infecting the 
nation, for many years an equally virulent process of infection had been attacking the public health of 
the people. In large cities, particularly, syphilis steadily increased and tuberculosis kept pace with it in 
reaping its harvest of death almost in every part of the country. 

Although in both cases the effect on the nation was alarming, it seemed as if nobody was in a position 
to undertake any decisive measures against these scourges. 

In the case of syphilis especially the attitude of the State and public bodies was one of absolute 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (12 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


capitulation. To combat this state of affairs something of far wider sweep should have been 
undertaken than was really done. The discovery of a remedy which is of a questionable nature and the 
excellent way in which it was placed on the market were only of little assistance in fighting such a 
scourge. Here again the only course to adopt is to attack the disease in its causes rather than in its 
symptoms. But in this case the primary cause is to be found in the manner in which love has been 
prostituted. Even though this did not directly bring about the fearful disease itself, the nation must still 
suffer serious damage thereby, for the moral havoc resulting from this prostitution would be sufficient 
to bring about the destruction of the nation, slowly but surely. This Judaizing of our spiritual life and 
mammonizing of our natural instinct for procreation will sooner or later work havoc with our whole 
posterity. For instead of strong, healthy children, blessed with natural feelings, we shall see miserable 
specimens of humanity resulting from economic calculation. For economic considerations are 
becoming more and more the foundations of marriage and the sole preliminary condition of it. And 
love looks for an outlet elsewhere. 

Here, as elsewhere, one may defy Nature for a certain period of time; but sooner or later she will take 
her inexorable revenge. And when man realizes this truth it is often too late. 

Our own nobility furnishes an example of the devastating consequences that follow from a persistent 
refusal to recognize the primary conditions necessary for normal wedlock. Here we are openly 
brought face to face with the results of those reproductive habits which on the one hand are 
determined by social pressure and, on the other, by financial considerations. The one leads to inherited 
debility and the other to adulteration of the blood- strain; for all the Jewish daughters of the department 
store proprietors are looked upon as eligible mates to co-operate in propagating His Lordships stock. 
And the stock certainly looks it. All this leads to absolute degeneration. Nowadays our bourgeoise are 
making efforts to follow in the same path, They will come to the same journeys end. 

These unpleasant truths are hastily and nonchalantly brushed aside, as if by so doing the real state of 
affairs could also be abolished. But no. It cannot be denied that the population of our great towns and 
cities is tending more and more to avail of prostitution in the exercise of its amorous instincts and is 
thus becoming more and more contaminated by the scourge of venereal disease. On the one hand, the 
visible effects of this mass-infection can be observed in our insane asylums and, on the other hand, 
alas! among the children at home. These are the doleful and tragic witnesses to the steadily increasing 
scourge that is poisoning our sexual life. Their sufferings are the visible results of parental vice. 

There are many ways of becoming resigned to this unpleasant and terrible fact. Many people go about 
seeing nothing or, to be more correct, not wanting to see anything. This is by far the simplest and 
cheapest attitude to adopt. Others cover themselves in the sacred mantle of prudery, as ridiculous as it 
is false. They describe the whole condition of affairs as sinful and are profoundly indignant when 
brought face to face with a victim. They close their eyes in reverend abhorrence to this godless 
scourge and pray to the Almighty that He if possible after their own death may rain down fire and 
brimstone as on Sodom and Gomorrah and so once again make an out standing example of this 
shameless section of humanity. Finally, there are those who are well aware of the terrible results 
which this scourge will and must bring about, but they merely shrug their shoulders, fully convinced 
of their inability to undertake anything against this peril. Hence matters are allowed to take their own 

Undoubtedly all this is very convenient and simple, only it must not be overlooked that this 
convenient way of approaching things can have fatal consequences for our national life. The excuse 
that other nations are also not faring any better does not alter the fact of our own deterioration, except 
that the feeling of sympathy for other stricken nations makes our own suffering easier to bear. But the 
important question that arises here is: Which nation will be the first to take the initiative in mastering 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (13 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


this scourge, and which nations will succumb to it? This will be the final upshot of the whole 
situation. The present is a period of probation for racial values. The race that fails to come through the 
test will simply die out and its place will be taken by the healthier and stronger races, which will be 
able to endure greater hardships. As this problem primarily concerns posterity, it belongs to that 
category of which it is said with terrible justification that the sins of the fathers are visited on their 
offspring unto the tenth generation. This is a consequence which follows on an infringement of the 
laws of blood and race. 

The sin against blood and race is the hereditary sin in this world and it brings disaster on every nation 
that commits it. 

The attitude towards this one vital problem in pre-War Germany was most regrettable. What measures 
were undertaken to arrest the infection of our youth in the large cities? What was done to put an end to 
the contamination and mammonization of sexual life among us? What was done to fight the resultant 
spreading of syphilis throughout the whole of our national life? The reply to this question can best be 
illustrated by showing what should have been done. 

Instead of tackling this problem in a haphazard way, the authorities should have realized that the 
fortunes or misfortunes of future generations depended on its solution. But to admit this would have 
demanded that active measures be carried out in a ruthless manner. The primary condition would have 
been that the enlightened attention of the whole country should be concentrated on this terrible 
danger, so that every individual would realize the importance of fighting against it. It would be futile 
to impose obligations of a definite character which are often difficult to bear and expect them to 
become generally effective, unless the public be thoroughly instructed on the necessity of imposing 
and accepting such obligations. This demands a widespread and systematic method of enlightenment 
and all other daily problems that might distract public attention from this great central problem should 
be relegated to the background. 

In every case where there are exigencies or tasks that seem impossible to deal with successfully public 
opinion must be concentrated on the one problem, under the conviction that the solution of this 
problem alone is a matter of life or death. Only in this way can public interest be aroused to such a 
pitch as will urge people to combine in a great voluntary effort and achieve important results. 

This fundamental truth applies also to the individual, provided he is desirous of attaining some great 
end. He must always concentrate his efforts to one definitely limited stage of his progress which has 
to be completed before the next step be attempted. Those who do not endeavour to realize their aims 
step by step and who do not concentrate their energy in reaching the individual stages, will never 
attain the final objective. At some stage or other they will falter and fail. This systematic way of 
approaching an objective is an art in itself, and always calls for the expenditure of every ounce of 
energy in order to conquer step after step of the road. 

Therefore the most essential preliminary condition necessary for an attack on such a difficult stage of 
the human road is that the authorities should succeed in convincing the masses that the immediate 
objective which is now being fought for is the only one that deserves to be considered and the only 
one on which everything depends. The broad masses are never able clearly to see the whole stretch of 
the road lying in front of them without becoming tired and thus losing faith in their ability to complete 
the task. To a certain extent they will keep the objective in mind, but they are only able to survey the 
whole road in small stages, as in the case of the traveller who knows where his journey is going to end 
but who masters the endless stretch far better by attacking it in degrees. Only in this way can he keep 
up his determination to reach the final objective. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (14 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


It is in this way, with the assistance of every form of propaganda, that the problem of fighting 
venereal disease should be placed before the public not as a task for the nation but as the main task. 
Every possible means should be employed to bring the truth about this scourge home to the minds of 
the people, until the whole nation has been convinced that everything depends on the solution of this 
problem; that is to say, a healthy future or national decay. 

Only after such preparatory measures if necessary spread over a period of many years will public 
attention and public resolution be fully aroused, and only then can serious and definite measures be 
undertaken without running the risk of not being fully understood or of being suddenly faced with a 
slackening of the public will. It must be made clear to all that a serious fight against this scourge calls 
for vast sacrifices and an enormous amount of work. 

To wage war against syphilis means fighting against prostitution, against prejudice, against 
old-established customs, against current fashion, public opinion, and, last but not least, against false 
prudery in certain circles. 

The first preliminary condition to be fulfilled before the State can claim a moral right to fight against 
all these things is that the young generation should be afforded facilities for contracting early 
marriages. Late marriages have the sanction of a custom which, from whatever angle we view it, is 
and will remain a disgrace to humanity. 

Prostitution is a disgrace to humanity and cannot be removed simply by charitable or academic 
methods. Its restriction and final extermination presupposes the removal of a whole series of 
contributory circumstances. The first remedy must always be to establish such conditions as will make 
early marriages possible, especially for young men for women are, after all, only passive subjects in 
this matter. 

An illustration of the extent to which people have so often been led astray nowadays is afforded by the 
fact that not infrequently one hears mothers in so-called better circles openly expressing their 
satisfaction at having found as a husband for their daughter a man who has already sown his wild oats, 
etc. As there is usually so little shortage in men of this type, the poor girl finds no difficulty in getting 
a mate of this description, and the children of this marriage are a visible result of such supposedly 
sensible unions. 

When one realizes, apart from this, that every possible effort is being made to hinder the process of 
procreation and that Nature is being wilfully cheated of her rights, there remains really only one 
question: Why is such an institution as marriage still in existence, and what are its functions? Is it 
really nothing better than prostitution? Does our duty to posterity no longer play any part? Or do 
people not realize the nature of the curse they are inflicting on themselves and their offspring by such 
criminally foolish neglect of one of the primary laws of Nature? This is how civilized nations 
degenerate and gradually perish. 

Marriage is not an end in itself but must serve the greater end, which is that of increasing and 
maintaining the human species and the race. This is its only meaning and purpose. 

This being admitted, then it is clear that the institution of marriage must be judged by the manner in 
which its allotted function is fulfilled. Therefore early marriages should be the rule, because thus the 
young couple will still have that pristine force which is the fountain head of a healthy posterity with 
unimpaired powers of resistance. Of course early marriages cannot be made the rule unless a whole 
series of social measures are first undertaken without which early marriages cannot be even thought of 
. In other words, a solution of this question, which seems a small problem in itself, cannot be brought 
about without adopting radical measures to alter the social background. The importance of such 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (15 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


measures ought to be studied and properly estimated, especially at a time when the so-called social 
Republic has shown itself unable to solve the housing problem and thus has made it impossible for 
innumerable couples to get married. That sort of policy prepares the way for the further advance of 

Another reason why early marriages are impossible is our nonsensical method of regulating the scale 
of salaries, which pays far too little attention to the problem of family support. Prostitution, therefore, 
can only be really seriously tackled if, by means of a radical social reform, early marriage is made 
easier than hitherto. This is the first preliminary necessity for the solution of this problem. 

Secondly, a whole series of false notions must be eradicated from our system of bringing up and 
educating children things which hitherto no one seems to have worried about. In our present 
educational system a balance will have to be established, first and foremost, between mental 
instruction and physical training. 

What is known as Gymnasium (Grammar School) to-day is a positive insult to the Greek institution. 
Our system of education entirely loses sight of the fact that in the long run a healthy mind can exist 
only in a healthy body. This statement, with few exceptions, applies particularly to the broad masses 
of the nation. 

In the pre-War Germany there was a time when no one took the trouble to think over this truth. 
Training of the body was criminally neglected, the one-sided training of the mind being regarded as a 
sufficient guarantee for the nations greatness. This mistake was destined to show its effects sooner 
than had been anticipated. It is not pure chance that the Bolshevic teaching flourishes in those regions 
whose degenerate population has been brought to the verge of starvation, as, for example, in the case 
of Central Germany, Saxony, and the Ruhr Valley. In all these districts there is a marked absence of 
any serious resistance, even by the so-called intellectual classes, against this Jewish contagion. And 
the simple reason is that the intellectual classes are themselves physically degenerate, not through 
privation but through education. The exclusive intellectualism of the education in vogue among our 
upper classes makes them unfit for lifes struggle at an epoch in which physical force and not mind is 
the dominating factor. Thus they are neither capable of maintaining themselves nor of making their 
way in life. In nearly every case physical disability is the forerunner of personal cowardice. 

The extravagant emphasis laid on purely intellectual education and the consequent neglect of physical 
training must necessarily lead to sexual thoughts in early youth. Those boys whose constitutions have 
been trained and hardened by sports and gymnastics are less prone to sexual indulgence than those 
stay-at-homes who have been fed exclusively with mental pabulum. Sound methods of education 
cannot, however, afford to disregard this, and we must not forget that the expectations of a healthy 
young man from a woman will differ from those of a weakling who has been prematurely corrupted. 

Thus in every branch of our education the days curriculum must be arranged so as to occupy a boys 
free time in profitable development of his physical powers. He has no right in those years to loaf 
about, becoming a nuisance in public streets and in cinemas; but when his days work is done he ought 
to harden his young body so that his strength may not be found wanting when the occasion arises. To 
prepare for this and to carry it out should be the function of our educational system and not 
exclusively to pump in knowledge or wisdom. Our school system must also rid itself of the notion that 
the training of the body is a task that should be left to the individual himself. There is no such thing as 
allowing freedom of choice to sin against posterity and thus against the race. 

The fight against pollution of the mind must be waged simultaneously with the training of the body. 
To-day the whole of our public life may be compared to a hot-house for the forced growth of sexual 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (16 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


notions and incitements. A glance at the bill-of-fare provided by our cinemas, playhouses, and 
theatres suffices to prove that this is not the right food, especially for our young people. Hoardings 
and advertisements kiosks combine to attract the public in the most vulgar manner. Anyone who has 
not altogether lost contact with adolescent yearnings will realize that all this must have very grave 
consequences. This seductive and sensuous atmosphere puts notions into the heads of our youth 
which, at their age, ought still to be unknown to them. Unfortunately, the results of this kind of 
education can best be seen in our contemporary youth who are prematurely grown up and therefore 
old before their time. The law courts from time to time throw a distressing light on the spiritual life of 
our 14- and 15-year old children. Who, therefore, will be surprised to learn that venereal disease 
claims its victims at this age? And is it not a frightful shame to see the number of physically weak and 
intellectually spoiled young men who have been introduced to the mysteries of marriage by the 
whores of the big cities? 

No; those who want seriously to combat prostitution must first of all assist in removing the spiritual 
conditions on which it thrives. They will have to clean up the moral pollution of our city culture 
fearlessly and without regard for the outcry that will follow. If we do not drag our youth out of the 
morass of their present environment they will be engulfed by it. Those people who do not want to see 
these things are deliberately encouraging them and are guilty of spreading the effects of prostitution to 
the future for the future belongs to our young generation. This process of cleansing our Kultur will 
have to be applied in practically all spheres. The stage, art, literature, the cinema, the Press and 
advertisement posters, all must have the stains of pollution removed and be placed in the service of a 
national and cultural idea. The life of the people must be freed from the asphyxiating perfume of our 
modern eroticism and also from every unmanly and prudish form of insincerity. In all these things the 
aim and the method must be determined by thoughtful consideration for the preservation of our 
national well-being in body and soul. The right to personal freedom comes second in importance to 
the duty of maintaining the race. 

Only after such measures have been put into practice can a medical campaign against this scourge 
begin with some hope of success. But, here again, half-measures will be valueless. Far-reaching and 
important decisions will have to be made. It would be doing things by halves if incurables were given 
the opportunity of infecting one healthy person after another. This would be that kind of 
humanitarianism which would allow hundreds to perish in order to save the suffering of one 
individual. The demand that it should be made impossible for defective people to continue to 
propagate defective offspring is a demand that is based on most reasonable grounds, and its proper 
fulfilment is the most humane task that mankind has to face. Unhappy and undeserved suffering in 
millions of cases will be spared, with the result that there will be a gradual improvement in national 
health. A determined decision to act in this manner will at the same time provide an obstacle against 
the further spread of venereal disease. It would then be a case, where necessary, of mercilessly 
isolating all incurables perhaps a barbaric measure for those unfortunates but a blessing for the 
present generation and for posterity. The temporary pain thus experienced in this century can and will 
spare future thousands of generations from suffering. 

The fight against syphilis and its pace-maker, prostitution, is one of the gigantic tasks of mankind; 
gigantic, because it is not merely a case of solving a single problem but the removal of a whole series 
of evils which are the contributory causes of this scourge. Disease of the body in this case is merely 
the result of a diseased condition of the moral, social, and racial instincts. 

But if for reasons of indolence or cowardice this fight is not fought to a finish we may imagine what 
conditions will be like 500 years hence. Little of Gods image will be left in human nature, except to 
mock the Creator. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (17 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


But what has been done in Germany to counteract this scourge? If we think calmly over the answer 
we shall find it distressing. It is true that in governmental circles the terrible and injurious effects of 
this disease were well known, but the counter-measures which were officially adopted were 
ineffective and a hopeless failure. They tinkered with cures for the symptoms, wholly regardless of 
the cause of the disease. Prostitutes were medically examined and controlled as far as possible, and 
when signs of infection were apparent they were sent to hospital . When outwardly cured, they were 
once more let loose on humanity. 

It is true that protective legislation was introduced which made sexual intercourse a punishable 
offence for all those not completely cured, or those suffering from venereal disease. This legislation 
was correct in theory, but in practice it failed completely. In the first place, in the majority of cases 
women will decline to appear in court as witnesses against men who have robbed them of their health. 
Women would be exposed far more than men to uncharitable remarks in such cases, and one can 
imagine what their position would be if they had been infected by their own husbands. Should women 
in that case lay a charge? Or what should they do? 

In the case of the man there is the additional fact that he frequently is unfortunate enough to run up 
against this danger when he is under the influence of alcohol. His condition makes it impossible for 
him to assess the qualities of his amorous beauty, a fact which is well known to every diseased 
prostitute and makes them single out men in this ideal condition for preference. The result is that the 
unfortunate man is not able to recollect later on who his compassionate benefactress was, which is not 
surprising in cities like Berlin and Munich. Many of such cases are visitors from the provinces who, 
held speechless and enthralled by the magic charm of city life, become an easy prey for prostitutes. 

In the final analysis who is able to say whether he has been infected or not? 

Are there not innumerable cases on record where an apparently cured person has a relapse and does 
untold harm without knowing it? 

Therefore in practice the results of these legislative measures are negative. The same applies to the 
control of prostitution, and, finally, even medical treatment and cure are nowadays unsafe and 
doubtful. One thing only is certain. The scourge has spread further and further in spite of all measures, 
and this alone suffices definitely to stamp and substantiate their inefficiency. 

Everything else that was undertaken was just as inefficient as it was absurd. The spiritual prostitution 
of the people was neither arrested nor was anything whatsoever undertaken in this direction. 

Those, however, who do not regard this subject as a serious one would do well to examine the 
statistical data of the spread of this disease, study its growth in the last century and contemplate the 
possibilities of its further development. The ordinary observer, unless he were particularly stupid, 
would experience a cold shudder if the position were made clear to him. 

The half-hearted and wavering attitude adopted in pre-War Germany towards this iniquitous condition 
can assuredly be taken as a visible sign of national decay. When the courage to fight for ones own 
health is no longer in evidence, then the right to live in this world of struggle also ceases. 

One of the visible signs of decay in the old Reich was the slow setback which the general cultural 
level experienced. But by Kultur I do not mean that which we nowadays style as civilization, which 
on the contrary may rather be regarded as inimical to the spiritual elevation of life. 

At the turn of the last century a new element began to make its appearance in our world. It was an 
element which had been hitherto absolutely unknown and foreign to us. In former times there had 
certainly been offences against good taste; but these were mostly departures from the orthodox canons 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (18 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


of art, and posterity could recognize a certain historical value in them. But the new products showed 
signs, not only of artistic aberration but of spiritual degeneration. Here, in the cultural sphere, the 
signs of the coming collapse first became manifest. 

The Bolshevization of art is the only cultural form of life and the only spiritual manifestation of which 
Bolshevism is capable. 

Anyone to whom this statement may appear strange need only take a glance at those lucky States 
which have become Bolshevized and, to his horror, he will there recognize those morbid monstrosities 
which have been produced by insane and degenerate people. All those artistic aberrations which are 
classified under the names of cubism and dadism, since the opening of the present century, are 
manifestations of art which have come to be officially recognized by the State itself. This 
phenomenon made its appearance even during the short-lived period of the Soviet Republic in 
Bavaria. At that time one might easily have recognized how all the official posters, propagandist 
pictures and newspapers, etc., showed signs not only of political but also of cultural decadence. 

About sixty years ago a political collapse such as we are experiencing to-day would have been just as 
inconceivable as the cultural decline which has been manifested in cubist and futurist pictures ever 
since 1900. Sixty years ago an exhibition of so-called dadistic experiences would have been an 
absolutely preposterous idea. The organizers of such an exhibition would then have been certified for 
the lunatic asylum, whereas, to-day they are appointed presidents of art societies. At that time such an 
epidemic would never have been allowed to spread. Public opinion would not have tolerated it, and 
the Government would not have remained silent; for it is the duty of a Government to save its people 
from being stampeded into such intellectual madness. But intellectual madness would have resulted 
from a development that followed the acceptance of this kind of art. It would have marked one of the 
worst changes in human history; for it would have meant that a retrogressive process had begun to 
take place in the human brain, the final stages of which would be unthinkable. 

If we study the course of our cultural life during the last twenty-five years we shall be astonished to 
note how far we have already gone in this process of retrogression. Everywhere we find the presence 
of those germs which give rise to protuberant growths that must sooner or later bring about the ruin of 
our culture. Here we find undoubted symptoms of slow corruption; and woe to the nations that are no 
longer able to bring that morbid process to a halt. 

In almost all the various fields of German art and culture those morbid phenomena may be observed. 
Here everything seems to have passed the culminating point of its excellence and to have entered the 
curve of a hasty decline. At the beginning of the century the theatres seemed already degenerating and 
ceasing to be cultural factors, except the Court theatres, which opposed this prostitution of the 
national art. With these exceptions, and also a few other decent institutions, the plays produced on the 
stage were of such a nature that the people would have benefited by not visiting them at all. A sad 
symptom of decline was manifested by the fact that in the case of many art centres the sign was 
posted on the entrance doors: For Adults Only. 

Let it be borne in mind that these precautions had to be taken in regard to institutions whose main 
purpose should have been to promote the education of the youth and not merely to provide amusement 
for sophisticated adults. What would the great dramatists of other times have said of such measures 
and, above all, of the conditions which made these measures necessary? How exasperated Schiller 
would have been, and how Goethe would have turned away in disgust! 

But what are Schiller, Goethe and Shakespeare when confronted with the heroes of our modern 
German literature? Old and frowsy and outmoded and finished. For it was typical of this epoch that 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (19 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


not only were its own products bad but that the authors of such products and their backers reviled 
everything that had really been great in the past. This is a phenomenon that is very characteristic of 
such epochs. The more vile and miserable are the men and products of an epoch, the more they will 
hate and denigrate the ideal achievements of former generations. What these people would like best 
would be completely to destroy every vestige of the past, in order to do away with that sole standard 
of comparison which prevents their own daubs from being looked upon as art. Therefore the more 
lamentable and wretched are the products of each new era, the more it will try to obliterate all the 
memorials of the past. But any real innovation that is for the benefit of mankind can always face 
comparison with the best of what has gone before; and frequently it happens that those monuments of 
the past guarantee the acceptance of those modern productions. There is no fear that modern 
productions of real worth will look pale and worthless beside the monuments of the past. What is 
contributed to the general treasury of human culture often fulfils a part that is necessary in order to 
keep the memory of old achievements alive, because this memory alone is the standard whereby our 
own works are properly appreciated. Only those who have nothing of value to give to the world will 
oppose everything that already exists and would have it destroyed at all costs. 

And this holds good not only for new phenomena in the cultural domain but also in politics. The more 
inferior new revolutionary movements are, the more will they try to denigrate the old forms. Here 
again the desire to pawn off their shoddy products as great and original achievements leads them into 
a blind hatred against everything which belongs to the past and which is superior to their own work. 
As long as the historical memory of Frederick the Great, for instance, still lives, Frederick Ebert can 
arouse only a problematic admiration. The relation of the hero of Sans Souci to the former republican 
of Bremen may be compared to that of the sun to the moon; for the moon can shine only after the 
direct rays of the sun have left the earth. Thus we can readily understand why it is that all the new 
moons in human history have hated the fixed stars. In the field of politics, if Fate should happen 
temporarily to place the ruling power in the hands of those nonentities they are not only eager to defile 
and revile the past but at the same time they will use all means to evade criticism of their own acts. 
The Law for the Protection of the Republic, which the new German State enacted, may be taken as 
one example of this truth. 

One has good grounds to be suspicious in regard to any new idea, or any doctrine or philosophy, any 
political or economical movement, which tries to deny everything that the past has produced or to 
present it as inferior and worthless. Any renovation which is really beneficial to human progress will 
always have to begin its constructive work at the level where the last stones of the structure have been 
laid. It need not blush to utilize those truths which have already been established; for all human 
culture, as well as man himself, is only the result of one long line of development, where each 
generation has contributed but one stone to the building of the whole structure. The meaning and 
purpose of revolutions cannot be to tear down the whole building but to take away what has not been 
well fitted into it or is unsuitable, and to rebuild the free space thus caused, after which the main 
construction of the building will be carried on. 

Thus alone will it be possible to talk of human progress; for otherwise the world would never be free 
of chaos, since each generation would feel entitled to reject the past and to destroy all the work of the 
past, as the necessary preliminary to any new work of its own. 

The saddest feature of the condition in which our whole civilization found itself before the War was 
the fact that it was not only barren of any creative force to produce its own works of art and 
civilization but that it hated, defiled and tried to efface the memory of the superior works produced in 
the past. About the end of the last century people were less interested in producing new significant 
works of their own particularly in the fields of dramatic art and literature than in defaming the best 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (20 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


works of the past and in presenting them as inferior and antiquated. As if this period of disgraceful 
decadence had the slightest capacity to produce anything of superior quality ! The efforts made to 
conceal the past from the eyes of the present afforded clear evidence of the fact that these apostles of 
the future acted from an evil intent. These symptoms should have made it clear to all that it was not a 
question of new, though wrong, cultural ideas but of a process which was undermining the very 
foundations of civilization. It threw the artistic feeling which had hitherto been quite sane into utter 
confusion, thus spiritually preparing the way for political Bolshevism. If the creative spirit of the 
Periclean age be manifested in the Parthenon, then the Bolshevist era is manifested through its cubist 

In this connection attention must be drawn once again to the want of courage displayed by one section 
of our people, namely, by those who, in virtue of their education and position, ought to have felt 
themselves obliged to take up a firm stand against this outrage on our culture. But they refrained from 
offering serious resistance and surrendered to what they considered the inevitable. This abdication of 
theirs was due, however, to sheer funk lest the apostles of Bolshevist art might raise a rumpus; for 
those apostles always violently attacked everyone who was not ready to recognize them as the choice 
spirits of artistic creation, and they tried to strangle all opposition by saying that it was the product of 
philistine and backwater minds. People trembled in fear lest they might be accused by these yahoos 
and swindlers of lacking artistic appreciation, as if it would have been a disgrace not to be able to 
understand and appreciate the effusions of those mental degenerates or arrant rogues. Those cultural 
disciples, however, had a very simple way of presenting their own effusions as works of the highest 
quality. They offered incomprehensible and manifestly crazy productions to their amazed 
contemporaries as what they called an inner experience. Thus they forestalled all adverse criticism at 
very little cost indeed. Of course nobody ever doubted that there could have been inner experiences 
like that, but some doubt ought to have arisen as to whether or not there was any justification for 
exposing these hallucinations of psychopaths or criminals to the sane portion of human society. The 
works produced by a Moritz von Schwind or a Bocklin were also externalizations of an inner 
experience, but these were the experiences of divinely gifted artists and not of buffoons. 

This situation afforded a good opportunity of studying the miserable cowardliness of our so-called 
intellectuals who shirked the duty of offering serious resistance to the poisoning of the sound instincts 
of our people. They left it to the people themselves to formulate their own attitude towards his 
impudent nonsense. Lest they might be considered as understanding nothing of art, they accepted 
every caricature of art, until they finally lost the power of judging what is really good or bad. 

Taken all in all, there were superabundant symptoms to show that a diseased epoch had begun. 

Still another critical symptom has to be considered. In the course of the nineteenth century our towns 
and cities began more and more to lose their character as centres of civilization and became more and 
more centres of habitation. In our great modern cities the proletariat does not show much attachment 
to the place where it lives. This feeling results from the fact that their dwelling-place is nothing but an 
accidental abode, and that feeling is also partly due to the frequent change of residence which is 
forced upon them by social conditions. There is no time for the growth of any attachment to the town 
in which they live. But another reason lies in the cultural barrenness and superficiality of our modern 
cities. At the time of the German Wars of Liberation our German towns and cities were not only small 
in number but also very modest in size. The few that could really be called great cities were mostly 
the residential cities of princes; as such they had almost always a definite cultural value and also a 
definite cultural aspect. Those few towns which had more than fifty thousand inhabitants were, in 
comparison with modern cities of the same size, rich in scientific and artistic treasures. At the time 
when Munich had not more than sixty thousand souls it was already well on the way to become one of 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (21 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


the first German centres of art. Nowadays almost every industrial town has a population at least as 
large as that, without having anything of real value to call its own. They are agglomerations of 
tenement houses and congested dwelling barracks, and nothing else. It would be a miracle if anybody 
should grow sentimentally attached to such a meaningless place. Nobody can grow attached to a place 
which offers only just as much or as little as any other place would offer, which has no character of its 
own and where obviously pains have been taken to avoid everything that might have any resemblance 
to an artistic appearance. 

But this is not all. Even the great cities become more barren of real works of art the more they 
increase in population. They assume more and more a neutral atmosphere and present the same 
aspect, though on a larger scale, as the wretched little factory towns. Everything that our modern age 
has contributed to the civilization of our great cities is absolutely deficient. All our towns are living on 
the glory and the treasures of the past. If we take away from the Munich of to-day everything that was 
created under Ludwig II we should be horror-stricken to see how meagre has been the output of 
important artistic creations since that time. One might say much the same of Berlin and most of our 
other great towns. 

But the following is the essential thing to be noticed: Our great modern cities have no outstanding 
monuments that dominate the general aspect of the city and could be pointed to as the symbols of a 
whole epoch. Yet almost every ancient town had a monument erected to its glory. It was not in private 
dwellings that the characteristic art of ancient cities was displayed but in the public monuments, 
which were not meant to have a transitory interest but an enduring one. And this was because they did 
not represent the wealth of some individual citizen but the greatness and importance of the 
community. It was under this inspiration that those monuments arose which bound the individual 
inhabitants to their own town in a manner that is often almost incomprehensible to us to-day. What 
struck the eye of the individual citizen was not a number of mediocre private buildings, but imposing 
structures that belonged to the whole community. In contradistinction to these, private dwellings were 
of only very secondary importance indeed. 

When we compare the size of those ancient public buildings with that of the private dwellings 
belonging to the same epoch then we can understand the great importance which was given to the 
principle that those works which reflected and affected the life of the community should take 
precedence of all others. 

Among the broken arches and vast spaces that are covered with ruins from the ancient world the 
colossal riches that still arouse our wonder have not been left to us from the commercial palaces of 
these days but from the temples of the Gods and the public edifices that belonged to the State. The 
community itself was the owner of those great edifices. Even in the pomp of Rome during the 
decadence it was not the villas and palaces of some citizens that filled the most prominent place but 
rather the temples and the baths, the stadia, the circuses, the aqueducts, the basilicas, etc., which 
belonged to the State and therefore to the people as a whole. 

In medieval Germany also the same principle held sway, although the artistic outlook was quite 
different. In ancient times the theme that found its expression in the Acropolis or the Pantheon was 
now clothed in the forms of the Gothic Cathedral. In the medieval cities these monumental structures 
towered gigantically above the swarm of smaller buildings with their framework walls of wood and 
brick. And they remain the dominant feature of these cities even to our own day, although they are 
becoming more and more obscured by the apartment barracks. They determine the character and 
appearance of the locality. Cathedrals, city-halls, corn exchanges, defence towers, are the outward 
expression of an idea which has its counterpart only in the ancient world. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (22 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


The dimensions and quality of our public buildings to-day are in deplorable contrast to the edifices 
that represent private interests. If a similar fate should befall Berlin as befell Rome future generations 
might gaze upon the ruins of some Jewish department stores or joint-stock hotels and think that these 
were the characteristic expressions of the culture of our time. In Berlin itself, compare the shameful 
disproportion between the buildings which belong to the Reich and those which have been erected for 
the accommodation of trade and finance. 

The credits that are voted for public buildings are in most cases inadequate and really ridiculous. They 
are not built as structures that were meant to last but mostly for the purpose of answering the need of 
the moment. No higher idea influenced those who commissioned such buildings. At the time the 
Berlin Schloss was built it had a quite different significance from what the new library has for our 
time, seeing that one battleship alone represents an expenditure of about sixty million marks, whereas 
less than half that sum was allotted for the building of the Reichstag, which is the most imposing 
structure erected for the Reich and which should have been built to last for ages. Yet, in deciding the 
question of internal decoration, the Upper House voted against the use of stone and ordered that the 
walls should be covered with stucco. For once, however, the parliamentarians made an appropriate 
decision on that occasion; for plaster heads would be out of place between stone walls. 

The community as such is not the dominant characteristic of our contemporary cities, and therefore it 
is not to be wondered at if the community does not find itself architecturally represented. Thus we 
must eventually arrive at a veritable civic desert which will at last be reflected in the total indifference 
of the individual citizen towards his own country. 

This is also a sign of our cultural decay and general break-up. Our era is entirely preoccupied with 
little things which are to no purpose, or rather it is entirely preoccupied in the service of money. 
Therefore it is not to be wondered at if, with the worship of such an idol, the sense of heroism should 
entirely disappear. But the present is only reaping what the past has sown. 

All these symptoms which preceded the final collapse of the Second Empire must be attributed to the 
lack of a definite and uniformly accepted Weltanschhauung and the general uncertainty of outlook 
consequent on that lack. This uncertainty showed itself when the great questions of the time had to be 
considered one after another and a decisive policy adopted towards them. This lack is also 
accountable for the habit of doing everything by halves, beginning with the educational system, the 
shilly-shally, the reluctance to undertake responsibilites and, finally, the cowardly tolerance of evils 
that were even admitted to be destructive. Visionary humanitarianisms became the fashion. In weakly 
submitting to these aberrations and sparing the feelings of the individual, the future of millions of 
human beings was sacrificed. 

An examination of the religious situation before the War shows that the general process of disruption 
had extended to this sphere also. A great part of the nation itself had for a long time already ceased to 
have any convictions of a uniform and practical character in their ideological outlook on life. In this 
matter the point of primary importance was by no means the number of people who renounced their 
church membership but rather the widespread indifference. While the two Christian denominations 
maintained missions in Asia and Africa, for the purpose of securing new adherents to the Faith, these 
same denominations were losing millions and millions of their adherents at home in Europe. These 
former adherents either gave up religion wholly as a directive force in their lives or they adopted their 
own interpretation of it. The consequences of this were specially felt in the moral life of the country. 
In parenthesis it may be remarked that the progress made by the missions in spreading the Christian 
Faith abroad was only quite modest in comparison with the spread of Mohammedanism. 

It must be noted too that the attack on the dogmatic principles underlying ecclesiastical teaching 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (23 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


increased steadily in violence. And yet this human world of ours would be inconceivable without the 
practical existence of a religious belief. The great masses of a nation are not composed of 
philosophers. For the masses of the people, especially faith is absolutely the only basis of a moral 
outlook on life. The various substitutes that have been offered have not shown any results that might 
warrant us in thinking that they might usefully replace the existing denominations. But if religious 
teaching and religious faith were once accepted by the broad masses as active forces in their lives, 
then the absolute authority of the doctrines of faith would be the foundation of all practical effort. 
There may be a few hundreds of thousands of superior men who can live wisely and intelligently 
without depending on the general standards that prevail in everyday life, but the millions of others 
cannot do so. Now the place which general custom fills in everyday life corresponds to that of general 
laws in the State and dogma in religion. The purely spiritual idea is of itself a changeable thing that 
may be subjected to endless interpretations. It is only through dogma that it is given a precise and 
concrete form without which it could not become a living faith. Otherwise the spiritual idea would 
never become anything more than a mere metaphysical concept, or rather a philosophical opinion. 
Accordingly the attack against dogma is comparable to an attack against the general laws on which 
the State is founded. And so this attack would finally lead to complete political anarchy if it were 
successful, just as the attack on religion would lead to a worthless religious nihilism. 

The political leader should not estimate the worth of a religion by taking some of its shortcomings 
into account, but he should ask himself whether there be any practical substitute in a view which is 
demonstrably better. Until such a substitute be available only fools and criminals would think of 
abolishing the existing religion. 

Undoubtedly no small amount of blame for the present unsatisfactory religious situation must be 
attributed to those who have encumbered the ideal of religion with purely material accessories and 
have thus given rise to an utterly futile conflict between religion and science. In this conflict victory 
will nearly always be on the side of science, even though after a bitter struggle, while religion will 
suffer heavily in the eyes of those who cannot penetrate beneath the mere superficial aspects of 

But the greatest damage of all has come from the practice of debasing religion as a means that can be 
exploited to serve political interests, or rather commercial interests. The impudent and loud-mouthed 
liars who do this make their profession of faith before the whole world in stentorian tones so that all 
poor mortals may hear not that they are ready to die for it if necessary but rather that they may live 
all the better. They are ready to sell their faith for any political quid pro quo. For ten parliamentary 
mandates they would ally themselves with the Marxists, who are the mortal foes of all religion. And 
for a seat in the Cabinet they would go the length of wedlock with the devil, if the latter had not still 
retained some traces of decency. 

If religious life in pre-war Germany had a disagreeable savour for the mouths of many people this was 
because Christianity had been lowered to base uses by political parties that called themselves 
Christian and because of the shameful way in which they tried to identify the Catholic Faith with a 
political party. 

This substitution was fatal. It procured some worthless parliamentary mandates for the party in 
question, but the Church suffered damage thereby. 

The consequences of that situation had to be borne by the whole nation; for the laxity that resulted in 
religious life set in at a juncture when everything was beginning to lose hold and vacillate and the 
traditional foundations of custom and of morality were threatening to fall asunder. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (24 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


Yet all those cracks and clefts in the social organism might not have been dangerous if no grave 
burdens had been laid upon it; but they became disastrous when the internal solidarity of the nation 
was the most important factor in withstanding the storm of big events. 

In the political field also observant eyes might have noticed certain anomalies of the Reich which 
foretold disaster unless some alteration and correction took place in time. The lack of orientation in 
German policy, both domestic and foreign, was obvious to everyone who was not purposely blind. 
The best thing that could be said about the practice of making compromises is that it seemed 
outwardly to be in harmony with Bismarcks axiom that politics is the art of the possible. But 
Bismarck was a slightly different man from the Chancellors who followed him. This difference 
allowed the former to apply that formula to the very essence of his policy, while in the mouths of the 
others it took on an utterly different significance. When he uttered that phrase Bismarck meant to say 
that in order to attain a definite political end all possible means should be employed or at least that all 
possibilities should be tried. But his successors see in that phrase only a solemn declaration that one is 
not necessarily bound to have political principles or any definite political aims at all. And the political 
leaders of the Reich at that time had no far-seeing policy. Here, again, the necessary foundation was 
lacking, namely, a definite Weltanschhauung, and these leaders also lacked that clear insight into the 
laws of political evolution which is a necessary quality in political leadership. 

Many people who took a gloomy view of things at that time condemned the lack of ideas and lack of 
orientation which were evident in directing the policy of the Reich. They recognized the inner 
weakness and futility of this policy. But such people played only a secondary role in politics. Those 
who had the Government of the country in their hands were quite as indifferent to principles of civil 
wisdom laid down by thinkers like Houston Stewart Chamberlain as our political leaders now are. 
These people are too stupid to think for themselves, and they have too much self-conceit to take from 
others the instruction which they need. Oxenstierna 14 ) gave expression to a truth which has lasted 
since time immemorial, when he said that the world is governed by only a particle of wisdom. Almost 
every civil servant of councillor rank might naturally be supposed to possess only an atom or so 
belonging to this particle. But since Germany became a Republic even this modicum is wanting. And 
that is why they had to promulgate the Law for the Defence of the Republic, which prohibits the 
holding of such views or expressing them. It was fortunate for Oxenstierna that he lived at that time 
and not in this wise Republic of our time. 

Already before the War that institution which should have represented the strength of the Reich the 
Parliament, the Reichstag was widely recognized as its weakest feature. Cowardliness and fear of 
shouldering responsibilities were associated together there in a perfect fashion. 

One of the silliest notions that one hears expressed to-day is that in Germany the parliamentary 
institution has ceased to function since the Revolution. This might easily be taken to imply that the 
case was different before the Revolution. But in reality the parliamentary institution never functioned 
except to the detriment of the country. And it functioned thus in those days when people saw nothing 
or did not wish to see anything. The German downfall is to be attributed in no small degree to this 
institution. But that the catastrophe did not take place sooner is not to be credited to the Parliament but 
rather to those who opposed the influence of this institution which, during peace times, was digging 
the grave of the German Nation and the German Reich. 

From the immense mass of devastating evils that were due either directly or indirectly to the 
Parliament I shall select one the most intimately typical of this institution which was the most 
irresponsible of all time. The evil I speak of was seen in the appalling shilly-shally and weakness in 
conducting the internal and external affairs of the Reich. It was attributable in the first place to the 
action of the Reichstag and was one of the principal causes of the political collapse. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (25 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


Everything subject to the influence of Parliament was done by halves, no matter from what aspect you 
may regard it. 

The foreign policy of the Reich in the matter of alliances was an example of shilly-shally. They 
wished to maintain peace, but in doing so they steered straight, into war. 

Their Polish policy was also carried out by half- measures. It resulted neither in a German triumph nor 
Polish conciliation, and it made enemies of the Russians. 

They tried to solve the Alsace-Lorraine question through half- measures. Instead of crushing the head 
of the French hydra once and for all with the mailed fist and granting Alsace-Lorraine equal rights 
with the other German States, they did neither the one nor the other. Anyhow, it was impossible for 
them to do otherwise, for they had among their ranks the greatest traitors to the country, such as Herr 
Wetter le of the Centre Party. 

But still the country might have been able to bear with all this provided the half-measure policy had 
not victimized that force in which, as the last resort, the existence of the Empire depended: namely, 
the Army. 

The crime committed by the so-called German Reichstag in this regard was sufficient of itself to draw 
down upon it the curses of the German Nation for all time. On the most miserable of pretexts these 
parliamentary party henchmen filched from the hands of the nation and threw away the weapons 
which were needed to maintain its existence and therewith defend the liberty and independence of our 
people. If the graves on the plains of Flanders were to open to-day the bloodstained accusers would 
arise, hundreds of thousands of our best German youth who were driven into the arms of death by 
those conscienceless parliamentary ruffians who were either wrongly educated for their task or only 
half-educated. Those youths, and other millions of the killed and mutilated, were lost to the Fatherland 
simply and solely in order that a few hundred deceivers of the people might carry out their political 
manoeuvres and their exactions or even treasonably pursue their doctrinaire theories. 

By means of the Marxist and democratic Press, the Jews spread the colossal falsehood about German 
Militarism throughout the world and tried to inculpate Germany by every possible means, while at 
the same time the Marxist and democratic parties refused to assent to the measures that were 
necessary for the adequate training of our national defence forces. The appalling crime thus 
committed by these people ought to have been obvious to everybody who foresaw that in case of war 
the whole nation would have to be called to arms and that, because of the mean huckstering of these 
noble representatives of the people, as they called themselves, millions of Germans would have to 
face the enemy ill-equipped and insufficiently trained. But even apart from the consequences of the 
crude and brutal lack of conscience which these parliamentarian rascals displayed, it was quite clear 
that the lack of properly trained soldiers at the beginning of a war would most probably lead to the 
loss of such a war; and this probability was confirmed in a most terrible way during the course of the 
world war. 

Therefore the German people lost the struggle for the freedom and independence of their country 
because of the half-hearted and defective policy employed during times of peace in the organization 
and training of the defensive strength of the nation. 

The number of recruits trained for the land forces was too small; but the same half-heartedness was 
shown in regard to the navy and made this weapon of national self-preservation more or less 
ineffective. Unfortunately, even the naval authorities themselves were contaminated with this spirit of 
half-heartedness. The tendency to build the ship on the stocks somewhat smaller than that just 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (26 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


launched by the British did not show much foresight and less genius. A fleet which cannot be brought 
to the same numerical strength as that of the probable enemy ought to compensate for this inferiority 
by the superior fighting power of the individual ship. It is the weight of the fighting power that counts 
and not any sort of traditional quality. As a matter of fact, modern technical development is so 
advanced and so well proportioned among the various civilized States that it must be looked on as 
practically impossible for one Power to build vessels which would have a superior fighting quality to 
that of the vessels of equal size built by the other Powers. But it is even less feasible to build vessels 
of smaller displacement which will be superior in action to those of larger displacement. 

As a matter of fact, the smaller proportions of the German vessels could be maintained only at the 
expense of speed and armament. The phrase used to justify this policy was in itself an evidence of the 
lack of logical thinking on the part of the naval authorities who were in charge of these matters in 
times of peace. They declared that the German guns were definitely superior to the British 30.5 cm. as 
regards striking efficiency. 

But that was just why they should have adopted the policy of building 30.5 cm. guns also; for it ought 
to have been their object not to achieve equality but superiority in fighting strength. If that were not so 
then it would have been superfluous to equip the land forces with 42 cm. mortars; for the German 21 
cm. mortar could be far superior to any high-angle guns which the French possessed at that time and 
since the fortresses could probably have been taken by means of 30.5 cm. mortars. The army 
authorities unfortunately failed to do so. If they refrained from assuring superior efficiency in the 
artillery as in the velocity, this was because of the fundamentally false principle of risk which they 
adopted. The naval authorities, already in times of peace, renounced the principle of attack and thus 
had to follow a defensive policy from the very beginning of the War. But by this attitude they 
renounced also the chances of final success, which can be achieved only by an offensive policy. 

A vessel with slower speed and weaker armament will be crippled and battered by an adversary that is 
faster and stronger and can frequently shoot from a favourable distance. A large number of cruisers 
have been through bitter experiences in this matter. How wrong were the ideas prevalent among the 
naval authorities in times of peace was proved during the War. They were compelled to modify the 
armament of the old vessels and to equip the new ones with better armament whenever there was a 
chance to do so. If the German vessels in the Battle of the Skagerrak had been of equal size, the same 
armament and the same speed as the English, the British Fleet would have gone down under the 
tempest of the German 38 centimeter shells, which hit their aims more accurately and were more 

Japan had followed a different kind of naval policy. There, care was principally taken to create with 
every single new vessel a fighting force that would be superior to those of the eventual adversaries. 
But, because of this policy, it was afterwards possible to use the fleet for the offensive. 

While the army authorities refused to adopt such fundamentally erroneous principles, the navy which 
unfortunately had more representatives in Parliament succumbed to the spirit that ruled there. The 
navy was not organized on a strong basis, and it was later used in an unsystematic and irresolute way. 
The immortal glory which the navy won, in spite of these drawbacks, must be entirely credited to the 
good work and the efficiency and incomparable heroism of officers and crews. If the former 
commanders-in-chief had been inspired with the same kind of genius all the sacrifices would not have 
been in vain. 

It was probably the very parliamentarian skill displayed by the chief of the navy during the years of 
peace which later became the cause of the fatal collapse, since parliamentarian considerations had 
begun to play a more important role in the construction of the navy than fighting considerations. The 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (27 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


irresolution, the weakness and the failure to adopt a logically consistent policy, which is typical of the 
parliamentary system, contaminated the naval authorities. 

As I have already emphasized, the military authorities did not allow themselves to be led astray by 
such fundamentally erroneous ideas. Ludendorff, who was then a Colonel in the General Staff, led a 
desperate struggle against the criminal vacillations with which the Reichstag treated the most vital 
problems of the nation and in most cases voted against them. If the fight which this officer then waged 
remained unsuccessful this must be debited to the Parliament and partly also to the wretched and weak 
attitude of the Chancellor, Bethmann-Hollweg. 

Yet those who are responsible for Germanys collapse do not hesitate now to lay all the blame on the 
shoulders of the one man who took a firm stand against the neglectful manner in which the interests of 
the nation were managed. But one falsehood more or less makes no difference to these congenital 

Anybody who thinks of all the sacrifices which this nation has had to bear, as a result of the criminal 
neglect of those irresponsible individuals; anybody who thinks of the number of those who died or 
were maimed unnecessarily; anybody who thinks of the deplorable shame and dishonour which has 
been heaped upon us and of the illimitable distress into which our people are now plunged anybody 
who realizes that in order to prepare the way to a few seats in Parliament for some unscrupulous 
place-hunters and arrivists will understand that such hirelings can be called by no other name than that 
of rascal and criminal; for otherwise those words could have no meaning. In comparison with traitors 
who betrayed the nations trust every other kind of twister may be looked upon as an honourable man. 

It was a peculiar feature of the situation that all the real faults of the old Germany were exposed to the 
public gaze only when the inner solidarity of the nation could be injured by doing so. Then, indeed, 
unpleasant truths were openly proclaimed in the ears of the broad masses, while many other things 
were at other times shamefully hushed up or their existence simply denied, especially at times when 
an open discussion of such problems might have led to an improvement in their regard. The higher 
government authorities knew little or nothing of the nature and use of propaganda in such matters. 
Only the Jew knew that by an able and persistent use of propaganda heaven itself can be presented to 
the people as if it were hell and, vice versa, the most miserable kind of life can be presented as if it 
were paradise. The Jew knew this and acted accordingly. But the German, or rather his Government, 
did not have the slightest suspicion of it. During the War the heaviest of penalties had to be paid for 
that ignorance. 

Over against the innumerable drawbacks which I have mentioned here and which affected German 
life before the War there were many outstanding features on the positive side. If we take an impartial 
survey we must admit that most of our drawbacks were in great measure prevalent also in other 
countries and among the other nations, and very often in a worse form than with us; whereas among 
us there were many real advantages which the other did not have. 

The leading phase of Germanys superiority arose from the fact that, almost alone among all the other 
European nations, the German nation had made the strongest effort to preserve the national character 
of its economic structure and for this reason was less subject than other countries to the power of 
international finance, though indeed there were many untoward symptoms in this regard also. 

And yet this superiority was a perilous one and turned out later to be one of the chief causes of the 
world war. 

But even if we disregard this advantage of national independence in economic matters there were 
certain other positive features of our social and political life which were of outstanding excellence. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (28 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


These features were represented by three institutions which were constant sources of regeneration. In 
their respective spheres they were models of perfection and were partly unrivalled. 

The first of these was the statal form as such and the manner in which it had been developed for 
Germany in modern times. Of course we must except those monarchs who, as human beings, were 
subject to the failings which afflict this life and its children. If we were not so tolerant in these 
matters, then the case of the present generation would be hopeless; for if we take into consideration 
the personal capabilities and character of the representative figures in our present regime it would be 
difficult to imagine a more modest level of intelligence and moral character. If we measure the value 
of the German Revolution by the personal worth and calibre of the individuals whom this revolution 
has presented to the German people since November 1918 then we may feel ashamed indeed in 
thinking of the judgment which posterity will pass on these people, when the Law for the Protection 
of the Republic can no longer silence public opinion. Coming generations will surely decide that the 
intelligence and integrity of our new German leaders were in adverse ratio to their boasting and their 

It must be admitted that the monarchy had become alien in spirit to many citizens and especially the 
broad masses. This resulted from the fact that the monarchs were not always surrounded by the 
highest intelligence so to say and certainly not always by persons of the most upright character. 
Unfortunately many of them preferred flatterers to honest- spoken men and hence received their 
information from the former. This was a source of grave danger at a time when the world was 
passing through a period in which many of the old conditions were changing and when this change 
was affecting even the traditions of the Court. 

The average man or woman could not have felt a wave of enthusiasm surging within the breast when, 
for example, at the turn of the century, a princess in uniform and on horseback had the soldiers file 
past her on parade. Those high circles had apparently no idea of the impression which such a parade 
made on the minds of ordinary people; else such unfortunate occurrences would not have taken place. 
The sentimental humanitarianism not always very sincere which was professed in those high circles 
was often more repulsive than attractive. When, for instance, the Princess X condescended to taste the 
products of a soup kitchen and found them excellent, as usual, such a gesture might have made an 
excellent impression in times long past, but on this occasion it had the opposite effect to what was 
intended. For even if we take it for granted that Her Highness did not have the slightest idea, that on 
the day she sampled it, the food was not quite the same as on other days, it sufficed that the people 
knew it. Even the best of intentions thus became an object of ridicule or a cause of exasperation. 

Descriptions of the proverbial frugality practised by the monarch, his much too early rise in the 
morning and the drudgery he had to go through all day long until late at night, and especially the 
constantly expressed fears lest he might become undernourished all this gave rise to ominous 
expression on the part of the people. Nobody was keen to know what and how much the monarch ate 
or drank. Nobody grudged him a full meal, or the necessary amount of sleep. Everybody was pleased 
when the monarch, as a man and a personality, brought honour on his family and his country and 
fulfilled his duties as a sovereign. All the legends which were circulated about him helped little and 
did much damage. 

These and such things, however, are only mere bagatelle. What was much worse was the feeling, 
which spread throughout large sections of the nation, that the affairs of the individual were being 
taken care of from above and that he did not need to bother himself with them. As long as the 
Government was really good, or at least moved by goodwill, no serious objections could be raised. 

But the country was destined to disaster when the old Government, which had at least striven for the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (29 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


best, became replaced by a new regime which was not of the same quality. Then the docile obedience 
and infantile credulity which formerly offered no resistance was bound to be one of the most fatal 
evils that can be imagined. 

But against these and other defects there were certain qualities which undoubtedly had a positive 

First of all the monarchical form of government guarantees stability in the direction of public affairs 
and safeguards public offices from the speculative turmoil of ambitious politicians. Furthermore, the 
venerable tradition which this institution possesses arouses a feeling which gives weight to the 
monarchical authority. Beyond this there is the fact that the whole corps of officials, and the army in 
particular, are raised above the level of political party obligations. And still another positive feature 
was that the supreme rulership of the State was embodied in the monarch, as an individual person, 
who could serve as the symbol of responsibility, which a monarch has to bear more seriously than any 
anonymous parliamentary majority. Indeed, the proverbial honesty and integrity of the German 
administration must be attributed chiefly to this fact. Finally, the monarchy fulfilled a high cultural 
function among the German people, which made amends for many of its defects. The German 
residential cities have remained, even to our time, centres of that artistic spirit which now threatens to 
disappear and is becoming more and more materialistic. The German princes gave a great deal of 
excellent and practical encouragement to art and science, especially during the nineteenth century. 
Our present age certainly has nothing of equal worth. 

During that process of disintegration which was slowly extending throughout the social order the most 
positive force of resistance was that offered by the army. This was the strongest source of education 
which the German people possessed. For that reason all the hatred of our enemies was directed against 
the paladin of our national self-preservation and our liberty. The strongest testimony in favour of this 
unique institution is the fact that it was derided, hated and fought against, but also feared, by worthless 
elements all round. The fact that the international profiteers who gathered at Versailles, further to 
exploit and plunder the nations directed their enmity specially against the old German army proved 
once again that it deserved to be regarded as the institution which protected the liberties of our people 
against the forces of the international stock-exchange. If the army had not been there to sound the 
alarm and stand on guard, the purposes of the Versailles representatives would have been carried out 
much sooner. There is only one word to express what the German people owe to this army 

It was the army that still inculcated a sense of responsibility among the people when this quality had 
become very rare and when the habit of shirking every kind of responsibility was steadily spreading. 
This habit had grown up under the evil influences of Parliament, which was itself the very model of 
irresponsibility. The army trained the people to personal courage at a time when the virtue of timidity 
threatened to become an epidemic and when the spirit of sacrificing ones personal interests for the 
good of the community was considered as something that amounted almost to weak-mindedness. At a 
time when only those were estimated as intelligent who knew how to safeguard and promote their 
own egotistic interests, the army was the school through which individual Germans were taught not to 
seek the salvation of their nation in the false ideology of international fraternization between negroes, 
Germans, Chinese, French and English, etc., but in the strength and unity of their own national being. 

The army developed the individuals powers of resolute decision, and this at a time when a spirit of 
indecision and scepticism governed human conduct. At a time when the wiseacres were everywhere 
setting the fashion it needed courage to uphold the principle that any command is better than none. 
This one principle represents a robust and sound style of thought, of which not a trace would have 
been left in the other branches of life if the army had not furnished a constant rejuvenation of this 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (30 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


fundamental force. A sufficient proof of this may be found in the appalling lack of decision which our 
present government authorities display. They cannot shake off their mental and moral lethargy and 
decide on some definite line of action except when they are forced to sign some new dictate for the 
exploitation of the German people. In that case they decline all responsibility while at the same time 
they sign everything which the other side places before them; and they sign with the readiness of an 
official stenographer. Their conduct is here explicable on the ground that in this case they are not 
under the necessity of coming to a decision; for the decision is dictated to them. 

The army imbued its members with a spirit of idealism and developed their readiness to sacrifice 
themselves for their country and its honour, while greed and materialism dominated in all the other 
branches of life. The army united a people who were split up into classes: and in this respect had only 
one defect, which was the One Year Military Service, a privilege granted to those who had passed 
through the high schools. It was a defect, because the principle of absolute equality was thereby 
violated; and those who had a better education were thus placed outside the cadres to which the rest of 
their comrades belonged. The reverse would have been better. Since our upper classes were really 
ignorant of what was going on in the body corporate of the nation and were becoming more and more 
estranged from the life of the people, the army would have accomplished a very beneficial mission if 
it had refused to discriminate in favour of the so-called intellectuals, especially within its own ranks. It 
was a mistake that this was not done; but in this world of ours can we find any institution that has not 
at least one defect? And in the army the good features were so absolutely predominant that the few 
defects it had were far below the average that generally rises from human weakness. 

But the greatest credit which the army of the old Empire deserves is that, at a time when the person of 
the individual counted for nothing and the majority was everything, it placed individual personal 
values above majority values. By insisting on its faith in personality, the army opposed that typically 
Jewish and democratic apotheosis of the power of numbers. The army trained what at that time was 
most surely needed: namely, real men. In a period when men were falling a prey to effeminacy and 
laxity, 350,000 vigorously trained young men went from the ranks of the army each year to mingle 
with their fellow-men. In the course of their two years training they had lost the softness of their 
young days and had developed bodies as tough as steel. The young man who had been taught 
obedience for two years was now fitted to command. The trained soldier could be recognized already 
by his walk. 

This was the great school of the German nation; and it was not without reason that it drew upon its 
head all the bitter hatred of those who wanted the Empire to be weak and defenceless, because they 
were jealous of its greatness and were themselves possessed by a spirit of rapacity and greed. The rest 
of the world recognized a fact which many Germans did not wish to see, either because they were 
blind to facts or because out of malice they did not wish to see it. This fact was that the German Army 
was the most powerful weapon for the defence and freedom of the German nation and the best 
guarantee for the livelihood of its citizens. 

There was a third institution of positive worth, which has to be placed beside that of the monarchy and 
the army. This was the civil service. 

German administration was better organized and better carried out than the administration of other 
countries. There may have been objections to the bureaucratic routine of the officials, but from this 
point of view the state of affairs was similar, if not worse, in the other countries. But the other States 
did not have the wonderful solidarity which this organization possessed in Germany, nor were their 
civil servants of that same high level of scrupulous honesty. It is certainly better to be a trifle 
over-bureaucratic and honest and loyal than to be over- sophisticated and modern, the latter often 
implying an inferior type of character and also ignorance and inefficiency. For if it be insinuated 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (31 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 


to-day that the German administration of the pre- War period may have been excellent so far as 
bureaucratic technique goes, but that from the practical business point of view it was incompetent, I 
can only give the following reply: What other country in the world possessed a better-organized and 
administered business enterprise than the German State Railways, for instance? It was left to the 
Revolution to destroy this standard organization, until a time came when it was taken out of the hands 
of the nation and socialized, in the sense which the founders of the Republic had given to that word, 
namely, making it subservient to the international stock-exchange capitalists, who were the 
wire-pullers of the German Revolution. 

The most outstanding trait in the civil service and the whole body of the civil administration was its 
independence of the vicissitudes of government, the political mentality of which could exercise no 
influence on the attitude of the German State officials. Since the Revolution this situation has been 
completely changed. Efficiency and capability have been replaced by the test of party-adherence; and 
independence of character and initiative are no longer appreciated as positive qualities in a public 
official. They rather tell against him. 

The wonderful might and power of the old Empire was based on the monarchical form of government, 
the army and the civil service. On these three foundations rested that great strength which is now 
entirely lacking; namely, the authority of the State. For the authority of the State cannot be based on 
the babbling that goes on in Parliament or in the provincial diets and not upon laws made to protect 
the State, or upon sentences passed by the law courts to frighten those who have had the hardihood to 
deny the authority of the State, but only on the general confidence which the management and 
administration of the community establishes among the people. This confidence is in its turn, nothing 
else than the result of an unshakable inner conviction that the government and administration of a 
country is inspired by disinterested and honest goodwill and on the feeling that the spirit of the law is 
in complete harmony with the moral convictions of the people. In the long run, systems of 
government are not maintained by terrorism but on the belief of the people in the merits and sincerity 
of those who administer and promote the public interests. 

Though it be true that in the period preceding the War certain grave evils tended to infect and corrode 
the inner strength of the nation, it must be remembered that the other States suffered even more than 
Germany from these drawbacks and yet those other States did not fail and break down when the time 
of crisis came. If we remember further that those defects in pre-War Germany were outweighed by 
great positive qualities we shall have to look elsewhere for the effective cause of the collapse. And 
elsewhere it lay. 

The ultimate and most profound reason of the German downfall is to be found in the fact that the 
racial problem was ignored and that its importance in the historical development of nations was not 
grasped. For the events that take place in the life of nations are not due to chance but are the natural 
results of the effort to conserve and multiply the species and the race, even though men may not be 
able consciously to picture to their minds the profound motives of their conduct. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap10.htm (32 of 32) [04/06/2000 16:15:12] 




There are certain truths which stand out so openly on the roadsides of life, as it were, that every 
passer-by may see them. Yet, because of their very obviousness, the general run of people disregard 
such truths or at least they do not make them the object of any conscious knowledge. People are so 
blind to some of the simplest facts in every-day life that they are highly surprised when somebody 
calls attention to what everybody ought to know. Examples of The Columbus Egg lie around us in 
hundreds of thousands; but observers like Columbus are rare. 

Walking about in the garden of Nature, most men have the self-conceit to think that they know 
everything; yet almost all are blind to one of the outstanding principles that Nature employs in her 
work. This principle may be called the inner isolation which characterizes each and every living 
species on this earth. 

Even a superficial glance is sufficient to show that all the innumerable forms in which the life-urge of 
Nature manifests itself are subject to a fundamental law one may call it an iron law of Nature which 
compels the various species to keep within the definite limits of their own life-forms when 
propagating and multiplying their kind. Each animal mates only with one of its own species. The 
titmouse cohabits only with the titmouse, the finch with the finch, the stork with the stork, the 
field-mouse with the field-mouse, the house-mouse with the house-mouse, the wolf with the she-wolf, 

Deviations from this law take place only in exceptional circumstances. This happens especially under 
the compulsion of captivity, or when some other obstacle makes procreative intercourse impossible 
between individuals of the same species. But then Nature abhors such intercourse with all her might; 
and her protest is most clearly demonstrated by the fact that the hybrid is either sterile or the fecundity 
of its descendants is limited. In most cases hybrids and their progeny are denied the ordinary powers 
of resistance to disease or the natural means of defence against outer attack. 

Such a dispensation of Nature is quite logical. Every crossing between two breeds which are not quite 
equal results in a product which holds an intermediate place between the levels of the two parents. 
This means that the offspring will indeed be superior to the parent which stands in the biologically 
lower order of being, but not so high as the higher parent. For this reason it must eventually succumb 
in any struggle against the higher species. Such mating contradicts the will of Nature towards the 
selective improvements of life in general. The favourable preliminary to this improvement is not to 
mate individuals of higher and lower orders of being but rather to allow the complete triumph of the 
higher order. The stronger must dominate and not mate with the weaker, which would signify the 
sacrifice of its own higher nature. Only the born weakling can look upon this principle as cruel, and if 
he does so it is merely because he is of a feebler nature and narrower mind; for if such a law did not 
direct the process of evolution then the higher development of organic life would not be conceivable 
at all. 

This urge for the maintenance of the unmixed breed, which is a phenomenon that prevails throughout 
the whole of the natural world, results not only in the sharply defined outward distinction between one 
species and another but also in the internal similarity of characteristic qualities which are peculiar to 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (1 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


each breed or species. The fox remains always a fox, the goose remains a goose, and the tiger will 
retain the character of a tiger. The only difference that can exist within the species must be in the 
various degrees of structural strength and active power, in the intelligence, efficiency, endurance, etc., 
with which the individual specimens are endowed. It would be impossible to find a fox which has a 
kindly and protective disposition towards geese, just as no cat exists which has a friendly disposition 
towards mice. 

That is why the struggle between the various species does not arise from a feeling of mutual antipathy 
but rather from hunger and love. In both cases Nature looks on calmly and is even pleased with what 
happens. The struggle for the daily livelihood leaves behind in the ruck everything that is weak or 
diseased or wavering; while the fight of the male to possess the female gives to the strongest the right, 
or at least, the possibility to propagate its kind. And this struggle is a means of furthering the health 
and powers of resistance in the species. Thus it is one of the causes underlying the process of 
development towards a higher quality of being. 

If the case were different the progressive process would cease, and even retrogression might set in. 
Since the inferior always outnumber the superior, the former would always increase more rapidly if 
they possessed the same capacities for survival and for the procreation of their kind; and the final 
consequence would be that the best in quality would be forced to recede into the background. 
Therefore a corrective measure in favour of the better quality must intervene. Nature supplies this by 
establishing rigorous conditions of life to which the weaker will have to submit and will thereby be 
numerically restricted; but even that portion which survives cannot indiscriminately multiply, for here 
a new and rigorous selection takes place, according to strength and health. 

If Nature does not wish that weaker individuals should mate with the stronger, she wishes even less 
that a superior race should intermingle with an inferior one; because in such a case all her efforts, 
throughout hundreds of thousands of years, to establish an evolutionary higher stage of being, may 
thus be rendered futile. 

History furnishes us with innumerable instances that prove this law. It shows, with a startling clarity, 
that whenever Aryans have mingled their blood with that of an inferior race the result has been the 
downfall of the people who were the standard-bearers of a higher culture. In North America, where 
the population is prevalently Teutonic, and where those elements intermingled with the inferior race 
only to a very small degree, we have a quality of mankind and a civilization which are different from 
those of Central and South America. In these latter countries the immigrants who mainly belonged to 
the Latin races mated with the aborigines, sometimes to a very large extent indeed. In this case we 
have a clear and decisive example of the effect produced by the mixture of races. But in North 
America the Teutonic element, which has kept its racial stock pure and did not mix it with any other 
racial stock, has come to dominate the American Continent and will remain master of it as long as that 
element does not fall a victim to the habit of adulterating its blood. 

In short, the results of miscegenation are always the following: 

(a) The level of the superior race becomes lowered; 

(b) physical and mental degeneration sets in, thus leading slowly but steadily towards a progressive 
drying up of the vital sap. 

The act which brings about such a development is a sin against the will of the Eternal Creator. And as 
a sin this act will be avenged. 

Mans effort to build up something that contradicts the iron logic of Nature brings him into conflict 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (2 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


with those principles to which he himself exclusively owes his own existence. By acting against the 
laws of Nature he prepares the way that leads to his ruin. 

Here we meet the insolent objection, which is Jewish in its inspiration and is typical of the modern 
pacifist. It says: "Man can control even Nature." 

There are millions who repeat by rote that piece of Jewish babble and end up by imagining that 
somehow they themselves are the conquerors of Nature. And yet their only weapon is just a mere 
idea, and a very preposterous idea into the bargain; because if one accepted it, then it would be 
impossible even to imagine the existence of the world. 

The real truth is that, not only has man failed to overcome Nature in any sphere whatsoever but that at 
best he has merely succeeded in getting hold of and lifting a tiny corner of the enormous veil which 
she has spread over her eternal mysteries and secret. He never creates anything. All he can do is to 
discover something. He does not master Nature but has only come to be the master of those living 
beings who have not gained the knowledge he has arrived at by penetrating into some of Natures laws 
and mysteries. Apart from all this, an idea can never subject to its own sway those conditions which 
are necessary for the existence and development of mankind; for the idea itself has come only from 
man. Without man there would be no human idea in this world. The idea as such is therefore always 
dependent on the existence of man and consequently is dependent on those laws which furnish the 
conditions of his existence. 

And not only that. Certain ideas are even confined to certain people. This holds true with regard to 
those ideas in particular which have not their roots in objective scientific truth but in the world of 
feeling. In other words, to use a phrase which is current to-day and which well and clearly expresses 
this truth: They reflect an inner experience. All such ideas, which have nothing to do with cold logic 
as such but represent mere manifestations of feeling, such as ethical and moral conceptions, etc., are 
inextricably bound up with mans existence. It is to the creative powers of mans imagination that such 
ideas owe their existence. 

Now, then, a necessary condition for the maintenance of such ideas is the existence of certain races 
and certain types of men. For example, anyone who sincerely wishes that the pacifist idea should 
prevail in this world ought to do all he is capable of doing to help the Germans conquer the world; for 
in case the reverse should happen it may easily be that the last pacifist would disappear with the last 
German. I say this because, unfortunately, only our people, and no other people in the world, fell a 
prey to this idea. Whether you like it or not, you would have to make up your mind to forget wars if 
you would achieve the pacifist ideal. Nothing less than this was the plan of the American 
world-redeemer, Woodrow Wilson. Anyhow that was what our visionaries believed, and they thought 
that through his plans their ideals would be attained. 

The pacifist-humanitarian idea may indeed become an excellent one when the most superior type of 
manhood will have succeeded in subjugating the world to such an extent that this type is then sole 
master of the earth. This idea could have an injurious effect only in the measure according to which its 
application would become difficult and finally impossible. So, first of all, the fight and then pacifism. 
If the case were different it would mean that mankind has already passed the zenith of its 
development, and accordingly the end would not be the supremacy of some moral ideal but 
degeneration into barbarism and consequent chaos. People may laugh at this statement; but our planet 
has been moving through the spaces of ether for millions and millions of years, uninhabited by men, 
and at some future date may easily begin to do so again if men should forget that wherever they have 
reached a superior level of existence, it was not the result of following the ideas of crazy visionaries 
but by acknowledging and rigorously observing the iron laws of Nature. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (3 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


All that we admire in the world to-day, its science, its art, its technical developments and discoveries, 
are the products of the creative activities of a few peoples, and it may be true that their first 
beginnings must be attributed to one race. The maintenance of civilization is wholly dependent on 
such peoples. Should they perish, all that makes this earth beautiful will descend with them into the 

However great, for example, be the influence which the soil exerts on men, this influence will always 
vary according to the race in which it produces its effect. Dearth of soil may stimulate one race to the 
most strenuous efforts and highest achievement; while, for another race, the poverty of the soil may be 
the cause of misery and finally of undernourishment, with all its consequences. The internal 
characteristics of a people are always the causes which determine the nature of the effect that outer 
circumstances have on them. What reduces one race to starvation trains another race to harder work. 

All the great civilizations of the past became decadent because the originally creative race died out, as 
a result of contamination of the blood. 

The most profound cause of such a decline is to be found in the fact that the people ignored the 
principle that all culture depends on men, and not the reverse. In other words, in order to preserve a 
certain culture, the type of manhood that creates such a culture must be preserved. But such a 
preservation goes hand-in-hand with the inexorable law that it is the strongest and the best who must 
triumph and that they have the right to endure. 

He who would live must fight. He who does not wish to fight in this world, where permanent struggle 
is the law of life, has not the right to exist. 

Such a saying may sound hard; but, after all, that is how the matter really stands. Yet far harder is the 
lot of him who believes that he can overcome Nature and thus in reality insults her. Distress, misery, 
and disease are her rejoinders. 

Whoever ignores or despises the laws of race really deprives himself of the happiness to which he 
believes he can attain. For he places an obstacle in the victorious path of the superior race and, by so 
doing, he interferes with a prerequisite condition of all human progress. Loaded with the burden of 
humanitarian sentiment, he falls back to the level of those who are unable to raise themselves in the 
scale of being. 

It would be futile to attempt to discuss the question as to what race or races were the original 
standard-bearers of human culture and were thereby the real founders of all that we understand by the 
word humanity. It is much simpler to deal with this question in so far as it relates to the present time. 
Here the answer is simple and clear. Every manifestation of human culture, every product of art, 
science and technical skill, which we see before our eyes to-day, is almost exclusively the product of 
the Aryan creative power. This very fact fully justifies the conclusion that it was the Aryan alone who 
founded a superior type of humanity; therefore he represents the architype of what we understand by 
the term: MAN. He is the Prometheus of mankind, from whose shining brow the divine spark of 
genius has at all times flashed forth, always kindling anew that fire which, in the form of knowledge, 
illuminated the dark night by drawing aside the veil of mystery and thus showing man how to rise and 
become master over all the other beings on the earth. Should he be forced to disappear, a profound 
darkness will descend on the earth; within a few thousand years human culture will vanish and the 
world will become a desert. 

If we divide mankind into three categories founders of culture, bearers of culture, and destroyers of 
culture the Aryan alone can be considered as representing the first category. It was he who laid the 
groundwork and erected the walls of every great structure in human culture. Only the shape and 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (4 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


colour of such structures are to be attributed to the individual characteristics of the various nations. It 
is the Aryan who has furnished the great building-stones and plans for the edifices of all human 
progress; only the way in which these plans have been executed is to be attributed to the qualities of 
each individual race. Within a few decades the whole of Eastern Asia, for instance, appropriated a 
culture and called such a culture its own, whereas the basis of that culture was the Greek mind and 
Teutonic skill as we know it. Only the external form at least to a certain degree shows the traits of 
an Asiatic inspiration. It is not true, as some believe, that Japan adds European technique to a culture 
of her own. The truth rather is that European science and technics are just decked out with the peculiar 
characteristics of Japanese civilization. The foundations of actual life in Japan to-day are not those of 
the native Japanese culture, although this characterizes the external features of the country, which 
features strike the eye of European observers on account of their fundamental difference from us; but 
the real foundations of contemporary Japanese life are the enormous scientific and technical 
achievements of Europe and America, that is to say, of Aryan peoples. Only by adopting these 
achievements as the foundations of their own progress can the various nations of the Orient take a 
place in contemporary world progress. The scientific and technical achievements of Europe and 
America provide the basis on which the struggle for daily livelihood is carried on in the Orient. They 
provide the necessary arms and instruments for this struggle, and only the outer forms of these 
instruments have become gradually adapted to Japanese ways of life. 

If, from to-day onwards, the Aryan influence on Japan would cease and if we suppose that Europe 
and America would collapse then the present progress of Japan in science and technique might still 
last for a short duration; but within a few decades the inspiration would dry up, and native Japanese 
character would triumph, while the present civilization would become fossilized and fall back into the 
sleep from which it was aroused about seventy years ago by the impact of Aryan culture. We may 
therefore draw the conclusion that, just as the present Japanese development has been due to Aryan 
influence, so in the immemorial past an outside influence and an outside culture brought into 
existence the Japanese culture of that day. This opinion is very strongly supported by the fact that the 
ancient civilization of Japan actually became fossilizied and petrified. Such a process of senility can 
happen only if a people loses the racial cell which originally had been creative or if the outside 
influence should be withdrawn after having awakened and maintained the first cultural developments 
in that region. If it be shown that a people owes the fundamental elements of its culture to foreign 
races, assimilating and elaborating such elements, and if subsequently that culture becomes fossilized 
whenever the external influence ceases, then such a race may be called the depository but never the 
creator of a culture. 

If we subject the different peoples to a strict test from this standpoint we shall find that scarcely any 
one of them has originally created a culture, but almost all have been merely the recipients of a culture 
created elsewhere. 

This development may be depicted as always happening somewhat in the following way: 

Aryan tribes, often almost ridiculously small in number, subjugated foreign peoples and, stimulated 
by the conditions of life which their new country offered them (fertility, the nature of the climate, 
etc.), and profiting also by the abundance of manual labour furnished them by the inferior race, they 
developed intellectual and organizing faculties which had hitherto been dormant in these conquering 
tribes. Within the course of a few thousand years, or even centuries, they gave life to cultures whose 
primitive traits completely corresponded to the character of the founders, though modified by 
adaptation to the peculiarities of the soil and the characteristics of the subjugated people. But finally 
the conquering race offended against the principles which they first had observed, namely, the 
maintenance of their racial stock unmixed, and they began to intermingle with the subjugated people. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (5 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


Thus they put an end to their own separate existence; for the original sin committed in Paradise has 
always been followed by the expulsion of the guilty parties. 

After a thousand years or more the last visible traces of those former masters may then be found in a 
lighter tint of the skin which the Aryan blood had bequeathed to the subjugated race, and in a 
fossilized culture of which those Aryans had been the original creators. For just as the blood, of the 
conqueror, who was a conqueror not only in body but also in spirit, got submerged in the blood of the 
subject race, so the substance disappeared out of which the torch of human culture and progress was 
kindled. In so far as the blood of the former ruling race has left a light nuance of colour in the blood of 
its descendants, as a token and a memory, the night of cultural life is rendered less dim and dark by a 
mild light radiated from the products of those who were the bearers of the original fire. Their radiance 
shines across the barbarism to which the subjected race has reverted and might often lead the 
superficial observer to believe that he sees before him an image of the present race when he is really 
looking into a mirror wherein only the past is reflected. 

It may happen that in the course of its history such a people will come into contact a second time, and 
even oftener, with the original founders of their culture and may not even remember that distant 
association. Instinctively the remnants of blood left from that old ruling race will be drawn towards 
this new phenomenon and what had formerly been possible only under compulsion can now be 
successfully achieved in a voluntary way. A new cultural wave flows in and lasts until the blood of its 
standard-bearers becomes once again adulterated by intermixture with the originally conquered race. 

It will be the task of those who set themselves to the study of a universal history of civilization to 
investigate history from this point of view instead of allowing themselves to be smothered under the 
mass of external data, as is only too often the case with our present historical science. 

This short sketch of the changes that take place among those races that are only the depositories of a 
culture also furnishes a picture of the development and the activity and the disappearance of those 
who are the true founders of culture on this earth, namely the Aryans themselves. 

Just as in our daily life the so-called man of genius needs a particular occasion, and sometimes indeed 
a special stimulus, to bring his genius to light, so too in the life of the peoples the race that has genius 
in it needs the occasion and stimulus to bring that genius to expression. In the monotony and routine 
of everyday life even persons of significance seem just like the others and do not rise beyond the 
average level of their fellow-men. But as soon as such men find themselves in a special situation 
which disconcerts and unbalances the others, the humble person of apparently common qualities 
reveals traits of genius, often to the amazement of those who have hitherto known him in the small 
things of everyday life. That is the reason why a prophet only seldom counts for something in his own 
country. War offers an excellent occasion for observing this phenomenon. In times of distress, when 
the others despair, apparently harmless boys suddenly spring up and become heroes, full of 
determination, undaunted in the presence of Death and manifesting wonderful powers of calm 
reflection under such circumstances. If such an hour of trial did not come nobody would have thought 
that the soul of a hero lurked in the body of that beardless youth. A special impulse is almost always 
necessary to bring a man of genius into the foreground. The sledge-hammer of Fate which strikes 
down the one so easily suddenly finds the counter-impact of steel when it strikes at the other. And, 
after the common shell of everyday life is broken, the core that lay hidden in it is displayed to the eyes 
of an astonished world. This surrounding world then grows obstinate and will not believe that what 
had seemed so like itself is really of that different quality so suddenly displayed. This is a process 
which is repeated probably every time a man of outstanding significance appears. 

Though an inventor, for example, does not establish his fame until the very day that he carries through 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (6 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


his invention, it would be a mistake to believe that the creative genius did not become alive in him 
until that moment. From the very hour of his birth the spark of genius is living within the man who 
has been endowed with the real creative faculty. True genius is an innate quality. It can never be the 
result of education or training. 

As I have stated already, this holds good not merely of the individual but also of the race. Those 
peoples who manifest creative abilities in certain periods of their history have always been 
fundamentally creative. It belongs to their very nature, even though this fact may escape the eyes of 
the superficial observer. Here also recognition from outside is only the consequence of practical 
achievement. Since the rest of the world is incapable of recognizing genius as such, it can only see the 
visible manifestations of genius in the form of inventions, discoveries, buildings, painting, etc.; but 
even here a long time passes before recognition is given. Just as the individual person who has been 
endowed with the gift of genius, or at least talent of a very high order, cannot bring that endowment to 
realization until he comes under the urge of special circumstances, so in the life of the nations the 
creative capacities and powers frequently have to wait until certain conditions stimulate them to 

The most obvious example of this truth is furnished by that race which has been, and still is, the 
standard-bearer of human progress: I mean the Aryan race. As soon as Fate brings them face to face 
with special circumstances their powers begin to develop progressively and to be manifested in 
tangible form. The characteristic cultures which they create under such circumstances are almost 
always conditioned by the soil, the climate and the people they subjugate. The last factor that of the 
character of the people is the most decisive one. The more primitive the technical conditions under 
which the civilizing activity takes place, the more necessary is the existence of manual labour which 
can be organized and employed so as to take the place of mechanical power. Had it not been possible 
for them to employ members of the inferior race which they conquered, the Aryans would never have 
been in a position to take the first steps on the road which led them to a later type of culture; just as, 
without the help of certain suitable animals which they were able to tame, they would never have 
come to the invention of mechanical power which has subsequently enabled them to do without these 
beasts. The phrase, The Moor has accomplished his function, so let him now depart, has, 
unfortunately, a profound application. For thousands of years the horse has been the faithful servant of 
man and has helped him to lay the foundations of human progress, but now motor power has 
dispensed with the use of the horse. In a few years to come the use of the horse will cease entirely; 
and yet without its collaboration man could scarcely have come to the stage of development which he 
has now created. 

For the establishment of superior types of civilization the members of inferior races formed one of the 
most essential pre-requisites. They alone could supply the lack of mechanical means without which no 
progress is possible. It is certain that the first stages of human civilization were not based so much on 
the use of tame animals as on the employment of human beings who were members of an inferior 

Only after subjugated races were employed as slaves was a similar fate allotted to animals, and not 
vice versa, as some people would have us believe. At first it was the conquered enemy who had to 
draw the plough and only afterwards did the ox and horse take his place. Nobody else but puling 
pacifists can consider this fact as a sign of human degradation. Such people fail to recognize that this 
evolution had to take place in order that man might reach that degree of civilization which these 
apostles now exploit in an attempt to make the world pay attention to their rigmarole. 

The progress of mankind may be compared to the process of ascending an infinite ladder. One does 
not reach the higher level without first having climbed the lower rungs. The Aryan therefore had to 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (7 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


take that road which his sense of reality pointed out to him and not that which the modern pacifist 
dreams of. The path of reality is, however, difficult and hard to tread; yet it is the only one which 
finally leads to the goal where the others envisage mankind in their dreams. But the real truth is that 
those dreamers help only to lead man away from his goal rather than towards it. 

It was not by mere chance that the first forms of civilization arose there where the Aryan came into 
contact with inferior races, subjugated them and forced them to obey his command. The members of 
the inferior race became the first mechanical tools in the service of a growing civilization. 

Thereby the way was clearly indicated which the Aryan had to follow. As a conqueror, he subjugated 
inferior races and turned their physical powers into organized channels under his own leadership, 
forcing them to follow his will and purpose. By imposing on them a useful, though hard, manner of 
employing their powers he not only spared the lives of those whom he had conquered but probably 
made their lives easier than these had been in the former state of so-called freedom. While he 
ruthlessly maintained his position as their master, he not only remained master but he also maintained 
and advanced civilization. For this depended exclusively on his inborn abilities and, therefore, on the 
preservation of the Aryan race as such. As soon, however, as his subject began to rise and approach 
the level of their conqueror, a phase of which ascension was probably the use of his language, the 
barriers that had distinguished master from servant broke down. The Aryan neglected to maintain his 
own racial stock unmixed and therewith lost the right to live in the paradise which he himself had 
created. He became submerged in the racial mixture and gradually lost his cultural creativeness, until 
he finally grew, not only mentally but also physically, more like the aborigines whom he had 
subjected rather than his own ancestors. For some time he could continue to live on the capital of that 
culture which still remained; but a condition of fossilization soon set in and he sank into oblivion. 

That is how cultures and empires decline and yield their places to new formations. 

The adulteration of the blood and racial deterioration conditioned thereby are the only causes that 
account for the decline of ancient civilizations; for it is never by war that nations are ruined, but by the 
loss of their powers of resistance, which are exclusively a characteristic of pure racial blood. In this 
world everything that is not of sound racial stock is like chaff. Every historical event in the world is 
nothing more nor less than a manifestation of the instinct of racial self-preservation, whether for weal 
or woe. 

The question as to the ground reasons for the predominant importance of Aryanism can be answered 
by pointing out that it is not so much that the Aryans are endowed with a stronger instinct for 
self-preservation, but rather that this manifests itself in a way which is peculiar to themselves. 
Considered from the subjective standpoint, the will-to-live is of course equally strong all round and 
only the forms in which it is expressed are different. Among the most primitive organisms the instinct 
for self-preservation does not extend beyond the care of the individual ego. Egotism, as we call this 
passion, is so predominant that it includes even the time element; which means that the present 
moment is deemed the most important and that nothing is left to the future. The animal lives only for 
itself, searching for food only when it feels hunger and fighting only for the preservation of its own 
life. As long as the instinct for self-preservation manifests itself exclusively in such a way, there is no 
basis for the establishment of a community; not even the most primitive form of all, that is to say the 
family. The society formed by the male with the female, where it goes beyond the mere conditions of 
mating, calls for the extension of the instinct of self-preservation, since the readiness to fight for ones 
own ego has to be extended also to the mate. The male sometimes provides food for the female, but in 
most cases both parents provide food for the offspring. Almost always they are ready to protect and 
defend each other; so that here we find the first, though infinitely simple, manifestation of the spirit of 
sacrifice. As soon as this spirit extends beyond the narrow limits of the family, we have the conditions 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (8 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


under which larger associations and finally even States can be formed. 

The lowest species of human beings give evidence of this quality only to a very small degree, so that 
often they do not go beyond the formation of the family society. With an increasing readiness to place 
their immediate personal interests in the background, the capacity for organizing more extensive 
communities develops. 

The readiness to sacrifice ones personal work and, if necessary, even ones life for others shows its 
most highly developed form in the Aryan race. The greatness of the Aryan is not based on his 
intellectual powers, but rather on his willingness to devote all his faculties to the service of the 
community. Here the instinct for self-preservation has reached its noblest form; for the Aryan 
willingly subordinates his own ego to the common weal and when necessity calls he will even 
sacrifice his own life for the community. 

The constructive powers of the Aryan and that peculiar ability he has for the building up of a culture 
are not grounded in his intellectual gifts alone. If that were so they might only be destructive and 
could never have the ability to organize; for the latter essentially depends on the readiness of the 
individual to renounce his own personal opinions and interests and to lay both at the service of the 
human group. By serving the common weal he receives his reward in return. For example, he does not 
work directly for himself but makes his productive work a part of the activity of the group to which he 
belongs, not only for his own benefit but for the general. The spirit underlying this attitude is 
expressed by the word: WORK, which to him does not at all signify a means of earning ones daily 
livelihood but rather a productive activity which cannot clash with the interests of the community. 
Whenever human activity is directed exclusively to the service of the instinct for self-preservation it is 
called theft or usury, robbery or burglary, etc. 

This mental attitude, which forces self-interest to recede into the background in favour of the common 
weal, is the first prerequisite for any kind of really human civilization. It is out of this spirit alone that 
great human achievements have sprung for which the original doers have scarcely ever received any 
recompense but which turns out to be the source of abundant benefit for their descendants. It is this 
spirit alone which can explain why it so often happens that people can endure a harsh but honest 
existence which offers them no returns for their toil except a poor and modest livelihood. But such a 
livelihood helps to consolidate the foundations on which the community exists. Every worker and 
every peasant, every inventor, state official, etc., who works without ever achieving fortune or 
prosperity for himself, is a representative of this sublime idea, even though he may never become 
conscious of the profound meaning of his own activity. 

Everything that may be said of that kind of work which is the fundamental condition of providing 
food and the basic means of human progress is true even in a higher sense of work that is done for the 
protection of man and his civilization. The renunciation of ones own life for the sake of the 
community is the crowning significance of the idea of all sacrifice. In this way only is it possible to 
protect what has been built up by man and to assure that this will not be destroyed by the hand of man 
or of nature. 

In the German language we have a word which admirably expresses this underlying spirit of all work: 
It is Pflichterfiillung, which means the service of the common weal before the consideration of ones 
own interests. The fundamental spirit out of which this kind of activity springs is the contradistinction 
of Egotism and we call it Idealism. By this we mean to signify the willingness of the individual to 
make sacrifices for the community and his fellow-men. 

It is of the utmost importance to insist again and again that idealism is not merely a superfluous 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (9 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


manifestation of sentiment but rather something which has been, is and always will be, a necessary 
precondition of human civilization; it is even out of this that the very idea of the word Human arises. 
To this kind of mentality the Aryan owes his position in the world. And the world is indebted to the 
Aryan mind for having developed the concept of mankind; for it is out of this spirit alone that the 
creative force has come which in a unique way combined robust muscular power with a first-class 
intellect and thus created the monuments of human civilization. 

Were it not for idealism all the faculties of the intellect, even the most brilliant, would be nothing but 
intellect itself, a mere external phenomenon without inner value and never a creative force. 

Since true idealism, however, is essentially the subordination of the interests and life of the individual 
to the interests and life of the community, and since the community on its part represents the 
pre-requisite condition of every form of organization, this idealism accords in its innermost essence 
with the final purpose of Nature. This feeling alone makes men voluntarily acknowledge that strength 
and power are entitled to take the lead and thus makes them a constituent particle in that order out of 
which the whole universe is shaped and formed. 

Without being conscious of it, the purest idealism is always associated with the most profound 

knowledge. How true this is and how little genuine idealism has to do with fantastic 

self- dramatization will become clear the moment we ask an unspoilt child, a healthy boy for example, 

to give his opinion. The very same boy who listens to the rantings of an idealistic pacifist without 

understanding them, and even rejects them, would readily sacrifice his young life for the ideal of his 


Unconsciously his instinct will submit to the knowledge that the preservation of the species, even at 
the cost of the individual life, is a primal necessity and he will protest against the fantasies of pacifist 
ranters, who in reality are nothing better than cowardly egoists, even though camouflaged, who 
contradict the laws of human development. For it is a necessity of human evolution that the individual 
should be imbued with the spirit of sacrifice in favour of the common weal, and that he should not be 
influenced by the morbid notions of those knaves who pretend to know better than Nature and who 
have the impudence to criticize her decrees. 

It is just at those junctures when the idealistic attitude threatens to disappear that we notice a 
weakening of this force which is a necessary constituent in the founding and maintenance of the 
community and is thereby a necessary condition of civilization. As soon as the spirit of egotism 
begins to prevail among a people then the bonds of the social order break and man, by seeking his 
own personal happiness, veritably tumbles out of heaven and falls into hell. 

Posterity will not remember those who pursued only their own individual interests, but it will praise 
those heroes who renounced their own happiness. 

The Jew offers the most striking contrast to the Aryan. There is probably no other people in the world 
who have so developed the instinct of self-preservation as the so-called chosen people. The best 
proof of this statement is found in the simple fact that this race still exists. Where can another people 
be found that in the course of the last two thousand years has undergone so few changes in mental 
outlook and character as the Jewish people? And yet what other people has taken such a constant part 
in the great revolutions? But even after having passed through the most gigantic catastrophes that 
have overwhelmed mankind, the Jews remain the same as ever. What an infinitely tenacious 
will-to-live, to preserve ones kind, is demonstrated by that fact! 

The intellectual faculties of the Jew have been trained through thousands of years. To-day the Jew is 
looked upon as specially cunning; and in a certain sense he has been so throughout the ages. His 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf chapl 1 .htm (1 of 28) [04/06/2000 1 6:1 5:50] 


intellectual powers, however, are not the result of an inner evolution but rather have been shaped by 
the object-lessons which the Jew has received from others. The human spirit cannot climb upwards 
without taking successive steps. For every step upwards it needs the foundation of what has been 
constructed before the past which in, the comprehensive sense here employed, can have been laid 
only in a general civilization. All thinking originates only to a very small degree in personal 
experience. The largest part is based on the accumulated experiences of the past. The general level of 
civilization provides the individual, who in most cases is not consciously aware of the fact, with such 
an abundance of preliminary knowledge that with this equipment he can more easily take further steps 
on the road of progress. The boy of to-day, for example, grows up among such an overwhelming mass 
of technical achievement which has accumulated during the last century that he takes as granted many 
things which a hundred years ago were still mysteries even to the greatest minds of those times. Yet 
these things that are not so much a matter of course are of enormous importance to those who would 
understand the progress we have made in these matters and would carry on that progress a step 
farther. If a man of genius belonging to the twenties of the last century were to arise from his grave 
to-day he would find it more difficult to understand our present age than the contemporary boy of 
fifteen years of age who may even have only an average intelligence. The man of genius, thus come 
back from the past, would need to provide himself with an extraordinary amount of preliminary 
information which our contemporary youth receive automatically, so to speak, during the time they 
are growing up among the products of our modern civilization. 

Since the Jew for reasons that I shall deal with immediately never had a civilization of his own, he 
has always been furnished by others with a basis for his: intellectual work. His intellect has always 
developed by the use of those cultural achievements which he has found ready-to-hand around him. 

The process has never been the reverse. 

For, though among the Jews the instinct of self-preservation has not been weaker but has been much 
stronger than among other peoples, and though the impression may easily be created that the 
intellectual powers of the Jew are at least equal to those of other races, the Jews completely lack the 
most essential pre-requisite of a cultural people, namely the idealistic spirit. With the Jewish people 
the readiness for sacrifice does not extend beyond the simple instinct of individual preservation. In 
their case the feeling of racial solidarity which they apparently manifest is nothing but a very 
primitive gregarious instinct, similar to that which may be found among other organisms in this world. 
It is a remarkable fact that this herd instinct brings individuals together for mutual protection only as 
long as there is a common danger which makes mutual assistance expedient or inevitable. The same 
pack of wolves which a moment ago joined together in a common attack on their victim will dissolve 
into individual wolves as soon as their hunger has been satisfied. This is also sure of horses, which 
unite to defend themselves against any aggressor but separate the moment the danger is over. 

It is much the same with the Jew. His spirit of sacrifice is only apparent. It manifests itself only so 
long as the existence of the individual makes this a matter of absolute necessity. But as soon as the 
common foe is conquered and the danger which threatened the individual Jews is overcome and the 
prey secured, then the apparent harmony disappears and the original conditions set in again. Jews act 
in concord only when a common danger threatens them or a common prey attracts them. Where these 
two motives no longer exist then the most brutal egotism appears and these people who before had 
lived together in unity will turn into a swarm of rats that bitterly fight against each other. 

If the Jews were the only people in the world they would be wallowing in filth and mire and would 
exploit one another and try to exterminate one another in a bitter struggle, except in so far as their 
utter lack of the ideal of sacrifice, which shows itself in their cowardly spirit, would prevent this 
struggle from developing. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (11 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


Therefore it would be a complete mistake to interpret the mutual help which the Jews render one 
another when they have to fight or, to put it more accurately, to exploit their fellow being, as the 
expression of a certain idealistic spirit of sacrifice. 

Here again the Jew merely follows the call of his individual egotism. That is why the Jewish State, 
which ought to be a vital organization to serve the purpose of preserving or increasing the race, has 
absolutely no territorial boundaries. For the territorial delimitation of a State always demands a certain 
idealism of spirit on the part of the race which forms that State and especially a proper acceptance of 
the idea of work. A State which is territorially delimited cannot be established or maintained unless 
the general attitude towards work be a positive one. If this attitude be lacking, then the necessary basis 
of a civilization is also lacking. 

That is why the Jewish people, despite the intellectual powers with which they are apparently 
endowed, have not a culture certainly not a culture of their own. The culture which the Jew enjoys 
to-day is the product of the work of others and this product is debased in the hands of the Jew. 

In order to form a correct judgment of the place which the Jew holds in relation to the whole problem 
of human civilization, we must bear in mind the essential fact that there never has been any Jewish art 
and consequently that nothing of this kind exists to-day. We must realize that especially in those two 
royal domains of art, namely architecture and music, the Jew has done no original creative work. 
When the Jew comes to producing something in the field of art he merely bowdler-izes something 
already in existence or simply steals the intellectual word, of others. The Jew essentially lacks those 
qualities which are characteristic of those creative races that are the founders of civilization. 

To what extent the Jew appropriates the civilization built up by others or rather corrupts it, to speak 
more accurately is indicated by the fact that he cultivates chiefly the art which calls for the smallest 
amount of original invention, namely the dramatic art. And even here he is nothing better than a kind 
of juggler or, perhaps more correctly speaking, a kind of monkey imitator; for in this domain also he 
lacks the creative elan which is necessary for the production of all really great work. Even here, 
therefore, he is not a creative genius but rather a superficial imitator who, in spite of all his retouching 
and tricks, cannot disguise the fact that there is no inner vitality in the shape he gives his products. At 
this juncture the Jewish Press comes in and renders friendly assistance by shouting hosannas over the 
head of even the most ordinary bungler of a Jew, until the rest of the world is stampeded into thinking 
that the object of so much praise must really be an artist, whereas in reality he may be nothing more 
than a low-class mimic. 

No; the Jews have not the creative abilities which are necessary to the founding of a civilization; for in 
them there is not, and never has been, that spirit of idealism which is an absolutely necessary element 
in the higher development of mankind. Therefore the Jewish intellect will never be constructive but 
always destructive. At best it may serve as a stimulus in rare cases but only within the meaning of the 
poets lines: The Power which always wills the Bad, and always works the Good (Kraft, die stets das 
Bose will und stets das Gute schafft). It is not through his help but in spite of his help that mankind 
makes any progress. 

Since the Jew has never had a State which was based on territorial delimitations, and therefore never a 
civilization of his own, the idea arose that here we were dealing with a people who had to be 
considered as Nomads. That is a great and mischievous mistake. The true nomad does actually 
possess a definite delimited territory where he lives. It is merely that he does not cultivate it, as the 
settled farmer does, but that he lives on the products of his herds, with which he wanders over his 
domain. The natural reason for this mode of existence is to be found in the fact that the soil is not 
fertile and that it does not give the steady produce which makes a fixed abode possible. Outside of this 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (12 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


natural cause, however, there is a more profound cause: namely, that no mechanical civilization is at 
hand to make up for the natural poverty of the region in question. There are territories where the 
Aryan can establish fixed settlements by means of the technical skill which he has developed in the 
course of more than a thousand years, even though these territories would otherwise have to be 
abandoned, unless the Aryan were willing to wander about them in nomadic fashion; but his technical 
tradition and his age-long experience of the use of technical means would probably make the nomadic 
life unbearable for him. We ought to remember that during the first period of American colonization 
numerous Aryans earned their daily livelihood as trappers and hunters, etc., frequently wandering 
about in large groups with their women and children, their mode of existence very much resembling 
that of ordinary nomads. The moment, however, that they grew more numerous and were able to 
accumulate larger resources, they cleared the land and drove out the aborigines, at the same time 
establishing settlements which rapidly increased all over the country. 

The Aryan himself was probably at first a nomad and became a settler in the course of ages. But yet 
he was never of the Jewish kind. The Jew is not a nomad; for the nomad has already a definite attitude 
towards the concept of work, and this attitude served as the basis of a later cultural development, 
when the necessary intellectual conditions were at hand. There is a certain amount of idealism in the 
general attitude of the nomad, even though it be rather primitive. His whole character may, therefore, 
be foreign to Aryan feeling but it will never be repulsive. But not even the slightest trace of idealism 
exists in the Jewish character. The Jew has never been a nomad, but always a parasite, battening on 
the substance of others. If he occasionally abandoned regions where he had hitherto lived he did not 
do it voluntarily. He did it because from time to time he was driven out by people who were tired of 
having their hospitality abused by such guests. Jewish self-expansion is a parasitic phenomenon 
since the Jew is always looking for new pastures for his race. 

But this has nothing to do with nomadic life as such; because the Jew does not ever think of leaving a 
territory which he has once occupied. He sticks where he is with such tenacity that he can hardly be 
driven out even by superior physical force. He expands into new territories only when certain 
conditions for his existence are provided therein; but even then unlike the nomad he will not change 
his former abode. He is and remains a parasite, a sponger who, like a pernicious bacillus, spreads over 
wider and wider areas according as some favourable area attracts him. The effect produced by his 
presence is also like that of the vampire; for wherever he establishes himself the people who grant him 
hospitality are bound to be bled to death sooner or later. Thus the Jew has at all times lived in States 
that have belonged to other races and within the organization of those States he had formed a State of 
his own, which is, however, hidden behind the mask of a religious community, as long as external 
circumstances do not make it advisable for this community to declare its true nature. As soon as the 
Jew feels himself sufficiently established in his position to be able to hold it without a disguise, he 
lifts the mask and suddenly appears in the character which so many did not formerly believe or wish 
to see: namely that of the Jew. 

The life which the Jew lives as a parasite thriving on the substance of other nations and States has 
resulted in developing that specific character which Schopenhauer once described when he spoke of 
the Jew as The Great Master of Lies. The kind of existence which he leads forces the Jew to the 
systematic use of falsehood, just as naturally as the inhabitants of northern climates are forced to wear 
warm clothes. 

He can live among other nations and States only as long as he succeeds in persuading them that the 
Jews are not a distinct people but the representatives of a religious faith who thus constitute a 
religious community, though this be of a peculiar character. 

As a matter of fact, however, this is the first of his great falsehoods. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (13 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


He is obliged to conceal his own particular character and mode of life that he may be allowed to 
continue his existence as a parasite among the nations. The greater the intelligence of the individual 
Jew, the better will he succeed in deceiving others. His success in this line may even go so far that the 
people who grant him hospitality may be led to believe that the Jew among them is a genuine 
Frenchman, for instance, or Englishman or German or Italian, who just happens to belong to a 
religious denomination which is different from that prevailing in these countries. Especially in circles 
concerned with the executive administration of the State, where the officials generally have only a 
minimum of historical sense, the Jew is able to impose his infamous deception with comparative ease. 
In these circles independent thinking is considered a sin against the sacred rules according to which 
official promotion takes place. It is therefore not surprising that even to-day in the Bavarian 
government offices, for example, there is not the slightest suspicion that the Jews form a distinct 
nation themselves and are not merely the adherents of a Confession, though one glance at the Press 
which belongs to the Jews ought to furnish sufficient evidence to the contrary even for those who 
possess only the smallest degree of intelligence. The Jewish Echo, however, is not an official gazette 
and therefore not authoritative in the eyes of those government potentates. 

Jewry has always been a nation of a definite racial character and never differentiated merely by the 
fact of belonging to a certain religion. At a very early date, urged on by the desire to make their way 
in the world, the Jews began to cast about for a means whereby they might distract such attention as 
might prove inconvenient for them. What could be more effective and at the same time more above 
suspicion than to borrow and utilize the idea of the religious community? Here also everything is 
copied, or rather stolen; for the Jew could not possess any religious institution which had developed 
out of his own consciousness, seeing that he lacks every kind of idealism; which means that belief in a 
life beyond this terrestrial existence is foreign to him. In the Aryan mind no religion can ever be 
imagined unless it embodies the conviction that life in some form or other will continue after death. 
As a matter of fact, the Talmud is not a book that lays down principles according to which the 
individual should prepare for the life to come. It only furnishes rules for a practical and convenient 
life in this world. 

The religious teaching of the Jews is principally a collection of instructions for maintaining the Jewish 
blood pure and for regulating intercourse between Jews and the rest of the world: that is to say, their 
relation with non-Jews. But the Jewish religious teaching is not concerned with moral problems. It is 
rather concerned with economic problems, and very petty ones at that. In regard to the moral value of 
the religious teaching of the Jews there exist and always have existed quite exhaustive studies (not 
from the Jewish side; for whatever the Jews have written on this question has naturally always been of 
a tendentious character) which show up the kind of religion that the Jews have in a light that makes it 
look very uncanny to the Aryan mind. The Jew himself is the best example of the kind of product 
which this religious training evolves. His life is of this world only and his mentality is as foreign to 
the true spirit of Christianity as his character was foreign to the great Founder of this new creed two 
thousand years ago. And the Founder of Christianity made no secret indeed of His estimation of the 
Jewish people. When He found it necessary He drove those enemies of the human race out of the 
Temple of God; because then, as always, they used religion as a means of advancing their commercial 
interests. But at that time Christ was nailed to the Cross for his attitude towards the Jews; whereas our 
modern Christians enter into party politics and when elections are being held they debase themselves 
to beg for Jewish votes. They even enter into political intrigues with the atheistic Jewish parties 
against the interests of their own Christian nation. 

On this first and fundamental lie, the purpose of which is to make people believe that Jewry is not a 
nation but a religion, other lies are subsequently based. One of those further lies, for example, is in 
connection with the language spoken by the Jew. For him language is not an instrument for the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (14 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


expression of his inner thoughts but rather a means of cloaking them. When talking French his 
thoughts are Jewish and when writing German rhymes he only gives expression to the character of his 
own race. 

As long as the Jew has not succeeded in mastering other peoples he is forced to speak their language 
whether he likes it or not. But the moment that the world would become the slave of the Jew it would 
have to learn some other language (Esperanto, for example) so that by this means the Jew could 
dominate all the more easily. 

How much the whole existence of this people is based on a permanent falsehood is proved in a unique 
way by The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, which are so violently repudiated by the Jews. With 
groans and moans, the Frankfurter Zeitung repeats again and again that these are forgeries. This alone 
is evidence in favour of their authenticity. What many Jews unconsciously wish to do is here clearly 
set forth. It is not necessary to ask out of what Jewish brain these revelations sprang; but what is of 
vital interest is that they disclose, with an almost terrifying precision, the mentality and methods of 
action characteristic of the Jewish people and these writings expound in all their various directions the 
final aims towards which the Jews are striving. The study of real happenings, however, is the best way 
of judging the authenticity of those documents. If the historical developments which have taken place 
within the last few centuries be studied in the light of this book we shall understand why the Jewish 
Press incessantly repudiates and denounces it. For the Jewish peril will be stamped out the moment 
the general public come into possession of that book and understand it. 

In order to get to know the Jew properly it is necessary to study the road which he has been following 
among the other peoples during the last few centuries. One example will suffice to give a clear insight 
here. Since his career has been the same at all epochs just as the people at whose expense he has 
lived have remained the same for the purposes of making the requisite analysis it will be best to mark 
his progress by stages. For the sake of simplicity we shall indicate these stages by letters of the 

The first Jews came into what was then called Germania during the period of the Roman invasion; 
and, as usual, they came as merchants. During the turmoil caused by the great migrations of the 
German tribes the Jews seem to have disappeared. We may therefore consider the period when the 
Germans formed the first political communities as the beginning of that process whereby Central and 
Northern Europe was again, and this time permanently, Judaized. A development began which has 
always been the same or similar wherever and whenever Jews came into contact with Aryan peoples. 

(a) As soon as the first permanent settlements had been established the Jew was suddenly there. He 
arrived as a merchant and in the beginning did not trouble to disguise his nationality. He still remained 
openly a Jew, partly it may be because he knew too little of the language. It may also be that people of 
other races refused to mix with him, so that he could not very well adopt any other appearance than 
that of a foreign merchant. Because of his subtlety and cunning and the lack of experience on the part 
of the people whose guest he became, it was not to his disadvantage openly to retain his Jewish 
character. This may even have been advantageous to him; for the foreigner was received kindly. 

(b) Slowly but steadily he began to take part in the economic life around him; not as a producer, 
however, but only as a middleman. His commercial cunning, acquired through thousands of years of 
negotiation as an intermediary, made him superior in this field to the Aryans, who were still quite 
ingenuous and indeed clumsy and whose honesty was unlimited; so that after a short while commerce 
seemed destined to become a Jewish monopoly. The Jew began by lending out money at usurious 
interest, which is a permanent trade of his. It was he who first introduced the payment of interest on 
borrowed money. The danger which this innovation involved was not at first recognized; indeed the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf chapl 1 .htm (1 5 of 28) [04/06/2000 1 6:1 5:50] 


innovation was welcomed, because it offered momentary advantages. 

(c) At this stage the Jew had become firmly settled down; that is to say, he inhabited special sections 
of the cities and towns and had his own quarter in the market-places. Thus he gradually came to form 
a State within a State. He came to look upon the commercial domain and all money transactions as a 
privilege belonging exclusively to himself and he exploited it ruthlessly. 

(d) At this stage finance and trade had become his complete monopoly. Finally, his usurious rate of 
interest aroused opposition and the increasing impudence which the Jew began to manifest all round 
stirred up popular indignation, while his display of wealth gave rise to popular envy. The cup of his 
iniquity became full to the brim when he included landed property among his commercial wares and 
degraded the soil to the level of a market commodity. Since he himself never cultivated the soil but 
considered it as an object to be exploited, on which the peasant may still remain but only on condition 
that he submits to the most heartless exactions of his new master, public antipathy against the Jew 
steadily increased and finally turned into open animosity. His extortionate tyranny became so 
unbearable that people rebelled against his control and used physical violence against him. They 
began to scrutinize this foreigner somewhat more closely, and then began to discover the repulsive 
traits and characteristics inherent in him, until finally an abyss opened between the Jews and their 
hosts, across which abyss there could be no further contact. 

In times of distress a wave of public anger has usually arisen against the Jew; the masses have taken 
the law into their own hands; they have seized Jewish property and ruined the Jew in their urge to 
protect themselves against what they consider to be a scourge of God. Having come to know the Jew 
intimately through the course of centuries, in times of distress they looked upon his presence among 
them as a public danger comparable only to the plague. 

(e) But then the Jew began to reveal his true character. He paid court to governments, with servile 
flattery, used his money to ingratiate himself further and thus regularly secured for himself once again 
the privilege of exploiting his victim. Although public wrath flared up against this eternal profiteer 
and drove him out, after a few years he reappeared in those same places and carried on as before. No 
persecution could force him to give up his trade of exploiting other people and no amount of harrying 
succeeded in driving him out permanently. He always returned after a short time and it was always the 
old story with him. 

In an effort to save at least the worst from happening, legislation was passed which debarred the Jew 
from obtaining possession of the land. 

(f) In proportion as the powers of kings and princes increased, the Jew sidled up to them. He begged 
for charters and privileges which those gentlemen, who were generally in financial straits, gladly 
granted if they received adequate payment in return. However high the price he has to pay, the Jew 
will succeed in getting it back within a few years from operating the privilege he has acquired, even 
with interest and compound interest. He is a real leech who clings to the body of his unfortunate 
victims and cannot be removed; so that when the princes found themselves in need once again they 
took the blood from his swollen veins with their own hands. 

This game was repeated unendingly. In the case of those who were called German Princes, the part 
they played was quite as contemptible as that played by the Jew. They were a real scourge for their 
people. Their compeers may be found in some of the government ministers of our time. 

It was due to the German princes that the German nation could not succeed in definitely freeing itself 
from the Jewish peril. Unfortunately the situation did not change at a later period. The princes finally 
received the reward which they had a thousand-fold deserved for all the crimes committed by them 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf chapl 1 .htm (1 6 of 28) [04/06/2000 1 6:1 5:50] 


against their own people. They had allied themselves with Satan and later on they discovered that they 
were in Satans embrace. 

(g) By permitting themselves to be entangled in the toils of the Jew, the princes prepared their own 
downfall. The position which they held among their people was slowly but steadily undermined not 
only by their continued failure to guard the interests of their subjects but by the positive exploitation 
of them. The Jew calculated exactly the time when the downfall of the princes was approaching and 
did his best to hasten it. He intensified their financial difficulties by hindering them in the exercise of 
their duty towards their people, by inveigling them through the most servile flatteries into further 
personal display, whereby he made himself more and more indispensable to them. His astuteness, or 
rather his utter unscrupulousness, in money affairs enabled him to exact new income from the princes, 
to squeeze the money out of them and then have it spent as quickly as possible. Every Court had its 
Court Jews, as this plague was called, who tortured the innocent victims until they were driven to 
despair; while at the same time this Jew provided the means which the princes squandered on their 
own pleasures. It is not to be wondered at that these ornaments of the human race became the 
recipients of official honours and even were admitted into the ranks of the hereditary nobility, thus 
contributing not only to expose that social institution to ridicule but also to contaminate it from the 

Naturally the Jew could now exploit the position to which he had attained and push himself forward 
even more rapidly than before. Finally he became baptized and thus entitled to all the rights and 
privileges which belonged to the children of the nation on which he preyed. This was a high-class 
stroke of business for him, and he often availed himself of it, to the great joy of the Church, which 
was proud of having gained a new child in the Faith, and also to the joy of Israel, which was happy at 
seeing the trick pulled off successfully. 

(h) At this stage a transformation began to take place in the world of Jewry. Up to now they had been 
Jews that is to say, they did not hitherto set any great value on pretending to be something else; and 
anyhow the distinctive characteristics which separated them from other races could not be easily 
overcome. Even as late as the time of Frederick the Great nobody looked upon the Jews as other than 
a foreign people, and Goethe rose up in revolt against the failure legally to prohibit marriage 
between Christians and Jews. Goethe was certainly no reactionary and no time-server. What he said 
came from the voice of the blood and the voice of reason. Notwithstanding the disgraceful happenings 
taking place in Court circles, the people recognized instinctively that the Jew was the foreign body in 
their own flesh and their attitude towards him was directed by recognition of that fact. 

But a change was now destined to take place. In the course of more than a thousand years the Jew had 
learned to master the language of his hosts so thoroughly that he considered he might now lay stress 
on his Jewish character and emphasize the Germanism a bit more. Though it must have appeared 
ridiculous and absurd at first sight, he was impudent enough to call himself a Teuton, which in this 
case meant a German. In that way began one of the most infamous impositions that can be imagined. 
The Jew did not possess the slightest traces of the German character. He had only acquired the art of 
twisting the German language to his own uses, and that in a disgusting way, without having 
assimilated any other feature of the German character. Therefore his command of the language was 
the sole ground on which he could pretend to be a German. It is not however by the tie of language, 
but exclusively by the tie of blood that the members of a race are bound together. And the Jew himself 
knows this better than any other, seeing that he attaches so little importance to the preservation of his 
own language while at the same time he strives his utmost to maintain his blood free from 
intermixture with that of other races. A man may acquire and use a new language without much 
trouble; but it is only his old ideas that he expresses through the new language. His inner nature is not 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (17 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


modified thereby. The best proof of this is furnished by the Jew himself. He may speak a thousand 
tongues and yet his Jewish nature will remain always one and the same. His distinguishing 
characteristics were the same when he spoke the Latin language at Ostia two thousand years ago as a 
merchant in grain, as they are to-day when he tries to sell adulterated flour with the aid of his German 
gibberish. He is always the same Jew. That so obvious a fact is not recognized by the average 
head-clerk in a German government department, or by an officer in the police administration, is also a 
self-evident and natural fact; since it would be difficult to find another class of people who are so 
lacking in instinct and intelligence as the civil servants employed by our modern German State 

The reason why, at the stage I am dealing with, the Jew so suddenly decided to transform himself into 
a German is not difficult to discover. He felt the power of the princes slowly crumbling and therefore 
looked about to find a new social plank on which he might stand. Furthermore, his financial 
domination over all the spheres of economic life had become so powerful that he felt he could no 
longer sustain that enormous structure or add to it unless he were admitted to the full enjoyment of the 
rights of citizenship. He aimed at both, preservation and expansion; for the higher he could climb the 
more alluring became the prospect of reaching the old goal, which was promised to him in ancient 
times, namely world-rulership, and which he now looked forward to with feverish eyes, as he thought 
he saw it visibly approaching. Therefore all his efforts were now directed to becoming a fully-fledged 
citizen, endowed with all civil and political rights. 

That was the reason for his emancipation from the Ghetto. 

(i) And thus the Court Jew slowly developed into the national Jew. But naturally he still remained 
associated with persons in higher quarters and he even attempted to push his way further into the inner 
circles of the ruling set. But at the same time some other representatives of his race were currying 
favour with the people. If we remember the crimes the Jew had committed against the masses of the 
people in the course of so many centuries, how repeatedly and ruthlessly he exploited them and how 
he sucked out even the very marrow of their substance, and when we further remember how they 
gradually came to hate him and finally considered him as a public scourge then we may well 
understand how difficult the Jew must have found this final transformation. Yes, indeed, it must tax 
all their powers to be able to present themselves as friends of humanity to the poor victims whom 
they have skinned raw. 

Therefore the Jew began by making public amends for the crimes which he had committed against the 
people in the past. He started his metamorphosis by first appearing as the benefactor of humanity. 
Since his new philanthropic policy had a very concrete aim in view, he could not very well apply to 
himself the biblical counsel, not to allow the left hand to know what the right hand is giving. He felt 
obliged to let as many people as possible know how deeply the sufferings of the masses grieved him 
and to what excesses of personal sacrifice he was ready to go in order to help them. With this 
manifestation of innate modesty, so typical of the Jew, he trumpeted his virtues before the world until 
finally the world actually began to believe him. Those who refused to share this belief were 
considered to be doing him an injustice. Thus after a little while he began to twist things around, so as 
to make it appear that it was he who had always been wronged, and vice versa. There were really 
some particularly foolish people who could not help pitying this poor unfortunate creature of a Jew. 

Attention may be called to the fact that, in spite of his proclaimed readiness to make personal 
sacrifices, the Jew never becomes poor thereby. He has a happy knack of always making both ends 
meet. Occasionally his benevolence might be compared to the manure which is not spread over the 
field merely for the purpose of getting rid of it, but rather with a view to future produce. Anyhow, 
after a comparatively short period of time, the world was given to know that the Jew had become a 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (18 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


general benefactor and philanthropist. What a transformation! 

What is looked upon as more or less natural when done by other people here became an object of 
astonishment, and even sometimes of admiration, because it was considered so unusual in a Jew. That 
is why he has received more credit for his acts of benevolence than ordinary mortals. 

And something more: The Jew became liberal all of a sudden and began to talk enthusiastically of 
how human progress must be encouraged. Gradually he assumed the air of being the herald of a new 

Yet at the same time he continued to undermine the ground-work of that part of the economic system 
in which the people have the most practical interest. He bought up stock in the various national 
undertakings and thus pushed his influence into the circuit of national production, making this latter 
an object of buying and selling on the stock exchange, or rather what might be called the pawn in a 
financial game of chess, and thus ruining the basis on which personal proprietorship alone is possible. 
Only with the entrance of the Jew did that feeling of estrangement, between employers and employees 
begin which led at a later date to the political class-struggle. 

Finally the Jew gained an increasing influence in all economic undertakings by means of his 
predominance in the stock-exchange. If not the ownership, at least he secured control of the working 
power of the nation. 

In order to strengthen his political position, he directed his efforts towards removing the barrier of 
racial and civic discrimination which had hitherto hindered his advance at every turn. With 
characteristic tenacity he championed the cause of religious tolerance for this purpose; and in the 
freemason organization, which had fallen completely into his hands, he found a magnificent weapon 
which helped him to achieve his ends. Government circles, as well as the higher sections of the 
political and commercial bourgeoisie, fell a prey to his plans through his manipulation of the masonic 
net, though they themselves did not even suspect what was happening. 

Only the people as such, or rather the masses which were just becoming conscious of their own power 
and were beginning to use it in the fight for their rights and liberties, had hitherto escaped the grip of 
the Jew. At least his influence had not yet penetrated to the deeper and wider sections of the people. 
This was unsatisfactory to him. The most important phase of his policy was therefore to secure control 
over the people. The Jew realized that in his efforts to reach the position of public despot he would 
need a peace-maker. And he thought he could find a peace-maker if he could whip-in sufficient 
extensive sections of the bourgeois. But the freemasons failed to catch the glove-manufacturers and 
the linen-weavers in the frail meshes of their net. And so it became necessary to find a grosser and 
withal a more effective means. Thus another weapon beside that of freemasonry would have to be 
secured. This was the Press. The Jew exercised all his skill and tenacity in getting hold of it. By means 
of the Press he began gradually to control public life in its entirety. He began to drive it along the road 
which he had chosen to reach his own ends; for he was now in a position to create and direct that 
force which, under the name of public opinion is better known to-day than it was some decades ago. 

Simultaneously the Jew gave himself the air of thirsting after knowledge. He lauded every phase of 
progress, particularly those phases which led to the ruin of others; for he judges all progress and 
development from the standpoint of the advantages which these bring to his own people. When it 
brings him no such advantages he is the deadly enemy of enlightenment and hates all culture which is 
real culture as such. All the knowledge which he acquires in the schools of others is exploited by him 
exclusively in the service of his own race. 

Even more watchfully than ever before, he now stood guard over his Jewish nationality. Though 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf chapl 1 .htm (1 9 of 28) [04/06/2000 1 6:1 5:50] 


bubbling over with enlightenment, progress, liberty, humanity, etc., his first care was to preserve 
the racial integrity of his own people. He occasionally bestowed one of his female members on an 
influential Christian; but the racial stock of his male descendants was always preserved unmixed 
fundamentally. He poisons the blood of others but preserves his own blood unadulterated. The Jew 
scarcely ever marries a Christian girl, but the Christian takes a Jewess to wife. The mongrels that are a 
result of this latter union always declare themselves on the Jewish side. Thus a part of the higher 
nobility in particular became completely degenerate. The Jew was well aware of this fact and 
systematically used this means of disarming the intellectual leaders of the opposite race. To mask his 
tactics and fool his victims, he talks of the equality of all men, no matter what their race or colour may 
be. And the simpletons begin to believe him. 

Since his whole nature still retains too foreign an odour for the broad masses of the people to allow 
themselves to be caught in his snare, he uses the Press to put before the public a picture of himself 
which is entirely untrue to life but well designed to serve his purpose. In the comic papers special 
efforts are made to represent the Jews as an inoffensive little race which, like all others, has its 
peculiarities. In spite of their manners, which may seem a bit strange, the comic papers present the 
Jews as fundamentally good-hearted and honourable. Attempts are generally made to make them 
appear insignificant rather than dangerous. 

During this phase of his progress the chief goal of the Jew was the victory of democracy, or rather the 
supreme hegemony of the parliamentary system, which embodies his concept of democracy. This 
institution harmonises best with his purposes; for thus the personal element is eliminated and in its 
place we have the dunder-headed majority, inefficiency and, last but by no means least, knavery. 

The final result must necessarily have been the overthrow of the monarchy, which had to happen 
sooner or later. 

(j) A tremendous economic development transformed the social structure of the nation. The small 
artisan class slowly disappeared and the factory worker, who took its place, had scarcely any chance 
of establishing an independent existence of his own but sank more and more to the level of a 
proletariat. An essential characteristic of the factory worker is that he is scarcely ever able to provide 
for an independent source of livelihood which will support him in later life. In the true sense of the 
word, he is disinherited. His old age is a misery to him and can hardly be called life at all. 

In earlier times a similar situation had been created, which had imperatively demanded a solution and 
for which a solution was found. Side by side with the peasant and the artisan, a new class was 
gradually developed, namely that of officials and employees, especially those employed in the various 
services of the State. They also were a disinherited class, in the true sense of the word. But the State 
found a remedy for this unhealthy situation by taking upon itself the duty of providing for the State 
official who could establish nothing that would be an independent means of livelihood for himself in 
his old age. Thus the system of pensions and retiring allowances was introduced. Private enterprises 
slowly followed this example in increasing numbers; so that to-day every permanent non-manual 
worker receives a pension in his later years, if the firm which he has served is one that has reached or 
gone beyond a certain size. It was only by virtue of the assurance given of State officials, that they 
would be cared for in their old age. that such a high degree of unselfish devotion to duty was 
developed, which in pre-war times was one of the distinguising characteristics of German officials. 

Thus a whole class which had no personal property was saved from destitution by an intelligent 
system of provision, and found a place in the social structure of the national community. 

The problem is now put before the State and nation, but this time in a much larger form. When the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (20 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


new industries sprang up and developed, millions of people left the countryside and the villages to 
take up employment in the big factories. The conditions under which this new class found itself forced 
to live were worse than miserable. The more or less mechanical transformation of the methods of 
work hitherto in vogue among the artisans and peasants did not fit in well with the habits or mentality 
of this new working-class. The way in which the peasants and artisans had formerly worked had 
nothing comparable to the intensive labour of the new factory worker. In the old trades time did not 
play a highly important role, but it became an essential element in the new industrial system. The 
formal taking over of the old working hours into the mammoth industrial enterprises had fatal results. 
The actual amount of work hitherto accomplished within a certain time was comparatively small, 
because the modern methods of intensive production were then unknown. Therefore, though in the 
older system a working day of fourteen or even fifteen hours was not unendurable, now it was beyond 
the possibilities of human endurance because in the new system every minute was utilized to the 
extreme. This absurd transference of the old working hours to the new industrial system proved fatal 
in two directions. First, it ruined the health of the workers; secondly, it destroyed their faith in a 
superior law of justice. Finally, on the one hand a miserable wage was received and, on the other, the 
employer held a much more lucrative position than before. Hence a striking difference between the 
ways of life on the one side and on the other. 

In the open country there could be no social problem, because the master and the farm-hand were 
doing the same kind of work and doing it together. They ate their food in common, and sometimes 
even out of the same dish. But in this sphere also the new system introduced an entirely different set 
of conditions between masters and men. 

The division created between employer and employees seems not to have extended to all branches of 
life. How far this Judaizing process has been allowed to take effect among our people is illustrated by 
the fact that manual labour not only receives practically no recognition but is even considered 
degrading. That is not a natural German attitude. It is due to the introduction of a foreign element into 
our lives, and that foreign element is the Jewish spirit, one of the effects of which has been to 
transform the high esteem in which our handicrafts once were held into a definite feeling that all 
physical labour is something base and unworthy. 

Thus a new social class has grown up which stands in low esteem; and the day must come when we 
shall have to face the question of whether the nation will be able to make this class an integral part of 
the social community or whether the difference of status now existing will become a permanent gulf 
separating this class from the others. 

One thing, however, is certain: This class does not include the worst elements of the community in its 
ranks. Rather the contrary is the truth: it includes the most energetic parts of the nation. The 
sophistication which is the result of a so-called civilization has not yet exercised its disintegrating and 
degenerating influence on this class. The broad masses of this new lower class, constituted by the 
manual labourers, have not yet fallen a prey to the morbid weakness of pacifism. These are still robust 
and, if necessary, they can be brutal. 

While our bourgeoisie middle class paid no attention at all to this momentous problem and 
indifferently allowed events to take their course, the Jew seized upon the manifold possibilities which 
the situation offered him for the future. While on the one hand he organized capitalistic methods of 
exploitation to their ultimate degree of efficiency, he curried favour with the victims of his policy and 
his power and in a short while became the leader of their struggle against himself. Against himself is 
here only a figurative way of speaking; for this Great Master of Lies knows how to appear in the 
guise of the innocent and throw the guilt on others. Since he had the impudence to take a personal lead 
among the masses, they never for a moment suspected that they were falling a prey to one of the most 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (21 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


infamous deceits ever practised. And yet that is what it actually was. 

The moment this new class had arisen out of the general economic situation and taken shape as a 
definite body in the social order, the Jew saw clearly where he would find the necessary pacemaker 
for his own progressive march. At first he had used the bourgeois class as a battering-ram against the 
feudal order; and now he used the worker against the bourgeois world. Just as he succeeded in 
obtaining civic rights by intrigues carried on under the protection of the bourgeois class, he now 
hoped that by joining in the struggle which the workers were waging for their own existence he would 
be able to obtain full control over them. 

When that moment arrives, then the only objective the workers will have to fight for will be the future 
of the Jewish people. Without knowing it, the worker is placing himself at the service of the very 
power against which he believes he is fighting. Apparently he is made to fight against capital and thus 
he is all the more easily brought to fight for capitalist interests. Outcries are systematically raised 
against international capital but in reality it is against the structure of national economics that these 
slogans are directed. The idea is to demolish this structure and on its ruins triumphantly erect the 
structure of the International Stock Exchange. 

In this line of action the procedure of the Jew was as follows: 

He kowtowed to the worker, hypocritically pretended to feel pity for him and his lot, and even to be 
indignant at the misery and poverty which the worker had to endure. That is the way in which the Jew 
endeavoured to gain the confidence of the working class. He showed himself eager to study their 
various hardships, whether real or imaginary, and strove to awaken a yearning on the part of the 
workers to change the conditions under which they lived. The Jew artfully enkindled that innate 
yearning for social justice which is a typical Aryan characteristic. Once that yearning became alive it 
was transformed into hatred against those in more fortunate circumstances of life. The next stage was 
to give a precise philosophical aspect to the struggle for the elimination of social wrongs. And thus the 
Marxist doctrine was invented. 

By presenting his doctrine as part and parcel of a just revindication of social rights, the Jew 
propagated the doctrine all the more effectively. But at the same time he provoked the opposition of 
decent people who refused to admit these demands which, because of the form and 
pseudo-philosophical trimmings in which they are presented, seemed fundamentally unjust and 
impossible for realization. For, under the cloak of purely social concepts there are hidden aims which 
are of a Satanic character. These aims are even expounded in the open with the clarity of unlimited 
impudence. This Marxist doctrine is an individual mixture of human reason and human absurdity; but 
the combination is arranged in such a way that only the absurd part of it could ever be put into 
practice, but never the reasonable part of it. By categorically repudiating the personal worth of the 
individual and also the nation and its racial constituent, this doctrine destroys the fundamental basis of 
all civilization; for civilization essentially depends on these very factors. Such is the true essence of 
the Marxist Weltanschhauung, so far as the word Weltanschhauung can be applied at all to this 
phantom arising from a criminal brain. The destruction of the concept of personality and of race 
removes the chief obstacle which barred the way to domination of the social body by its inferior 
elements, which are the Jews. 

The very absurdity of the economic and political theories of Marxism gives the doctrine its peculiar 
significance. Because of its pseudo-logic, intelligent people refuse to support it, while all those who 
are less accustomed to use their intellectual faculties, or who have only a rudimentary notion of 
economic principles, join the Marxist cause with flying banners. The intelligence behind the 
movement for even this movement needs intelligence if it is to subsist is supplied by the Jews 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (22 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


themselves, naturally of course as a gratuitous service which is at the same time a sacrifice on their 

Thus arose a movement which was composed exclusively of manual workers under the leadership of 
Jews. To all external appearances, this movement strives to ameliorate the conditions under which the 
workers live; but in reality its aim is to enslave and thereby annihilate the non- Jewish races. 

The propaganda which the freemasons had carried on among the so-called intelligentsia, whereby 
their pacifist teaching paralysed the instinct for national self-preservation, was now extended to the 
broad masses of the workers and bourgeoisie by means of the Press, which was almost everywhere in 
Jewish hands. To those two instruments of disintegration a third and still more ruthless one was 
added, namely, the organization of brute physical force among the masses. As massed columns of 
attacks, the Marxist troops stormed those parts of the social order which had been left standing after 
the two former undermining operations had done their work. 

The combined activity of all these forces has been marvellously managed. And it will not be 
surprising if it turns out that those institutions which have always appeared as the organs of the more 
or less traditional authority of the State should now fall before the Marxist attack. Among our higher 
and highest State officials, with very few exceptions, the Jew has found the cost complacent backers 
in his work of destruction. An attitude of sneaking servility towards superiors and supercilious 
arrogance towards inferiors are the characteristics of this class of people, as well as a grade of 
stupidity which is really frightening and at the same time a towering self-conceit, which has been so 
consistently developed to make it amusing. 

But these qualities are of the greatest utility to the Jew in his dealings with our authorities. Therefore 
they are qualities which he appreciates most in the officials. 

If I were to sketch roughly the actual struggle which is now beginning I should describe it somewhat 

Not satisfied with the economic conquest of the world, but also demanding that it must come under 
his political control, the Jew subdivides the organized Marxist power into two parts, which correspond 
to the ultimate objectives that are to be fought for in this struggle which is carried on under the 
direction of the Jew. To outward appearance, these seem to be two independent movements, but in 
reality they constitute an indivisible unity. The two divisions are: The political movement and the 
trades union movement. 

The trades union movement has to gather in the recruits. It offers assistance and protection to the 
workers in the hard struggle which they have to wage for the bare means of existence, a struggle 
which has been occasioned by the greediness and narrow-mindedness of many of the industrialists. 
Unless the workers be ready to surrender all claims to an existence which the dignity of human nature 
itself demands, and unless they are ready to submit their fate to the will of employers who in many 
cases have no sense of human responsibilities and are utterly callous to human wants, then the worker 
must necessarily take matters into his own hands, seeing that the organized social community that is 
to say, the State pays no attention to his needs. 

The so-called national-minded bourgeoisie, blinded by its own material interests, opposes this 
life-or-death struggle of the workers and places the most difficult obstacles in their way. Not only 
does this bourgeoisie hinder all efforts to enact legislation which would shorten the inhumanly long 
hours of work, prohibit child-labour, grant security and protection to women and improve the hygienic 
conditions of the workshops and the dwellings of the working-class, but while the bourgeoisie hinders 
all this the shrewd Jew takes the cause of the oppressed into his own hands. He gradually becomes the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (23 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:50] 


leader of the trades union movements, which is an easy task for him, because he does not genuinely 
intend to find remedies for the social wrong: he pursues only one objective, namely, to gather and 
consolidate a body of followers who will act under his commands as an armed weapon in the 
economic war for the destruction of national economic independence. For, while a sound social policy 
has to move between the two poles of securing a decent level of public health and welfare on the one 
hand and, on the other, that of safeguarding the independence of the economic life of the nation, the 
Jew does not take these poles into account at all. The destruction of both is one of his main objects. 
He would ruin, rather than safeguard, the independence of the national economic system. Therefore, 
as the leader of the trades union movement, he has no scruples about putting forward demands which 
not only go beyond the declared purpose of the movement but could not be carried into effect without 
ruining the national economic structure. On the other hand, he has no interest in seeing a healthy and 
sturdy population develop; he would be more content to see the people degenerate into an unthinking 
herd which could be reduced to total subjection. Because these are his final objectives, he can afford 
to put forward the most absurd claims. He knows very well that these claims can never be realized and 
that therefore nothing in the actual state of affairs could be altered by them, but that the most they can 
do is to arouse the spirit of unrest among the masses. That is exactly the purpose which he wishes 
such propaganda to serve and not a real and honest improvement of the social conditions. 

The Jews will therefore remain the unquestioned leaders of the trades union movement so long as a 
campaign is not undertaken, which must be carried out on gigantic lines, for the enlightenment of the 
masses; so that they will be enabled better to understand the causes of their misery. Or the same end 
might be achieved if the government authorities would get rid of the Jew and his work. For as long as 
the masses remain so ill-informed as they actually are to-day, and as long as the State remains as 
indifferent to their lot as it now is, the masses will follow whatever leader makes them the most 
extravagant promises in regard to economic matters. The Jew is a past master at this art and his 
activities are not hampered by moral considerations of any kind. 

Naturally it takes him only a short time to defeat all his competitors in this field and drive them from 
the scene of action. In accordance with the general brutality and rapacity of his nature, he turns the 
trades union movement into an organization for the exercise of physical violence. The resistance of 
those whose common sense has hitherto saved them from surrendering to the Jewish dictatorship is 
now broken down by terrorization. The success of that kind of activity is enormous. 

Parallel with this, .the political organization advances. It operates hand-in-hand with the trades union 
movement, inasmuch as the latter prepares the masses for the political organization and even forces 
them into it. This is also the source that provides the money which the political organization needs to 
keep its enormous apparatus in action. The trades union organization is the organ of control for the 
political activity of its members and whips in the masses for all great political demonstrations. In the 
end it ceases to struggle for economic interests but places its chief weapon, the refusal to continue 
work which takes the form of a general strike at the disposal of the political movement. 

By means of a Press whose contents are adapted to the level of the most ignorant readers, the political 
and trades union organizations are provided with an instrument which prepares the lowest stratum of 
the nation for a campaign of ruthless destruction. It is not considered part of the purpose of this Press 
to inspire its readers with ideals which might help them to lift their minds above the sordid conditions 
of their daily lives; but, on the contrary, it panders to their lowest instincts. Among the lazy-minded 
and self-seeking sections of the masses this kind of speculation turns out lucrative. 

It is this Press above all which carries on a fanatical campaign of calumny, strives to tear down 
everything that might be considered as a mainstay of national independence and to sabotage all 
cultural values as well as to destroy the autonomy of the national economic system. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (24 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:51] 


It aims its attack especially against all men of character who refuse to fall into line with the Jewish 
efforts to obtain control over the State or who appear dangerous to the Jews merely because of their 
superior intelligence. For in order to incur the enmity of the Jew it is not necessary to show any open 
hostility towards him. It is quite sufficient if one be considered capable of opposing the Jew some 
time in the future or using his abilities and character to enhance the power and position of a nation 
which the Jew finds hostile to himself. 

The Jewish instinct, which never fails where these problems have to be dealt with, readily discerns the 
true mentality of those whom the Jew meets in everyday life; and those who are not of a kindred spirit 
with him may be sure of being listed among his enemies. Since the Jew is not the object of aggression 
but the aggressor himself, he considers as his enemies not only those who attack him but also those 
who may be capable of resisting him. The means which he employs to break people of this kind, who 
may show themselves decent and upright, are not the open means generally used in honourable 
conflict, but falsehood and calumny. 

He will stop at nothing. His utterly low-down conduct is so appalling that one really cannot be 
surprised if in the imagination of our people the Jew is pictured as the incarnation of Satan and the 
symbol of evil. 

The ignorance of the broad masses as regards the inner character of the Jew, and the lack of instinct 
and insight that our upper classes display, are some of the reasons which explain how it is that so 
many people fall an easy prey to the systematic campaign of falsehood which the Jew carries on. 

While the upper classes, with their innate cowardliness, turn away from anyone whom the Jew thus 
attacks with lies and calumny, the common people are credulous of everything, whether because of 
their ignorance or their simple-mindedness. Government authorities wrap themselves up in a robe of 
silence, but more frequently they persecute the victims of Jewish attacks in order to stop the campaign 
in the Jewish Press. To the fatuous mind of the government official such a line of conduct appears to 
belong to the policy of upholding the authority of the State and preserving public order. Gradually the 
Marxist weapon in the hands of the Jew becomes a constant bogy to decent people. Sometimes the 
fear of it sticks in the brain or weighs upon them as a kind of nightmare. People begin to quail before 
this fearful foe and therewith become his victims. 

(k) The Jewish domination in the State seems now so fully assured that not only can he now afford to 
call himself a Jew once again, but he even acknowledges freely and openly what his ideas are on 
racial and political questions. A section of the Jews avows itself quite openly as an alien people, but 
even here there is another falsehood. When the Zionists try to make the rest of the world believe that 
the new national consciousness of the Jews will be satisfied by the establishment of a Jewish State in 
Palestine, the Jews thereby adopt another means to dupe the simple-minded Gentile. They have not 
the slightest intention of building up a Jewish State in Palestine so as to live in it. What they really are 
aiming at is to establish a central organization for their international swindling and cheating. As a 
sovereign State, this cannot be controlled by any of the other States. Therefore it can serve as a refuge 
for swindlers who have been found out and at the same time a high-school for the training of other 

As a sign of their growing presumption and sense of security, a certain section of them openly and 
impudently proclaim their Jewish nationality while another section hypocritically pretend that they are 
German, French or English as the case may be. Their blatant behaviour in their relations with other 
people shows how clearly they envisage their day of triumph in the near future. 

The black-haired Jewish youth lies in wait for hours on end, satanically glaring at and spying on the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf chapl 1 .htm (25 of 28) [04/06/2000 1 6:1 5:51 ] 


unsuspicious girl whom he plans to seduce, adulterating her blood and removing her from the bosom 
of her own people. The Jew uses every possible means to undermine the racial foundations of a 
subjugated people. In his systematic efforts to ruin girls and women he strives to break down the last 
barriers of discrimination between him and other peoples. The Jews were responsible for bringing 
negroes into the Rhineland, with the ultimate idea of bastardizing the white race which they hate and 
thus lowering its cultural and political level so that the Jew might dominate. For as long as a people 
remain racially pure and are conscious of the treasure of their blood, they can never be overcome by 
the Jew. Never in this world can the Jew become master of any people except a bastardized people. 

That is why the Jew systematically endeavours to lower the racial quality of a people by permanently 
adulterating the blood of the individuals who make up that people. 

In the field of politics he now begins to replace the idea of democracy by introducing the dictatorship 
of the proletariat. In the masses organized under the Marxist banners he has found a weapon which 
makes it possible for him to discard democracy, so as to subjugate and rule in a dictatorial fashion by 
the aid of brute force. He is systematically working in two ways to bring about this revolution. These 
ways are the economic and the political respectively. 

Aided by international influences, he forms a ring of enemies around those nations which have proved 
themselves too sturdy for him in withstanding attacks from within. He would like to force them into 
war and then, if it should be necessary to his plans, he will unfurl the banners of revolt even while the 
troops are actually fighting at the front. 

Economically he brings about the destruction of the State by a systematic method of sabotaging social 
enterprises until these become so costly that they are taken out of the hands of the State and then 
submitted to the control of Jewish finance. Politically he works to withdraw from the State its means 
of susbsistence, inasmuch as he undermines the foundations of national resistance and defence, 
destroys the confidence which the people have in their Government, reviles the past and its history 
and drags everything national down into the gutter. 

Culturally his activity consists in bowdlerizing art, literature and the theatre, holding the expressions 
of national sentiment up to scorn, overturning all concepts of the sublime and beautiful, the worthy 
and the good, finally dragging the people to the level of his own low mentality. 

Of religion he makes a mockery. Morality and decency are described as antiquated prejudices and 
thus a systematic attack is made to undermine those last foundations on which the national being must 
rest if the nation is to struggle for its existence in this world. 

(1) Now begins the great and final revolution. As soon as the Jew is in possession of political power he 
drops the last few veils which have hitherto helped to conceal his features. Out of the democratic Jew, 
the Jew of the People, arises the Jew of the Blood, the tyrant of the peoples. In the course of a few 
years he endeavours to exterminate all those who represent the national intelligence. And by thus 
depriving the peoples of their natural intellectual leaders he fits them for their fate as slaves under a 
lasting despotism. 

Russia furnishes the most terrible example of such a slavery. In that country the Jew killed or starved 
thirty millions of the people, in a bout of savage fanaticism and partly by the employment of inhuman 
torture. And he did this so that a gang of Jewish literati and financial bandits should dominate over a 
great people. 

But the final consequence is not merely that the people lose all their freedom under the domination of 
the Jews, but that in the end these parasites themselves disappear. The death of the victim is followed 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf chapl 1 .htm (26 of 28) [04/06/2000 1 6:1 5:51 ] 


sooner or later by that of the vampire. 

If we review all the causes which contributed to bring about the downfall of the German people we 
shall find that the most profound and decisive cause must be attributed to the lack of insight into the 
racial problem and especially in the failure to recognize the Jewish danger. 

It would have been easy enough to endure the defeats suffered on the battlefields in August 1918. 
They were nothing when compared with the military victories which our nation had achieved. Our 
downfall was not the result of those defeats; but we were overthrown by that force which had 
prepared those defeats by systematically operating for several decades to destroy those political 
instincts and that moral stamina which alone enable a people to struggle for its existence and 
therewith secure the right to exist. 

By neglecting the problem of preserving the racial foundations of our national life, the old Empire 
abrogated the sole right which entitles a people to live on this planet. Nations that make mongrels of 
their people, or allow their people to be turned into mongrels, sin against the Will of Eternal 
Providence. And thus their overthrow at the hands of a stronger opponent cannot be looked upon as a 
wrong but, on the contrary, as a restoration of justice. If a people refuses to guard and uphold the 
qualities with which it has been endowed by Nature and which have their roots in the racial blood, 
then such a people has no right to complain over the loss of its earthly existence. 

Everything on this earth can be made into something better. Every defeat may be made the foundation 
of a future victory. Every lost war may be the cause of a later resurgence. Every visitation of distress 
can give a new impetus to human energy. And out of every oppression those forces can develop which 
bring about a new re-birth of the national soul provided always that the racial blood is kept pure. 

But the loss of racial purity will wreck inner happiness for ever. It degrades men for all time to come. 
And the physical and moral consequences can never be wiped out. 

If this unique problem be studied and compared with the other problems of life we shall easily 
recognize how small is their importance in comparison with this. They are all limited to time; but the 
problem of the maintenance or loss of the purity of the racial blood will last as long as man himself 

All the symptoms of decline which manifested themselves already in pre-war times can be traced back 
to the racial problem. 

Whether one is dealing with questions of general law, or monstrous excrescences in economic life, of 
phenomena which point to a cultural decline or political degeneration, whether it be a question of 
defects in the school-system or of the evil influence which the Press exerts over the adult population 
always and everywhere these phenomena are at bottom caused by a lack of consideration for the 
interests of the race to which ones own nation belongs, or by the failure to recognize the danger that 
comes from allowing a foreign race to exist within the national body. 

That is why all attempts at reform, all institutions for social relief, all political striving, all economic 
progress and all apparent increase in the general stock of knowledge, were doomed to be unproductive 
of any significant results. The nation, as well as the organization which enables it to exist namely, 
the State were not developing in inner strength and stability, but, on the contrary, were visibly losing 
their vitality. The false brilliance of the Second Empire could not disguise the inner weakness. And 
every attempt to invigorate it anew failed because the main and most important problem was left out 
of consideration. 

It would be a mistake to think that the followers of the various political parties which tried to doctor 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap11.htm (27 of 28) [04/06/2000 16:15:51] 


the condition of the German people, or even all their leaders, were bad in themselves or meant wrong. 
Their activity even at best was doomed to fail, merely because of the fact that they saw nothing but 
the symptoms of our general malady and they tried to doctor the symptoms while they overlooked the 
real cause of the disease. If one makes a methodical study of the lines along which the old Empire 
developed one cannot help seeing, after a careful political analysis, that a process of inner 
degeneration had already set in even at the time when the united Empire was formed and the German 
nation began to make rapid external progress. The general situation was declining, in spite of the 
apparent political success and in spite of the increasing economic wealth. At the elections to the 
Reichstag the growing number of Marxist votes indicated that the internal breakdown and the political 
collapse were then rapidly approaching. All the victories of the so-called bourgeois parties were 
fruitless, not only because they could not prevent the numerical increase in the growing mass of 
Marxist votes, even when the bourgeois parties triumphed at the polls, but mainly because they 
themselves were already infected with the germs of decay. Though quite unaware of it, the bourgeois 
world was infected from within with the deadly virus of Marxist ideas. The fact that they sometimes 
openly resisted was to be explained by the competitive strife among ambitious political leaders, rather 
than by attributing it to any opposition in principle between adversaries who were determined to fight 
one another to the bitter end. During all those years only one protagonist was fighting with steadfast 
perseverance. This was the Jew. The Star of David steadily ascended as the will to national 
self-preservation declined. 

Therefore it was not a solid national phalanx that, of itself and out of its own feeling of solidarity, 
rushed to the battlefields in August 1914. But it was rather the manifestation of the last flicker from 
the instinct of national self-preservation against the progress of the paralysis with which the pacifist 
and Marxist doctrine threatened our people. Even in those days when the destinies of the nation were 
in the balance the internal enemy was not recognized; therefore all efforts to resist the external enemy 
were bound to be in vain. Providence did not grant the reward to the victorious sword, but followed 
the eternal law of retributive justice. A profound recognition of all this was the source of those 
principles and tendencies which inspire our new movement. We were convinced that only by 
recognizing such truths could we stop the national decline in Germany and lay a granite foundation on 
which the State could again be built up, a State which would not be a piece of mechanism alien to our 
people, constituted for economic purposes and interests, but an organism created from the soul of the 
people themselves. 


file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf chapl 1 .htm (28 of 28) [04/06/2000 1 6:1 5:51 ] 







Here at the close of the volume I shall describe the first stage in the progress of our movement and 
shall give a brief account of the problems we had to deal with during that period. In doing this I have 
no intention of expounding the ideals which we have set up as the goal of our movement; for these 
ideals are so momentous in their significance that an exposition of them will need a whole volume. 
Therefore I shall devote the second volume of this book to a detailed survey of the principles which 
form the programme of our movement and I shall attempt to draw a picture of what we mean by the 
word State. When I say we in this connection I mean to include all those hundreds of thousands 
who have fundamentally the same longing, though in the individual cases they cannot find adequate 
words to describe the vision that hovers before their eyes. It is a characteristic feature of all great 
reforms that in the beginning there is only one single protagonist to come forward on behalf of several 
millions of people. The final goal of a great reformation has often been the object of profound longing 
on the parts of hundreds of thousands for many centuries before, until finally one among them comes 
forward as a herald to announce the will of that multitude and become the standard-bearer of the old 
yearning, which he now leads to a realization in a new idea. 

The fact that millions of our people yearn at heart for a radical change in our present conditions is 
proved by the profound discontent which exists among them. This feeling is manifested in a thousand 
ways. Some express it in a form of discouragement and despair. Others show it in resentment and 
anger and indignation. Among some the profound discontent calls forth an attitude of indifference, 
while it urges others to violent manifestations of wrath. Another indication of this feeling may be seen 
on the one hand in the attitude of those who abstain from voting at elections and, on the other, in the 
large numbers of those who side with the fanatical extremists of the left wing. 

To these latter people our young movement had to appeal first of all. It was not meant to be an 
organization for contented and satisfied people, but was meant to gather in all those who were 
suffering from profound anxiety and could find no peace, those who were unhappy and discontented. 
It was not meant to float on the surface of the nation but rather to push its roots deep among the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (1 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:32] 


Looked at from the purely political point of view, the situation in 1918 was as follows: A nation had 
been torn into two parts. One part, which was by far the smaller of the two, contained the intellectual 
classes of the nation from which all those employed in physical labour were excluded. On the surface 
these intellectual classes appeared to be national-minded, but that word meant nothing else to them 
except a very vague and feeble concept of the duty to defend what they called the interests of the 
State, which in turn seemed identical with those of the dynastic regime. This class tried to defend its 
ideas and reach its aims by carrying on the fight with the aid of intellectual weapons, which could be 
used only here and there and which had only a superficial effect against the brutal measures employed 
by the adversaries, in the face of which the intellectual weapons were of their very nature bound to 
fail. With one violent blow the class which had hitherto governed was now struck down. It trembled 
with fear and accepted every humiliation imposed on it by the merciless victor. 

Over against this class stood the broad masses of manual labourers who were organized in movements 
with a more or less radically Marxist tendency. These organized masses were firmly determined to 
break any kind of intellectual resistance by the use of brute force. They had no nationalist tendencies 
whatsoever and deliberately repudiated the idea of advancing the interests of the nation as such. On 
the contrary, they promoted the interests of the foreign oppressor. Numerically this class embraced the 
majority of the population and, what is more important, included all those elements of the nation 
without whose collaboration a national resurgence was not only a practical impossibility but was even 

For already in 1918 one thing had to be clearly recognized; namely, that no resurgence of the German 
nation could take place until we had first restored our national strength to face the outside world. For 
this purpose arms are not the preliminary necessity, though our bourgeois statesmen always 
blathered about it being so; what was wanted was will-power. At one time the German people had 
more than sufficient military armament. And yet they were not able to defend their liberty because 
they lacked those energies which spring from the instinct of national self-preservation and the will to 
hold on to ones own. The best armament is only dead and worthless material as long as the spirit is 
wanting which makes men willing and determined to avail themselves of such weapons. Germany 
was rendered defenceless not because she lacked arms, but because she lacked the will to keep her 
arms for the maintenance of her people. 

To-day our Left-wing politicians in particular are constantly insisting that their craven-hearted and 
obsequious foreign policy necessarily results from the disarmament of Germany, whereas the truth is 
that this is the policy of traitors. To all that kind of talk the answer ought to be: No, the contrary is the 
truth. Your action in delivering up the arms was dictated by your anti-national and criminal policy of 
abandoning the interests of the nation. And now you try to make people believe that your miserable 
whining is fundamentally due to the fact that you have no arms. Just like everything else in your 
conduct, this is a lie and a falsification of the true reason. 

But the politicians of the Right deserve exactly the same reproach. It was through their miserable 
cowardice that those ruffians of Jews who came into power in 1918 were able to rob the nation of its 
arms. The conservative politicians have neither right nor reason on their side when they appeal to 
disarmament as the cause which compelled them to adopt a policy of prudence (that is to say, 
cowardice). Here, again, the contrary is the truth. Disarmament is the result of their lack of spirit. 

Therefore the problem of restoring Germanys power is not a question of how can we manufacture 
arms but rather a question of how we can produce that spirit which enables a people to bear arms. 
Once this spirit prevails among a people then it will find a thousand ways, each of which leads to the 
necessary armament. But a coward will not fire even a single shot when attacked though he may be 
armed with ten pistols. For him they are of less value than a blackthorn in the hands of a man of 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (2 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 



The problem of re-establishing the political power of our nation is first of all a problem of restoring 
the instinct of national self-preservation for if no other reason than that every preparatory step in 
foreign policy and every foreign judgment on the worth of a State has been proved by experience to 
be grounded not on the material size of the armament such a State may possess but rather on the moral 
capacity for resistance which such a State has or is believed to have. The question whether or not a 
nation be desirable as an ally is not so much determined by the inert mass of arms which it has at hand 
but by the obvious presence of a sturdy will to national self-preservation and a heroic courage which 
will fight through to the last breath. For an alliance is not made between arms but between men. 

The British nation will therefore be considered as the most valuable ally in the world as long as it can 
be counted upon to show that brutality and tenacity in its government, as well as in the spirit of the 
broad masses, which enables it to carry through to victory any struggle that it once enters upon, no 
matter how long such a struggle may last, or however great the sacrifice that may be necessary or 
whatever the means that have to be employed; and all this even though the actual military equipment 
at hand may be utterly inadequate when compared with that of other nations. 

Once it is understood that the restoration of Germany is a question of reawakening the will to political 
self-preservation we shall see quite clearly that it will not be enough to win over those elements that 
are already national-minded but that the deliberately anti-national masses must be converted to 
believe in the national ideals. 

A young movement that aims at re-establishing a German State with full sovereign powers will 
therefore have to make the task of winning over the broad masses a special objective of its plan of 
campaign. Our so-called national bourgeoisie are so lamentably supine, generally speaking, and their 
national spirit appears so feckless, that we may feel sure they will offer no serious resistance against a 
vigorous national foreign or domestic policy. Even though the narrow-minded German bourgeoisie 
should keep up a passive resistance when the hour of deliverance is at hand, as they did in Bismarcks 
time, we shall never have to fear any active resistance on their part, because of their recognized 
proverbial cowardice. 

It is quite different with the masses of our population, who are imbued with ideas of internationalism. 
Through the primitive roughness of their natures they are disposed to accept the preaching of 
violence, while at the same time their Jewish leaders are more brutal and ruthless. They will crush any 
attempt at a German revival, just as they smashed the German Army by striking at it from the rear. 
Above all, these organized masses will use their numerical majority in this Parliamentarian State not 
only to hinder any national foreign policy, but also to prevent Germany from restoring her political 
power and therewith her prestige abroad. Thus she becomes excluded from the ranks of desirable 
allies. For it is not we ourselves alone who are aware of the handicap that results from the existence of 
fifteen million Marxists, democrats, pacifists and followers of the Centre, in our midst, but foreign 
nations also recognize this internal burden which we have to bear and take it into their calculations 
when estimating the value of a possible alliance with us. Nobody would wish to form an alliance with 
a State where the active portion of the population is at least passively opposed to any resolute foreign 

The situation is made still worse by reason of the fact that the leaders of those parties which were 
responsible for the national betrayal are ready to oppose any and every attempt at a revival, simply 
because they want to retain the positions they now hold. According to the laws that govern human 
history it is inconceivable that the German people could resume the place they formerly held without 
retaliating on those who were both cause and occasion of the collapse that involved the ruin of our 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (3 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


State. Before the judgment seat of posterity November 1918 will not be regarded as a simple rebellion 
but as high treason against the country. 

Therefore it is not possible to think of re-establishing German sovereignty and political independence 
without at the same time reconstructing a united front within the nation, by a peaceful conversion of 
the popular will. 

Looked at from the standpoint of practical ways and means, it seems absurd to think of liberating 
Germany from foreign bondage as long as the masses of the people are not willing to support such an 
ideal of freedom. After carefully considering this problem from the purely military point of view, 
everybody, and in particular every officer, will agree that a war cannot be waged against an outside 
enemy by battalions of students; but that, together with the brains of the nation, the physical strength 
of the nation is also necessary. Furthermore it must be remembered that the nation would be robbed of 
its irreplaceable assets by a national defence in which only the intellectual circles, as they are called, 
were engaged. The young German intellectuals who joined the volunteer regiments and fell on the 
battlefields of Flanders in the autumn of 1914 were bitterly missed later on. They were the dearest 
treasure which the nation possessed and their loss could not be made good in the course of the war. 
And it is not only the struggle itself which could not be waged if the working masses of the nation did 
not join the storm battalions, but the necessary technical preparations could not be made without a 
unified will and a common front within the nation itself. Our nation which has to exist disarmed, 
under the thousand eyes appointed by the Versailles Peace Treaty, cannot make any technical 
preparations for the recovery of its freedom and human independence until the whole army of spies 
employed within the country is cut down to those few whose inborn baseness would lead them to 
betray anything and everything for the proverbial thirty pieces of silver. But we can deal with such 
people. The millions, however, who are opposed to every kind of national revival simply because of 
their political opinions, constitute an insurmountable obstacle. At least the obstacle will remain 
insurmountable as long as the cause of their opposition, which is international Marxism, is not 
overcome and its teachings banished from both their hearts and heads. 

From whatever point of view we may examine the possibility of recovering our independence as a 
State and a people, whether we consider the problem from the standpoint of technical rearmament or 
from that of the actual struggle itself, the necessary pre-requisite always remains the same. This 
pre-requisite is that the broad masses of the people must first be won over to accept the principle of 
our national independence. 

If we do not regain our external freedom every step forward in domestic reform will at best be an 
augmentation of our productive powers for the benefit of those nations that look upon us as a colony 
to be exploited. The surplus produced by any so-called improvement would only go into the hands of 
our international controllers and any social betterment would at best increase the product of our labour 
in favour of those people. No cultural progress can be made by the German nation, because such 
progress is too much bound up with the political independence and dignity of a people. 

Therefore, as we can find a satisfactory solution for the problem of Germanys future only by winning 
over the broad masses of our people for the support of the national idea, this work of education must 
be considered the highest and most important task to be accomplished by a movement which does not 
strive merely to satisfy the needs of the moment but considers itself bound to examine in the light of 
future results everything it decides to do or refrain from doing. 

As early as 1919 we were convinced that the nationalization of the masses would have to constitute 
the first and paramount aim of the new movement. From the tactical standpoint, this decision laid a 
certain number of obligations on our shoulders. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (4 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


(1) No social sacrifice could be considered too great in this effort to win over the masses for the 
national revival. 

In the field of national economics, whatever concessions are granted to-day to the employees are 
negligible when compared with the benefit to be reaped by the whole nation if such concessions 
contribute to bring back the masses of the people once more to the bosom of their own nation. 
Nothing but meanness and shortsightedness, which are characteristics that unfortunately are only too 
prevalent among our employers, could prevent people from recognizing that in the long run no 
economic improvement and therefore no rise in profits are possible unless internal solidarity be 
restored among the bulk of the people who make up our nation. 

If the German trades unions had defended the interests of the working-classes uncompromisingly 
during the War; if even during the War they had used the weapon of the strike to force the 
industrialists who were greedy for higher dividends to grant the demands of the workers for whom 
the unions acted; if at the same time they had stood up as good Germans for the defence of the nation 
as stoutly as for their own claims, and if they had given to their country what was their countrys due 
then the War would never have been lost. How ludicrously insignificant would all, and even the 
greatest, economic concession have been in face of the tremendous importance of such a victory. 

For a movement which would restore the German worker to the German people it is therefore 
absolutely necessary to understand clearly that economic sacrifices must be considered light in such 
cases, provided of course that they do not go the length of endangering the independence and stability 
of the national economic system. 

(2) The education of the masses along national lines can be carried out only indirectly, by improving 
their social conditions; for only by such a process can the economic conditions be created which 
enable everybody to share in the cultural life of the nation. 

(3) The nationalization of the broad masses can never be achieved by half-measures that is to say, by 
feebly insisting on what is called the objective side of the question but only by a ruthless and devoted 
insistence on the one aim which must be achieved. This means that a people cannot be made national 
according to the signification attached to that word by our bourgeois class to-day that is to say, 
nationalism with many reservations but national in the vehement and extreme sense. Poison can be 
overcome only by a counter-poison, and only the supine bourgeois mind could think that the Kingdom 
of Heaven can be attained by a compromise. 

The broad masses of a nation are not made up of professors and diplomats. Since these masses have 
only a poor acquaintance with abstract ideas, their reactions lie more in the domain of the feelings, 
where the roots of their positive as well as their negative attitudes are implanted. They are susceptible 
only to a manifestation of strength which comes definitely either from the positive or negative side, 
but they are never susceptible to any half-hearted attitude that wavers between one pole and the other. 
The emotional grounds of their attitude furnish the reason for their extraordinary stability. It is always 
more difficult to fight successfully against Faith than against knowledge. Love is less subject to 
change than respect. Hatred is more lasting than mere aversion. And the driving force which has 
brought about the most tremendous revolutions on this earth has never been a body of scientific 
teaching which has gained power over the masses, but always a devotion which has inspired them, 
and often a kind of hysteria which has urged them to action. 

Whoever wishes to win over the masses must know the key that will open the door to their hearts. It is 
not objectivity, which is a feckless attitude, but a determined will, backed up by force, when 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (5 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


(4) The soul of the masses can be won only if those who lead the movement for that purpose are 
determined not merely to carry through the positive struggle for their own aims but are also 
determined to destroy the enemy that opposes them. 

When they see an uncompromising onslaught against an adversary the people have at all times taken 
this as a proof that right is on the side of the active aggressor; but if the aggressor should go only 
half-way and fail to push home his success by driving his opponent entirely from the scene of action, 
the people will look upon this as a sign that the aggressor is uncertain of the justice of his own cause 
and his half-way policy may even be an acknowledgment that his cause is unjust. 

The masses are but a part of Nature herself. Their feeling is such that they cannot understand mutual 
hand-shakings between men who are declared enemies. Their wish is to see the stronger side win and 
the weaker wiped out or subjected unconditionally to the will of the stronger. 

The nationalization of the masses can be successfully achieved only if, in the positive struggle to win 
the soul of the people, those who spread the international poison among them are exterminated. 

(5) All the great problems of our time are problems of the moment and are only the results of certain 
definite causes. And among all those there is only one that has a profoundly causal significance. This 
is the problem of preserving the pure racial stock among the people. Human vigour or decline depends 
on the blood. Nations that are not aware of the importance of their racial stock, or which neglect to 
preserve it, are like men who would try to educate the pug-dog to do the work of the greyhound, not 
understanding that neither the speed of the greyhound nor the imitative faculties of the poodle are 
inborn qualities which cannot be drilled into the one or the other by any form of training. A people 
that fails to preserve the purity of its racial blood thereby destroys the unity of the soul of the nation in 
all its manifestations. A disintegrated national character is the inevitable consequence of a process of 
disintegration in the blood. And the change which takes place in the spiritual and creative faculties of 
a people is only an effect of the change that has modified its racial substance. 

If we are to free the German people from all those failings and ways of acting which do not spring 
from their original character, we must first get rid of those foreign germs in the national body which 
are the cause of its failings and false ways. 

The German nation will never revive unless the racial problem is taken into account and dealt with. 
The racial problem furnishes the key not only to the understanding of human history but also to the 
understanding of every kind of human culture. 

(6) By incorporating in the national community the masses of our people who are now in the 
international camp we do not thereby mean to renounce the principle that the interests of the various 
trades and professions must be safeguarded. Divergent interests in the various branches of labour and 
in the trades and professions are not the same as a division between the various classes, but rather a 
feature inherent in the economic situation. Vocational grouping does not clash in the least with the 
idea of a national community, for this means national unity in regard to all those problems that affect 
the life of the nation as such. 

To incorporate in the national community, or simply the State, a stratum of the people which has now 
formed a social class the standing of the higher classes must not be lowered but that of the lower 
classes must be raised. The class which carries through this process is never the higher class but rather 
the lower one which is fighting for equality of rights. The bourgeoisie of to-day was not incorporated 
in the State through measures enacted by the feudal nobility but only through its own energy and a 
leadership that had sprung from its own ranks. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (6 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


The German worker cannot be raised from his present standing and incorporated in the German 
folk-community by means of goody-goody meetings where people talk about the brotherhood of the 
people, but rather by a systematic improvement in the social and cultural life of the worker until the 
yawning abyss between him and the other classes can be filled in. A movement which has this for its 
aim must try to recruit its followers mainly from the ranks of the working class. It must include 
members of the intellectual classes only in so far as such members have rightly understood and 
accepted without reserve the ideal towards which the movement is striving. This process of 
transformation and reunion cannot be completed within ten or twenty years. It will take several 
generations, as the history of such movements has shown. 

The most difficult obstacle to the reunion of our contemporary worker in the national folk-community 
does not consist so much in the fact that he fights for the interests of his fellow-workers, but rather in 
the international ideas with which he is imbued and which are of their nature at variance with the 
ideas of nationhood and fatherland. This hostile attitude to nation and fatherland has been inculcated 
by the leaders of the working class. If they were inspired by the principle of devotion to the nation in 
all that concerns its political and social welfare, the trades unions would make those millions of 
workers most valuable members of the national community, without thereby affecting their own 
constant struggle for their economic demands. 

A movement which sincerely endeavours to bring the German worker back into his folk-community, 
and rescue him from the folly of internationalism, must wage a vigorous campaign against certain 
notions that are prevalent among the industrialists. One of these notions is that according to the 
concept of the folk-community, the employee is obliged to surrender all his economic rights to the 
employer and, further, that the workers would come into conflict with the folk-community if they 
should attempt to defend their own just and vital interests. Those who try to propagate such a notion 
are deliberate liars. The idea of a folk-community does not impose any obligations on the one side that 
are not imposed on the other. 

A worker certainly does something which is contrary to the spirit of folk-community if he acts entirely 
on his own initiative and puts forward exaggerated demands without taking the common good into 
consideration or the maintenance of the national economic structure. But an industrialist also acts 
against the spirit of the folk-community if he adopts inhuman methods of exploitation and misuses the 
working forces of the nation to make millions unjustly for himself from the sweat of the workers. He 
has no right to call himself national and no right to talk of a folk-community, for he is only an 
unscrupulous egoist who sows the seeds of social discontent and provokes a spirit of conflict which 
sooner or later must be injurious to the interests of the country. 

The reservoir from which the young movement has to draw its members will first of all be the 
working masses. Those masses must be delivered from the clutches of the international mania. Their 
social distress must be eliminated. They must be raised above their present cultural level, which is 
deplorable, and transformed into a resolute and valuable factor in the folk-community, inspired by 
national ideas and national sentiment. 

If among those intellectual circles that are nationalist in their outlook men can be found who 
genuinely love the people and look forward eagerly to the future of Germany, and at the same time 
have a sound grasp of the importance of a struggle whose aim is to win over the soul of the masses, 
such men are cordially welcomed in the ranks of our movement, because they can serve as a valuable 
intellectual force in the work that has to be done. But this movement can never aim at recruiting its 
membership from the unthinking herd of bourgeois voters. If it did so the movement would be 
burdened with a mass of people whose whole mentality would only help to paralyse the effort of our 
campaign to win the mass of the people. In theory it may be very fine to say that the broad masses 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (7 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


ought to be influenced by a combined leadership of the upper and lower social strata within the 
framework of the one movement; but, notwithstanding all this, the fact remains that though it may be 
possible to exercise a psychological influence on the bourgeois classes and to arouse some enthusiasm 
or even awaken some understanding among them by our public demonstrations, their traditional 
characteristics cannot be changed. In other words, we could not eliminate from the bourgeois classes 
the inefficiency and supineness which are part of a tradition that has developed through centuries. The 
difference between the cultural levels of the two groups and between their respective attitudes towards 
social-economic questions is still so great that it would turn out a hindrance to the movement the 
moment the first enthusiasm aroused by our demonstrations calmed down. 

Finally, it is not part of our programme to transform the nationalist camp itself, but rather to win over 
those who are anti-national in their outlook. It is from this viewpoint that the strategy of the whole 
movement must finally be decided. 

(7) This one-sided but accordingly clear and definite attitude must be manifested in the propaganda of 
the movement; and, on the other hand, this is absolutely necessary to make the propaganda itself 

If propaganda is to be of service to the movement it must be addressed to one side alone; for if it 
should vary the direction of its appeal it will not be understood in the one camp or may be rejected by 
the other, as merely insisting on obvious and uninteresting truisms; for the intellectual training of the 
two camps that come into question here has been very different. 

Even the manner in which something is presented and the tone in which particular details are 
emphasized cannot have the same effect in those two strata that belong respectively to the opposite 
extremes of the social structure. If the propaganda should refrain from using primitive forms of 
expression it will not appeal to the sentiments of the masses. If, on the other hand, it conforms to the 
crude sentiments of the masses in its words and gestures the intellectual circles will be averse to it 
because of its roughness and vulgarity. Among a hundred men who call themselves orators there are 
scarcely ten who are capable of speaking with effect before an audience of street-sweepers, locksmiths 
and navvies, etc., to-day and expound the same subject with equal effect to-morrow before an 
audience of university professors and students. Among a thousand public speakers there may be only 
one who can speak before a composite audience of locksmiths and professors in the same hall in such 
a way that his statements can be fully comprehended by each group while at the same time he 
effectively influences both and awakens enthusiasm, on the one side as well as on the other, to hearty 
applause. But it must be remembered that in most cases even the most beautiful idea embodied in a 
sublime theory can be brought home to the public only through the medium of smaller minds. The 
thing that matters here is not the vision of the man of genius who created the great idea but rather the 
success which his apostles achieve in shaping the expression of this idea so as to bring it home to the 
minds of the masses. 

Social-Democracy and the whole Marxist movement were particularly qualified to attract the great 
masses of the nation, because of the uniformity of the public to which they addressed their appeal. 
The more limited and narrow their ideas and arguments, the easier it was for the masses to grasp and 
assimilate them; for those ideas and arguments were well adapted to a low level of intelligence. 

These considerations led the new movement to adopt a clear and simple line of policy, which was as 

In its message as well as in its forms of expression the propaganda must be kept on a level with the 
intelligence of the masses, and its value must be measured only by the actual success it achieves. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (8 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


At a public meeting where the great masses are gathered together the best speaker is not he whose 
way of approaching a subject is most akin to the spirit of those intellectuals who may happen to be 
present, but the speaker who knows how to win the hearts of the masses. 

An educated man who is present and who finds fault with an address because he considers it to be on 
an intellectual plane that is too low, though he himself has witnessed its effect on the lower 
intellectual groups whose adherence has to be won, only shows himself completely incapable of 
rightly judging the situation and therewith proves that he can be of no use in the new movement. Only 
intellectuals can be of use to a movement who understand its mission and its aims so well that they 
have learned to judge our methods of propaganda exclusively by the success obtained and never by 
the impression which those methods made on the intellectuals themselves. For our propaganda is not 
meant to serve as an entertainment for those people who already have a nationalist outlook, but its 
purpose is to win the adhesion of those who have hitherto been hostile to national ideas and who are 
nevertheless of our own blood and race. 

In general, those considerations of which I have given a brief summary in the chapter on War 
Propaganda became the guiding rules and principles which determined the kind of propaganda we 
were to adopt in our campaign and the manner in which we were to put it into practice. The success 
that has been obtained proves that our decision was right. 

(8) The ends which any political reform movement sets out to attain can never be reached by trying to 
educate the public or influence those in power but only by getting political power into its hands. Every 
idea that is meant to move the world has not only the right but also the obligation of securing control 
of those means which will enable the idea to be carried into effect. In this world success is the only 
rule of judgment whereby we can decide whether such an undertaking was right or wrong. And by the 
word success in this connection I do not mean such a success as the mere conquest of power in 1918 
but the successful issue whereby the common interests of the nation have been served. A coup detat 
cannot be considered successful if, as many empty-headed government lawyers in Germany now 
believe, the revolutionaries succeeded in getting control of the State into their hands but only if, in 
comparison with the state of affairs under the old regime, the lot of the nation has been improved 
when the aims and intentions on which the revolution was based have been put into practice. This 
certainly does not apply to the German Revolution, as that movement was called, which brought a 
gang of bandits into power in the autumn of 1918. 

But if the conquest of political power be a requisite preliminary for the practical realization of the 
ideals that inspire a reform movement, then any movement which aims at reform must, from the very 
first day of its activity, be considered by its leaders as a movement of the masses and not as a literary 
tea club or an association of philistines who meet to play ninepins. 

(9) The nature and internal organization of the new movement make it anti-parliamentarian. That is to 
say, it rejects in general and in its own structure all those principles according to which decisions are 
to be taken on the vote of the majority and according to which the leader is only the executor of the 
will and opinion of others. The movement lays down the principle that, in the smallest as well as in 
the greatest problems, one person must have absolute authority and bear all responsibility. 

In our movement the practical consequences of this principle are the following: 

The president of a large group is appointed by the head of the group immediately above his in 
authority. He is then the responsible leader of his group. All the committees are subject to his 
authority and not he to theirs. There is no such thing as committees that vote but only committees that 
work. This work is allotted by the responsible leader, who is the president of the group. The same 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (9 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


principle applies to the higher organizations the Bezirk (district), the Kreis (urban circuit) and the 
Gau (the region). In each case the president is appointed from above and is invested with full authority 
and executive power. Only the leader of the whole party is elected at the general meeting of the 
members. But he is the sole leader of the movement. All the committees are responsible to him, but he 
is not responsible to the committees. His decision is final, but he bears the whole responsibility of it. 
The members of the movement are entitled to call him to account by means of a new election, or to 
remove him from office if he has violated the principles of the movement or has not served its 
interests adequately. He is then replaced by a more capable man. who is invested with the same 
authority and obliged to bear the same responsibility. 

One of the highest duties of the movement is to make this principle imperative not only within its own 
ranks but also for the whole State. 

The man who becomes leader is invested with the highest and unlimited authority, but he also has to 
bear the last and gravest responsibility. 

The man who has not the courage to shoulder responsibility for his actions is not fitted to be a leader. 
Only a man of heroic mould can have the vocation for such a task. 

Human progress and human cultures are not founded by the multitude. They are exclusively the work 
of personal genius and personal efficiency. 

Because of this principle, our movement must necessarily be anti-parliamentarian, and if it takes part 
in the parliamentary institution it is only for the purpose of destroying this institution from within; in 
other words, we wish to do away with an institution which we must look upon as one of the gravest 
symptoms of human decline. 

(10) The movement steadfastly refuses to take up any stand in regard to those problems which are 
either outside of its sphere of political work or seem to have no fundamental importance for us. It does 
not aim at bringing about a religious reformation, but rather a political reorganization of our people. It 
looks upon the two religious denominations as equally valuable mainstays for the existence of our 
people, and therefore it makes war on all those parties which would degrade this foundation, on which 
the religious and moral stability of our people is based, to an instrument in the service of party 

Finally, the movement does not aim at establishing any one form of State or trying to destroy another, 
but rather to make those fundamental principles prevail without which no republic and no monarchy 
can exist for any length of time. The movement does not consider its mission to be the establishment 
of a monarchy or the preservation of the Republic but rather to create a German State. 

The problem concerning the outer form of this State, that is to say, its final shape, is not of 
fundamental importance. It is a problem which must be solved in the light of what seems practical and 
opportune at the moment. 

Once a nation has understood and appreciated the great problems that affect its inner existence, the 
question of outer formalities will never lead to any internal conflict. 

(11) The problem of the inner organization of the movement is not one of principle but of expediency. 

The best kind of organization is not that which places a large intermediary apparatus between the 
leadership of the movement and the individual followers but rather that which works successfully with 
the smallest possible intermediary apparatus. For it is the task of such an organization to transmit a 
certain idea which originated in the brain of one individual to a multitude of people and to supervise 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (10 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


the manner in which this idea is being put into practice. 

Therefore, from any and every viewpoint, the organization is only a necessary evil. At best it is only a 
means of reaching certain ends. The worst happens when it becomes an end in itself. 

Since the world produces more mechanical than intelligent beings, it will always be easier to develop 
the form of an organization than its substance; that is to say, the ideas which it is meant to serve. 

The march of any idea which strives towards practical fulfilment, and in particular those ideas which 
are of a reformatory character, may be roughly sketched as follows: 

A creative idea takes shape in the mind of somebody who thereupon feels himself called upon to 
transmit this idea to the world. He propounds his faith before others and thereby gradually wins a 
certain number of followers. This direct and personal way of promulgating ones ideas among ones 
contemporaries is the most natural and the most ideal. But as the movement develops and secures a 
large number of followers it gradually becomes impossible for the original founder of the doctrine on 
which the movement is based to carry on his propaganda personally among his innumerable followers 
and at the same time guide the course of the movement. 

According as the community of followers increases, direct communication between the head and the 
individual followers becomes impossible. This intercourse must then take place through an 
intermediary apparatus introduced into the framework of the movement. Thus ideal conditions of 
inter-communication cease, and organization has to be introduced as a necessary evil. Small 
subsidiary groups come into existence, as in the political movement, for example, where the local 
groups represent the germ-cells out of which the organization develops later on. 

But such sub-divisions must not be introduced into the movement until the authority of the spiritual 
founder and of the school he has created are accepted without reservation. Otherwise the movement 
would run the risk of becoming split up by divergent doctrines. In this connection too much emphasis 
cannot be laid on the importance of having one geographic centre as the chief seat of the movement. 
Only the existence of such a seat or centre, around which a magic charm such as that of Mecca or 
Rome is woven, can supply a movement with that permanent driving force which has its sources in 
the internal unity of the movement and the recognition of one head as representing this unity. 

When the first germinal cells of the organization are being formed care must always be taken to insist 
on the importance of the place where the idea originated. The creative, moral and practical greatness 
of the place whence the movement went forth and from which it is governed must be exalted to a 
supreme symbol, and this must be honoured all the more according as the original cells of the 
movement become so numerous that they have to be regrouped into larger units in the structure of the 

When the number of individual followers became so large that direct personal contact with the head of 
the movement was out of the question, then we had to form those first local groups. As those groups 
multiplied to an extraordinary number it was necessary to establish higher cadres into which the local 
groups were distributed. Examples of such cadres in the political organization are those of the region 
(Gau) and the district (Bezirk). 

Though it may be easy enough to maintain the original central authority over the lowest groups, it is 
much more difficult to do so in relation to the higher units of organization which have now developed. 
And yet we must succeed in doing this, for this is an indispensable condition if the unity of the 
movement is to be guaranteed and the idea of it carried into effect. 

Finally, when those larger intermediary organizations have to be combined in new and still higher 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (11 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


units it becomes increasingly difficult to maintain over them the absolute supremacy of the original 
seat of the movement and the school attached to it. 

Consequently the mechanical forms of an organization must only be introduced if and in so far as the 
spiritual authority and the ideals of the central seat of the organization are shown to be firmly 
established. In the political sphere it may often happen that this supremacy can be maintained only 
when the movement has taken over supreme political control of the nation. 

Having taken all these considerations into account, the following principles were laid down for the 
inner structure of the movement: 

(a) That at the beginning all activity should be concentrated in one town: namely, Munich. That a 
band of absolutely reliable followers should be trained and a school founded which would 
subsequently help to propagate the idea of the movement. That the prestige of the movement, for the 
sake of its subsequent extension, should first be established here through gaining as many successful 
and visible results as possible in this one place. To secure name and fame for the movement and its 
leader it was necessary, not only to give in this one town a striking example to shatter the belief that 
the Marxist doctrine was invincible but also to show that a counter-doctrine was possible. 

(b) That local groups should not be established before the supremacy of the central authority in 
Munich was definitely established and acknowledged. 

(c) That District, Regional, and Provincial groups should be formed only after the need for them has 
become evident and only after the supremacy of the central authority has been satisfactorily 

Further, that the creation of subordinate organisms must depend on whether or not those persons can 
be found who are qualified to undertake the leadership of them. 

Here there were only two solutions: 

(a) That the movement should acquire the necessary funds to attract and train intelligent people who 
would be capable of becoming leaders. The personnel thus obtained could then be systematically 
employed according as the tactical situation and the necessity for efficiency demanded. 

This solution was the easier and the more expedite. But it demanded large financial resources; for this 
group of leaders could work in the movement only if they could be paid a salary. 

(b) Because the movement is not in a position to employ paid officials it must begin by depending on 
honorary helpers. Naturally this solution is slower and more difficult. 

It means that the leaders of the movement have to allow vast territories to lie fallow unless in these 
respective districts one of the members comes forward who is capable and willing to place himself at 
the service of the central authority for the purpose of organizing and directing the movement in the 
region concerned. 

It may happen that in extensive regions no such leader can be found, but that at the same time in other 
regions two or three or even more persons appear whose capabilities are almost on a level. The 
difficulty which this situation involves is very great and can be overcome only with the passing of the 

For the establishment of any branch of the organization the decisive condition must always be that a 
person can be found who is capable of fulfilling the functions of a leader. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (12 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


Just as the army and all its various units of organization are useless if there are no officers, so any 
political organization is worthless if it has not the right kind of leaders. 

If an inspiring personality who has the gift of leadership cannot be found for the organization and 
direction of a local group it is better for the movement to refrain from establishing such a group than 
to run the risk of failure after the group has been founded. 

The will to be a leader is not a sufficient qualification for leadership. For the leader must have the 
other necessary qualities. Among these qualities will-power and energy must be considered as more 
serviceable than the intellect of a genius. The most valuable association of qualities is to be found in a 
combination of talent, determination and perseverance. 

(12) The future of a movement is determined by the devotion, and even intolerance, with which its 
members fight for their cause. They must feel convinced that their cause alone is just, and they must 
carry it through to success, as against other similar organizations in the same field. 

It is quite erroneous to believe that the strength of a movement must increase if it be combined with 
other movements of a similar kind. Any expansion resulting from such a combination will of course 
mean an increase in external development, which superficial observers might consider as also an 
increase of power; but in reality the movement thus admits outside elements which will subsequently 
weaken its constitutional vigour. 

Though it may be said that one movement is identical in character with another, in reality no such 
identity exists. If it did exist then practically there would not be two movements but only one. And 
whatever the difference may be, even if it consist only of the measure in which the capabilities of the 
one set of leaders differ from those of the other, there it is. It is against the natural law of all 
development to couple dissimilar organisms,or the law is that the stronger must overcome the weaker 
and, through the struggle necessary for such a conquest, increase the constitutional vigour and 
effective strength of the victor. 

By amalgamating political organizations that are approximately alike, certain immediate advantages 
may be gained, but advantages thus gained are bound in the long run to become the cause of internal 
weaknesses which will make their appearance later on. 

A movement can become great only if the unhampered development of its internal strength be 
safeguarded and steadfastly augmented, until victory over all its competitors be secured. 

One may safely say that the strength of a movement and its right to existence can be developed only 
as long as it remains true to the principle that struggle is a necessary condition of its progress and that 
its maximum strength will be reached only as soon as complete victory has been won. 

Therefore a movement must not strive to obtain successes that will be only immediate and transitory, 
but it must show a spirit of uncompromising perseverance in carrying through a long struggle which 
will secure for it a long period of inner growth. 

All those movements which owe their expansion to a so-called combination of similar organisms, 
which means that their external strength is due to a policy of compromise, are like plants whose 
growth is forced in a hothouse. They shoot up externally but they lack that inner strength which 
enables the natural plant to grow into a tree that will withstand the storms of centuries. 

The greatness of every powerful organization which embodies a creative idea lies in the spirit of 
religious devotion and intolerance with which it stands out against all others, because it has an ardent 
faith in its own right. If an idea is right in itself and, furnished with the fighting weapons I have 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (13 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


mentioned, wages war on this earth, then it is invincible and persecution will only add to its internal 

The greatness of Christianity did not arise from attempts to make compromises with those 
philosophical opinions of the ancient world which had some resemblance to its own doctrine, but in 
the unrelenting and fanatical proclamation and defence of its own teaching. 

The apparent advance that a movement makes by associating itself with other movements will be 
easily reached and surpassed by the steady increase of strength which a doctrine and its organization 
acquires if it remains independent and fights its own cause alone. 

(13) The movement ought to educate its adherents to the principle that struggle must not be 
considered a necessary evil but as something to be desired in itself. Therefore they must not be afraid 
of the hostility which their adversaries manifest towards them but they must take it as a necessary 
condition on which their whole right to existence is based. They must not try to avoid being hated by 
those who are the enemies of our people and our philosophy of life, but must welcome such hatred. 
Lies and calumnies are part of the method which the enemy employs to express his chagrin. 

The man who is not opposed and vilified and slandered in the Jewish Press is not a staunch German 
and not a true National Socialist. The best rule whereby the sincerity of his convictions, his character 
and strength of will, can be measured is the hostility which his name arouses among the mortal 
enemies of our people. 

The followers of the movement, and indeed the whole nation, must be reminded again and again of 
the fact that, through the medium of his newspapers, the Jew is always spreading falsehood and that if 
he tells the truth on some occasions it is only for the purpose of masking some greater deceit, which 
turns the apparent truth into a deliberate falsehood. The Jew is the Great Master of Lies. Falsehood 
and duplicity are the weapons with which he fights. 

Every calumny and falsehood published by the Jews are tokens of honour which can be worn by our 
comrades. He whom they decry most is nearest to our hearts and he whom they mortally hate is our 
best friend. 

If a comrade of ours opens a Jewish newspaper in the morning and does not find himself vilified 
there, then he has spent yesterday to no account. For if he had achieved something he would be 
persecuted, slandered, derided and abused. Those who effectively combat this mortal enemy of our 
people, who is at the same time the enemy of all Aryan peoples and all culture, can only expect to 
arouse opposition on the part of this race and become the object of its slanderous attacks. 

When these truths become part of the flesh and blood, as it were, of our members, then the movement 
will be impregnable and invincible. 

(14) The movement must use all possible means to cultivate respect for the individual personality. It 
must never forget that all human values are based on personal values, and that every idea and 
achievement is the fruit of the creative power of one man. We must never forget that admiration for 
everything that is great is not only a tribute to one creative personality but that all those who feel such 
admiration become thereby united under one covenant. 

Nothing can take the place of the individual, especially if the individual embodies in himself not the 
mechanical element but the element of cultural creativeness. No pupil can take the place of the master 
in completing a great picture which he has left unfinished; and just in the same way no substitute can 
take the place of the great poet or thinker, or the great statesman or military general. For the source of 
their power is in the realm of artistic creativeness. It can never be mechanically acquired, because it is 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (14 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


an innate product of divine grace. 

The greatest revolutions and the greatest achievements of this world, its greatest cultural works and 
the immortal creations of great statesmen, are inseparably bound up with one name which stands as a 
symbol for them in each respective case. The failure to pay tribute to one of those great spirits 
signifies a neglect of that enormous source of power which lies in the remembrance of all great men 
and women. 

The Jew himself knows this best. He, whose great men have always been great only in their efforts to 
destroy mankind and its civilization, takes good care that they are worshipped as idols. But the Jew 
tries to degrade the honour in which nations hold their great men and women. He stigmatizes this 
honour as the cult of personality. 

As soon as a nation has so far lost its courage as to submit to this impudent defamation on the part of 
the Jews it renounces the most important source of its own inner strength. This inner force cannot 
arise from a policy of pandering to the masses but only from the worship of men of genius, whose 
lives have uplifted and ennobled the nation itself. 

When mens hearts are breaking and their souls are plunged into the depths of despair, their great 
forebears turn their eyes towards them from the dim shadows of the past those forebears who knew 
how to triumph over anxiety and affliction, mental servitude and physical bondage and extend their 
eternal hands in a gesture of encouragement to despairing souls. Woe to the nation that is ashamed to 
clasp those hands. 

During the initial phase of our movement our greatest handicap was the fact that none of us were 
known and our names meant nothing, a fact which then seemed to some of us to make the chances of 
final success problematical. Our most difficult task then was to make our members firmly believe that 
there was a tremendous future in store for the movement and to maintain this belief as a living faith; 
for at that time only six, seven or eight persons came to hear one of our speakers. 

Consider that only six or seven poor devils who were entirely unknown came together to found a 
movement which should succeed in doing what the great mass-parties had failed to do: namely, to 
reconstruct the German Reich, even in greater power and glory than before. We should have been 
very pleased if we were attacked or even ridiculed. But the most depressing fact was that nobody paid 
any attention to us whatever. This utter lack of interest in us caused me great mental pain at that time. 

When I entered the circle of those men there was not yet any question of a party or a movement. I 
have already described the impression which was made on me when I first came into contact with that 
small organization. Subsequently I had time, and also the occasion, to study the form of this so-called 
party which at first had made such a woeful impression. The picture was indeed quite depressing and 
discouraging. There was nothing, absolutely nothing at all. There was only the name of a party. And 
the committee consisted of all the party members. Somehow or other it seemed just the kind of thing 
we were about to fight against a miniature parliament. The voting system was employed. When the 
great parliament cried until they were hoarse at least they shouted over problems of importance 
here this small circle engaged in interminable discussions as to the form in which they might answer 
the letters which they were delighted to have received. 

Needless to say, the public knew nothing of all this. In Munich nobody knew of the existence of such 
a party, not even by name, except our few members and their small circle of acquaintances. 

Every Wednesday what was called a committee meeting was held in one of the cafes, and a debate 
was arranged for one evening each week. In the beginning all the members of the movement were also 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (15 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


members of the committee, therefore the same persons always turned up at both meetings. The first 
step that had to be taken was to extend the narrow limits of this small circle and get new members, but 
the principal necessity was to utilize all the means at our command for the purpose of making the 
movement known. 

We chose the following methods: We decided to hold a monthly meeting to which the public would 
be invited. Some of the invitations were typewritten, and some were written by hand. For the first few 
meetings we distributed them in the streets and delivered them personally at certain houses. Each one 
canvassed among his own acquaintances and tried to persuade some of them to attend our meetings. 
The result was lamentable. 

I still remember once how I personally delivered eighty of these invitations and how we waited in the 
evening for the crowds to come. After waiting in vain for a whole hour the chairman finally had to 
open the meeting. Again there were only seven people present, the old familiar seven. 

We then changed our methods. We had the invitations written with a typewriter in a Munich stationer 
s shop and then multigraphed them. 

The result was that a few more people attended our next meeting. The number increased gradually 
from eleven to thirteen to seventeen, to twenty-three and finally to thirty-four. We collected some 
money within our own circle, each poor devil giving a small contribution, and in that way we raised 
sufficient funds to be able to advertise one of our meetings in the Munich Observer, which was still an 
independent paper. 

This time we had an astonishing success. We had chosen the Munich Hofbrauhaus Keller (which must 
not be confounded with the Munich Hofbrauhaus Festsaal) as our meeting-place. It was a small hall 
and would accommodate scarcely more than 130 people. To me, however, the hall seemed enormous, 
and we were all trembling lest this tremendous edifice would remain partly empty on the night of the 

At seven oclock 111 persons were present, and the meeting was opened. A Munich professor 
delivered the principal address, and I spoke after him. That was my first appearance in the role of 
public orator. The whole thing seemed a very daring adventure to Herr Harrer, who was then 
chairman of the party. He was a very decent fellow; but he had an a priori conviction that, although I 
might have quite a number of good qualities, I certainly did not have a talent for public speaking. 
Even later he could not be persuaded to change his opinion. But he was mistaken. Twenty minutes 
had been allotted to me for my speech on this occasion, which might be looked upon as our first 
public meeting. 

I talked for thirty minutes, and what I always had felt deep down in my heart, without being able to 
put it to the test, was here proved to be true: I could make a good speech. At the end of the thirty 
minutes it was quite clear that all the people in the little hall had been profoundly impressed. The 
enthusiasm aroused among them found its first expression in the fact that my appeal to those present 
brought us donations which amounted to three hundred marks. That was a great relief for us. Our 
finances were at that time so meagre that we could not afford to have our party prospectus printed, or 
even leaflets. Now we possessed at least the nucleus of a fund from which we could pay the most 
urgent and necessary expenses. 

But the success of this first larger meeting was also important from another point of view. I had 
already begun to introduce some young and fresh members into the committee. During the long period 
of my military service I had come to know a large number of good comrades whom I was now able to 
persuade to join our party. All of them were energetic and disciplined young men who, through their 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (16 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


years of military service, had been imbued with the principle that nothing is impossible and that where 
theres a will theres a way. 

The need for this fresh blood supply became evident to me after a few weeks of collaboration with the 
new members. Herr Harrer, who was then chairman of the party, was a journalist by profession, and 
as such he was a man of general knowledge. But as leader of the party he had one very serious 
handicap: he could not speak to the crowd. Though he did his work conscientiously, it lacked the 
necessary driving force, probably for the reason that he had no oratorical gifts whatsoever. Herr 
Drexler, at that time chairman of the Munich local group, was a simple working man. He, too, was not 
of any great importance as a speaker. Moreover, he was not a soldier. He had never done military 
service, even during the War. So that this man who was feeble and diffident by nature had missed the 
only school which knows how to transform diffident and weakly natures into real men. Therefore 
neither of those two men were of the stuff that would have enabled them to stir up an ardent and 
indomitable faith in the ultimate triumph of the movement and to brush aside, with obstinate force and 
if necessary with brutal ruthlessness, all obstacles that stood in the path of the new idea. Such a task 
could be carried out only by men who had been trained, body and soul, in those military virtues which 
make a man, so to speak, agile as a greyhound, tough as leather, and hard as Krupp steel. 

At that time I was still a soldier. Physically and mentally I had the polish of six years of service, so 
that in the beginning this circle must have looked on me as quite a stranger. In common with my army 
comrades, I had forgotten such phrases as: "That will not go", or "That is not possible", or "We ought 
not to take such a risk; it is too dangerous". 

The whole undertaking was of its very nature dangerous. At that time there were many parts of 
Germany where it would have been absolutely impossible openly to invite people to a national 
meeting that dared to make a direct appeal to the masses. Those who attended such meetings were 
usually dispersed and driven away with broken heads. It certainly did not call for any great qualities to 
be able to do things in that way. The largest so-called bourgeois mass meetings were accustomed to 
dissolve, and those in attendance would run away like rabbits when frightened by a dog as soon as a 
dozen communists appeared on the scene. The Reds used to pay little attention to those bourgeois 
organizations where only babblers talked. They recognized the inner triviality of such associations 
much better than the members themselves and therefore felt that they need not be afraid of them. On 
the contrary, however, they were all the more determined to use every possible means of annihilating 
once and for all any movement that appeared to them to be a danger to their own interests. The most 
effective means which they always employed in such cases were terror and brute force. 

The Marxist leaders, whose business consisted in deceiving and misleading the public, naturally hated 
most of all a movement whose declared aim was to win over those masses which hitherto had been 
exclusively at the service of international Marxism in the Jewish and Stock Exchange parties. The title 
alone, German Labour party, irritated them. It could easily be foreseen that at the first opportune 
moment we should have to face the opposition of the Marxist despots, who were still intoxicated with 
their triumph in 1918. 

People in the small circles of our own movement at that time showed a certain amount of anxiety at 
the prospect of such a conflict. They wanted to refrain as much as possible from coming out into the 
open, because they feared that they might be attacked and beaten. In their minds they saw our first 
public meetings broken up and feared that the movement might thus be ruined for ever. I found it 
difficult to defend my own position, which was that the conflict should not be evaded but that it 
should be faced openly and that we should be armed with those weapons which are the only 
protection against brute force. Terror cannot be overcome by the weapons of the mind but only by 
counter-terror. The success of our first public meeting strengthened my own position. The members 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (17 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


felt encouraged to arrange for a second meeting, even on a larger scale. 

Some time in October 1919 the second larger meeting took place in the Eberl-brau Keller. The theme 
of our speeches was Brest-Litowsk and Versailles. There were four speakers. I talked for almost an 
hour, and the success was even more striking than at our first meeting. The number of people who 
attended had grown to more than 130. An attempt to disturb the proceedings was immediately 
frustrated by my comrades. The would-be disturbers were thrown down the stairs, bearing imprints of 
violence on their heads. 

A fortnight later another meeting took place in the same hall. The number in attendance had now 
increased to more than 170, which meant that the room was fairly well filled. I spoke again, and once 
more the success obtained was greater than at the previous meeting. 

Then I proposed that a larger hall should be found. After looking around for some time we discovered 
one at the other end of the town, in the Deutschen Reich in the Dachauer Strasse. The first meeting at 
this new rendezvous had a smaller attendance than the previous meeting. There were just less than 
140 present. The members of the committee began to be discouraged, and those who had always been 
sceptical were now convinced that this falling-off in the attendance was due to the fact that we were 
holding the meetings at too short intervals. There were lively discussions, in which I upheld my own 
opinion that a city with 700,000 inhabitants ought to be able not only to stand one meeting every 
fortnight but ten meetings every week. I held that we should not be discouraged by one comparative 
setback, that the tactics we had chosen were correct, and that sooner or later success would be ours if 
we only continued with determined perseverance to push forward on our road. This whole winter of 
191920 was one continual struggle to strengthen confidence in our ability to carry the movement 
through to success and to intensify this confidence until it became a burning faith that could move 

Our next meeting in the small hall proved the truth of my contention. Our audience had increased to 
more than 200. The publicity effect and the financial success were splendid. I immediately urged that 
a further meeting should be held. It took place in less than a fortnight, and there were more than 270 
people present. Two weeks later we invited our followers and their friends, for the seventh time, to 
attend our meeting. The same hall was scarcely large enough for the number that came. They 
amounted to more than four hundred. 

During this phase the young movement developed its inner form. Sometimes we had more or less 
hefty discussions within our small circle. From various sides it was then just the same as it is to-day 
objections were made against the idea of calling the young movement a party. I have always 
considered such criticism as a demonstration of practical incapability and narrow-mindedness on the 
part of the critic. Those objections have always been raised by men who could not differentiate 
between external appearances and inner strength, but tried to judge the movement by the 
high-sounding character of the name attached to it. To this end they ransacked the vocabulary of our 
ancestors, with unfortunate results. 

At that time it was very difficult to make the people understand that every movement is a party as 
long as it has not brought its ideals to final triumph and thus achieved its purpose. It is a party even if 
it give itself a thousand difterent names. 

Any person who tries to carry into practice an original idea whose realization would be for the benefit 
of his fellow men will first have to look for disciples who are ready to fight for the ends he has in 
view. And if these ends did not go beyond the destruction of the party system and therewith put a stop 
to the process of disintegration, then all those who come forward as protagonists and apostles of such 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (18 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


an ideal are a party in themselves as long as their final goal is reached. It is only hair-splitting and 
playing with words when these antiquated theorists, whose practical success is in reverse ratio to their 
wisdom, presume to think they can change the character of a movement which is at the same time a 
party, by merely changing its name. 

On the contrary, it is entirely out of harmony with the spirit of the nation to keep harping on that 
far-off and forgotten nomenclature which belongs to the ancient Germanic times and does not awaken 
any distinct association in our age. This habit of borrowing words from the dead past tends to mislead 
the people into thinking that the external trappings of its vocabulary are the important feature of a 
movement. It is really a mischievous habit; but it is quite prevalent nowadays. 

At that time, and subsequently, I had to warn followers repeatedly against these wandering scholars 
who were peddling Germanic folk-lore and who never accomplished anything positive or practical, 
except to cultivate their own superabundant self-conceit. The new movement must guard itself against 
an influx of people whose only recommendation is their own statement that they have been fighting 
for these very same ideals during the last thirty or forty years. 

Now if somebody has fought for forty years to carry into effect what he calls an idea, and if these 
alleged efforts not only show no positive results but have not even been able to hinder the success of 
the opposing party, then the story of those forty years of futile effort furnishes sufficient proof for the 
incompetence of such a protagonist. People of that kind are specially dangerous because they do not 
want to participate in the movement as ordinary members. They talk rather of the leading positions 
which would be the only fitting posts for them, in view of their past work and also so that they might 
be enabled to carry on that work further. But woe to a young movement if the conduct of it should fall 
into the hands of such people. A business man who has been in charge of a great firm for forty years 
and who has completely ruined it through his mismanagement is not the kind of person one would 
recommend for the founding of a new firm. And it is just the same with a new national movement. 
Nobody of common sense would appoint to a leading post in such a movement some Teutonic 
Methuselah who had been ineffectively preaching some idea for a period of forty years, until himself 
and his idea had entered the stage of senile decay. 

Furthermore, only a very small percentage of such people join a new movement with the intention of 
serving its end unselfishly and helping in the spread of its principles. In most cases they come because 
they think that, under the a?gis of the new movement, it will be possible for them to promulgate their 
old ideas to the misfortune of their new listeners. Anyhow, nobody ever seems able to describe what 
exactly these ideas are. 

It is typical of such persons that they rant about ancient Teutonic heroes of the dim and distant ages, 
stone axes, battle spears and shields, whereas in reality they themselves are the woefullest poltroons 
imaginable. For those very same people who brandish Teutonic tin swords that have been fashioned 
carefully according to ancient models and wear padded bear-skins, with the horns of oxen mounted 
over their bearded faces, proclaim that all contemporary conflicts must be decided by the weapons of 
the mind alone. And thus they skedaddle when the first communist cudgel appears. Posterity will have 
little occasion to write a new epic on these heroic gladiators. 

I have seen too much of that kind of people not to feel a profound contempt for their miserable 
play-acting. To the masses of the nation they are just an object of ridicule; but the Jew finds it to his 
own interest to treat these folk-lore comedians with respect and to prefer them to real men who are 
fighting to establish a German State. And yet these comedians are extremely proud of themselves. 
Notwithstanding their complete fecklessness, which is an established fact, they pretend to know 
everything better than other people; so much so that they make themselves a veritable nuisance to all 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (19 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


sincere and honest patriots, to whom not only the heroism of the past is worthy of honour but who 
also feel bound to leave examples of their own work for the inspiration of the coming generation. 

Among those people there were some whose conduct can be explained by their innate stupidity and 
incompetence; but there are others who have a definite ulterior purpose in view. Often it is difficult to 
distinguish between the two classes. The impression which I often get, especially of those so-called 
religious reformers whose creed is grounded on ancient Germanic customs, is that they are the 
missionaries and proteges of those forces which do not wish to see a national revival taking place in 
Germany. All their activities tend to turn the attention of the people away from the necessity of 
fighting together in a common cause against the common enemy, namely the Jew. Moreover, that kind 
of preaching induces the people to use up their energies, not in fighting for the common cause, but in 
absurd and ruinous religious controversies within their own ranks. There are definite grounds that 
make it absolutely necessary for the movement to be dominated by a strong central force which is 
embodied in the authoritative leadership. In this way alone is it possible to counteract the activity of 
such fatal elements. And that is just the reason why these folk-lore Ahasueruses are vigorously hostile 
to any movement whose members are firmly united under one leader and one discipline. Those people 
of whom I have spoken hate such a movement because it is capable of putting a stop to their mischief. 

It was not without good reason that when we laid down a clearly defined programme for the new 
movement we excluded the word volkisch from it. The concept underlying the term volkisch cannot 
serve as the basis of a movement, because it is too indefinite and general in its application. Therefore, 
if somebody called himself volkisch such a designation could not be taken as the hall-mark of some 
definite, party affiliation. 

Because this concept is so indefinite from the practical viewpoint, it gives rise to various 
interpretations and thus people can appeal to it all the more easily as a sort of personal 
recommendation. Whenever such a vague concept, which is subject to so many interpretations, is 
admitted into a political movement it tends to break up the disciplined solidarity of the fighting forces. 
No such solidarity can be maintained if each individual member be allowed to define for himself what 
he believes and what he is willing to do. 

One feels it a disgrace when one notices the kind of people who float about nowadays with the 
volkisch symbol stuck in their buttonholes, and at the same time to notice how many people have 
various ideas of their own as to the significance of that symbol. A well-known professor in Bavaria, a 
famous combatant who fights only with the weapons of the mind and who boasts of having marched 
against Berlin by shouldering the weapons of the mind, of course believes that the word volkisch is 
synonymous with monarchical. But this learned authority has hitherto neglected to explain how our 
German monarchs of the past can be identified with what we generally mean by the word volkisch 
to-day. I am afraid he will find himself at a loss if he is asked to give a precise answer. For it would be 
very difficult indeed to imagine anything less volkisch than most of those German monarchical States 
were. Had they been otherwise they would not have disappeared; or if they were volkisch, then the 
fact of their downfall may be taken as evidence that the volkisch outlook on the world 
(Weltanschhauung) is a false outlook. 

Everybody interprets this concept in his own way. But such multifarious opinions cannot be adopted 
as the basis of a militant political movement. I need not call attention to the absolute lack of worldly 
wisdom, and especially the failure to understand the soul of the nation, which is displayed by these 
Messianic Precursors of the Twentieth Century. Sufficient attention has been called to those people by 
the ridicule which the left-wing parties have bestowed on them. They allow them to babble on and 
sneer at them. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (20 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


I do not set much value on the friendship of people who do not succeed in getting disliked by their 
enemies. Therefore, we considered the friendship of such people as not only worthless but even 
dangerous to our young movement. That was the principal reason why we first called ourselves a 
Party. We hoped that by giving ourselves such a name we might scare away a whole host of volkisch 
dreamers. And that was the reason also why we named our Party, The National Socialist German 
Labour Party. 

The first term, Party, kept away all those dreamers who live in the past and all the lovers of bombastic 
nomenclature, as well as those who went around beating the big drum for the volkisch idea. The full 
name of the Party kept away all those heroes whose weapon is the sword of the spirit and all those 
whining poltroons who take refuge behind their so-called intelligence as if it were a kind of shield. 

It was only to be expected that this latter class would launch a massed attack against us after our 
movement had started; but, of course, it was only a pen-and-ink attack, for the goose-quill is the only 
weapon which these volkisch lancers wield. We had declared one of our principles thus: "We shall 
meet violence with violence in our own defence". Naturally that principle disturbed the equanimity of 
the knights of the pen. They reproached us bitterly not only for what they called our crude worship of 
the cudgel but also because, according to them, we had no intellectual forces on our side. These 
charlatans did not think for a moment that a Demosthenes could be reduced to silence at a 
mass-meeting by fifty idiots who had come there to shout him down and use their fists against his 
supporters. The innate cowardice of the pen-and-ink charlatan prevents him from exposing himself to 
such a danger, for he always works in safe retirement and never dares to make a noise or come 
forward in public. 

Even to-day I must warn the members of our young movement in the strongest possible terms to 
guard against the danger of falling into the snare of those who call themselves silent workers. These 
silent workers are not only a whitelivered lot but are also, and always will be, ignorant do-nothings. 
A man who is aware of certain happenings and knows that a certain danger threatens, and at the same 
time sees a certain remedy which can be employed against it, is in duty bound not to work in silence 
but to come into the open and publicly fight for the destruction of the evil and the acceptance of his 
own remedy. If he does not do so, then he is neglecting his duty and shows that he is weak in 
character and that he fails to act either because of his timidity, or indolence or incompetence. Most of 
these silent workers generally pretend to know God knows what. Not one of them is capable of any 
real achievement, but they keep on trying to fool the world with their antics. Though quite indolent, 
they try to create the impression that their silent work keeps them very busy. To put it briefly, they 
are sheer swindlers, political jobbers who feel chagrined by the honest work which others are doing. 
When you find one of these volkisch moths buzzing over the value of his silent work you may be 
sure that you are dealing with a fellow who does no productive work at all but steals from others the 
fruits of their honest labour. 

In addition to all this one ought to note the arrogance and conceited impudence with which these 
obscurantist idlers try to tear to pieces the work of other people, criticizing it with an air of 
superiority, and thus playing into the hands of the mortal enemy of our people. 

Even the simplest follower who has the courage to stand on the table in some beer-hall where his 
enemies are gathered, and manfully and openly defend his position against them, achieves a thousand 
times more than these slinking hypocrites. He at least will convert one or two people to believe in the 
movement. One can examine his work and test its effectiveness by its actual results. But those knavish 
swindlers who praise their own silent work and shelter themselves under the cloak of anonymity, 
are just worthless drones, in the truest sense of the term, and are utterly useless for the purpose of our 
national reconstruction. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (21 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


In the beginning of 1920 I put forward the idea of holding our first mass meeting. On this proposal 
there were differences of opinion amongst us. Some leading members of our party thought that the 
time was not ripe for such a meeting and that the result might be detrimental. The Press of the Left 
had begun to take notice of us and we were lucky enough in being able gradually to arouse their 
wrath. We had begun to appear at other meetings and to ask questions or contradict the speakers, with 
the natural result that we were shouted down forthwith. But still we thereby gained some of our ends. 
People began to know of our existence and the better they understood us, the stronger became their 
aversion and their enmity. Therefore we might expect that a large contingent of our friends from the 
Red Camp would attend our first mass meeting. 

I fully realized that our meeting would probably be broken up. But we had to face the fight; if not 
now, then some months later. Since the first day of our foundation we were resolved to secure the 
future of the movement by fighting our way forward in a spirit of blind faith and ruthless 
determination. I was well acquainted with the mentality of all those who belonged to the Red Camp, 
and I knew quite well that if we opposed them tooth and nail not only would we make an impression 
on them but that we even might win new followers for ourselves. Therefore I felt that we must decide 
on a policy of active opposition. 

Herr Harrer was then chairman of our party. He did not see eye to eye with me as to the opportune 
time for our first mass meeting. Accordingly he felt himself obliged to resign from the leadership of 
the movement, as an upright and honest man. Herr Anton Drexler took his place. I kept the work of 
organizing the propaganda in my own hands and I listened to no compromise in carrying it out. 

We decided on February 24th 1920 as the date for the first great popular meeting to be held under the 
eegis of this movement which was hitherto unknown. 

I made all the preparatory arrangements personally. They did not take very long. The whole apparatus 
of our organization was set in motion for the purpose of being able to secure a rapid decision as to our 
policy. Within twenty-four hours we had to decide on the attitude we should take in regard to the 
questions of the day which would be put forward at the mass meeting. The notices which advertised 
the meeting had to bring these points before the public. In this direction we were forced to depend on 
the use of posters and leaflets, the contents of which and the manner in which they were displayed 
were decided upon in accordance with the principles which I have already laid down in dealing with 
propaganda in general. They were produced in a form which would appeal to the crowd. They 
concentrated on a few points which were repeated again and again. The text was concise and definite, 
an absolutely dogmatic form of expression being used. We distributed these posters and leaflets with a 
dogged energy and then we patiently waited for the effect they would produce. 

For our principal colour we chose red, as it has an exciting effect on the eye and was therefore 
calculated to arouse the attention of our opponents and irritate them. Thus they would have to take 
notice of us whether they liked it or not and would not forget us. 

One result of our tactics was to show up clearly the close political fraternization that existed also here 
in Bavaria between the Marxists and the Centre Party. The political party that held power in Bavaria, 
which was the Bavarian Peoples Party (affiliated with the Centre Party) did its best to counteract the 
effect which our placards were having on the Red masses. Thus they made a definite step to fetter 
our activities. If the police could find no other grounds for prohibiting our placards, then they might 
claim that we were disturbing the traffic in the streets. And thus the so-called German National People 
s Party calmed the anxieties of their Red allies by completely prohibiting those placards which 
proclaimed a message that was bringing back to the bosom of their own people hundreds of thousands 
of workers who had been misled by international agitators and incensed against their own nation. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (22 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


These placards bear witness to the bitterness of the struggle in which the young movement was then 
engaged. Future generations will find in these placards a documentary proof of our determination and 
the justice of our own cause. And these placards will also prove how the so-called national officials 
took arbitrary action to strangle a movement that did not please them, because it was nationalizing the 
broad masses of the people and winning them back to their own racial stock. 

These placards will also help to refute the theory that there was then a national government in Bavaria 
and they will afford documentary confirmation of the fact that if Bavaria remained nationally-minded 
during the years 1919, 1920, 1921, 1922 and 1923, this was not due to a national government but it 
was because the national spirit gradually gained a deeper hold on the people and the Government was 
forced to follow public feeling. The Government authorities themselves did everything in their power 
to hamper this process of recovery and make it impossible. But in this connection two officials must 
be mentioned as outstanding exceptions. 

Ernst Pohner was Chief of Police at the time. He had a loyal counsellor in Dr. Frick, who was his 
chief executive official. These were the only men among the higher officials who had the courage to 
place the interests of their country before their own interests in holding on to their jobs. Of those in 
responsible positions Ernst Pohner was the only one who did not pay court to the mob but felt that his 
duty was towards the nation as such and was ready to risk and sacrifice everything, even his personal 
livelihood, to help in the restoration of the German people, whom he dearly loved. For that reason he 
was a bitter thorn in the side of the venal group of Government officials. It was not the interests of the 
nation or the necessity of a national revival that inspired or directed their conduct. They simply 
truckled to the wishes of the Government, so as to secure their daily bread for themselves, but they 
had no thought whatsoever for the national welfare that had been entrusted to their care. 

Above all, Pohner was one of those people who, in contradistinction to the majority of our so-called 
defenders of the authority of the State, did not fear to incur the enmity of the traitors to the country 
and the nation but rather courted it as a mark of honour and honesty. For such men the hatred of the 
Jews and Marxists and the lies and calumnies they spread, were their only source of happiness in the 
midst of the national misery. Pohner was a man of granite loyalty. He was like one of the ascetic 
characters of the classical era and was at the same time that kind of straightforward German for whom 
the saying Better dead than a slave is not an empty phrase but a veritable hearts cry. 

In my opinion he and his collaborator, Dr. Frick, are the only men holding positions then in Bavaria 
who have the right to be considered as having taken active part in the creation of a national Bavaria. 

Before holding our first great mass meeting it was necessary not only to have our propaganda material 
ready but also to have the main items of our programme printed. 

In the second volume of this book I shall give a detailed account of the guiding principles which we 
then followed in drawing up our programme. Here I will only say that the programme was arranged 
not merely to set forth the form and content of the young movement but also with an eye to making it 
understood among the broad masses. The so-called intellectual circles made jokes and sneered at it 
and then tried to criticize it. But the effect of our programme proved that the ideas which we then held 
were right. 

During those years I saw dozens of new movements arise and disappear without leaving a trace 
behind. Only one movement has survived. It is the National Socialist German Labour Party. To-day I 
am more convinced than ever before that, though they may combat us and try to paralyse our 
movement, and though pettifogging party ministers may forbid us the right of free speech, they cannot 
prevent the triumph of our ideas. When the present system of statal administration and even the names 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (23 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 


of the political parties that represent it will be forgotten, the programmatic basis of the National 
Socialist movement will supply the groundwork on which the future State will be built. 

The meetings which we held before January 1920 had enabled us to collect the financial means that 
were necessary to have our first pamphlets and posters and programmes printed. 

I shall bring the first part of this book to a close by referring to our first great mass meeting, because 
that meeting marked the occasion on which our framework as a small party had to be broken up and 
we started to become the most powerful factor of this epoch in the influence we exercised on public 
opinion. At that time my chief anxiety was that we might not fill the hall and that we might have to 
face empty benches. I myself was firmly convinced that if only the people would come this day would 
turn out a great success for the young movement. That was my feeling as I waited impatiently for the 
hour to come. 

It had been announced that the meeting would begin at 7.30. A quarter-of-an-hour before the opening 
time I walked through the chief hall of the Hofbrauhaus on the Platz in Munich and my heart was 
nearly bursting with joy. The great hall for at that time it seemed very big to me was filled to 
overflowing. Nearly 2,000 people were present. And, above all, those people had come whom we had 
always wished to reach. More than half the audience consisted of persons who seemed to be 
communists or independents. Our first great demonstration was destined, in their view, to come to an 
abrupt end. 

But things happened otherwise. When the first speaker had finished I got up to speak. After a few 
minutes I was met with a hailstorm of interruptions and violent encounters broke out in the body of 
the hall. A handful of my loyal war comrades and some other followers grappled with the disturbers 
and restored order in a little while. I was able to continue my speech. After half an hour the applause 
began to drown the interruptions and the hootings. Then interruptions gradually ceased and applause 
took their place. When I finally came to explain the twenty-five points and laid them, point after point, 
before the masses gathered there and asked them to pass their own judgment on each point, one point 
after another was accepted with increasing enthusiasm. When the last point was reached I had before 
me a hall full of people united by a new conviction, a new faith and a new will. 

Nearly four hours had passed when the hall began to clear. As the masses streamed towards the exits, 
crammed shoulder to shoulder, shoving and pushing, I knew that a movement was now set afoot 
among the German people which would never pass into oblivion. 

A fire was enkindled from whose glowing heat the sword would be fashioned which would restore 
freedom to the German Siegfried and bring back life to the German nation. 

Beside the revival which I then foresaw, I also felt that the Goddess of Vengeance was now getting 
ready to redress the treason of the 9th of November, 1918. The hall was emptied. The movement was 
on the march. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampfchap12.htm (24 of 24) [04/06/2000 16:16:33] 




On February 24th, 1920, the first great mass meeting under the auspices of the new movement took 
place. In the Banquet Hall of the Hofbrauhaus in Munich the twenty-five theses which constituted the 
programme of our new party were expounded to an audience of nearly two thousand people and each 
thesis was enthusiastically received. 

Thus we brought to the knowledge of the public those first principles and lines of action along which 
the new struggle was to be conducted for the abolition of a confused mass of obsolete ideas and 
opinions which had obscure and often pernicious tendencies. A new force was to make its appearance 
among the timid and feckless bourgeoisie. This force was destined to impede the triumphant advance 
of the Marxists and bring the Chariot of Fate to a standstill just as it seemed about to reach its goal. 

It was evident that this new movement could gain the public significance and support which are 
necessary pre-requisites in such a gigantic struggle only if it succeeded from the very outset in 
awakening a sacrosanct conviction in the hearts of its followers, that here it was not a case of 
introducing a new electoral slogan into the political field but that an entirely new Weltanschhauung, 
which was of a radical significance, had to be promoted. 

One must try to recall the miserable jumble of opinions that used to be arrayed side by side to form 
the usual Party Programme, as it was called, and one must remember how these opinions used to be 
brushed up or dressed in a new form from time to time. If we would properly understand these 
programmatic monstrosities we must carefully investigate the motives which inspired the average 
bourgeois programme committee. 

Those people are always influenced by one and the same preoccupation when they introduce 
something new into their programme or modify something already contained in it. That preoccupation 
is directed towards the results of the next election. The moment these artists in parliamentary 
government have the first glimmering of a suspicion that their darling public may be ready to kick up 
its heels and escape from the harness of the old party wagon they begin to paint the shafts with new 
colours. On such occasions the party astrologists and horoscope readers, the so-called experienced 
men and experts, come forward. For the most part they are old parliamentary hands whose political 
schooling has furnished them with ample experience. They can remember former occasions when the 
masses showed signs of losing patience and they now diagnose the menace of a similar situation 
arising. Resorting to their old prescription, they form a committee. They go around among the 
darling public and listen to what is being said. They dip their noses into the newspapers and gradually 
begin to scent what it is that their darlings, the broad masses, are wishing for, what they reject and 
what they are hoping for. The groups that belong to each trade or business, and even office 
employees, are carefully studied and their innermost desires are investigated. The malicious slogans 
of the opposition from which danger is threatened are now suddenly looked upon as worthy of 
reconsideration, and it often happens that these slogans, to the great astonishment of those who 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chapl .htm (1 of 8) [04/06/2000 16:18:50] 


originally coined and circulated them, now appear to be quite harmless and indeed are to be found 
among the dogmas of the old parties. 

So the committees meet to revise the old programme and draw up a new one. 

For these people change their convictions just as the soldier changes his shirt in war when the old 
one is bug-eaten. In the new programme everyone gets everything he wants. The farmer is assured 
that the interests of agriculture will be safeguarded. The industrialist is assured of protection for his 
products. The consumer is assured that his interests will be protected in the market prices. Teachers 
are given higher salaries and civil servants will have better pensions. Widows and orphans will 
receive generous assistance from the State. Trade will be promoted. The tariff will be lowered and 
even the taxes, though they cannot be entirely abolished, will be almost abolished. It sometimes 
happens that one section of the public is forgotten or that one of the demands mooted among the 
public has not reached the ears of the party. This is also hurriedly patched on to the whole, should 
there be any space available for it: until finally it is felt that there are good grounds for hoping that the 
whole normal host of philistines, including their wives, will have their anxieties laid to rest and will 
beam with satisfaction once again. And so, internally armed with faith in the goodness of God and the 
impenetrable stupidity of the electorate, the struggle for what is called the reconstruction of the Reich 
can now begin. 

When the election day is over and the parliamentarians have held their last public meeting for the next 
five years, when they can leave their job of getting the populace to toe the line and can now devote 
themselves to higher and more pleasing tasks then the programme committee is dissolved and the 
struggle for the progressive reorganization of public affairs becomes once again a business of earning 
ones daily bread, which for the parliamentarians means merely the attendance that is required in order 
to be able to draw their daily remunerations. Morning after morning the honourable deputy wends his 
way to the House, and though he may not enter the Chamber itself he gets at least as far as the front 
hall, where he will find the register on which the names of the deputies in attendance have to be 
inscribed. As a part of his onerous service to his constituents he enters his name, and in return receives 
a small indemnity as a well-earned reward for his unceasing and exhausting labours. 

When four years have passed, or in the meantime if there should be some critical weeks during which 
the parliamentary corporations have to face the danger of being dissolved, these honourable 
gentlemen become suddenly seized by an irresistible desire to act. Just as the grub-worm cannot help 
growing into a cock-chafer, these parliamentarian worms leave the great House of Puppets and flutter 
on new wings out among the beloved public. They address the electors once again, give an account of 
the enormous labours they have accomplished and emphasize the malicious obstinacy of their 
opponents. They do not always meet with grateful applause; for occasionally the unintelligent masses 
throw rude and unfriendly remarks in their faces. When this spirit of public ingratitude reaches a 
certain pitch there is only one way of saving the situation. The prestige of the party must be burnished 
up again. The programme has to be amended. The committee is called into existence once again. And 
the swindle begins anew. Once we understand the impenetrable stupidity of our public we cannot be 
surprised that such tactics turn out successful. Led by the Press and blinded once again by the alluring 
appearance of the new programme, the bourgeois as well as the proletarian herds of voters faithfully 
return to the common stall and re-elect their old deceivers. The peoples man and labour candidate 
now change back again into the parliamentarian grub and become fat and rotund as they batten on the 
leaves that grow on the tree of public life to be retransformed into the glittering butterfly after 
another four years have passed. 

Scarcely anything else can be so depressing as to watch this process in sober reality and to be the 
eyewitness of this repeatedly recurring fraud. On a spiritual training ground of that kind it is not 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chapl .htm (2 of 8) [04/06/2000 1 6:1 8:50] 


possible for the bourgeois forces to develop the strength which is necessary to carry on the fight 
against the organized might of Marxism. Indeed they have never seriously thought of doing so. 
Though these parliamentary quacks who represent the white race are generally recognized as persons 
of quite inferior mental capacity, they are shrewd enough to know that they could not seriously 
entertain the hope of being able to use the weapon of Western Democracy to fight a doctrine for the 
advance of which Western Democracy, with all its accessories, is employed as a means to an end. 
Democracy is exploited by the Marxists for the purpose of paralysing their opponents and gaining for 
themselves a free hand to put their own methods into action. When certain groups of Marxists use all 
their ingenuity for the time being to make it be believed that they are inseparably attached to the 
principles of democracy, it may be well to recall the fact that when critical occasions arose these same 
gentlemen snapped their fingers at the principle of decision by majority vote, as that principle is 
understood by Western Democracy. Such was the case in those days when the bourgeois 
parliamentarians, in their monumental shortsightedness, believed that the security of the Reich was 
guaranteed because it had an overwhelming numerical majority in its favour, and the Marxists did not 
hesitate suddenly to grasp supreme power in their own hands, backed by a mob of loafers, deserters, 
political place-hunters and Jewish dilettanti. That was a blow in the face for that democracy in which 
so many parliamentarians believed. Only those credulous parliamentary wizards who represented 
bourgeois democracy could have believed that the brutal determination of those whose interest it is to 
spread the Marxist world-pest, of which they are the carriers, could for a moment, now or in the 
future, be held in check by the magical formulas of Western Parliamentarianism. Marxism will march 
shoulder to shoulder with democracy until it succeeds indirectly in securing for its own criminal 
purposes even the support of those whose minds are nationally orientated and whom Marxism strives 
to exterminate. But if the Marxists should one day come to believe that there was a danger that from 
this witchs cauldron of our parliamentary democracy a majority vote might be concocted, which by 
reason of its numerical majority would be empowered to enact legislation and might use that power 
seriously to combat Marxism, then the whole parliamentarian hocus-pocus would be at an end. Instead 
of appealing to the democratic conscience, the standard bearers of the Red International would 
immediately send forth a furious rallying-cry among the proletarian masses and the ensuing fight 
would not take place in the sedate atmosphere of Parliament but in the factories and the streets. Then 
democracy would be annihilated forthwith. And what the intellectual prowess of the apostles who 
represented the people in Parliament had failed to accomplish would now be successfully carried out 
by the crow-bar and the sledge-hammer of the exasperated proletarian masses just as in the autumn 
of 1918. At a blow they would awaken the bourgeois world to see the madness of thinking that the 
Jewish drive towards world-conquest can be effectually opposed by means of Western Democracy. 

As I have said, only a very credulous soul could think of binding himself to observe the rules of the 
game when he has to face a player for whom those rules are nothing but a mere bluff or a means of 
serving his own interests, which means he will discard them when they prove no longer useful for his 

All the parties that profess so-called bourgeois principles look upon political life as in reality a 
struggle for seats in Parliament. The moment their principles and convictions are of no further use in 
that struggle they are thrown overboard, as if they were sand ballast. And the programmes are 
constructed in such a way that they can be dealt with in like manner. But such practice has a 
correspondingly weakening effect on the strength of those parties. They lack the great magnetic force 
which alone attracts the broad masses; for these masses always respond to the compelling force which 
emanates from absolute faith in the ideas put forward, combined with an indomitable zest to fight for 
and defend them. 

At a time in which the one side, armed with all the fighting power that springs from a systematic 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap1.htm (3 of 8) [04/06/2000 16:18:50] 


conception of life even though it be criminal in a thousand ways makes an attack against the 
established order the other side will be able to resist when it draws its strength from a new faith, 
which in our case is a political faith. This faith must supersede the weak and cowardly command to 
defend. In its stead we must raise the battle-cry of a courageous and ruthless attack. Our present 
movement is accused, especially by the so-called national bourgeois cabinet ministers the Bavarian 
representatives of the Centre, for example of heading towards a revolution. We have one answer to 
give to those political pigmies. We say to them: We are trying to make up for that which you, in your 
criminal stupidity, have failed to carry out. By your parliamentarian jobbing you have helped to drag 
the nation into ruin. But we, by our aggressive policy, are setting up a new Weltanschhauung which 
we shall defend with indomitable devotion. Thus we are building the steps on which our nation once 
again may ascend to the temple of freedom. 

And so during the first stages of founding our movement we had to take special care that our militant 
group which fought for the establishment of a new and exalted political faith should not degenerate 
into a society for the promotion of parliamentarian interests. 

The first preventive measure was to lay down a programme which of itself would tend towards 
developing a certain moral greatness that would scare away all the petty and weakling spirits who 
make up the bulk of our present party politicians. 

Those fatal defects which finally led to Germanys downfall afford the clearest proof of how right we 
were in considering it absolutely necessary to set up programmatic aims which were sharply and 
distinctly defined. 

Because we recognized the defects above mentioned, we realized that a new conception of the State 
had to be formed, which in itself became a part of our new conception of life in general. 

In the first volume of this book I have already dealt with the term volkisch, and I said then that this 
term has not a sufficiently precise meaning to furnish the kernel around which a closely consolidated 
militant community could be formed. All kinds of people, with all kinds of divergent opinions, are 
parading about at the present moment under the device volkisch on their banners. Before I come to 
deal with the purposes and aims of the National Socialist Labour Party I want to establish a clear 
understanding of what is meant by the concept volkisch and herewith explain its relation to our party 
movement. The word volkisch does not express any clearly specified idea. It may be interpreted in 
several ways and in practical application it is just as general as the word religious, for instance. It is 
difficult to attach any precise meaning to this latter word, either as a theoretical concept or as a 
guiding principle in practical life. The word religious acquires a precise meaning only when it is 
associated with a distinct and definite form through which the concept is put into practice. To say that 
a person is deeply religious may be very fine phraseology; but, generally speaking, it tells us little or 
nothing. There may be some few people who are content with such a vague description and there may 
even be some to whom the word conveys a more or less definite picture of the inner quality of a 
person thus described. But, since the masses of the people are not composed of philosophers or saints, 
such a vague religious idea will mean for them nothing else than to justify each individual in thinking 
and acting according to his own bent. It will not lead to that practical faith into which the inner 
religious yearning is transformed only when it leaves the sphere of general metaphysical ideas and is 
moulded to a definite dogmatic belief. Such a belief is certainly not an end in itself, but the means to 
an end. Yet it is a means without which the end could never be reached at all. This end, however, is 
not merely something ideal; for at the bottom it is eminently practical. We must always bear in mind 
the fact that, generally speaking, the highest ideals are always the outcome of some profound vital 
need, just as the most sublime beauty owes its nobility of shape, in the last analysis, to the fact that the 
most beautiful form is the form that is best suited to the purpose it is meant to serve. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chapl .htm (4 of 8) [04/06/2000 1 6:1 8:50] 


By helping to lift the human being above the level of mere animal existence, Faith really contributes 
to consolidate and safeguard its own existence. Taking humanity as it exists to-day and taking into 
consideration the fact that the religious beliefs which it generally holds and which have been 
consolidated through our education, so that they serve as moral standards in practical life, if we should 
now abolish religious teaching and not replace it by anything of equal value the result would be that 
the foundations of human existence would be seriously shaken. We may safely say that man does not 
live merely to serve higher ideals, but that these ideals, in their turn, furnish the necessary conditions 
of his existence as a human being. And thus the circle is closed. 

Of course, the word religious implies some ideas and beliefs that are fundamental. Among these we 
may reckon the belief in the immortality of the soul, its future existence in eternity, the belief in the 
existence of a Higher Being, and so on. But all these ideas, no matter how firmly the individual 
believes in them, may be critically analysed by any person and accepted or rejected accordingly, until 
the emotional concept or yearning has been transformed into an active service that is governed by a 
clearly defined doctrinal faith. Such a faith furnishes the practical outlet for religious feeling to 
express itself and thus opens the way through which it can be put into practice. 

Without a clearly defined belief, the religious feeling would not only be worthless for the purposes of 
human existence but even might contribute towards a general disorganization, on account of its vague 
and multifarious tendencies. 

What I have said about the word religious can also be applied to the term volkisch. This word also 
implies certain fundamental ideas. Though these ideas are very important indeed, they assume such 
vague and indefinite forms that they cannot be estimated as having a greater value than mere opinions, 
until they become constituent elements in the structure of a political party. For in order to give 
practical force to the ideals that grow out of a Weltanschhauung and to answer the demands which are 
a logical consequence of such ideals, mere sentiment and inner longing are of no practical assistance, 
just as freedom cannot be won by a universal yearning for it. No. Only when the idealistic longing for 
independence is organized in such a way that it can fight for its ideal with military force, only then 
can the urgent wish of a people be transformed into a potent reality. 

Any Weltanschhauung, though a thousandfold right and supremely beneficial to humanity, will be of 
no practical service for the maintenance of a people as long as its principles have not yet become the 
rallying point of a militant movement. And, on its own side, this movement will remain a mere party 
until is has brought its ideals to victory and transformed its party doctrines into the new foundations of 
a State which gives the national community its final shape. 

If an abstract conception of a general nature is to serve as the basis of a future development, then the 
first prerequisite is to form a clear understanding of the nature and character and scope of this 
conception. For only on such a basis can a movement he founded which will be able to draw the 
necessary fighting strength from the internal cohesion of its principles and convictions. From general 
ideas a political programme must be constructed and a general Weltanschhauung must receive the 
stamp of a definite political faith. Since this faith must be directed towards ends that have to be 
attained in the world of practical reality, not only must it serve the general ideal as such but it must 
also take into consideration the means that have to be employed for the triumph of the ideal. Here the 
practical wisdom of the statesman must come to the assistance of the abstract idea, which is correct in 
itself. In that way an eternal ideal, which has everlasting significance as a guiding star to mankind, 
must be adapted to the exigencies of human frailty so that its practical effect may not be frustrated at 
the very outset through those shortcomings which are general to mankind. The exponent of truth must 
here go hand in hand with him who has a practical knowledge of the soul of the people, so that from 
the realm of eternal verities and ideals what is suited to the capacities of human nature may be 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chapl .htm (5 of 8) [04/06/2000 1 6:1 8:50] 


selected and given practical form. To take abstract and general principles, derived from a 
Weltanschhauung which is based on a solid foundation of truth, and transform them into a militant 
community whose members have the same political faith a community which is precisely defined, 
rigidly organized, of one mind and one will such a transformation is the most important task of all; 
for the possibility of successfully carrying out the idea is dependent on the successful fulfilment of 
that task. Out of the army of millions who feel the truth of these ideas, and even may understand them 
to some extent, one man must arise. This man must have the gift of being able to expound general 
ideas in a clear and definite form, and, from the world of vague ideas shimmering before the minds of 
the masses, he must formulate principles that will be as clear-cut and firm as granite. He must fight for 
these principles as the only true ones, until a solid rock of common faith and common will emerges 
above the troubled waves of vagrant ideas. The general justification of such action is to be sought in 
the necessity for it and the individual will be justified by his success. 

If we try to penetrate to the inner meaning of the word volkisch we arrive at the following 

The current political conception of the world is that the State, though it possesses a creative force 
which can build up civilizations, has nothing in common with the concept of race as the foundation of 
the State. The State is considered rather as something which has resulted from economic necessity, or, 
at best, the natural outcome of the play of political forces and impulses. Such a conception of the 
foundations of the State, together with all its logical consequences, not only ignores the primordial 
racial forces that underlie the State, but it also leads to a policy in which the importance of the 
individual is minimized. If it be denied that races differ from one another in their powers of cultural 
creativeness, then this same erroneous notion must necessarily influence our estimation of the value of 
the individual. The assumption that all races are alike leads to the assumption that nations and 
individuals are equal to one another. And international Marxism is nothing but the application 
effected by the Jew, Karl Marx of a general conception of life to a definite profession of political 
faith; but in reality that general concept had existed long before the time of Karl Marx. If it had not 
already existed as a widely diffused infection the amazing political progress of the Marxist teaching 
would never have been possible. In reality what distinguished Karl Marx from the millions who were 
affected in the same way was that, in a world already in a state of gradual decomposition, he used his 
keen powers of prognosis to detect the essential poisons, so as to extract them and concentrate them, 
with the art of a necromancer, in a solution which would bring about the rapid destruction of the 
independent nations on the globe. But all this was done in the service of his race. 

Thus the Marxist doctrine is the concentrated extract of the mentality which underlies the general 
concept of life to-day. For this reason alone it is out of the question and even ridiculous to think that 
what is called our bourgeois world can put up any effective fight against Marxism. For this bourgeois 
world is permeated with all those same poisons and its conception of life in general differs from 
Marxism only in degree and in the character of the persons who hold it. The bourgeois world is 
Marxist but believes in the possibility of a certain group of people that is to say, the bourgeoisie 
being able to dominate the world, while Marxism itself systematically aims at delivering the world 
into the hands of the Jews. 

Over against all this, the volkisch concept of the world recognizes that the primordial racial elements 
are of the greatest significance for mankind. In principle, the State is looked upon only as a means to 
an end and this end is the conservation of the racial characteristics of mankind. Therefore on the 
volkisch principle we cannot admit that one race is equal to another. By recognizing that they are 
different, the volkisch concept separates mankind into races of superior and inferior quality. On the 
basis of this recognition it feels bound in conformity with the eternal Will that dominates the universe, 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap1.htm (6 of 8) [04/06/2000 16:18:50] 


to postulate the victory of the better and stronger and the subordination of the inferior and weaker. 
And so it pays homage to the truth that the principle underlying all Natures operations is the 
aristocratic principle and it believes that this law holds good even down to the last individual 
organism. It selects individual values from the mass and thus operates as an organizing principle, 
whereas Marxism acts as a disintegrating solvent. The volkisch belief holds that humanity must have 
its ideals, because ideals are a necessary condition of human existence itself. But, on the other hand, it 
denies that an ethical ideal has the right to prevail if it endangers the existence of a race that is the 
standard-bearer of a higher ethical ideal. For in a world which would be composed of mongrels and 
negroids all ideals of human beauty and nobility and all hopes of an idealized future for our humanity 
would be lost forever. 

On this planet of ours human culture and civilization are indissolubly bound up with the presence of 
the Aryan. If he should be exterminated or subjugated, then the dark shroud of a new barbarian era 
would enfold the earth. 

To undermine the existence of human culture by exterminating its founders and custodians would be 
an execrable crime in the eyes of those who believe that the folk-idea lies at the basis of human 
existence. Whoever would dare to raise a profane hand against that highest image of God among His 
creatures would sin against the bountiful Creator of this marvel and would collaborate in the 
expulsion from Paradise. 

Hence the folk concept of the world is in profound accord with Natures will; because it restores the 
free play of the forces which will lead the race through stages of sustained reciprocal education 
towards a higher type, until finally the best portion of mankind will possess the earth and will be free 
to work in every domain all over the world and even reach spheres that lie outside the earth. 

We all feel that in the distant future many may be faced with problems which can be solved only by a 
superior race of human beings, a race destined to become master of all the other peoples and which 
will have at its disposal the means and resources of the whole world. 

It is evident that such a general sketch of the ideas implied in the folk concept of the world may easily 
be interpreted in a thousand different ways. As a matter of fact there is scarcely one of our recent 
political movements that does not refer at some point to this conception of the world. But the fact that 
this conception of the world still maintains its independent existence in face of all the others proves 
that their ways of looking at life are quite difierent from this. Thus the Marxist conception, directed by 
a central organization endowed with supreme authority, is opposed by a motley crew of opinions 
which is not very impressive in face of the solid phalanx presented by the enemy. Victory cannot be 
achieved with such weak weapons. Only when the international idea, politically organized by 
Marxism, is confronted by the folk idea, equally well organized in a systematic way and equally well 
led only then will the fighting energy in the one camp be able to meet that of the other on an equal 
footing; and victory will be found on the side of eternal truth. 

But a general conception of life can never be given an organic embodiment until it is precisely and 
definitely formulated. The function which dogma fulfils in religious belief is parallel to the function 
which party principles fulfil for a political party which is in the process of being built up. Therefore, 
for the conception of life that is based on the folk idea it is necessary that an instrument be forged 
which can be used in fighting for this ideal, similar to the Marxist party organization which clears the 
way for internationalism. 

And this is the aim which the German National Socialist Labour Movement pursues. 

The folk conception must therefore be definitely formulated so that it may be organically incorporated 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chapl .htm (7 of 8) [04/06/2000 1 6:1 8:50] 


in the party. That is a necessary prerequisite for the success of this idea. And that it is so is very 
clearly proved even by the indirect acknowledgment of those who oppose such an amalgamation of 
the folk idea with party principles. The very people who never tire of insisting again and again that the 
conception of life based on the folk idea can never be the exclusive property of a single group, 
because it lies dormant or lives in myriads of hearts, only confirm by their own statements the simple 
fact that the general presence of such ideas in the hearts of millions of men has not proved sufficient 
to impede the victory of the opposing ideas, which are championed by a political party organized on 
the principle of class conflict. If that were not so, the German people ought already to have gained a 
gigantic victory instead of finding themselves on the brink of the abyss. The international ideology 
achieved success because it was organized in a militant political party which was always ready to take 
the offensive. If hitherto the ideas opposed to the international concept have had to give way before 
the latter the reason is that they lacked a united front to fight for their cause. A doctrine which forms a 
definite outlook on life cannot struggle and triumph by allowing the right of free interpretation of its 
general teaching, but only by defining that teaching in certain articles of faith that have to be accepted 
and incorporating it in a political organization. 

Therefore I considered it my special duty to extract from the extensive but vague contents of a general 
Weltanschhauung the ideas which were essential and give them a more or less dogmatic form. 
Because of their precise and clear meaning, these ideas are suited to the purpose of uniting in a 
common front all those who are ready to accept them as principles. In other words: The German 
National Socialist Labour Party extracts the essential principles from the general conception of the 
world which is based on the folk idea. On these principles it establishes a political doctrine which 
takes into account the practical realities of the day, the nature of the times, the available human 
material and all its deficiencies. Through this political doctrine it is possible to bring great masses of 
the people into an organization which is constructed as rigidly as it could be. Such an organization is 
the main preliminary that is necessary for the final triumph of this ideal. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chapl .htm (8 of 8) [04/06/2000 1 6:1 8:50] 




Already in 19201921 certain circles belonging to the effete bourgeois class accused our movement 
again and again of taking up a negative attitude towards the modern State. For that reason the motley 
gang of camp followers attached to the various political parties, representing a heterogeneous 
conglomeration of political views, assumed the right of utilizing all available means to suppress the 
protagonists of this young movement which was preaching a new political gospel. Our opponents 
deliberately ignored the fact that the bourgeois class itself stood for no uniform opinion as to what the 
State really meant and that the bourgeoisie did not and could not give any coherent definition of this 
institution. Those whose duty it is to explain what is meant when we speak of the State, hold chairs in 
State universities, often in the department of constitutional law, and consider it their highest duty to 
find explanations and justifications for the more or less fortunate existence of that particular form of 
State which provides them with their daily bread. The more absurd such a form of State is the more 
obscure and artificial and incomprehensible are the definitions which are advanced to explain the 
purpose of its existence. What, for instance, could a royal and imperial university professor write 
about the meaning and purpose of a State in a country whose statal form represented the greatest 
monstrosity of the twentieth century? That would be a difficult undertaking indeed, in view of the fact 
that the contemporary professor of constitutional law is obliged not so much to serve the cause of 
truth but rather to serve a certain definite purpose. And this purpose is to defend at all costs the 
existence of that monstrous human mechanism which we now call the State. Nobody can be surprised 
if concrete facts are evaded as far as possible when the problem of the State is under discussion and if 
professors adopt the tactics of concealing themselves in morass of abstract values and duties and 
purposes which are described as ethical and moral. 

Generally speaking, these various theorists may be classed in three groups: 

1. Those who hold that the State is a more or less voluntary association of men who have agreed to set 
up and obey a ruling authority. 

This is numerically the largest group. In its ranks are to be found those who worship our present 
principle of legalized authority. In their eyes the will of the people has no part whatever in the whole 
affair. For them the fact that the State exists is sufficient reason to consider it sacred and inviolable. 
To accept this aberration of the human brain one would have to have a sort of canine adoration for 
what is called the authority of the State. In the minds of these people the means is substituted for the 
end, by a sort of sleight-of-hand movement. The State no longer exists for the purpose of serving men 
but men exist for the purpose of adoring the authority of the State, which is vested in its functionaries, 
even down to the smallest official. So as to prevent this placid and ecstatic adoration from changing 
into something that might become in any way disturbing, the authority of the State is limited simply to 
the task of preserving order and tranquillity. Therewith it is no longer either a means or an end. The 
State must see that public peace and order are preserved and, in their turn, order and peace must make 
the existence of the State possible. All life must move between these two poles. In Bavaria this view is 
upheld by the artful politicians of the Bavarian Centre, which is called the Bavarian Populist Party. 
In Austria the Black-and- Yellow legitimists adopt a similar attitude. In the Reich, unfortunately, the 
so-called conservative elements follow the same line of thought. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (1 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:19:44] 


2. The second group is somewhat smaller in numbers. It includes those who would make the existence 
of the State dependent on some conditions at least. They insist that not only should there be a uniform 
system of government but also, if possible, that only one language should be used, though solely for 
technical reasons of administration. In this view the authority of the State is no longer the sole and 
exclusive end for which the State exists. It must also promote the good of its subjects. Ideas of 
freedom, mostly based on a misunderstanding of the meaning of that word, enter into the concept of 
the State as it exists in the minds of this group. The form of government is no longer considered 
inviolable simply because it exists. It must submit to the test of practical efficiency. Its venerable age 
no longer protects it from being criticized in the light of modern exigencies. Moreover, in this view 
the first duty laid upon the State is to guarantee the economic well-being of the individual citizens. 
Hence it is judged from the practical standpoint and according to general principles based on the idea 
of economic returns. The chief representatives of this theory of the State are to be found among the 
average German bourgeoisie, especially our liberal democrats. 

3. The third group is numerically the smallest. In the State they discover a means for the realization of 
tendencies that arise from a policy of power, on the part of a people who are ethnically homogeneous 
and speak the same language. But those who hold this view are not clear about what they mean by 
tendencies arising from a policy of power. A common language is postulated not only because they 
hope that thereby the State would be furnished with a solid basis for the extension of its power outside 
its own frontiers, but also because they think though falling into a fundamental error by doing so 
that such a common language would enable them to carry out a process of nationalization in a definite 

During the last century it was lamentable for those who had to witness it, to notice how in these 
circles I have just mentioned the word Germanization was frivolously played with, though the 
practice was often well intended. I well remember how in the days of my youth this very term used to 
give rise to notions which were false to an incredible degree. Even in Pan-German circles one heard 
the opinion expressed that the Austrian Germans might very well succeed in Germanizing the 
Austrian Slavs, if only the Government would be ready to co-operate. Those people did not 
understand that a policy of Germanization can be carried out only as regards human beings. What they 
mostly meant by Germanization was a process of forcing other people to speak the German language. 
But it is almost inconceivable how such a mistake could be made as to think that a Nigger or a 
Chinaman will become a German because he has learned the German language and is willing to speak 
German for the future, and even to cast his vote for a German political party. Our bourgeois 
nationalists could never clearly see that such a process of Germanization is in reality 
de- Germanization; for even if all the outstanding and visible differences between the various peoples 
could be bridged over and finally wiped out by the use of a common language, that would produce a 
process of bastardization which in this case would not signify Germanization but the annihilation of 
the German element. In the course of history it has happened only too often that a conquering race 
succeeded by external force in compelling the people whom they subjected to speak the tongue of the 
conqueror and that after a thousand years their language was spoken by another people and that thus 
the conqueror finally turned out to be the conquered. 

What makes a people or, to be more correct, a race, is not language but blood. Therefore it would be 
justifiable to speak of Germanization only if that process could change the blood of the people who 
would be subjected to it, which is obviously impossible. A change would be possible only by a 
mixture of blood, but in this case the quality of the superior race would be debased. The final result of 
such a mixture would be that precisely those qualities would be destroyed which had enabled the 
conquering race to achieve victory over an inferior people. It is especially the cultural creativeness 
which disappears when a superior race intermixes with an inferior one, even though the resultant 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (2 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:19:44] 


mongrel race should excel a thousandfold in speaking the language of the race that once had been 
superior. For a certain time there will be a conflict between the different mentalities, and it may be 
that a nation which is in a state of progressive degeneration will at the last moment rally its cultural 
creative power and once again produce striking examples of that power. But these results are due only 
to the activity of elements that have remained over from the superior race or hybrids of the first 
crossing in whom the superior blood has remained dominant and seeks to assert itself. But this will 
never happen with the final descendants of such hybrids. These are always in a state of cultural 

We must consider it as fortunate that a Germanization of Austria according to the plan of Joseph II did 
not succeed. Probably the result would have been that the Austrian State would have been able to 
survive, but at the same time participation in the use of a common language would have debased the 
racial quality of the German element. In the course of centuries a certain herd instinct might have been 
developed but the herd itself would have deteriorated in quality. A national State might have arisen, 
but a people who had been culturally creative would have disappeared. 

For the German nation it was better that this process of intermixture did not take place, although it 
was not renounced for any high-minded reasons but simply through the short-sighted pettiness of the 
Habsburgs. If it had taken place the German people could not now be looked upon as a cultural factor. 

Not only in Austria, however, but also in the Reich, these so-called national circles were, and still are, 
under the influence of similar erroneous ideas. Unfortunately, a policy towards Poland, whereby the 
East was to be Germanized, was demanded by many and was based on the same false reasoning. Here 
again it was believed that the Polish people could be Germanized by being compelled to use the 
German language. The result would have been fatal. A people of foreign race would have had to use 
the German language to express modes of thought that were foreign to the German, thus 
compromising by its own inferiority the dignity and nobility of our nation. 

It is revolting to think how much damage is indirectly done to German prestige to-day through the fact 
that the German patois of the Jews when they enter the United States enables them to be classed as 
Germans, because many Americans are quite ignorant of German conditions. Among us, nobody 
would think of taking these unhygienic immigrants from the East for members of the German race and 
nation merely because they mostly speak German. 

What has been beneficially Germanized in the course of history was the land which our ancestors 
conquered with the sword and colonized with German tillers of the soil. To the extent that they 
introduced foreign blood into our national body in this colonization, they have helped to disintegrate 
our racial character, a process which has resulted in our German hyper-individualism, though this 
latter characteristic is even now frequently praised. 

In this third group also there are people who, to a certain degree, consider the State as an end in itself. 
Hence they consider its preservation as one of the highest aims of human existence. Our analysis may 
be summed up as follows: 

All these opinions have this common feature and failing: that they are not grounded in a recognition 
of the profound truth that the capacity for creating cultural values is essentially based on the racial 
element and that, in accordance with this fact, the paramount purpose of the State is to preserve and 
improve the race; for this is an indispensable condition of all progress in human civilization. 

Thus the Jew, Karl Marx, was able to draw the final conclusions from these false concepts and ideas 
on the nature and purpose of the State. By eliminating from the concept of the State all thought of the 
obligation which the State bears towards the race, without finding any other formula that might be 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (3 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:19:44] 


universally accepted, the bourgeois teaching prepared the way for that doctrine which rejects the State 
as such. 

That is why the bourgeois struggle against Marxist internationalism is absolutely doomed to fail in 
this field. The bourgeois classes have already sacrificed the basic principles which alone could furnish 
a solid footing for their ideas. Their crafty opponent has perceived the defects in their structure and 
advances to the assault on it with those weapons which they themselves have placed in his hands 
though not meaning to do so. 

Therefore any new movement which is based on the racial concept of the world will first of all have to 
put forward a clear and logical doctrine of the nature and purpose of the State. 

The fundamental principle is that the State is not an end in itself but the means to an end. It is the 
preliminary condition under which alone a higher form of human civilization can be developed, but it 
is not the source of such a development. This is to be sought exclusively in the actual existence of a 
race which is endowed with the gift of cultural creativeness. There may be hundreds of excellent 
States on this earth, and yet if the Aryan, who is the creator and custodian of civilization, should 
disappear, all culture that is on an adequate level with the spiritual needs of the superior nations to-day 
would also disappear. We may go still further and say that the fact that States have been created by 
human beings does not in the least exclude the possiblity that the human race may become extinct, 
because the superior intellectual faculties and powers of adaptation would be lost when the racial 
bearer of these faculties and powers disappeared. 

If, for instance, the surface of the globe should be shaken to-day by some seismic convulsion and if a 
new Himalaya would emerge from the waves of the sea, this one catastrophe alone might annihilate 
human civilization. No State could exist any longer. All order would be shattered. And all vestiges of 
cultural products which had been evolved through thousands of years would disappear. Nothing 
would be left but one tremendous field of death and destruction submerged in floods of water and 
mud. If, however, just a few people would survive this terrible havoc, and if these people belonged to 
a definite race that had the innate powers to build up a civilization, when the commotion had passed, 
the earth would again bear witness to the creative power of the human spirit, even though a span of a 
thousand years might intervene. Only with the extermination of the last race that possesses the gift of 
cultural creativeness, and indeed only if all the individuals of that race had disappeared, would the 
earth definitely be turned into a desert. On the other hand, modern history furnishes examples to show 
that statal institutions which owe their beginnings to members of a race which lacks creative genius 
are not made of stuff that will endure. Just as many varieties of prehistoric animals had to give way to 
others and leave no trace behind them, so man will also have to give way, if he loses that definite 
faculty which enables him to find the weapons that are necessary for him to maintain his own 

It is not the State as such that brings about a certain definite advance in cultural progress. The State 
can only protect the race that is the cause of such progress. The State as such may well exist without 
undergoing any change for hundreds of years, though the cultural faculties and the general life of the 
people, which is shaped by these faculties, may have suffered profound changes by reason of the fact 
that the State did not prevent a process of racial mixture from taking place. The present State, for 
instance, may continue to exist in a mere mechanical form, but the poison of miscegenation 
permeating the national body brings about a cultural decadence which manifests itself already in 
various symptoms that are of a detrimental character. 

Thus the indispensable prerequisite for the existence of a superior quality of human beings is not the 
State but the race, which is alone capable of producing that higher human quality. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (4 of 30) [04/06/2000 1 6:1 9:45] 


This capacity is always there, though it will lie dormant unless external circumstances awaken it to 
action. Nations, or rather races, which are endowed with the faculty of cultural creativeness possess 
this faculty in a latent form during periods when the external circumstances are unfavourable for the 
time being and therefore do not allow the faculty to express itself effectively. It is therefore 
outrageously unjust to speak of the pre-Christian Germans as barbarians who had no civilization. 
They never have been such. But the severity of the climate that prevailed in the northern regions 
which they inhabited imposed conditions of life which hampered a free development of their creative 
faculties. If they had come to the fairer climate of the South, with no previous culture whatsoever, and 
if they acquired the necessary human material that is to say, men of an inferior race to serve them as 
working implements, the cultural faculty dormant in them would have splendidly blossomed forth, as 
happened in the case of the Greeks, for example. But this primordial creative faculty in cultural things 
was not solely due to their northern climate. For the Laplanders or the Eskimos would not have 
become creators of a culture if they were transplanted to the South. No, this wonderful creative faculty 
is a special gift bestowed on the Aryan, whether it lies dormant in him or becomes active, according 
as the adverse conditions of nature prevent the active expression of that faculty or favourable 
circumstances permit it. 

From these facts the following conclusions may be drawn: 

The State is only a means to an end. Its end and its purpose is to preserve and promote a community 
of human beings who are physically as well as spiritually kindred. Above all, it must preserve the 
existence of the race, thereby providing the indispensable condition for the free development of all the 
forces dormant in this race. A great part of these faculties will always have to be employed in the first 
place to maintain the physical existence of the race, and only a small portion will be free to work in 
the field of intellectual progress. But, as a matter of fact, the one is always the necessary counterpart 
of the other. 

Those States which do not serve this purpose have no justification for their existence. They are 
monstrosities. The fact that they do exist is no more of a justification than the successful raids carried 
out by a band of pirates can be considered a justification of piracy. 

We National Socialists, who are fighting for a new Weltanschhauung, must never take our stand on 
the famous basis of facts, and especially not on mistaken facts. If we did so, we should cease to be 
the protagonists of a new and great idea and would become slaves in the service of the fallacy which 
is dominant to-day. We must make a clear-cut distinction between the vessel and its contents. The 
State is only the vessel and the race is what it contains. The vessel can have a meaning only if it 
preserves and safeguards the contents. Otherwise it is worthless. 

Hence the supreme purpose of the ethnical State is to guard and preserve those racial elements which, 
through their work in the cultural field, create that beauty and dignity which are characteristic of a 
higher mankind. As Aryans, we can consider the State only as the living organism of a people, an 
organism which does not merely maintain the existence of a people, but functions in such a way as to 
lead its people to a position of supreme liberty by the progressive development of the intellectual and 
cultural faculties. 

What they want to impose upon us as a State to-day is in most cases nothing but a monstrosity, the 
product of a profound human aberration which brings untold suffering in its train. 

We National Socialists know that in holding these views we take up a revolutionary stand in the world 
of to-day and that we are branded as revolutionaries. But our views and our conduct will not be 
determined by the approbation or disapprobation of our contemporaries, but only by our duty to 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (5 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:19:45] 


follow a truth which we have acknowledged. In doing this we have reason to believe that posterity 
will have a clearer insight, and will not only understand the work we are doing to-day, but will also 
ratify it as the right work and will exalt it accordingly. 

On these principles we National Socialists base our standards of value in appraising a State. This 
value will be relative when viewed from the particular standpoint of the individual nation, but it will 
be absolute when considered from the standpoint of humanity as a whole. In other words, this means: 

That the excellence of a State can never be judged by the level of its culture or the degree of 
importance which the outside world attaches to its power, but that its excellence must be judged by 
the degree to which its institutions serve the racial stock which belongs to it. 

A State may be considered as a model example if it adequately serves not only the vital needs of the 
racial stock it represents but if it actually assures by its own existence the preservation of this same 
racial stock, no matter what general cultural significance this statal institution may have in the eyes of 
the rest of the world. For it is not the task of the State to create human capabilities, but only to assure 
free scope for the exercise of capabilities that already exist. On the other hand, a State may be called 
bad if, in spite of the existence of a high cultural level, it dooms to destruction the bearers of that 
culture by breaking up their racial uniformity. For the practical effect of such a policy would be to 
destroy those conditions that are indispensable for the ulterior existence of that culture, which the 
State did not create but which is the fruit of the creative power inherent in the racial stock whose 
existence is assured by being united in the living organism of the State. Once again let me emphasize 
the fact that the State itself is not the substance but the form. Therefore, the cultural level is not the 
standard by which we can judge the value of the State in which that people lives. It is evident that a 
people which is endowed with high creative powers in the cultural sphere is of more worth than a tribe 
of negroes. And yet the statal organization of the former, if judged from the standpoint of efficiency, 
may be worse than that of the negroes. Not even the best of States and statal institutions can evolve 
faculties from a people which they lack and which they never possessed, but a bad State may 
gradually destroy the faculties which once existed. This it can do by allowing or favouring the 
suppression of those who are the bearers of a racial culture. 

Therefore, the worth of a State can be determined only by asking how far it actually succeeds in 
promoting the well-being of a definite race and not by the role which it plays in the world at large. Its 
relative worth can be estimated readily and accurately; but it is difficult to judge its absolute worth, 
because the latter is conditioned not only by the State but also by the quality and cultural level of the 
people that belong to the individual State in question. 

Therefore, when we speak of the high mission of the State we must not forget that the high mission 
belongs to the people and that the business of the State is to use its organizing powers for the purpose 
of furnishing the necessary conditions which allow this people freely to unfold its creative faculties. 
And if we ask what kind of statal institution we Germans need, we must first have a clear notion as to 
the people which that State must embrace and what purpose it must serve. 

Unfortunately the German national being is not based on a uniform racial type. The process of 
welding the original elements together has not gone so far as to warrant us in saying that a new race 
has emerged. On the contrary, the poison which has invaded the national body, especially since the 
Thirty Years War, has destroyed the uniform constitution not only of our blood but also of our 
national soul. The open frontiers of our native country, the association with non-German foreign 
elements in the territories that lie all along those frontiers, and especially the strong influx of foreign 
blood into the interior of the Reich itself, has prevented any complete assimilation of those various 
elements, because the influx has continued steadily. Out of this melting-pot no new race arose. The 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (6 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:19:45] 


heterogeneous elements continue to exist side by side. And the result is that, especially in times of 
crisis, when the herd usually flocks together, the Germans disperse in all directions. The fundamental 
racial elements are not only different in different districts, but there are also various elements in the 
single districts. Beside the Nordic type we find the East-European type, beside the Eastern there is the 
Dinaric, the Western type intermingling with both, and hybrids among them all. That is a grave 
drawback for us. Through it the Germans lack that strong herd instinct which arises from unity of 
blood and saves nations from ruin in dangerous and critical times; because on such occasions small 
differences disappear, so that a united herd faces the enemy. What we understand by the word 
hyper-individualism arises from the fact that our primordial racial elements have existed side by side 
without ever consolidating. During times of peace such a situation may offer some advantages, but, 
taken all in all, it has prevented us from gaining a mastery in the world. If in its historical 
development the German people had possessed the unity of herd instinct by which other peoples have 
so much benefited, then the German Reich would probably be mistress of the globe to-day. World 
history would have taken another course and in this case no man can tell if what many blinded 
pacifists hope to attain by petitioning, whining and crying, may not have been reached in this way: 
namely, a peace which would not be based upon the waving of olive branches and tearful 
misery-mongering of pacifist old women, but a peace that would be guaranteed by the triumphant 
sword of a people endowed with the power to master the world and administer it in the service of a 
higher civilization. 

The fact that our people did not have a national being based on a unity of blood has been the source of 
untold misery for us. To many petty German potentates it gave residential capital cities, but the 
German people as a whole was deprived of its right to rulership. 

Even to-day our nation still suffers from this lack of inner unity; but what has been the cause of our 
past and present misfortunes may turn out a blessing for us in the future. Though on the one hand it 
may be a drawback that our racial elements were not welded together, so that no homogeneous 
national body could develop, on the other hand, it was fortunate that, since at least a part of our best 
blood was thus kept pure, its racial quality was not debased. 

A complete assimilation of all our racial elements would certainly have brought about a homogeneous 
national organism; but, as has been proved in the case of every racial mixture, it would have been less 
capable of creating a civilization than by keeping intact its best original elements. A benefit which 
results from the fact that there was no all-round assimilation is to be seen in that even now we have 
large groups of German Nordic people within our national organization, and that their blood has not 
been mixed with the blood of other races. We must look upon this as our most valuable treasure for 
the sake of the future. During that dark period of absolute ignorance in regard to all racial laws, when 
each individual was considered to be on a par with every other, there could be no clear appreciation of 
the difference between the various fundamental racial characteristics. We know to-day that a complete 
assimilation of all the various elements which constitute the national being might have resulted in 
giving us a larger share of external power: but, on the other hand, the highest of human aims would 
not have been attained, because the only kind of people which fate has obviously chosen to bring 
about this perfection would have been lost in such a general mixture of races which would constitute 
such a racial amalgamation. 

But what has been prevented by a friendly Destiny, without any assistance on our part, must now be 
reconsidered and utilized in the light of our new knowledge. 

He who talks of the German people as having a mission to fulfil on this earth must know that this 
cannot be fulfilled except by the building up of a State whose highest purpose is to preserve and 
promote those nobler elements of our race and of the whole of mankind which have remained 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (7 of 30) [04/06/2000 1 6:1 9:45] 



Thus for the first time a high inner purpose is accredited to the State. In face of the ridiculous phrase 
that the State should do no more than act as the guardian of public order and tranquillity, so that 
everybody can peacefully dupe everybody else, it is given a very high mission indeed to preserve and 
encourage the highest type of humanity which a beneficent Creator has bestowed on this earth. Out of 
a dead mechanism which claims to be an end in itself a living organism shall arise which has to serve 
one purpose exclusively: and that, indeed, a purpose which belongs to a higher order of ideas. 

As a State the German Reich shall include all Germans. Its task is not only to gather in and foster the 
most valuable sections of our people but to lead them slowly and surely to a dominant position in the 

Thus a period of stagnation is superseded by a period of effort. And here, as in every other sphere, the 
proverb holds good that to rest is to rust; and furthermore the proverb that victory will always be won 
by him who attacks. The higher the final goal which we strive to reach, and the less it be understood at 
the time by the broad masses, the more magnificent will be its success. That is what the lesson of 
history teaches. And the achievement will be all the more significant if the end is conceived in the 
right way and the fight carried through with unswerving persistence. Many of the officials who direct 
the affairs of State nowadays may find it easier to work for the maintenance of the present order than 
to fight for a new one. They will find it more comfortable to look upon the State as a mechanism, 
whose purpose is its own preservation, and to say that their lives belong to the State, as if anything 
that grew from the inner life of the nation can logically serve anything but the national being, and as if 
man could be made for anything else than for his fellow beings. Naturally, it is easier, as I have said, 
to consider the authority of the State as nothing but the formal mechanism of an organization, rather 
than as the sovereign incarnation of a peoples instinct for self-preservation on this earth. For these 
weak minds the State and the authority of the State is nothing but an aim in itself, while for us it is an 
effective weapon in the service of the great and eternal struggle for existence, a weapon which 
everyone must adopt, not because it is a mere formal mechanism, but because it is the main 
expression of our common will to exist. 

Therefore, in the fight for our new idea, which conforms completely to the primal meaning of life, we 
shall find only a small number of comrades in a social order which has become decrepit not only 
physically but mentally also. From these strata of our population only a few exceptional people will 
join our ranks, only those few old people whose hearts have remained young and whose courage is 
still vigorous, but not those who consider it their duty to maintain the state of affairs that exists. 

Against us we have the innumerable army of all those who are lazy-minded and indifferent rather than 
evil, and those whose self-interest leads them to uphold the present state of affairs. On the apparent 
hopelessness of our great struggle is based the magnitude of our task and the possibilities of success. 
A battle-cry which from the very start will scare off all the petty spirits, or at least discourage them, 
will become the signal for a rally of all those temperaments that are of the real fighting metal. And it 
must be clearly recognized that if a highly energetic and active body of men emerge from a nation and 
unite in the fight for one goal, thereby ultimately rising above the inert masses of the people, this 
small percentage will become masters of the whole. World history is made by minorities if these 
numerical minorities represent in themselves the will and energy and initiative of the people as a 

What seems an obstacle to many persons is really a preliminary condition of our victory. Just because 
our task is so great and because so many difficulties have to be overcome, the highest probability is 
that only the best kind of protagonists will join our ranks. This selection is the guarantee of our 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (8 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:19:45] 


success. Nature generally takes certain measures to correct the effect which racial mixture produces in 
life. She is not much in favour of the mongrel. The later products of cross-breeding have to suffer 
bitterly, especially the third, fourth and fifth generations. Not only are they deprived of the higher 
qualities that belonged to the parents who participated in the first mixture, but they also lack definite 
will-power and vigorous vital energies owing to the lack of harmony in the quality of their blood. At 
all critical moments in which a person of pure racial blood makes correct decisions, that is to say, 
decisions that are coherent and uniform, the person of mixed blood will become confused and take 
measures that are incoherent. Hence we see that a person of mixed blood is not only relatively inferior 
to a person of pure blood, but is also doomed to become extinct more rapidly. In innumerable cases 
wherein the pure race holds its ground the mongrel breaks down. Therein we witness the corrective 
provision which Nature adopts. She restricts the possibilities of procreation, thus impeding the fertility 
of cross-breeds and bringing them to extinction. 

For instance, if an individual member of a race should mingle his blood with the member of a superior 
race the first result would be a lowering of the racial level, and furthermore the descendants of this 
cross-breeding would be weaker than those of the people around them who had maintained their blood 
unadulterated. Where no new blood from the superior race enters the racial stream of the mongrels, 
and where those mongrels continue to cross-breed among themselves, the latter will either die out 
because they have insufficient powers of resistance, which is Natures wise provision, or in the course 
of many thousands of years they will form a new mongrel race in which the original elements will 
become so wholly mixed through this millennial crossing that traces of the original elements will be 
no longer recognizable. And thus a new people would be developed which possessed a certain 
resistance capacity of the herd type, but its intellectual value and its cultural significance would be 
essentially inferior to those which the first cross-breeds possessed. But even in this last case the 
mongrel product would succumb in the mutual struggle for existence with a higher racial group that 
had maintained its blood unmixed. The herd solidarity which this mongrel race had developed through 
thousands of years will not be equal to the struggle. And this is because it would lack elasticity and 
constructive capacity to prevail over a race of homogeneous blood that was mentally and culturally 

Therewith we may lay down the following principle as valid: every racial mixture leads, of necessity, 
sooner or later to the downfall of the mongrel product, provided the higher racial strata of this 
cross-breed has not retained within itself some sort of racial homogeneity. The danger to the mongrels 
ceases only when this higher stratum, which has maintained certain standards of homogeneous 
breeding, ceases to be true to its pedigree and intermingles with the mongrels. 

This principle is the source of a slow but constant regeneration whereby all the poison which has 
invaded the racial body is gradually eliminated so long as there still remains a fundamental stock of 
pure racial elements which resists further crossbreeding. 

Such a process may set in automatically among those people where a strong racial instinct has 
remained. Among such people we may count those elements which, for some particular cause such as 
coercion, have been thrown out of the normal way of reproduction along strict racial lines. As soon as 
this compulsion ceases, that part of the race which has remained intact will tend to marry with its own 
kind and thus impede further intermingling. Then the mongrels recede quite naturally into the 
background unless their numbers had increased so much as to be able to withstand all serious 
resistance from those elements which had preserved the purity of their race. 

When men have lost their natural instincts and ignore the obligations imposed on them by Nature, 
then there is no hope that Nature will correct the loss that has been caused, until recognition of the lost 
instincts has been restored. Then the task of bringing back what has been lost will have to be 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (9 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:19:45] 


accomplished. But there is serious danger that those who have become blind once in this respect will 
continue more and more to break down racial barriers and finally lose the last remnants of what is best 
in them. What then remains is nothing but a uniform mish-mash, which seems to be the dream of our 
fine Utopians. But that mish-mash would soon banish all ideals from the world. Certainly a great herd 
could thus be formed. One can breed a herd of animals; but from a mixture of this kind men such as 
have created and founded civilizations would not be produced. The mission of humanity might then 
be considered at an end. 

Those who do not wish that the earth should fall into such a condition must realize that it is the task of 
the German State in particular to see to it that the process of bastardization is brought to a stop. 

Our contemporary generation of weaklings will naturally decry such a policy and whine and complain 
about it as an encroachment on the most sacred of human rights. But there is only one right that is 
sacrosanct and this right is at the same time a most sacred duty. This right and obligation are: that the 
purity of the racial blood should be guarded, so that the best types of human beings may be preserved 
and that thus we should render possible a more noble development of humanity itself. 

A folk-State should in the first place raise matrimony from the level of being a constant scandal to the 
race. The State should consecrate it as an institution which is called upon to produce creatures made in 
the likeness of the Lord and not create monsters that are a mixture of man and ape. The protest which 
is put forward in the name of humanity does not fit the mouth of a generation that makes it possible 
for the most depraved degenerates to propagate themselves, thereby imposing unspeakable suffering 
on their own products and their contemporaries, while on the other hand contraceptives are permitted 
and sold in every drug store and even by street hawkers, so that babies should not be born even among 
the healthiest of our people. In this present State of ours, whose function it is to be the guardian of 
peace and good order, our national bourgeoisie look upon it as a crime to make procreation impossible 
for syphilitics and those who suffer from tuberculosis or other hereditary diseases, also cripples and 
imbeciles. But the practical prevention of procreation among millions of our very best people is not 
considered as an evil, nor does it offend against the noble morality of this social class but rather 
encourages their short-sightedness and mental lethargy. For otherwise they would at least stir their 
brains to find an answer to the question of how to create conditions for the feeding and maintaining of 
those future beings who will be the healthy representatives of our nation and must also provide the 
conditions on which the generation that is to follow them will have to support itself and live. 

How devoid of ideals and how ignoble is the whole contemporary system! The fact that the churches 
join in committing this sin against the image of God, even though they continue to emphasize the 
dignity of that image, is quite in keeping with their present activities. They talk about the Spirit, but 
they allow man, as the embodiment of the Spirit, to degenerate to the proletarian level. Then they look 
on with amazement when they realize how small is the influence of the Christian Faith in their own 
country and how depraved and ungodly is this riff-raff which is physically degenerate and therefore 
morally degenerate also. To balance this state of affairs they try to convert the Hottentots and the 
Zulus and the Kaffirs and to bestow on them the blessings of the Church. While our European people, 
God be praised and thanked, are left to become the victims of moral depravity, the pious missionary 
goes out to Central Africa and establishes missionary stations for negroes. Finally, sound and healthy 
though primitive and backward people will be transformed, under the name of our higher 
civilization, into a motley of lazy and brutalized mongrels. 

It would better accord with noble human aspirations if our two Christian denominations would cease 
to bother the negroes with their preaching, which the negroes do not want and do not understand. It 
would be better if they left this work alone, and if, in its stead, they tried to teach people in Europe, 
kindly and seriously, that it is much more pleasing to God if a couple that is not of healthy stock were 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (10 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:19:45] 


to show loving kindness to some poor orphan and become a father and mother to him, rather than give 
life to a sickly child that will be a cause of suffering and unhappiness to all. 

In this field the Peoples State will have to repair the damage that arises from the fact that the problem 
is at present neglected by all the various parties concerned. It will be the task of the Peoples State to 
make the race the centre of the life of the community. It must make sure that the purity of the racial 
strain will be preserved. It must proclaim the truth that the child is the most valuable possession a 
people can have. It must see to it that only those who are healthy shall beget children; that there is 
only one infamy, namely, for parents that are ill or show hereditary defects to bring children into the 
world and that in such cases it is a high honour to refrain from doing so. But, on the other hand, it 
must be considered as reprehensible conduct to refrain from giving healthy children to the nation. In 
this matter the State must assert itself as the trustee of a millennial future, in face of which the 
egotistic desires of the individual count for nothing and will have to give way before the ruling of the 
State. In order to fulfil this duty in a practical manner the State will have to avail itself of modern 
medical discoveries. It must proclaim as unfit for procreation all those who are inflicted with some 
visible hereditary disease or are the carriers of it; and practical measures must be adopted to have such 
people rendered sterile. On the other hand, provision must be made for the normally fertile woman so 
that she will not be restricted in child-bearing through the financial and economic system operating in 
a political regime that looks upon the blessing of having children as a curse to their parents. The State 
will have to abolish the cowardly and even criminal indifference with which the problem of social 
amenities for large families is treated, and it will have to be the supreme protector of this greatest 
blessing that a people can boast of. Its attention and care must be directed towards the child rather 
than the adult. 

Those who are physically and mentally unhealthy and unfit must not perpetuate their own suffering in 
the bodies of their children. From the educational point of view there is here a huge task for the 
Peoples State to accomplish. But in a future era this work will appear greater and more significant 
than the victorious wars of our present bourgeois epoch. Through educational means the State must 
teach individuals that illness is not a disgrace but an unfortunate accident which has to be pitied, yet 
that it is a crime and a disgrace to make this affliction all the worse by passing on disease and defects 
to innocent creatures out of mere egotism. 

And the State must also teach the people that it is an expression of a really noble nature and that it is a 
humanitarian act worthy of admiration if a person who innocently suffers from hereditary disease 
refrains from having a child of his own but gives his love and affection to some unknown child who, 
through its health, promises to become a robust member of a healthy community. In accomplishing 
such an educational task the State integrates its function by this activity in the moral sphere. It must 
act on this principle without paying any attention to the question of whether its conduct will be 
understood or misconstrued, blamed or praised. 

If for a period of only 600 years those individuals would be sterilized who are physically degenerate 
or mentally diseased, humanity would not only be delivered from an immense misfortune but also 
restored to a state of general health such as we at present can hardly imagine. If the fecundity of the 
healthy portion of the nation should be made a practical matter in a conscientious and methodical 
way, we should have at least the beginnings of a race from which all those germs would be eliminated 
which are to-day the cause of our moral and physical decadence. If a people and a State take this 
course to develop that nucleus of the nation which is most valuable from the racial standpoint and thus 
increase its fecundity, the people as a whole will subsequently enjoy that most precious of gifts which 
consists in a racial quality fashioned on truly noble lines. 

To achieve this the State should first of all not leave the colonization of newly acquired territory to a 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (11 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:19:45] 


haphazard policy but should have it carried out under the guidance of definite principles. Specially 
competent committees ought to issue certificates to individuals entitling them to engage in 
colonization work, and these certificates should guarantee the racial purity of the individuals in 
question. In this way frontier colonies could gradually be founded whose inhabitants would be of the 
purest racial stock, and hence would possess the best qualities of the race. Such colonies would be a 
valuable asset to the whole nation. Their development would be a source of joy and confidence and 
pride to each citizen of the nation, because they would contain the pure germ which would ultimately 
bring about a great development of the nation and indeed of mankind itself. 

The Weltanschhauung which bases the State on the racial idea must finally succeed in bringing about 
a nobler era, in which men will no longer pay exclusive attention to breeding and rearing pedigree 
dogs and horses and cats, but will endeavour to improve the breed of the human race itself. That will 
be an era of silence and renunciation for one class of people, while the others will give their gifts and 
make their sacrifices joyfully. 

That such a mentality may be possible cannot be denied in a world where hundreds and thousands 
accept the principle of celibacy from their own choice, without being obliged or pledged to do so by 
anything except an ecclesiastical precept. Why should it not be possible to induce people to make this 
sacrifice if, instead of such a precept, they were simply told that they ought to put an end to this truly 
original sin of racial corruption which is steadily being passed on from one generation to another. 
And, further, they ought to be brought to realize that it is their bounden duty to give to the Almighty 
Creator beings such as He himself made to His own image. 

Naturally, our wretched army of contemporary philistines will not understand these things. They will 
ridicule them or shrug their round shoulders and groan out their everlasting excuses: "Of course it is a 
fine thing, but the pity is that it cannot be carried out." And we reply: "With you indeed it cannot be 
done, for your world is incapable of such an idea. You know only one anxiety and that is for your own 
personal existence. You have one God, and that is your money. We do not turn to you, however, for 
help, but to the great army of those who are too poor to consider their personal existence as the 
highest good on earth. They do not place their trust in money but in other gods, into whose hands they 
confide their lives. Above all we turn to the vast army of our German youth. They are coming to 
maturity in a great epoch, and they will fight against the evils which were due to the laziness and 
indifference of their fathers." Either the German youth will one day create a new State founded on the 
racial idea or they will be the last witnesses of the complete breakdown and death of the bourgeois 

For if a generation suffers from defects which it recognizes and even admits and is nevertheless quite 
pleased with itself, as the bourgeois world is to-day, resorting to the cheap excuse that nothing can be 
done to remedy the situation, then such a generation is doomed to disaster. A marked characteristic of 
our bourgeois world is that they no longer can deny the evil conditions that exist. They have to admit 
that there is much which is foul and wrong; but they are not able to make up their minds to fight 
against that evil, which would mean putting forth the energy to mobilize the forces of 60 or 70 million 
people and thus oppose this menace. They do just the opposite. When such an effort is made 
elsewhere they only indulge in silly comment and try from a safe distance to show that such an 
enterprise is theoretically impossible and doomed to failure. No arguments are too stupid to be 
employed in the service of their own pettifogging opinions and their knavish moral attitude. If, for 
instance, a whole continent wages war against alcoholic intoxication, so as to free a whole people 
from this devastating vice, our bourgeois European does not know better than to look sideways 
stupidly, shake the head in doubt and ridicule the movement with a superior sneer a state of mind 
which is effective in a society that is so ridiculous. But when all these stupidities miss their aim and in 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (12 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:19:45] 


that part of the world this sublime and intangible attitude is treated effectively and success attends the 
movement, then such success is called into question or its importance minimized. Even moral 
principles are used in this slanderous campaign against a movement which aims at suppressing a great 
source of immorality. 

No. We must not permit ourselves to be deceived by any illusions on this point. Our contemporary 
bourgeois world has become useless for any such noble human task because it has lost all high quality 
and is evil, not so much as I think because evil is wished but rather because these people are too 
indolent to rise up against it. That is why those political societies which call themselves bourgeois 
parties are nothing but associations to promote the interests of certain professional groups and 
classes. Their highest aim is to defend their own egoistic interests as best they can. It is obvious that 
such a guild, consisting of bourgeois politicians, may be considered fit for anything rather than a 
struggle, especially when the adversaries are not cautious shopkeepers but the proletarian masses, 
goaded on to extremities and determined not to hesitate before deeds of violence. 

If we consider it the first duty of the State to serve and promote the general welfare of the people, by 
preserving and encouraging the development of the best racial elements, the logical consequence is 
that this task cannot be limited to measures concerning the birth of the infant members of the race and 
nation but that the State will also have to adopt educational means for making each citizen a worthy 
factor in the further propagation of the racial stock. 

Just as, in general, the racial quality is the preliminary condition for the mental efficiency of any given 
human material, the training of the individual will first of all have to be directed towards the 
development of sound bodily health. For the general rule is that a strong and healthy mind is found 
only in a strong and healthy body. The fact that men of genius are sometimes not robust in health and 
stature, or even of a sickly constitution, is no proof against the principle I have enunciated. These 
cases are only exceptions which, as everywhere else, prove the rule. But when the bulk of a nation is 
composed of physical degenerates it is rare for a great spirit to arise from such a miserable motley. 
And in any case his activities would never meet with great success. A degenerate mob will either be 
incapable of understanding him at all or their will-power is so feeble that they cannot follow the 
soaring of such an eagle. 

The State that is grounded on the racial principle and is alive to the significance of this truth will first 
of all have to base its educational work not on the mere imparting of knowledge but rather on physical 
training and development of healthy bodies. The cultivation of the intellectual facilities comes only in 
the second place. And here again it is character which has to be developed first of all, strength of will 
and decision. And the educational system ought to foster the spirit of readiness to accept 
responsibilities gladly. Formal instruction in the sciences must be considered last in importance. 
Accordingly the State which is grounded on the racial idea must start with the principle that a person 
whose formal education in the sciences is relatively small but who is physically sound and robust, of a 
steadfast and honest character, ready and able to make decisions and endowed with strength of will, is 
a more useful member of the national community than a weakling who is scholarly and refined. A 
nation composed of learned men who are physical weaklings, hesitant about decisions of the will, and 
timid pacifists, is not capable of assuring even its own existence on this earth. In the bitter struggle 
which decides the destiny of man it is very rare that an individual has succumbed because he lacked 
learning. Those who fail are they who try to ignore these consequences and are too faint-hearted about 
putting them into effect. There must be a certain balance between mind and body. An ill-kept body is 
not made a more beautiful sight by the indwelling of a radiant spirit. We should not be acting justly if 
we were to bestow the highest intellectual training on those who are physically deformed and 
crippled, who lack decision and are weak-willed and cowardly. What has made the Greek ideal of 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (13 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:19:45] 


beauty immortal is the wonderful union of a splendid physical beauty with nobility of mind and spirit. 

Moltkes saying, that in the long run fortune favours only the efficient, is certainly valid for the 
relationship between body and spirit. A mind which is sound will generally maintain its dwelling in a 
body that is sound. 

Accordingly, in the Peoples State physical training is not a matter for the individual alone. Nor is it a 
duty which first devolves on the parents and only secondly or thirdly a public interest; but it is 
necessary for the preservation of the people, who are represented and protected by the State. As 
regards purely formal education the State even now interferes with the individuals right of 
self-determination and insists upon the right of the community by submitting the child to an 
obligatory system of training, without paying attention to the approval or disapproval of the parents. 
In a similar way and to a higher degree the new Peoples State will one day make its authority prevail 
over the ignorance and incomprehension of individuals in problems appertaining to the safety of the 
nation. It must organize its educational work in such a way that the bodies of the young will be 
systematically trained from infancy onwards, so as to be tempered and hardened for the demands to be 
made on them in later years. Above all, the State must see to it that a generation of stay-at-homes is 
not developed. 

The work of education and hygiene has to begin with the young mother. The painstaking efforts 
carried on for several decades have succeeded in abolishing septic infection at childbirth and reducing 
puerperal fever to a relatively small number of cases. And so it ought to be possible by means of 
instructing sisters and mothers in an opportune way, to institute a system of training the child from 
early infancy onwards so that this may serve as an excellent basis for future development. 

The Peoples State ought to allow much more time for physical training in the school. It is nonsense to 
burden young brains with a load of material of which, as experience shows, they retain only a small 
part, and mostly not the essentials, but only the secondary and useless portion; because the young 
mind is incapable of sifting the right kind of learning out of all the stuff that is pumped into it. To-day, 
even in the curriculum of the high schools, only two short hours in the week are reserved for 
gymnastics; and worse still, it is left to the pupils to decide whether or not they want to take part. This 
shows a grave disproportion between this branch of education and purely intellectual instruction. Not 
a single day should be allowed to pass in which the young pupil does not have one hour of physical 
training in the morning and one in the evening; and every kind of sport and gymnastics should be 
included. There is one kind of sport which should be specially encouraged, although many people 
who call themselves volkisch consider it brutal and vulgar, and that is boxing. It is incredible how 
many false notions prevail among the cultivated classes. The fact that the young man learns how to 
fence and then spends his time in duels is considered quite natural and respectable. But boxing that is 
brutal. Why? There is no other sport which equals this in developing the militant spirit, none that 
demands such a power of rapid decision or which gives the body the flexibility of good steel. It is no 
more vulgar when two young people settle their differences with their fists than with sharp-pointed 
pieces of steel. One who is attacked and defends himself with his fists surely does not act less manly 
than one who runs off and yells for the assistance of a policeman. But, above all, a healthy youth has 
to learn to endure hard knocks. This principle may appear savage to our contemporary champions who 
fight only with the weapons of the intellect. But it is not the purpose of the Peoples State to educate a 
colony of aesthetic pacifists and physical degenerates. This State does not consider that the human 
ideal is to be found in the honourable philistine or the maidenly spinster, but in a dareful 
personification of manly force and in women capable of bringing men into the world. 

Generally speaking, the function of sport is not only to make the individual strong, alert and daring, 
but also to harden the body and train it to endure an adverse environment. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (14 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:19:45] 


If our superior class had not received such a distinguished education, and if, on the contrary, they had 
learned boxing, it would never have been possible for bullies and deserters and other such canaille to 
carry through a German revolution. For the success of this revolution was not due to the courageous, 
energetic and audacious activities of its authors but to the lamentable cowardice and irresolution of 
those who ruled the German State at that time and were responsible for it. But our educated leaders 
had received only an intellectual training and thus found themselves defenceless when their 
adversaries used iron bars instead of intellectual weapons. All this could happen only because our 
superior scholastic system did not train men to be real men but merely to be civil servants, engineers, 
technicians, chemists, litterateurs, jurists and, finally, professors; so that intellectualism should not die 

Our leadership in the purely intellectual sphere has always been brilliant, but as regards will-power in 
practical affairs our leadership has been beneath criticism. 

Of course education cannot make a courageous man out of one who is temperamentally a coward. But 
a man who naturally possesses a certain degree of courage will not be able to develop that quality if 
his defective education has made him inferior to others from the very start as regards physical strength 
and prowess. The army offers the best example of the fact that the knowledge of ones physical ability 
develops a mans courage and militant spirit. Outstanding heroes are not the rule in the army, but the 
average represents men of high courage. The excellent schooling which the German soldiers received 
before the War imbued the members of the whole gigantic organism with a degree of confidence in 
their own superiority such as even our opponents never thought possible. All the immortal examples 
of dauntless courage and daring which the German armies gave during the late summer and autumn of 
1914, as they advanced from triumph to triumph, were the result of that education which had been 
pursued systematically. During those long years of peace before the last War men who were almost 
physical weaklings were made capable of incredible deeds, and thus a self-confidence was developed 
which did not fail even in the most terrible battles. 

It is our German people, which broke down and were delivered over to be kicked by the rest of the 
world, that had need of the power that comes by suggestion from self-confidence. But this confidence 
in ones self must be instilled into our children from their very early years. The whole system of 
education and training must be directed towards fostering in the child the conviction that he is 
unquestionably a match for any- and everybody. The individual has to regain his own physical 
strength and prowess in order to believe in the invincibility of the nation to which he belongs. What 
has formerly led the German armies to victory was the sum total of the confidence which each 
individual had in himself, and which all of them had in those who held the positions of command. 
What will restore the national strength of the German people is the conviction that they will be able to 
reconquer their liberty. But this conviction can only be the final product of an equal feeling in the 
millions of individuals. And here again we must have no illusions. 

The collapse of our people was overwhelming, and the efforts to put an end to so much misery must 
also be overwhelming. It would be a bitter and grave error to believe that our people could be made 
strong again simply by means of our present bourgeois training in good order and obedience. That 
will not suffice if we are to break up the present order of things, which now sanctions the 
acknowledgment of our defeat and cast the broken chains of our slavery in the face of our opponents. 
Only by a superabundance of national energy and a passionate thirst for liberty can we recover what 
has been lost. 

Also the manner of clothing the young should be such as harmonizes with this purpose. It is really 
lamentable to see how our young people have fallen victims to a fashion mania which perverts the 
meaning of the old adage that clothes make the man. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (15 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:19:45] 


Especially in regard to young people clothes should take their place in the service of education. The 
boy who walks about in summer-time wearing long baggy trousers and clad up to the neck is 
hampered even by his clothes in feeling any inclination towards strenuous physical exercise. Ambition 
and, to speak quite frankly, even vanity must be appealed to. I do not mean such vanity as leads 
people to want to wear fine clothes, which not everybody can afford, but rather the vanity which 
inclines a person towards developing a fine bodily physique. And this is something which everybody 
can help to do. 

This will come in useful also for later years. The young girl must become acquainted with her 
sweetheart. If the beauty of the body were not completely forced into the background to-day through 
our stupid manner of dressing, it would not be possible for thousands of our girls to be led astray by 
Jewish mongrels, with their repulsive crooked waddle. It is also in the interests of the nation that those 
who have a beautiful physique should be brought into the foreground, so that they might encourage 
the development of a beautiful bodily form among the people in general. 

Military training is excluded among us to-day, and therewith the only institution which in peace-times 
at least partly made up for the lack of physical training in our education. Therefore what I have 
suggested is all the more necessary in our time. The success of our old military training not only 
showed itself in the education of the individual but also in the influence which it exercised over the 
mutual relationship between the sexes. The young girl preferred the soldier to one who was not a 
soldier. The Peoples State must not confine its control of physical training to the official school 
period, but it must demand that, after leaving school and while the adolescent body is still developing, 
the boy continues this training. For on such proper physical development success in after-life largely 
depends. It is stupid to think that the right of the State to supervise the education of its young citizens 
suddenly comes to an end the moment they leave school and recommences only with military service. 
This right is a duty, and as such it must continue uninterruptedly. The present State, which does not 
interest itself in developing healthy men, has criminally neglected this duty. It leaves our 
contemporary youth to be corrupted on the streets and in the brothels, instead of keeping hold of the 
reins and continuing the physical training of these youths up to the time when they are grown into 
healthy young men and women. 

For the present it is a matter of indifference what form the State chooses for carrying on this training. 
The essential matter is that it should be developed and that the most suitable ways of doing so should 
be investigated. The Peoples State will have to consider the physical training of the youth after the 
school period just as much a public duty as their intellectual training; and this training will have to be 
carried out through public institutions. Its general lines can be a preparation for subsequent service in 
the army. And then it will no longer be the task of the army to teach the young recruit the most 
elementary drill regulations. In fact the army will no longer have to deal with recruits in the present 
sense of the word, but it will rather have to transform into a soldier the youth whose bodily prowess 
has been already fully trained. 

In the Peoples State the army will no longer be obliged to teach boys how to walk and stand erect, but 
it will be the final and supreme school of patriotic education. In the army the young recruit will learn 
the art of bearing arms, but at the same time he will be equipped for his other duties in later life. And 
the supreme aim of military education must always be to achieve that which was attributed to the old 
army as its highest merit: namely, that through his military schooling the boy must be transformed 
into a man, that he must not only learn to obey but also acquire the fundamentals that will enable him 
one day to command. He must learn to remain silent not only when he is rightly rebuked but also 
when he is wrongly rebuked. 

Furthermore, on the self-consciousness of his own strength and on the basis of that esprit de corps 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (16 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:19:45] 


which inspires him and his comrades, he must become convinced that he belongs to a people who are 

After he has completed his military training two certificates shall be handed to the soldier. The one 
will be his diploma as a citizen of the State, a juridical document which will enable him to take part in 
public affairs. The second will be an attestation of his physical health, which guarantees his fitness for 

The Peoples State will have to direct the education of girls just as that of boys and according to the 
same fundamental principles. Here again special importance must be given to physical training, and 
only after that must the importance of spiritual and mental training be taken into account. In the 
education of the girl the final goal always to be kept in mind is that she is one day to be a mother. 

It is only in the second place that the Peoples State must busy itself with the training of character, 
using all the means adapted to that purpose. 

Of course the essential traits of the individual character are already there fundamentally before any 
education takes place. A person who is fundamentally egoistic will always remain fundamentally 
egoistic, and the idealist will always remain fundamentally an idealist. Besides those, however, who 
already possess a definite stamp of character there are millions of people with characters that are 
indefinite and vague. The born delinquent will always remain a delinquent, but numerous people who 
show only a certain tendency to commit criminal acts may become useful members of the community 
if rightly trained; whereas, on the other hand, weak and unstable characters may easily become evil 
elements if the system of education has been bad. 

During the War it was often lamented that our people could be so little reticent. This failing made it 
very difficult to keep even highly important secrets from the knowledge of the enemy. But let us ask 
this question: What did the German educational system do in pre- War times to teach the Germans to 
be discreet? Did it not very often happen in schooldays that the little tell-tale was preferred to his 
companions who kept their mouths shut? Is it not true that then, as well as now, complaining about 
others was considered praiseworthy candour, while silent discretion was taken as obstinacy? Has any 
attempt ever been made to teach that discretion is a precious and manly virtue? No, for such matters 
are trifles in the eyes of our educators. But these trifles cost our State innumerable millions in legal 
expenses; for 90 per cent of all the processes for defamation and such like charges arise only from a 
lack of discretion. Remarks that are made without any sense of responsibility are thoughtlessly 
repeated from mouth to mouth; and our economic welfare is continually damaged because important 
methods of production are thus disclosed. Secret preparations for our national defence are rendered 
illusory because our people have never learned the duty of silence. They repeat everything they 
happen to hear. In times of war such talkative habits may even cause the loss of battles and therefore 
may contribute essentially to the unsuccessful outcome of a campaign. Here, as in other matters, we 
may rest assured that adults cannot do what they have not learnt to do in youth. A teacher must not try 
to discover the wild tricks of the boys by encouraging the evil practice of tale-bearing. Young people 
form a sort of State among themselves and face adults with a certain solidarity. That is quite natural. 
The ties which unite the ten-year boys to one another are stronger and more natural than their 
relationship to adults. A boy who tells on his comrades commits an act of treason and shows a bent of 
character which is, to speak bluntly, similar to that of a man who commits high treason. Such a boy 
must not be classed as good, reliable, and so on, but rather as one with undesirable traits of 
character. It may be rather convenient for the teacher to make use of such unworthy tendencies in 
order to help his own work, but by such an attitude the germ of a moral habit is sown in young hearts 
and may one day show fatal consequences. It has happened more often than once that a young 
informer developed into a big scoundrel. 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (1 7 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:1 9:45] 


This is only one example among many. The deliberate training of fine and noble traits of character in 
our schools to-day is almost negative. In the future much more emphasis will have to be laid on this 
side of our educational work. Loyalty, self-sacrifice and discretion are virtues which a great nation 
must possess. And the teaching and development of these in the school is a more important matter 
than many others things now included in the curriculum. To make the children give up habits of 
complaining and whining and howling when they are hurt, etc., also belongs to this part of their 
training. If the educational system fails to teach the child at an early age to endure pain and injury 
without complaining we cannot be surprised if at a later age, when the boy has grown to be the man 
and is, for example, in the trenches, the postal service is used for nothing else than to send home 
letters of weeping and complaint. If our youths, during their years in the primary schools, had had 
their minds crammed with a little less knowledge, and if instead they had been better taught how to be 
masters of themselves, it would have served us well during the years 19141918. 

In its educational system the Peoples State will have to attach the highest importance to the 
development of character, hand-in-hand with physical training. Many more defects which our national 
organism shows at present could be at least ameliorated, if not completely eliminated, by education of 
the right kind. 

Extreme importance should be attached to the training of will-power and the habit of making firm 
decisions, also the habit of being always ready to accept responsibilities. 

In the training of our old army the principle was in vogue that any order is always better than no 
order. Applied to our youth this principle ought to take the form that any answer is better than no 
answer. The fear of replying, because one fears to be wrong, ought to be considered more humiliating 
than giving the wrong reply. On this simple and primitive basis our youth should be trained to have 
the courage to act. 

It has been often lamented that in November and December 1918 all the authorities lost their heads 
and that, from the monarch down to the last divisional commander, nobody had sufficient mettle to 
make a decision on his own responsibility. That terrible fact constitutes a grave rebuke to our 
educational system; because what was then revealed on a colossal scale at that moment of catastrophe 
was only what happens on a smaller scale everywhere among us. It is the lack of will-power, and not 
the lack of arms, which renders us incapable of offering any serious resistance to-day. This defect is 
found everywhere among our people and prevents decisive action wherever risks have to be taken, as 
if any great action can be taken without also taking the risk. Quite unsuspectingly, a German General 
found a formula for this lamentable lack of the will-to-act when he said: "I act only when I can count 
on a 51 per cent probability of success." In that 51 per cent probability we find the very root of the 
German collapse. The man who demands from Fate a guarantee of his success deliberately denies the 
significance of an heroic act. For this significance consists in the very fact that, in the definite 
knowledge that the situation in question is fraught with mortal danger, an action is undertaken which 
may lead to success. A patient suffering from cancer and who knows that his death is certain if he 
does not undergo an operation, needs no 51 per cent probability of a cure before facing the operation. 
And if the operation promises only half of one per cent probability of success a man of courage will 
risk it and would not whine if it turned out unsuccessful. 

All in all, the cowardly lack of will-power and the incapacity for making decisions are chiefly results 
of the erroneous education given us in our youth. The disastrous effects of this are now widespread 
among us. The crowning examples of that tragic chain of consequences are shown in the lack of civil 
courage which our leading statesmen display. 

The cowardice which leads nowadays to the shirking of every kind of responsibility springs from the 

file:///F|/lrving/Mein Kampf/mein kampf 2 chap2.htm (18 of 30) [04/06/2000 16:19:45] 


same roots. Here again it is the fault of the education given our young people. This drawback 
permeates all sections of public life and finds its immortal consummation in the institutions of 
government that function under the parliamentary regime. 

Already in the school, unfortunately, more value is placed on confession and full repentance and 
contrite renouncement, on the part of little sinners, than on a simple and frank avowal. But this latter 
seems to-day, in the eyes of many an educator, to savour of a spirit of utter incorrigibility and 
depravation. And, though it may seem incredible, many a boy is told that the gallows tree is waiting 
for him because he has shown certain traits which might be of inestimable value in the nation as a 

Just as the Peoples State must one day give its attention to training the will-power and capacity for 
decision among the youth, so too it must inculcate in the hearts of the young generation from early 
childhood onwards a readiness to accept responsibilities, and the courage of open and frank avowal. If 
it recognizes the full significance of this necessity, finally after a century of educative work it will 
succeed in building up a nation which will no longer be subject to those defeats that have contributed 
so disastrously to bring about our present overthrow. 

The formal imparting of knowledge, which constitutes the chief work of our educational system 
to-day, will be taken over by the Peoples State with only few modifications. These modifications 
must be made in three branches. 

First of all, the brains of the young people must not generally be burdened with subjects of which 
ninety-five per cent are useless to them and are therefore forgotten again. The curriculum of the 
primary and secondary schools presents an odd mixture at the present time. In many branches of study 
the subject matter to be learned has become so enormous that only a very small fraction of it can be 
remembered later on, and indeed only a very small fraction of this whole mass of knowledge can be 
used. On the other hand, what is learned is insufficient for anybody who wishes to specialize in any 
certain branch for the purpose of earning his dai